Groundbreaking Findings on the Giza Pyramid Complex Could Re-Write Human History

This guy is deep into conspiracy theories, UFOs, spirituality non-sense and the like.
He is not a scientist and is very far from being a reliable source.
Seems like he is the kind of guy that makes stuff up to sell his youtube channel and twitter.
 
Probably the satellite companies hoaxing for publicity.

2.6km is well beyond human technology from back then. The last "deep" coal mine in the UK was only 460m and that was done in the 1980's
 
The History for Granite youtube channel I've been watching for quite a while. I like his dry mundane but well thought out stuff. He makes the pyramids both boring and fascinating without all the alien BS.

m.youtube.com

History for GRANITE

Exploring the pyramids of Ancient Egypt. New evidence, written in stone. Egyptology will never be the same. Do you take your History for Granite? -------------------------------- Channel Merchandise Link: https://history-for-granite.creator-spring.com All merchandise designs created by...
m.youtube.com m.youtube.com
 
EviLore said:
The twitter guy linked in the OP is a crackpot, that's why. Look at his other tweets.

The actual findings are interesting but not freak-out worthy:

Click to expand...

Nah bro, we are so back.

GmeejklbYAAw4FV.jpg
 
EviLore said:
The twitter guy linked in the OP is a crackpot, that's why. Look at his other tweets.

The actual findings are interesting but not freak-out worthy:

Click to expand...
Huh. Looking at the Smithsonianmag and some other articles I'm not seeing anything about about structures going 2km down or those images the guy was showing. In fact the only "deep" structure I can find is like 10m down at most.

Edit: If he's a crackpot then he's a crackpot but I'm wondering if he's just making shit up or if he's taking facts and running to crazy conclusions.
 
Last edited:
Thing is it can never be proven because the only way to prove it is by digging to it and the Egyptian government ain't going to let anyone start digging a big hole next to a pyramid to find out.
 
ssringo said:
Huh. Looking at the Smithsonianmag and some other articles I'm not seeing anything about about structures going 2km down or those images the guy was showing. In fact the only "deep" structure I can find is like 10m down at most.

Edit: If he's a crackpot then he's a crackpot but I'm wondering if he's just making shit up or if he's taking facts and running to crazy conclusions.
Click to expand...
I think it's a different study https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/20/5231
 
I remember on NeoGAF when we used to get a Megaton once every few months. Nowadays with YouTube, TikTok and X we get them multiple times a day. We live in truly amazing times.
 
Last edited:
Incredible claims require incredible proof and I'm not seeing it here, at least yet.

Something like this should be heavily peer reviewed and then critiqued and attempted to be replicated with various approaches.

It's likely nothing or, at best, natural formations of some kind, but let's examine it to get more info
 
I recently wondered if the pyramid was built with limestone cement rather than dragging stones from miles away. Then I realized, of course that's what they did.
 
Last edited:
Trogdor1123 said:
Incredible claims require incredible proof and I'm not seeing it here, at least yet.

Something like this should be heavily peer reviewed and then critiqued and attempted to be replicated with various approaches.

It's likely nothing or, at best, natural formations of some kind, but let's examine it to get more info
Click to expand...

Peer reviewed by whom? Failed from the start sadly. Other wise hard agree.

Maybe when that nefarious (not all to be sincere) academic closed reasoning and carefully cherrypicking of these well paid "experts" that are in control of these LOL "investigations" could take a back seat, which means ykwyk, we can get some immense investigation going that'll ofc has to be cross referenced, and even then we'll most likely end up with different hypothesis regarding the multiple facets that make not only the Piramids in Gaza but all over the world still a mystery. Wait doesn't the Vatican holds miles of ....
 
Last edited:
Chuck Berry said:
The real deal

Click to expand...

Is this guy considered fake among serious scientists ?
His claims of rain withering patterns showing Pyramids should have faced 1000s of years of rain, which according to history of Earth climate should have happen much before 2000 years ago which is the expected timeline of the most pyramids.

Pretty dreamy stuff to think that ancient people found these pyramids already built and made their own instead of creating it from scratch. Haven't done any serious research by me.
 
It is known that there are networks of natural caves under the whole area. The scans showed do not show the perfect shapes in the renders as far as I could see. And even if they are dug out, the Egyptions were expert excavators. But I don't see why they left the basement unfinished yet dug huge 2km cylinders. I love the theories but often the mundane explanations are more believable and interesting in other ways.
At this point we need much more information, looking forward to this four hour presentation should it ever surface.
 
There's soooo much evidence of huge mud floods that only let us see the the tops of most and even Capitol buildings.

Enormous architectural cities being melted via (insert option). Closed off massive massive acers of private/government (lol) land with exotic architecture.

The "Ether" being removed from the periodic table, enforced false narrative regarding our history.

Mr Rogers Clown GIF
 
I find it really strange how aggressively some people resist ideas put forward by non-mainstream historians and theorists.

I mean, why not entertain some of the contentions? When there absolutely is evidence and artifacts out there that does not conform with the standard picture of history and human civilization.

Despite what is commonly stated, science has always been entwined with politics. Soft-sciences especially so as they are more interpretive, so the idea of the "purity" of the academy has always been more of an aspiration than an actual reality. And the obvious consequence of that is that maintaining the absolute dominance of a certain canonical view is frequently extremely valuable both reputationally and economically for its champions.

I think seeing the orthodoxy challenged by dissidents is healthy and absolutely necessary.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Locked
Harvard to Launch Groundbreaking Course on “Hawk Tuah Girl” Phenomenon
1
588
EviLore replied
  • Poll
What do you prefer more, human voice or natural voice in the media?
4
323
Codes 208 replied
Ignoring the Pyramids what is the most famous or most impressive ancient structure in the world to you?
Opinion  2 3
105
3K
jason10mm replied
Alexander Ovechkin Breaks Wayne Gretzky's All-Time Record For Most Goals In NHL History
25
772
StreetsofBeige replied
The Worst Job Interview in History
2
84
5K
dave_d replied
Top Bottom