Yagami_Sama
Member
Who will be the other Toro Rosso driver since Sainz is out ? Pierre Gasly is the best bet right ?
Who will be the other Toro Rosso driver since Sainz is out ? Pierre Gasly is the best bet right ?
Unless I'm mistaken, there aren't any Honda backed drivers that have enough superlicense points. Matsushita is the closest in F2, but it looks like he won't finish high enough in the championship to qualify.Won't Honda have any influence on the matter?
Unless I'm mistaken, there aren't any Honda backed drivers that have enough superlicense points. Matsushita is the closest in F2, but it looks like he won't finish high enough in the championship to qualify.
Here's a list from the beginning of the year of all the drivers in the world who scored superlicense points. You need 40 for a superlicense.Oh so that thing really is important now?
Matsushita was a F2 driver for 3 years now so I figure he was qualified (not like I want him though)
Is there a ranking of all juniors drivers with enough superlicence points somewhere?
If Matsushita hasn't enough I think there are probably not so many young drivers that can qualify overall (30 maybe?)
Here's a list from the beginning of the year of all the drivers in the world who scored superlicense points. You need 40 for a superlicense.
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2017/01/23/superlicence-points-2017-full-list-of-all-314-points-scoring-drivers/
It hasn't been updated up to now.
Joe Saward is predicting that Lando Norris will drive for Prema in F2. Sean Gelael being the second driver. I will be very disappointed that a team as professional as Prema is takes Gelael.
Won't Honda have any influence on the matter?
Some nice 2018 livery concepts with the halo included:
https://www.behance.net/gallery/55965459/2018-F1-Livery-Concepts
That Force India (One) looks great.
Red Bull drivers with the newest member of the junior team, baby Horner.
Funny that the guy that's leaving is in the pic yet Kvyatt is missing.
Red Bull drivers with the newest member of the junior team, baby Horner.
We'll see.
In my opinion Vandoorne is hugely overrated.
Some nice 2018 livery concepts with the halo included:
https://www.behance.net/gallery/55965459/2018-F1-Livery-Concepts
That Force India (One) looks great.
Did Vandoorne need 4 seasons in GP2 to be crowned a champion?
Has Vandoorne shown anything this season to suggest he can compete with the best drivers?
He's 25 years old, he's not young anymore. Maybe he'll improve next season, who knows. I just think that considering Stroll is 7 years younger, he seems to have progressed quicker throughout the season than Vandoorne.
Vandoorne is less erratic and more consistent, but you'd expect that considering his age and experience. I believe Stroll has the bigger upside once he has a few more races under his belt.
He's no Verstappen, either, though.
The same was said about Hulkenberg though, whom is good, but...well...no podiums is hurting...he did win LeMan's though. He really needs a better car or something.To be fair, Vandoorne is in a bucket of shit car. He's doing as good as you can do in that package.
I think he's a very good driver, but he's not a LeClerc. And LeClerc is clearly the brightest talent in GP2 since Hamilton IMO.
Some nice 2018 livery concepts with the halo included:
https://www.behance.net/gallery/55965459/2018-F1-Livery-Concepts
That Force India (One) looks great.
In the same car Perez was on the podium once in 2014, once in 2015 and twice in 2016. I prefer Perez over Hulk but I would say they are comparable on pace. More interesting would be to see both of them up against the top tier of Alonso, Hamilton and Vettel.The same was said about Hulkenberg though, whom is good, but...well...no podiums is hurting...he did win LeMan's though. He really needs a better car or something.
I still cannot understand how the Halo is not impairing driver's vision... I honestly cant see how it doesnt affect things negatively on this aspect, blind spots etc.
And then it is just a matter of figuring out the % of accidents the introduction of Halo might cause due to vision impairment vs the benefits of protection against debris.
Sure the cars will be safer, but I believe we will have even more accidents.
I still cannot understand how the Halo is not impairing driver's vision... I honestly cant see how it doesnt affect things negatively on this aspect, blind spots etc.
And then it is just a matter of figuring out the % of accidents the introduction of Halo might cause due to vision impairment vs the benefits of protection against debris.
Sure the cars will be safer, but I believe we will have even more accidents.
Drivers look at apexes most of the time.
The halo is still shit and they are discussing keeping shark fins now for identification because driver helmets are blocked.
It's a done deal, but hopefully is quickly replaced. I just can't believe the halo is the best option they could come up with. How could a screen not work if built into to the chassis rather than being a bolted on after thought.
In the same car Perez was on the podium once in 2014, once in 2015 and twice in 2016. I prefer Perez over Hulk but I would say they are comparable on pace. More interesting would be to see both of them up against the top tier of Alonso, Hamilton and Vettel.
I actually like both, though seem to prefer Hulkenburg these days because he doesn't seem like the type to try to crash out his teammate, but Perez has the stats and seemingly better luck. I mean Bottas can barely handle Hamilton so...what would Hulk's prospects be?In the same car Perez was on the podium once in 2014, once in 2015 and twice in 2016. I prefer Perez over Hulk but I would say they are comparable on pace. More interesting would be to see both of them up against the top tier of Alonso, Hamilton and Vettel.
Heidfeld and Rosenqvist staying at Mahindra. I guess no Indycar for Rosenqvist except for maybe the Indy 500?
http://www.gpupdate.net/en/autosport-news/358647/mahindra-holds-on-to-heidfeld-rosenqvist/
I think the Hulk has done Hulk things in that Renault. He's clearly flattering that car. Palmer really hasn't been anywhere near him in conparison. Vandoorne has shown improvement and is close to Alonso after a shaky start to the year.
Ganassi really wanted Rosenqvist, but apparently he couldn't get out of his Formula E contract. Ganassi is looking to sign Brendon Hartley for this year.
Re Halos, I'm only now getting somewhat used to them - although begrudgingly. It's too late for them to can that concept now - were just going to have to tolerate them until we see a more elegant solution.
Aside from the green one those still look miles better than the Halo.If we can get through stepped noses and penis noses, we'll do just fine with a year of halos on the cars.
Aside from the green one those still look miles better than the Halo.
I personally think choice to use the Halo should be down to the individual driver - if they want to run it great, but if they don't no harm no foul.
I personally think choice to use the Halo should be down to the individual driver - if they want to run it great, but if they don't no harm no foul.
No harm until someone is gravely injured or dead, sure, great idea.
As with everything, you can't leave it up to the driver. They will more often than not do whatever they need to go faster. If that means dropping xkg of titanium off the car in order to do so they will. That's why this stuff is always regulated and not "well, if you'd like to be safe, do this".
No harm until someone is gravely injured or dead, sure, great idea.
And exactly the same can be said if a car overturns on fire and the Halo traps someone inside.
I'm no safety engineer, but wouldn't a halo give more space to move in the cockpit if a car gets overturned?
I'm no safety engineer, but wouldn't a halo give more space to move in the cockpit if a car gets overturned?
https://images.cdn.circlesix.co/image/2/1200/630/5/uploads/posts/2017/08/ed6e2b16d7595d202b21a7ac21468bba.jpg[img][/QUOTE]
I believe in most cases the car will be on an angle on its side, with the halo. It certainly is much less likely to bury itself, or rather the driver, into a barrier