Any of you doing hypertrophy training in particular? Thoughts' on it? What are your workouts like if so?
Now when you are doing it, do you push your first set to failure? Every set to failure? Just the last set? I've been pretty much doing last set to failure and it's working pretty well for me, but I'm unsure if there's a better way. And I'll say, at 37, I'm easily in the best shape I've ever been in. Even better than when I was at my leanest right after Boot Camp. It's crazy that I waited this long to focus on this as it's all been pretty rewarding.It's the only way to be. I do full body workouts. I really concentrate on the muscle burn, stretch, and lifting intensity over how much weight I am lifting. I love it and am close to my best overall shape at age 42.
Now when you are doing it, do you push your first set to failure? Every set to failure? Just the last set? I've been pretty much doing last set to failure and it's working pretty well for me, but I'm unsure if there's a better way. And I'll say, at 37, I'm easily in the best shape I've ever been in. Even better than when I was at my leanest right after Boot Camp. It's crazy that I waited this long to focus on this as it's all been pretty rewarding.
First off, damn man, congratulations on cleaning up your life. Flat out bad ass. The limiting the drinking, the work you are putting in on the fitness front...just outstanding work and you should be very proud of yourself.I'd say on average over the last year I've really increased my activity but I never put much credence behind walking/cardio other than a 5 minute warm-up before my workouts.
If I spend 10 minutes walking before I work out, which by the way, at 4mph and a 7% inclince makes me feel like a goddamn wrestler walking around a pool as fast as possible but not too fast that the lifeguard blows the whistle.
But if I spend 10 minutes before and 10 minutes after my lifts, I'll hit my 10000 steps naturally kinda walking around doing normal shit around the house by 1pm or so. That small addition has really accelerated the weight loss slump I was in. I could no long feasibly lower my calorie intake anymore and that adjustment has let me eat more and still lose weight while feeling better.
I will say though, since really committing to fasting, it's been difficult to eat more than 2000 calories before I sleep, but if I don't get enough to eat, I get HORRIBLE sleep which really affects my lifts. It's been a very interesting adventure seeing how my body and mind have responded, both positively and negatively this last year. I've not felt this focused and motivated for a long time and being able to keep this motivation over the last year hasn't been nearly the struggle I thought it'd be once I made some choices with more commitment to them.
I DRASTICALLY reduced my drinking and drinking habit. I'd easily drink a bottle of vodka every weekend for a couple years, never during the week, but on the weekend, classic binge drinking and eating. But cutting my drinking habits down to just for occasions(birthdays/rare evening out with buddies) has made some very significant improvements to just about everything. I think me cutting out my drinking while also getting a job as a bartender really helped me see what my drinking was doing to me. It's been eye-opening serving the patrons at my bar and watching their lives over the last 10 mos. or so.
I'm really growing interested in hypertrophy training and really wanting to dial in on my diet and routines. I've more or less been doing a push/pull/legs routine for the better part of the last 10 mos. or so and I've found it to be pretty great, but my gains slowed down significantly as I leaned out, which I understand is to be expected, I'm just now trying to find what the balance I need that lets me put on muscle as best as possible. I weighed in at 194 today which puts me at about 105lbs lost so far. I've been pushing my goal post back for a while now, it was under 220, then under 200 and now I'm shooting for 185. I'm unsure as to where is a good stopping point on weight loss proper and really focusing on putting muscle on should be? I don't look super lean by any stretch, but my wife thinks I'm at a good point to start going the other way. I dunno, I don't quite feel that way, but I do think she brings up some valid concerns that my diet probably isn't the best as it's mostly just straight chicken/turkey and spinach/broccoli with a multivitamin every day.
I recently had a physical a few weeks back, and more or less all my vitals improved drastically other than my liver apparently being very active I guess, which the doctor wants me to get ultrasounded. Which I still don't really understand as I figured my HUGE reduction in drinking would more or less normalize a lot of homeostasis in my body. Not really too concerned, but it's something to be mindful of I guess.
I'm def. finding myself becoming food apprehensive and developing a bit of dysmorphia if I had to guess, but I address it as I can.
Any of you doing hypertrophy training in particular? Thoughts' on it? What are your workouts like if so?
It is recommended that you get really lean before building muscle. This is especially true for people who have a history of being overweight or obese. We're talking ~12% body fat lean.I'm unsure as to where is a good stopping point on weight loss proper and really focusing on putting muscle on should be?
In order to get lean, you have to stop fasting. Intermittent fasting creates the illusion of fat loss by promoting your body to release water from cells. At the end of your fasting period, you look and feel slim even though you didn't lose a single gramm of fat tissue.I will say though, since really committing to fasting, it's been difficult to eat more than 2000 calories before I sleep, but if I don't get enough to eat, I get HORRIBLE sleep which really affects my lifts.
This is a very detailed explanation and somewhat different from most that can be found online.In order to get lean, you have to stop fasting. Intermittent fasting creates the illusion of fat loss by promoting your body to release water from cells. At the end of your fasting period, you look and feel slim even though you didn't lose a single gramm of fat tissue.
Intermittent fasting is an ineffective way to lose body fat. It promotes binge eating and makes your performance and ability to rest highly dependent on your eating times: fasting period = high performance, eating period = resting time. These downsides are unnecessary because at the end of the day, all you really want is a caloric deficit.
Bodybuilders, fitness models and actors all use the same method to get lean. It's the healthiest form of dieting and will yield the best results.
All you need is a caloric deficit, healthy fats, slow carbs, lean protein, and vegetables evenly distributed over the entire day.
You eat vegetables with every meal, except pre, intra and post workout. Vegetables are the best source of fiber. Fiber slows down the time at which carbs are broken down into glycogen. If this happens too fast, your body will release insulin. Once insulin is released, it will store fatty acids and surplus glycogen in your fat cells. What's even worse: your body can't burn fat tissue as long as insulin is released even if you're in a caloric deficit.
Glycogen is fuel for your body. You want to make sure that you always have enough of it stored in your muscles. If these stores are full, any surplus glycogen in your blood (= blood sugar) will trigger an insulin release. Intermittent fasting will cause an insulin release everytime you eat simply because you have to eat a lot of carbs at once. A better way is to split your caloric intake into 5 smaller meals. This way, you can get your carbs in smaller amountsand reduce the chance of insulin being released. Even better: you adjust your carb intake to your activity level. On training days, you eat more carbs and less fats. On rest days, you eat less carbs and more fats.
Just like carbs get broken down into glycogen, protein gets broken down into amino acids (AAs) within your body. And much like with glycogen, your body keeps the AA concentration within your blood in check. If there are a lot of AAs in your blood, your body will release glucagon. Glucagon is an insulin antagonist and will reduce the potency of insulin effects. Eat 45g lean protein (not powder) with every meal and you're good.
Now when you are doing it, do you push your first set to failure? Every set to failure? Just the last set?
This is a very detailed explanation and somewhat different from most that can be found online.
Where did you learn this from?
( I am not doubting the richness of it, I am definitely interested in learning more)
That is some great information! I really haven't been vigilant about warm-up sets and I probably should. I'm gonna give your suggestions a try, I've noticed that my weight lift totals have more or less stagnated a bit, but I've seen what looks like pretty effective muscle growth. I've also been doing my best to focus on my form and deep stretch and contraction of the muscles.*snip*
Amen.All you need is a caloric deficit, healthy fats, slow carbs, lean protein, and vegetables evenly distributed over the entire day.
Aces High has some great advice here, but IMO is a bit too advanced.That is some great information! I really haven't been vigilant about warm-up sets and I probably should. I'm gonna give your suggestions a try, I've noticed that my weight lift totals have more or less stagnated a bit, but I've seen what looks like pretty effective muscle growth. I've also been doing my best to focus on my form and deep stretch and contraction of the muscles.
I do bench press, but I don't squat or dead-lift, I'll just lift as heavy as I can on the leg-presses and calf-raises. But I'll also do incline dumbbell bench and really do the full stretch of the exercise, which really works you harder than people probably realized if they don't cheat the exercises.
I've noticed that I used to be able to kinda cheat my way into about 3 or 4 poor form pull-ups, but after watching this lady at my gym do full, all the way lowered, scapular pull-ups, I've switched to that style, which is much harder to do, but I noticed my strength and form improve so much after a few months.
Hypertrophy training is not about getting strong. If you want to get strong, hypertrophy training is not for you.
I'm really not happy with your answer, Raven. Getting strong first with barbell movements is an outdated bro science concept. Barbell movements are by far the worst exercises for muscle growth for the majority of people.
Go to any gym in the world and you'll see guys that look like a T-Rex (skinny arms, big legs and ass) do barbell compound movements with low rep ranges while the guys with big muscles use machines and do isolation exercises with high rep ranges. Ronnie Coleman once said that there's no muscle growth below 8 reps.
If you want to get strong, do powerlifting. If you want to have big muscles, do hypertrophy training. If you try to do both at the same time, you will achieve neither unless you have unicorn genetics like Arnold or Ronnie.
You'll eventually get strong with hypertrophy training, too. But it's only a byproduct of progressive overload and not a primary training goal. You will not achieve your maximum genetically possible strength with hypertrophy training.
I can't watch your video right now, but I know this guy's channel and he usually talks first class bullshit. Or at least that's what he did some years ago. Don't know about the quality of his content today. I will check it out later.
My recommendation for everyone who is interested in growing muscles is to watch the following video. Listen very closely to what Jordan says. There's only a handful of people on this planet who have this much knowledge on the topic.
Thats pretty agressive, but you have the weight to lose it seems. But I agree, cut out the easy stuff first and see what happens.Thinking of going on a calorie deficit diet as of today. Been on my mind for a good while. Give me your worst!
Currently weighing ~115 kg (250 lbs), looking at a goal of losing ~20 kg (45lbs). Have set period time frame of 2-3 months depending on how it goes come October.
Not planning on counting caleries, at least for the first weeks, but rather going for an approximation. I'm looking at plans containing 800 calories per day ( I'm 180cm (5'11"?), bmi of ~36)
A big part of the dieting will mean sticking to one serving, drinking more water (or green tea), removing snacks and sweets from my day. Maybe chew on some vegetables or nori paper (lol).
Currently suffering from runners knee(?) and impinchment/rotary cuff injury, so I don't know how dieting will affect the healing process yet.
Yet you recommend a training philosophy that limits people to a fixed rep range and a small set of old school exercises.In my experience, I've found that there is not a once size fits all for anyone. (...)
I suggested another path. One that he may want to consider as “old school” as it is. If you get strong, in the low rep ranges (like 6 months on a linear progression), then switch over to 3x8-10 (or whatever) you are going to be able to move considerably more weight than if you just tried 3x8-10 right off the bat.Yet you recommend a training philosophy that limits people to a fixed rep range and a small set of old school exercises.
The idea to train with different rep ranges isn't new. It's the training principle of Dr. Fred Hatfield aka "Dr. Squat". Hatfield was a sports scientist and powerlifting champion. He also set a squat world record in 1987. Hatfield discovered that different rep ranges have different effects on the body.
A rep range of 1-5 enhances intramuscular coordination. Your central nervous system (CNS) will become better at activating muscle fibres. It learns to activate more fibres at once and it will activate them quicker.
This is key knowledge. It is important to understand that you can get stronger without building muscle. Your muscles might happen to get bigger through training with 1-5 reps, but this is only a byproduct of your training.
Vice versa, your strength will increase through training in higher rep ranges. But then again, this is only a byproduct of your muscles growing.
For a powerlifter, strength is the goal and muscle is just one of many tools. For the bodybuilder, muscle is the goal and strength is just one of many tools.
*insert Arnie voice* You have to have a clear goal in mind in order to reach it. You have to visualize it. Focus on it with all your power. And so on...
Doing barbell compound movements with low rep ranges before doing real hypertrophy work is an outdated approach. We know this for decades. If you want big muscles, get those fucking big muscles with real bodybuilding training and don't waste your time with things that decrease your focus.
The guys with big muscles use steroids. Isolation exercises are great for steroid users obsessed with aesthetic proportions since they can fine tune each muscle.the guys with big muscles use machines and do isolation exercises with high rep ranges. Ronnie Coleman once said that there's no muscle growth below 8 reps.
The guys with big muscles use steroids. Isolation exercises are great for steroid users obsessed with aesthetic proportions since they can fine tune each muscle.
Compound barbell movements are good for natural lifters since you get the highest CNS adaptation and hormonal response from heavy compound movements. You get strong, you look good, and you don't need to spend your life in the gym.
Uh-huh. Everyone in the fitness industry is on PEDs, especially "natural bodybuilders."People tend overestimate the effect of steroids and underestimate the effect of genetics. A person with great genetics for bodybuilding will always get bigger muscles natural than a person with unfavorable genetics will get with steroids. A young Arnold Schwarzenegger could take all the EPO in this world and he would never win the Tour de France nor would he become a halfway decent cyclist.
Natural bodybuilders and steroid-using bodybuilders train and eat with adherence to the exact same principles. The only difference is the training volume.
There's an incredibly huge amount of people in the fitness industry that claim to be natural while they are not, yes. I also get the feeling that being natural often means different things in different regions. In the USA for example, TRT almost officially counts as natural which it obviously isn't.Uh-huh. Everyone in the fitness industry is on PEDs, especially "natural bodybuilders."
Thinking of going on a calorie deficit diet as of today. Been on my mind for a good while. Give me your worst!
Currently weighing ~115 kg (250 lbs), looking at a goal of losing ~20 kg (45lbs). Have set period time frame of 2-3 months depending on how it goes come October.
Not planning on counting caleries, at least for the first weeks, but rather going for an approximation. I'm looking at plans containing 800 calories per day ( I'm 180cm (5'11"?), bmi of ~36)
A big part of the dieting will mean sticking to one serving, drinking more water (or green tea), removing snacks and sweets from my day. Maybe chew on some vegetables or nori paper (lol).
Currently suffering from runners knee(?) and impinchment/rotary cuff injury, so I don't know how dieting will affect the healing process yet.
This. Both on the steroids use and on the compound barbell movements.The guys with big muscles use steroids. Isolation exercises are great for steroid users obsessed with aesthetic proportions since they can fine tune each muscle.
Compound barbell movements are good for natural lifters since you get the highest CNS adaptation and hormonal response from heavy compound movements. You get strong, you look good, and you don't need to spend your life in the gym.
Also true. Genetics are absolutely huge in the high levels. You are also right that working say in the 5 rep range will emphasize strength rather than size. That said, you will get bigger in this rep range though, especially if you are eating enough. Someone who can bench 3x5 of 225 is going to be bigger than someone doing 3x10 of 185 (on average, sure there are some genetic freaks). At no point did I advocate that someone train for strength forever or be a powerlifter. Yes, there are imbalances that can occur, but that can be evened out once you get your numbers up.People tend overestimate the effect of steroids and underestimate the effect of genetics. A person with great genetics for bodybuilding will always get bigger muscles natural than a person with unfavorable genetics will get with steroids. A young Arnold Schwarzenegger could take all the EPO in this world and he would never win the Tour de France nor would he become a halfway decent cyclist.
Natural bodybuilders and steroid-using bodybuilders train and eat with adherence to the exact same principles. The only difference is the training volume.
Compound barbell movements with low rep-range are great to make your body stronger. Can you build muscle with barbell compounds ? Yes. It is an effective way to build muscle? No. With compound movements, your strongest muscle groups will get stronger. Your weakest muscle groups will fall behind even further. If you have dominant triceps for example, you will get a big triceps with bench presses but your chest will suck. If you have a wide collarbone, your chest will also suck because you are gonna be shoulder dominant. The longer you train this way, the more imbalanced your physique will become. Isolateral isolation movements will not only add to your phyisque. They are functional and will reduce the risk of injury.
Man, I tell ya. I just didn't' realize how prevalent all of this is now. Hell, I saw a dude take a syringe in the ass in a LA Fitness locker room. There are even signs talking about PEDs in the locker room.Uh-huh. Everyone in the fitness industry is on PEDs, especially "natural bodybuilders."
Ha. Good deal. What did you decide on? (There are no wrong answers...well...there are...but those wrong answers haven't been discussed in these last few pages). In the end. Working out hard and challenging yourself with the right exercises. Eating right. Is going to get most people down the road to where they want to be.This is exactly what has been crossing my mind the last few days.
So much information from two "different" points of view. It's exactly what a forum is supposed to be. Knowledge, debate, information
This helped me realize what I need to do in order to continue on the road I am now in the best way possible.
I thank you all for your inputs on these last weeks
You are the best
I've always considered myself a "jack of all trades master of none" type of person.Ha. Good deal. What did you decide on? (There are no wrong answers...well...there are...but those wrong answers haven't been discussed in these last few pages). In the end. Working out hard and challenging yourself with the right exercises. Eating right. Is going to get most people down the road to where they want to be.
Holy smokes man! This is badass stuff right here!I've always considered myself a "jack of all trades master of none" type of person.
Lately I've been focusing too much on how I'm supposed to look instead of focusing on what I've achieved so far.
I'll keep doing my 12 weeks tactical barbell routine intercalated with 4-6 weeks hypertrophy on the same exercises.
All that while not forgetting why I started doing exercise in the first place. Freedom
I can do parkour, bouldering, play ninja warrior with the kids, straddle planche on the parallel bars, a press handstand, a very clean muscle up on the rings, I teach young guys how to achieve a front lever in a street workout park I helped build in my city, I'm a taekwondo black belt and I also teach taekwondo to kids, and I recently discovered something called rope flow that I'll start doing...
I run, I jump, I swim, I climb... I'm free I can do whatever I want and that is why I train.
Unfortunately I was starting to forget why I started it all.
So that is my road... The road in the middle where I can be anything
Bing strong gives you an edge in professional bodybuilding. If you can lift heavy and with great form, your muscles will get a different structure. You can't win Mister Olympia (open) if you're not strong.Someone who can bench 3x5 of 225 is going to be bigger than someone doing 3x10 of 185 (on average, sure there are some genetic freaks).
Bing strong gives you an edge in professional bodybuilding. If you can lift heavy and with great form, your muscles will get a different structure. You can't win Mister Olympia (open) if you're not strong.
If you have two guys with the same genetics (bone structure, muscle fibre distribution, hormones, etc), the one who trained like a bodybuilder will be bigger independent from the weight he can move. The one who trained like a powerlifter will be stronger independent from the muscles he has.
Here you'll get the same information I am trying to explain from two of the best bodybuilders of all time:
Of course. No argument there from a strict sense.
But if you are just an average dude. Wants to get healthy… wants to look good and is patient… why not get strong for 6-9 months then switch to hypertrophy? Wouldn’t this approach get you both strong and big? And get you there faster? (In the end…. So what for both? someone wants to bodybuild… then they will stick with it…if they want to powerlift, then will stick with that…. It’s whatever one will stick to).
All this focus on professional lifters (both bodybuilding and powerfifting) misses the point for most people.
Thinking of going on a calorie deficit diet as of today. Been on my mind for a good while. Give me your worst!
Currently weighing ~115 kg (250 lbs), looking at a goal of losing ~20 kg (45lbs). Have set period time frame of 2-3 months depending on how it goes come October.
Not planning on counting caleries, at least for the first weeks, but rather going for an approximation. I'm looking at plans containing 800 calories per day ( I'm 180cm (5'11"?), bmi of ~36)
A big part of the dieting will mean sticking to one serving, drinking more water (or green tea), removing snacks and sweets from my day. Maybe chew on some vegetables or nori paper (lol).
Currently suffering from runners knee(?) and impinchment/rotary cuff injury, so I don't know how dieting will affect the healing process yet.
Thats pretty agressive, but you have the weight to lose it seems. But I agree, cut out the easy stuff first and see what happens.
Don't forget to incorporate some resistance training...try and keep as much muscle as possible.
Here's a pro tip from Chris Aceto that works really great:
Stop eating any carbs at all and slowly increase your activity level. Go for a short walk three times a day and slowly keep increasing the distance.
Once you have lowered your bodyweight to 99 kg, start lifting weights and switch to a balanced diet with lean protein, healthy fats and slow carbs.
First, I've really enjoyed our conversation. I think its good to have two different points of view for folks to take a look at and figure out the best way to achieve their goals.If someone is completely new to this stuff, I'd recommend him to take a look inside and be 100% clear about his true motivations. As humans, we all have subconscious desires and chase after that image of what we want to be for ourselves and others.
Be true to yourself: What do you hope to achieve by hitting the gym?
Some people aim to become better at their primary sports activity by doing weight lifting as a complementary activity. These people will benefit greatly from functional strength training with different compound movements and isolation exercises. Even in this case, limiting yourself to only barbell exercises is not a good idea at all. A soccer player will benefit from doing leg extensions, which is a machine-based isolation movement. A cyclist will benefit from doing isolation exercises for his calves. Boxers do lots of compound pushing movements at the gym, but they also do isolation exercises for their shoulders and arms. If a boxer needs to up his weight, he will go through a true hypertrophy phase that follows the same training principles of what bodybuilders do.
Then you have people who go to the gym to stay fit and healthy. Limiting these people to barbell movements will eventually lead to injury since barbell movements create muscular imbalances within your body. In many cases, people who had a disc prolapse can't do any barbell compounds at all because the axial stress on the spine is too high when they use weights that create a training effect on their muscles. At a certain age it would be absolutely reckless to train with low rep ranges, anyway. The risk of injury is way too high.
Most people I know go to the gym because they just want to look good. For these people, a strength based barbell routine is not helpful at all because how you look at the end of this strength phase is pure luck as it's based on genetics. As I said earlier, if you do 9 months of bench pressing with a barbell, you can be lucky an have a balanced physique, you can get super big triceps with small chest, super big front delts with small triceps and chest, and so on. Barbell strength training will magnify your body's original strengths and weaknesses. A lot of people do barbell training and get the T-Rex look because they're not creating enough stimulus on their arm muscles. For someone who went to the gym for looks only, this can be very frustrating. There are guys on YouTube who have a great physique and claim to be only doing barbell movements. But in most cases these guys are on roids or a straight out lying because they want to populate a niche that connects with people who have a soft spot for old-school pumping iron style of training as portrayed in countless Hollywood movies. And I can assure you: the actor who does the bench press with fake weights in cinema used machines and isolation movements to get his physique.
People usually misunderstand the concept of "functional strength". They think only because they do strength training in the gym will make them a stronger individual. But this isn't the case. Strength is always movement-based. No exception. What are you gonna do if some big guy threatens you? Deadlift him until he's knocked out? If you train deadlift's, you'll become better at deadlift-like movements. That's it. If you do bench presses, you'll become stronger at bench-press-like movements. Do a movement that you didn't train in the gym and you'll be just as strong as your individual biomechanics allow you to be. And if you switch from a barbell-based strength routine to a hypertrophy routine, you will have to relearn every movement from ground up anyway. Powerlifters "cheat" as much as possible during their movements in order to lift as much weight as possible. Bodybuilders do the exact opposite. Doing strength training first and then switch to a bodybuilding routine is like doing sprint training before training for a marathon. Both has to do with running, but the principles are diametrically opposed.
Doing strength training will make you a better powerlifter and powerlifting is awesome. It's a fascinating sport opposed to bodybuilding which is - let's be honest - not a sport, but a beauty contest. But the benefits of a barbell-based strength training routine with low rep ranges are vastly overstated. And this is coming from a guy who's favorite exercise are deadlifts.
Couldn't agree more. I do think the general population would benefit from straight up strength training (especially as they get older...myself included) rather than bodybuilding TO START (again, I'm not talking about pros here. I'm talking about normal joes) more than bodybuilding right off the bat as the big compound movements do enforce more natural movement patters. Standing up (squat), picking heavy stuff off the floor (deadlift), etc. etc. But, these benefits can also be seen with some bodybuilding. And if strength training is not something someone likes, they wont stick to it likely (I'm stubborn and honestly it took me years to even get to a place where I didn't mind going to the gym....Im a tall, lanky, endurance athlete rather run than do anything).Be true to yourself: What do you hope to achieve by hitting the gym?
This, I don't really agree with. ISO exercises for specific sports is not good training as sports rely on a many interconnected systems. For example, leg extension for a soccer player is not good training. What about that movement pattern is strong for a soccer player? Thats not how the leg moves during the sport. Moreover, if you loaded it heavy enough to challenge you, it puts your knees in a weak position and that exercise particularly is prone to injury. For a soccer player (or cyclist) squats, deadlift, heavy lunges, maybe bulgarian split squat, are where they are going to want to be. (But working in some different rep rangers. 1-5 for squat and deadlift, lunges and split squats 8-12...depending on their training cycle). Working out calves specifically is not a great use of time for any athlete. As for boxers and weight, more difficult of a question...but as a general rule...they want to be stronger per lb than bigger. Under very few circumstances do they want to go up in weight and not be considerably stronger.Some people aim to become better at their primary sports activity by doing weight lifting as a complementary activity. These people will benefit greatly from functional strength training with different compound movements and isolation exercises. Even in this case, limiting yourself to only barbell exercises is not a good idea at all. A soccer player will benefit from doing leg extensions, which is a machine-based isolation movement. A cyclist will benefit from doing isolation exercises for his calves. Boxers do lots of compound pushing movements at the gym, but they also do isolation exercises for their shoulders and arms. If a boxer needs to up his weight, he will go through a true hypertrophy phase that follows the same training principles of what bodybuilders do.
Most people do go the gym to stay fit and healthy. Totally agree. But I disagree on "at a certain age, it would be absolutely reckless to train with low reps." Yes, training must change as people age, but holding onto strength as we get older is paramount! Lifting as much as can be tolerated safely is a better way to train. If its twice a week for 5 sets of 3 doing the most that can be tolerated with good form in very basic movement patters (again, squats, deadlift, press), is going to keep them healthier and stronger longer than having them do iso leg exercises or a pec deck. Again, I'm not talking about a huge amount of weight here, I'm talking about enough to keep some moderate pressure on the system. Hell, some old people are strong as hell, I saw a video of a 70 year old squat 405 and a 90 year old deadlift 405 (huge exceptions, I know). Imbalances are a concern, you are right, but again, I've never said barbell only and forever. I said get strong, then do what you want (ie, take a run at your novice linear progression for a good while...get strong, then start tweaking).Then you have people who go to the gym to stay fit and healthy. Limiting these people to barbell movements will eventually lead to injury since barbell movements create muscular imbalances within your body. In many cases, people who had a disc prolapse can't do any barbell compounds at all because the axial stress on the spine is too high when they use weights that create a training effect on their muscles. At a certain age it would be absolutely reckless to train with low rep ranges, anyway. The risk of injury is way too high.
Ah, now we are getting to it. This really is where the debate lies. Do you want to simply look good or actually be strong. (Again, normal people here, pros are different animals). Its hard to know how people will respond to different stimulus. For me, I got considerably bigger and eff more stronger on 3x5 squats, press, bench than I did on 3x8/3x12. To say, you wont get bigger and look good working in the lower rep ranges is bullshit. I'm not a trainer, but anecdotally, ive seen this transformation happen in people working in this rep range (again, normal folks) get both bigger and stronger. (I've seen it in the 3x8-12 range as well, but they usually aren't AS strong as the 3x5ers aren't AS big...but the different is not all that much in this beginning phase). And lets be honest here, most youtubers building great physiques are all on the juice bodybuilding or powerlifting.Most people I know go to the gym because they just want to look good. For these people, a strength based barbell routine is not helpful at all because how you look at the end of this strength phase is pure luck as it's based on genetics. As I said earlier, if you do 9 months of bench pressing with a barbell, you can be lucky an have a balanced physique, you can get super big triceps with small chest, super big front delts with small triceps and chest, and so on. Barbell strength training will magnify your body's original strengths and weaknesses. A lot of people do barbell training and get the T-Rex look because they're not creating enough stimulus on their arm muscles. For someone who went to the gym for looks only, this can be very frustrating. There are guys on YouTube who have a great physique and claim to be only doing barbell movements. But in most cases these guys are on roids or a straight out lying because they want to populate a niche that connects with people who have a soft spot for old-school pumping iron style of training as portrayed in countless Hollywood movies. And I can assure you: the actor who does the bench press with fake weights in cinema used machines and isolation movements to get his physique.
Well, yeah, you can't deadlift a big guy (but the thought made me laugh). But the rest of this is effing bullshit at least as it applies to me (and willing to bet many others). The specific example I'm thinking of is OHP. When I started to incorporate OHP barbell into my training, heavy. 3x5...I did that for 4 months. When I tried some Dumbell presses, seated, I doubled the amount of weight I used to do in the higher rep range. Same with DB bench press. 33% more on my lunges at the higher rep range. Sure, we can think of a few exercises that will have to be trained from the ground up...but ISO work and machines are easy to learn and much less mentally taxing.People usually misunderstand the concept of "functional strength". They think only because they do strength training in the gym will make them a stronger individual. But this isn't the case. Strength is always movement-based. No exception. What are you gonna do if some big guy threatens you? Deadlift him until he's knocked out? If you train deadlift's, you'll become better at deadlift-like movements. That's it. If you do bench presses, you'll become stronger at bench-press-like movements. Do a movement that you didn't train in the gym and you'll be just as strong as your individual biomechanics allow you to be. And if you switch from a barbell-based strength routine to a hypertrophy routine, you will have to relearn every movement from ground up anyway. Powerlifters "cheat" as much as possible during their movements in order to lift as much weight as possible. Bodybuilders do the exact opposite. Doing strength training first and then switch to a bodybuilding routine is like doing sprint training before training for a marathon. Both has to do with running, but the principles are diametrically opposed.
I don't think its overstated at all. Getting stronger is going to be more beneficial to a normal person in the long run than being able to iso bicep curl to chase the pump. (And don't get me wrong, I freakin love the pump).Doing strength training will make you a better powerlifter and powerlifting is awesome. It's a fascinating sport opposed to bodybuilding which is - let's be honest - not a sport, but a beauty contest. But the benefits of a barbell-based strength training routine with low rep ranges are vastly overstated. And this is coming from a guy who's favorite exercise are deadlifts.
You probably want a bit more than 1200, thats still pretty aggressive, but try it for a bit and see how you feel. If you are shooting for 1200 but then getting about 1600 to 1800 then thats going to be a bit better in terms of holding on to your muscle. Just monitor it. If you feel like shit (Im talking shit...not just hungry), recalibrate.After reading up a bit, I think 800 kcal is a bit hazardous.. dangerous actually. I think I'll up it to 1200.
Quoted for accuracy.Never go below basal metabolic rate (BMR) which is around 1800 kcal for a healthy male. Eating below BMR will burn your lean body mass in no time and crash your metabolism. This means you'll 100% get a nasty yoyo effect and end up even fatter than before.
Instead, just slowly up your activity level und reduce carbs. Or, as I recommended earlier, just stop eating carbs altogether until you've made it from obese to overweight. Then switch to a balanced diet and instead of lowering calories, start weightlifting.
It doesn't matter if you're trying to lose fat or build muscle: transforming your body takes time. Be patient. Crash dieting or crash bulking has never helped anyone. In fact, it's highly unhealthy. Your body stores environmental toxins in fat cells. Burning fat will release these toxins into your bloodstream. Crash dieting will not only kill your metabolism (which is a pain to fix), it will also put immense stress on your liver. And now guess which organ is responsible for fat metabolism...
Ive been straight up trying to gain weight for the last 9 months. Eating in surplus. I’m gaining weight but it still seems like I’m gaining weight and not eating up to even maintenance (via online calculators). Don’t know if my metabolism is still screwed up, or what.High carb, low fat, high protein diet with a moderate caloric surplus for a couple of weeks. So basically the exact opposite of what you would need if you wanted to lose body fat.
Gaining weight can mean a lot of things. Could be muscle mass. Could be fat. Could be just water which is often confused with both muscle or fat.Ive been straight up trying to gain weight for the last 9 months. Eating in surplus. I’m gaining weight but it still seems like I’m gaining weight and not eating up to even maintenance (via online calculators). Don’t know if my metabolism is still screwed up, or what.
But thanks for the advice!
I know there is both some muscle and fat going on with the weight gain. (Thats a good thing for me. I got too low a body fat % without enough muscle built up to go along with it. I looked like I had health issues, but I had abs!)Gaining weight can mean a lot of things. Could be muscle mass. Could be fat. Could be just water which is often confused with both muscle or fat.
Also keep in mind that your weight will jump up and down over the course of the week. This is completely normal. It's best to weigh yourself under the same conditions over the course of 4-6 weeks before you adjust your diet.
Example: Let's say your weight is 190 lbs. You step on the scale with boxershorts every Saturday morning after peeing. You do this for 6 weeks. Let's say your weight after 6 weeks is 194 lbs. Then you just do the math 4 lbs / 6 weeks = 0,66 lbs mass gain per week. Which is perfect if your goal was to increase mass. Watch your macros and you'll be fine. A moderate caloric surplus with high carb intake will bring your metabolism back on track.
How much calories you need is individual. A male pro bodybuilder will still eat over 4000 kcal if he wants to lose body fat. The harder you train and the higher your activity level, the more calories you will need.
Man, that kal from fat v muscle is incredible. When I finally go on a cut, (which won’t be for awhile… I still don’t think my resting metabolic rate is where it should be…. So I want to keep the fires stoked) I’ll be following this advice exactly. Building muscle is way harder to do than losing fat.It's important to understand that your metabolism is linked to your lean body mass. The bigger your muscles, the more calories you need. When you crash diet, your metabolism will slow down because you lose lean body mass.
Why is this a pain to fix? Because your body will burn through muscles much faster than through body fat. A pound of body fat can serve your body with about 3,500 kcal. A pound of muscle tissue will yield only 600 kcal.
Your body has to burn through 6 pounds of muscle to get the same amount of energy that it can get from one pound of fat. If you understand this and think back how hard it was to put on the muscle in the first place, you will never ever crash diet again.
The best way to diet is by staying away from your basal metabolic rate as far as possible. For the average adult male I would always aim to eat around 3,000 kcal on training with high carbs and low fats, and 2,500 kcal on rest days with medium to low carbs and medium fats. Protein has to be at 250-300 g every day to protect your muscle. Eat clean and the highest quality foods.
With this baseline, try to increase your activity level until you lose up to one pound of body weight every week. Increase training intensity to the max. Don't add unnecessary volume. Do 10k steps minimum every day. Add 30 min cardio if necessary. If you stop losing weight, reduce the amount of carbs very slightly. Proteins and fats should always stay the same. Once your bodyfat becomes closer to the percentage you want it to be, stop doing any cardio at all. Just do 10k steps per day.
It's a matter of genetics first and foremost, but also depends on how advanced you are.Building muscle is way harder to do than losing fat.
Meh, for the vast majority of average folks, they will have to work at building muscle (ie, go workout). A function of training and nutrition (gotta eat).It's a matter of genetics first and foremost, but also depends on how advanced you are.
If two average guys go to the gym, the one with better biomechanics will built more muscles. Better biomechanics in this case means that the guy will train with correct form for hypertrophy by default. For these guys, building muscle comes naturally. People with "bad" genetics on the other side will have to learn how to move their body in order to achieve a hypertrophy stimulus at all. This can take a lot of time, but it always pays off.
That's pretty much the biggest genetic factor until you're advanced enough to enter natural amateur bodybuilding competitions. People are freaking out about their hormones and whatnot and think they can never grow big without steroids. Sure, a 20 year old will in theory grow faster than a 40 year old due to better hormone levels, but with correct form, the 40 year old can still grow much bigger when the 20 year old trains like 99% of gym goers.
Once you reach this level, there are many other genetic factors that come into play if you aim to advance further. The digestive system is one of the most important. If your guts can't handle high amounts of food, you will struggle a lot. Sleep and regeneration is another important factor. You can't advance to pro-level splits like Push Pull Legs if you can't regenerate the volume.
If you go to the gym for more than two years and you don't look like a natural bodybuilder, you have to fix your training. Reduce volume. Increase intensity. Learn correct form. The worse your biomechanics are, the tougher it is to learn correct form.
Nutrition is the easy part. You can fix problems with your nutrition immediately and it's not hard to do right at all.