mckmas8808
Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
[Paul Tassi]
Does Microsoft pay him directly?
[Paul Tassi]
More like you should love for the company to put some time and effort into the damn networking of the game, regardless of pomp and circumstance.Yes, I would love longer queues and more disconnects.
Who doesn't?
Probably through a shell.Does Microsoft pay him directly?
Once again, it's not networking, it uses AZURE, such trash I heard for a network /sMore like you should love for the company to put some time and effort into the damn networking of the game, regardless of pomp and circumstance.
You need embracers like bafta.... etc, you can't just win those players when they don't like seeing new shit, it's understandable, conservative gamers, seeing changes is uncomfortable.Where are those PlayStation fans? We need to talk with them.
[Paul Tassi]
Does Microsoft pay him directly?
Sorry I thought you knew. There's been confirmed? reports of xbox having paid people to post on forums. Every week, as the narrative changes you will see it go, from top down, almost verbatim. The "get fucked" you're seeing is because it's made up. If they want a game, come out and just port beg like Phil did. Don't pretend PS5 gamers are clamoring for it to happen. I could be wrong on it being confirmed so I apologize and someone can correct me if I'm wrong.There are Fanboys for every platform though, and people with ulterior motives. It's nothing new. I still don't see why the discourse needs to amount to "get fucked" when people legit express a desire at experiencing what both worlds have to offer.
Yet people are way too employed to one brand, and it needs to stay super exclusive without any amount of give and take.
Hi Phil,nice to see you on GAF but you should spend more time steering that sinking Xbox ship away from the incoming icebergs than playing Diablo 4 and sharing your invaluable wisdom on forums all day.More people enjoying any game is just better
Trust me. MS wishes I was Phil. I'd fix that shit right up.Hi Phil,nice to see you on GAF but you should spend more time steering that sinking Xbox ship away from the incoming icebergs than playing Diablo 4 and sharing your invaluable wisdom on forums all day.
In an ideal world sure but in the real world no that's a recepee for disaster in long term asTrust me. MS wishes I was Phil. I'd fix that shit right up.
I still would think that more people playing a game is just better if my mate had an xbox only why wouldn't I won't him to have the same fun we are having playing HD2
Yeah but I am saying that I would like all people to enjoy a video game.In an ideal world sure but in the real world no that's a recepee for disaster in long term as
1.devs will have less time to squeeze the most out of a game if they make 6 versions of it at the same time making sure they are all optimized.
2.the platform holder will stop putting all their weight behind the console if the console won't sell.
3.the console won't sell cuz who the fuck would buy these things if everything is also on everything else.
4.reverting back to point 2 and 1. Helldivers 2 wouldn't exist as it is now if it were multiplatform from the start because it wouldn't have had the budget,support and time allowed to have optimizations for 6 platforms including Switch and Series S which would have downgraded it to fuck all for parity.
It's not controversial but having the game be enjoyed by more people might in the end make the game itself launch in a worse state than you'd think it would,I was just explaining how that isn't really feasible in the grand scheme of things even though it's a nice thought and I agree with youYeah but I am saying that I would like all people to enjoy a video game.
Not that is viable or feasible or possible. It shouldn't really be a controversial opinion to want everyone to enjoy the same the experience I have with a game
Lmao, this is the second article I've seen of this type, publicly port begging.
Their trying to set this up like with crossplay; Making it look like a player lead issue, when it's not.
You can smell the bs a mile away.
Social engineering. They did the same with cross-play and the very same articles dropped right after Phil PRed it.Microsoft is wild for this one. They are literally publically port begging for HellDivers 2. They are even sending their influencers in for help. Never thought I'd see the day. This is embarrassing if you ask me.
Not gunna lie but exclusive GAAS are just dumb af, the cost of porting such a game could be covered so quickly, always thought it was retarded ms making sea of thieves and infinte (dont get me started on infinte) and my opinion of sony doing it isnt any different
He could always trade in his Xbox and buy a PS5 cheaper.Trust me. MS wishes I was Phil. I'd fix that shit right up.
I still would think that more people playing a game is just better if my mate had an xbox only why wouldn't I won't him to have the same fun we are having playing HD2
Because some, even though might only be dozens, don't care about which plastic box people worship to and just want to play games.
Well this certainly is a strong fanboy argument. Seems you care more about a mega corporation than fellow gamers.
Not gunna lie but exclusive GAAS are just dumb af, the cost of porting such a game could be covered so quickly, always thought it was retarded ms making sea of thieves and infinte (dont get me started on infinte) and my opinion of sony doing it isnt any different
Yeah I don’t personally care which platform. Why would it hurt anyone to port a game to another machine? We aren’t in the early 90’s anymore. I would like to login to a device that plays games and access all my library. I believe that day is coming eventually.
Yeah, who would it hurt if HBO released Succession, House of the Dragon and The Last Of Us on Disney+, Netflix and Prime Video?Yeah I don’t personally care which platform. Why would it hurt anyone to port a game to another machine?
Yeah, they certainly was championing Microsoft consolidation for "buisness reasons". Now it's about gaming for everyone. Get the fuck out here with that hypocritical bs.It was an argument used not that long ago by some of those who liked the post you quoted back when MS was consolidating publishers.
I wonder what changed?
Honestly I think GAAS games like these are in their own realm,. Applying the old school thought process of exclusive enrich my box to a game genre that wasn’t around doesn’t make sense to me.Exclusives are what make a console attractive and give the platform value. The more (good) exclusive my box of choice has, the more valuable it becomes. I think the only people who have a problem with exclusives are the people who can't play them. (No one should feel entitled to play every game available)
Or in this case, Microsoft trying to make their lack of exclusives a good thing by saying other companies exclusives are bad and anti consumer.
Or some of us believe in traditions. You don't see Apple releasing all their apps on Andriod.
They want you to buy the console.
Do you realize Sony paid to have this game made? They own the IP! Hopefully that day will never come.
Paul Tassi has been great for keeping us updated on the latest astroturfing campaigns and narratives, though. Stuff he's written about has the stench of 'direct orders' and this is an example of that.
Honestly I think GAAS games like these are in their own realm,. Applying the old school thought process of exclusive enrich my box to a game genre that wasn’t around doesn’t make sense to me.
Didn't this forum predict something like this was going to happen after that Business Update podcast? Articles and campaigns like this i mean... wow.
This is some serious level CIA psych or social engineering mission going on here. Turn the world against Sony and their exclusives, make it uncool not to share games. Suddenly Microsoft is the hero again and Sony is anti-consumer.
Microsoft has tried this before.
That same sentiment has thoroughly filtered down to their fanbase as well. Very cultish, with hardly any criticism pointed towards the decision makers.Plus it's like, why aren't these port-beggars asking for Microsoft to actually compete? Why can't one of their 30+ studios make a Helldivers-inspired competitor? That way gamers have more real choice, and such a game could get a nice rivalry going which boosts the efforts of both.
Instead they want the $3 trillion company to campaign for hand-outs like a homeless person.
Updated? Soon enough he'll be leading the pack. He might even have green chest hair already!
Then Nintendo should be bringing Mario Kart and Smash Bros. to every platform under the sun...
...or maybe it's that GaaS titles can be leveraged to draw in people to a given platform/ecosystem, just like non-GaaS titles can. If you want to get technical, Fortnite's not on GOG or Steam, or Windows/MS Store for that matter. Should Epic be obligated to provide it on competing PC storefronts just because Fortnite's a GaaS?
Businesses aren't charities.
Yep and we know why, too. Look no further than Good Guy Phil™ and that idiotic quote of his.
Definitely. The platform holder that least understands the value of exclusive games, because they have traditionally been the worst at creating high-demand exclusives themselves, wants no one to have a good thing unless they can have it, too.
The sense of entitlement and greed is almost stomach-churning.
Yes because Mario kart and smash brothers is the same as helldivers which relies on a player count. Bit of a stretch…..Plus it's like, why aren't these port-beggars asking for Microsoft to actually compete? Why can't one of their 30+ studios make a Helldivers-inspired competitor? That way gamers have more real choice, and such a game could get a nice rivalry going which boosts the efforts of both.
Instead they want the $3 trillion company to campaign for hand-outs like a homeless person.
Updated? Soon enough he'll be leading the pack. He might even have green chest hair already!
Then Nintendo should be bringing Mario Kart and Smash Bros. to every platform under the sun...
...or maybe it's that GaaS titles can be leveraged to draw in people to a given platform/ecosystem, just like non-GaaS titles can. If you want to get technical, Fortnite's not on GOG or Steam, or Windows/MS Store for that matter. Should Epic be obligated to provide it on competing PC storefronts just because Fortnite's a GaaS?
Businesses aren't charities.
Yep and we know why, too. Look no further than Good Guy Phil™ and that idiotic quote of his.
Definitely. The platform holder that least understands the value of exclusive games, because they have traditionally been the worst at creating high-demand exclusives themselves, wants no one to have a good thing unless they can have it, too.
The sense of entitlement and greed is almost stomach-churning.
That’s because unlike console makers, MS has roots with PC gaming so it’s natural for them to want to cover two platforms with one game.Plus it's like, why aren't these port-beggars asking for Microsoft to actually compete? Why can't one of their 30+ studios make a Helldivers-inspired competitor? That way gamers have more real choice, and such a game could get a nice rivalry going which boosts the efforts of both.
Instead they want the $3 trillion company to campaign for hand-outs like a homeless person.
Updated? Soon enough he'll be leading the pack. He might even have green chest hair already!
Then Nintendo should be bringing Mario Kart and Smash Bros. to every platform under the sun...
...or maybe it's that GaaS titles can be leveraged to draw in people to a given platform/ecosystem, just like non-GaaS titles can. If you want to get technical, Fortnite's not on GOG or Steam, or Windows/MS Store for that matter. Should Epic be obligated to provide it on competing PC storefronts just because Fortnite's a GaaS?
Businesses aren't charities.
Yep and we know why, too. Look no further than Good Guy Phil™ and that idiotic quote of his.
Definitely. The platform holder that least understands the value of exclusive games, because they have traditionally been the worst at creating high-demand exclusives themselves, wants no one to have a good thing unless they can have it, too.
The sense of entitlement and greed is almost stomach-churning.
Because some, even though might only be dozens, don't care about which plastic box people worship to and just want to play games.
#SonyTooThat’s because unlike console makers, MS has roots with PC gaming so it’s natural for them to want to cover two platforms with one game.
MS had had tons of high profile games. Their 360 halo and gears games blew away most PS3 first party games in sales. Halo games alone during that time outsold lots of Sony first patty franchisee combined, including gran turusmo.
Dont get too snarky about exclusives because Helldivers 2 is a day one PC game and PSVR 2 is coming to PC soon. Seems Sony isn’t too confident about their walled garden lately either. And that doesn’t even include the tons of PC ports or MLB on Xbox and switch.
Because the vast majority of people in the world enjoy products based on their own experience and don’t care if a guy 5000 miles away enjoys using it too.Why would anyone who's preferred platform is the ps5 want diminish it's existence by having the same game, that makes it worth buying , come to its direct competitors platform