BacklashWave534
Member
You are confusing not believing the guy with wanting "blood" my man. They ain't the same.
Out of curiosity what was your take on his explanation? Curious to know if you thought he was telling the truth.
You are confusing not believing the guy with wanting "blood" my man. They ain't the same.
Did twitch pay him to go away or was it breach of contract and twitch had to pay up? im asking because i don't know. If it was breach of contract and it makes twitch look bad and the comments make Doc look bad then i can see how both sides are gagged. The aftermath is no side was able to say anything. only reason we know anything is because it was leaked. If it was bad as people make it sound in all the other cases we know about said company would have made a public statement about and the state attorney would have pressed chargers, at the minimum a civil trail from the accuser. Feds would have raided his house it would be a full investigation. None of that has happened. Im leaning towards this is bs.There wasn't a lawsuit. It was settled out of court. Yes, Twitch paid him to go away. What does that tell you? No, his previous statement was clearly not prepared by his lawyers. If it was then they wouldn't have to be fixing the mess.
Not believing what the guy is saying is not a "mob" wanting "blood". The worst thing that could happen to the guy is that he takes his millions and lives the rest of his life in luxury.
There wasn't a lawsuit. It was settled out of court. Yes, Twitch paid him to go away. What does that tell you? No, his previous statement was clearly not prepared by his lawyers. If it was then they wouldn't have to be fixing the mess.
That doesn’t make any sense whatsoever.It was back in 2020 with that stuff being spread around from the old politics forum. They demonetized it from that.
Coming from someone who played professional sports I can say without a doubt there is a huge infatuation with "celebrities"
I have seen firsthand Baseball players admit they cheated the sport (some multiple times) and home crowds give them standing ovations when they return
Twitch is a far left cesspool. Are you saying we should trust them over law enforcement. They have a deer on their advisory team lol
Out of curiosity what was your take on his explanation? Curious to know if you thought he was telling the truth.
I’m not “worshipping” anybody.My bad. He admitted to having whisper messages with a minor.
Then he said those conversations sometimes leaned too much in the direction of inappropriate.
Hey bro. You do you, worship who you want. When a grown as married man and father says those two things, yeah, fuck that piece of shit.
That doesn’t make any sense whatsoever.
Are you sure you didn’t just violate partner policies…Basically, what people are trying to do with the Fandom Menace now. Spam YouTube Partners about the channel and sending the cancel mob stuff to them. Right after all that stuff happened and people were mass reporting my channel with the screen captures being shared on Twitter, they demonized it with a generic "violated Partner policies" excuse.
Exactly. I really don’t care at the end of the day. Once I get in my car and head home, I won’t think about the Doc until I see the thread updated on 9/25.You are confusing not believing the guy with wanting "blood" my man. They ain't the same.
That’s not necessarily true though. Again, maybe Twitch ran a risk assessment and found it easier to pay the guy out than drag it out.We can go around in circles on this one, but I'd rather not. He sued, and got paid out. He wouldn't have been paid out if the ban was justified. I don't really want to speculate on the how and why, I'd rather just look at what we know to be true and can justify with logical reasoning.
Did twitch pay him to go away or was it breach of contract and twitch had to pay up? im asking because i don't know. The aftermath is no side was able to say anything. only reason we know anything is because it was leaked. If it was bad as people make it sound in all the other cases we know about said company would have made a public statement about and the state attorney would have pressed chargers, at the minimum a civil trail from the accuser. Feds would have raided his house it would be a full investigation. None of that has happened. Im leaning towards this is bs.
I think it was done through arbitration as outlined in their TOS, more than likely, odds are, Twitch didn't win that arbitration. Which is interesting if if Twitch did lose, as arbitration, apparently it's easier to admit evidence and a whole host of other things. What I am trying to say, is that, it would be so dang easy to prove he was sexting a minor, thus violating the TOS and voiding his contract as a result.
Are you sure you didn’t just violate partner policies…
Grown, married men shouldn’t be sending “borderline” inappropriate messages to underage KIDS only able to consent in “some” states. It’s not illegal but is immoral.
If you disagree you’re a piece of shit, and retarded. Full stop.
That’s unfortunate and sounds unreasonable on their part, but you didn’t get demonetized for posting on GAF. Maybe for having enemies online who abused the reporting system, then.Didn't break any rules. Just uploaded a video version of my podcast, ~20-30 min videos of me talking into a camera. Never had a copyright strike or anything on the channel. Didn't repost stuff like trailers (which YouTube hits) or anything like that. 10K subs. Was making $500-$1000 on it depending on the month. They gave a generic response citing policy violations against their community guidelines. Their email said I could delete any videos that had restrictions that violated policies, but out of 200 videos on the channel absolutely 0 are flagged or have any sort of restriction. It was completely brigaded back then.
Twitch didn't hold all the cards thats for sure. Twitch doesn't ever want to pay out because they lose money. Paying him to go away vs suing for breach of contract is not the same thing. Twitch could break ties him make statement we don't condone this activity etc, like hollywood does all the time. Drop him or pay out reminder of contract. Twitch still comes out looking like a hero. But that didn't happen.It is all the same. Twitch wanted him gone and so they banned him. They signed him to a contract and the arbitration was clearly trying to negotiate as little as possible to pay him. Either way, they were paying him to go away for reasons. Part of arbitration is keeping everything quiet. The ex-Twitch employee ruined that for both sides.
I think twitch fucked up because the person isn't a minor and Doc doesn't want those comments released. both agreed to a clean break.Yeah, that's why I don't think he did anything illegal here. Just enough that Twitch wanted nothing to do with him. We will probably never see the messages, but I just have a feeling that if we did, we would probably understand why Twitch was willing to forego millions
Twitch didn't hold all the cards thats for sure. Twitch doesn't ever want to pay out because they lose money. Paying him to go away vs suing for breach of contract is not the same thing. Twitch could break ties him make statement we don't condone this activity etc, like hollywood does all the time. Drop him or pay out reminder of contract. Twitch still comes out looking like a hero. But that didn't happen.
This narrative doesn't sit well with me because Twitch has never been historically consistent with bans. There are a lot of popular streamers that violate ToS and have never been banned, and when you say things like this it just paints Twitch out to be ethically just in their reviews, which just isn't true. It could equally be argued that whoever sanctioned the ban, could've done so prematurely, and not having all the facts at hand. They get sued, and settle.Technically correct. Twitch didn't want to pay him, but they wanted him to go away. Thus, the lawsuit. The point remains, Twitch wanted him gone even though he broke no laws. Whatever he said in those messages, Twitch thought it was enough to part ways with an extremely lucrative partner.
Been seeing this guy trending again. What happened now? Is there a TLDR version of why everyone's talking about him this week?
I'm quite sure at this point that neither party is even remotely interested in a reunion, however funny that would be.What if in a plot twist noone saw coming, Twitch allows him back on their platform?
He admitted to inappropriately texting a minor in his first statement I don't know what else people want. A 40year old guy in a position of power admitting to inappropriately texting a minor is creepy as fuck and he deserves to lose his sponsors and monetization.So was there any evidence either way? Did he post any messages, any emails from twitch, or letters from lawyers? If it was just him saying "I didn't do it" it's not going to really sway anyone who thinks he probably did do it seeing as he was banned.
If he was in a contract with them, they'd have to had shown him evidence of why he was banned.
The definitely didn't like him. It's crazy how in this video Dr Disrespect lists 3 worse accounts in which those people got "multi million" dollar contracts with twitch.This narrative doesn't sit well with me because Twitch has never been historically consistent with bans. There are a lot of popular streamers that violate ToS and have never been banned, and when you say things like this it just paints Twitch out to be ethically just in their reviews, which just isn't true. It could equally be argued that whoever sanctioned the ban, could've done so prematurely, and not having all the facts at hand. They get sued, and settle.
But he admitted to inappropriately texting a minor in his OWN STATEMENTIt's my understanding that the person he was sending messages to wasn't a minor and the internet jumped to conclusions.
And what if the "inappropriate" messages weren't sexual in nature?He admitted to inappropriately texting a minor in his first statement I don't know what else people want. A 40year old guy in a position of power admitting to inappropriately texting a minor is creepy as fuck and he deserves to lose his sponsors and monetization.
How many minors have people here texted inappropriately? You just wouldn't do it it's weirdo shit.
This narrative doesn't sit well with me because Twitch has never been historically consistent with bans. There are a lot of popular streamers that violate ToS and have never been banned, and when you say things like this it just paints Twitch out to be ethically just in their reviews, which just isn't true. It could equally be argued that whoever sanctioned the ban, could've done so prematurely, and not having all the facts at hand. They get sued, and settle.
Yeah, maybe he texted them links to pirated Nintendo ROMs.And what if the "inappropriate" messages weren't sexual in nature?
I'm not sitting here saying the messages weren't sexual in nature.Yeah, maybe he texted them links to pirated Nintendo ROMs.
I didn't say you said anything controversial. I'm just pointing something out in regard to Twitch bans in general.If that's how you wish to view then that's fine. I'm not suggesting Twitch is "ethically just" in anything. I have no basis for an opinion on that. I'm stating the simple fact that they wanted him to go away. I don't see how that is a controversial statement in any way.
It’s been shut down for years.
Based off his info though the person wasn’t a minor at the time this all went down though? Seems like who gives a shit what he said then if true.
He didn't admit to sexting a minor or planning to meet them. He's original tweet comes across as an admission of guilt without a doubt. He admits to the whispers occurring, and the conversation leaning towards inappropriate. There really is only one way to interpret all of that. But he never admitted to any wrong doing at any point. What he is saying now is basically doubling down on not sexting the user, and denies planning to meet them. He also states that they were over the age of consent. He contextualizes he's use of the word inappropriate as inappropriate jokes, which honestly could mean anything. This whole thing has been a bit of a mindfuck. I think he is a shady guy, and he's past infidelity has been documented. I just don't think there is enough here to say with certainty. I feel like I can counter argue every point I make against him. He is a weird guy regardless though.Why would he now say, he is innocent after already admitted that he did it, but was not serious about it.
That guy is clearly guilty and the way he behaves just make the whole thing worse.
Wtf did I just read.If I was accused of this shit, you better believe I’d present everything I could, texts, chats, browser history, phone calls, etc. All people would learn is that I like VR porn and I like older women porn. Well, I guess they would need to learn that because I just put it out there. I’ve always been attracted to the older woman. I remember having sleeping dreams with my 2nd grade teacher, while in the second grade. Not sex, but sleeping together in the bed together, in our underwear.
What were we talking about?
I think he always had a target on his back because he's not politically correct.Call me naive, dumb, etc. I certainly can be at times but I really can't muster a shit to give. I never really followed Doc until my buddy sent me a Village clip last year. I occasionally watched his streams but mostly watched his clips or compilations videos. I honestly don't understand why he has such a target on his back. He's just a character and he's funny. Obviously he created enemies because that's how entertainment works, you either hold water for the narrative, otherwise you get canceled.
Him cheating on his wife is despicable but that's for him and his wife to deal with and he allows that clip to remain up; him crying and coming clean. I have to assume he has grown as a husband.
As for the twitch stuff. People need to show evidence. How many people have been canceled over bogus accusations? We're on freaking gaf for goodness sake, lol.
That's just me. I'm not team doc, I'm just a random nobody who doesn't agree with the mob mindset and until charges are pressed, I assume doc is innocent and a victim of a smear campaign.
If that makes me an idiot to some people here, so be it.
He likely didn't do anything illegal. My personal theory is that some high school jailbait approached him via twitch with the usual "i'm a huge fan doc...blablabla" and Doc tried to convice her to meet on a fan event where the actual illegal stuff would happen.Well , this guy will keep on You Tube for long time...his army of minions is big. Hope police and authorities did a deep investigation in order to keep him free of chargues.
I think he always had a target on his back because he's not politically correct.
Like in this clip:
This was in H1Z1. The Battle Royale game before PUBG.
Nowadays you probably get banned for jokes like this.