Thats Insomniac Agenda, just like the agendas each studios have. And thats a western epidemy not a Sony agenda. You cant even select a female avatar in GT7, meanwhile in forza you can choose pronouns. The only thing GT7 has close to something woke, is a Pontiac Trans AM.You must missed Spider-Man 2.
You're probably right.
My main point is it's a California problem and thinking From Software is going to be woke now because of Playstation is ridiculous.
There is definitely some woke shit going on in some areas of Playstation, but is kind of disingenuous to center them out like it's not going on other places.
Recently since Concord (which is crazy woke) they shut the game down, shut the studio down and haven't talked about it or accused people of being bigots (to my knowledge, Im sure FW studio employees have). So give them some credit and let's hope that phase is over.
Is he not already stinking rich? Like he’s surely at that point in life and creative career where he pretty much only does what he wants to do.Miyazaki would literally be buried in money with a multi-year talent retention bonus of likely tens of millions of dollars.
If he were to turn down all that generational wealth, he'd be instantly murdered by his own family.
The anime community aint happy.
While I do see some pros (mostly regarding funding & technical assistance) that’s massively overshadowed by Hermen Hulst potentially having any influence on FromSoft.
I can mod out or ignore wokeshit so I’m not worried about the western/California side of Sony ruining From. Hulst is a moron and everything he touches seemingly turns to shit. His “leadership” pushed me out of Sony’s ecosystem over to PC and I could totally see him completely mismanaging & sabotaging FromSoft.
Sony will control a lot of anime, manga distribution and publishing. Crunchy Roll is not great, censorship and agenda pushing.Why?
These shills have no shame.
PlayStation is in talks to acquire the parent company of From Software. That means that they could soon own massive titles like Bloodborne and Armored Core. My concern lies with what does the future hold for titles like, uh, a Bloodborne remake or Bloodborne 2 or, uh, Armored core in the future. You know, this is one situation where it seems like most people online are left feeling a little bit uneasy about the idea of From Software being acquired.
I think them purchasing someplace like From Software would likely mean that they make those titles exclusive. Xbox is more about having an open ecosystem. PlayStation is largely about having a closed ecosystem. So if there was ever another Elden Ring or another armored core, there is a higher potential that PlayStation would make those at least exclusive to PlayStation and PC.
But time would tell it absolutely would have a PlayStation requirement, a PSN requirement locking hundreds of thousands of people, at least, at least hundreds of thousands, if not millions of players, out of being able to purchase and interact with these games.
But couldn’t that logic be applied to all Sony games? Spider-Man and helldivers would do massive on other platforms but they aren’t there.Ultimately, if they are selling and Sony is buying, I think that is the best case scenario. The games will remain multi- platform. I have no doubt about that.
There is too much to gain from this acquisition to try to make the games exclusive.
But couldn’t that logic be applied to all Sony games? Spider-Man and helldivers would do massive on other platforms but they aren’t there.
Way too many people are positive they will stay multiplat and I don’t get why. The arguments people use could be applied to all Sony games.
I’m still trying to figure out how Californian developers would even have an effect on a Japanese developer who is known for putting storytelling in the backseat.So centering out Playstation for being so woke to the point they're going to ruin Fromsoft is strange.
Isn’t a lot of the big anime companies like Toei (DBZ) not owned by Sony/Kadokawa?I am oddly concerned about consolidation in anime now. I didn't really care yesterday, but for a lot of people that is a major, passionate hobby and it sucks to see a company apparently trying to become "The Company" in anything you care a lot about.
Had to check whether this was a typical unironic post of boob_in_boxesObviously, it is a great idea because they can then modernise From Soft by getting Bungie to tell them how to make a live service hero shooter. Drag them out of the stone age.
This was written by an adult.No, Sony is closing down studios that they encouraged to do the most egregious DEI initiative GAAS push.
All of their games are DEI hell in the last 5 years. Even Astro Bot pushes Aloy as the most important sony mascot today.
Plus, I do not know what you are talking about? lol
From's games also take around around half a decade - if not more years - to be made this generation:We’ve seen how long Sony’s games take to make, 6 years plus. For extra graphical fidelity and smoother frame rate, less frame tears etc I’d rather we just got From games as they are now (a new amazing release every 2-3 years).
I'm sure he's wealthy, but not tens of millions of dollars wealthy as the Bungie board of directors are following the deal.Is he not already stinking rich? Like he’s surely at that point in life and creative career where he pretty much only does what he wants to do.
Isn’t a lot of the big anime companies like Toei (DBZ) not owned by Sony/Kadokawa?
Think they’re still a small fry in comparison, that said I don’t watch a lot of anime.
Pokemon is probably made somewhere else as well.
None of those Cons would be a thing.I *really* don't want it to happen
Plausible pros:
1. Increased technical performance support for future FROM games
2. Increased (and consistent) funding for development, marketing, etc
3. Operational stability means any potential experimental games would more likely be approved
4. Creative interference+ (cinematic presentation support, accessibility/ui support, etc)
5. Spinoff media ventures (more adaptations (even though elden ring adaptations are already in talks), toys)
6. Job security (assuming no concord-level failures, most FROM developers would be more secure in their jobs)
Plausible cons:
1. Limited userbase/exclusivity (far fewer people in the games industry would get to play FROM software games just to push hardware sales for one section of the industry)
2. Job loss (Firing of FROM staff deemed superfluous during consolidation)
3. Simplification of graphical options and loss of choice in presentation preference
4. Creative interference-/Potential conflict of interest (narrative style adjustments, development workflow mandates, etc)
5. Studio direction ultimately becomes tied to console venture's success (i.e. a bad set of years for the console and FROM might be disbanded, broken apart, or forced to develop a more 'strategically relevant' game in a different genre, regardless of their own studio's success)
6. Loss of ip ownership (FROM could eventually have to give up the soulsborne games to be developed by a different studio if there are strong enough disagreements)
7. Worse experience for non-PS users (unnecessary PSN login, limiting sales regions, loss of PC/steam specific features like refunds and slightly better customer support)
What other pros or cons can you think of?
You really think they turned Bungie into blue hair activists? Bungie was always what it was, Bungie. As is every studio. These takes, along with that racism post with demon's souls is crazy.I don't know about anyone else, but I sure as hell do not want Sony to turn From Soft into a blue haired activist dev group like Bungie. No thank you.
Are we seriously expecting Venom?From's games also take around around half a decade - if not more years - to be made this generation:
The difference is that, unlike some of Sony's studios such as Sucker Punch or Bend, From actually has a multi-team structure, similar to that of Insomniac Games, which allows them to release new games every few years.
- Elden Ring started in early 2016, was announced in 2019, came out early 2022.
- Armored Core VI started in early 2016, was announced in 2022, came out mid 2023.
Marvel's Spider-Man 2 took five years to be made and Marvel's Wolverine is going to have taken six years by the time it comes out in late 2026, but thanks to their multi-team structure, the studio was able come up with all these ultra polished AAA games in the span of a decade:
Which is all to say that Sony's focus on great production values and sophisticated tech doesn't mean that From's output would start to suffer because of it.
- Ratchet & Clank (2016)
- Marvel's Spider-Man (2018)
- Marvel's Spider-Man Remastered (2020)
- Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales (2020)
- Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart (2021)
- Marvel's Spider-Man 2 (2023)
- Marvel's Venom (2025 target)
- Marvel's Wolverine (2026 target)
If this happens and they dont use this logo/design I will be so dissapointed.
It was slated before Wolverine in the Insomniac leak, but things can always change.Are we seriously expecting Venom?
I'd assume it went to shit along with the Spider-Man 2 DLC and their GAAS. A Venom game is inventible, but I doubt it's coming out before Wolverine. Or did I miss something other than the leaked powerpoint?
Lol imagine putting this drivel at number 1.Plausible cons:
1. Limited userbase/exclusivity (far fewer people in the games industry would get to play FROM software games just to push hardware sales for one section of the industry)