I'm looking forward to that.It'll go up even higher with higher clocks. UE3 is one of the most CPU-bound engines out there.
I'm looking forward to that.It'll go up even higher with higher clocks. UE3 is one of the most CPU-bound engines out there.
You probably mean .0025v, right? Going from 1.45 to 1.475 is a big jump, for example.OCing a 2500k should be super easy. Go into your bios, look at the shit for the cpu, increase the multiplier to 4.1/4.2 and you're done. If you want to go higher increase the voltage by like what, .05v at a time?
Someone will have to correct me on that, my mobo does .025v steps.
Bummer.God damn UPS. Guy shows up, has no paper work for brokage payment, cant accept payment........ Build will have to start tomorrow =(
I think you can get other SSDs for that price from Newegg with free shipping.http://www.ebay.com/itm/Kingston-Hy...?pt=US_Solid_State_Drives&hash=item2a23145011
how does that look to you gaf?
might risk importing an SSD due to the small form factor. Could very well pass customs and whatnot without having to pay fees. That price is kinda low enough to risk it and storage space should at least sustain an OS drive..
It'll go up even higher with higher clocks. UE3 is one of the most CPU-bound engines out there.
![]()
First off.
Thank you, Hazaro for this great PC build guide. I built my rig following suggestions from 2012 [Part 1]. Googling and studying about the new CPUs, GPUs, and how far PC tech has come.
***My first PC (that I built w/help from my brother) was an Asus A7v-333, Athlon XP 1600+, & an ATi Radeon 128MB LE.***
Thank you to everyone here that gave suggestions, showed off personal builds, and helped others (& me) find our direction.
Now to my issue that I've run into.
CRYSIS: I recently installed it, and everytime I try to run it, it freezes during opening scene that says "SEVERAL DAYS LATER".
GTA IV: (Steam v.1.0.7.0) Stops and crashes either during intro where you here whats his name plowing (getting plowed by) some chick. I started skiping that scene, and same thing happens when the conversation gets to "Fucking terrorists!".
ASUS P8Z77-V LK
i5 3450K 3.4Ghz (not sure how to OC yet)
eVGA GTX 670 FTW 2GB
Corsair Vengeance 8Gb (4GBx2)
Samsung 830 64GB
WD Black 2TB
So, with my new rig coming soon... what games should I get to test it?
I am thinking Darksiders 2, Dishonored... and don't know what else. Come GAF, I wanna test my future PC's power!!!
OK, did some OC tests tonight. As mentioned earlier, I have an i7-920 + CM Hyper 212 Plus w/ 2 fans on it inside a HAF 932 case (3 fans in, 1 fan out).
I bumped up to 4GHz, and under load, looks like my temps are a little on the high side (68-74). I've read that anything below 80 is "OK", but it still seems high to me. Not like I game 24-7, though, so I might be good. It's funny noting that with the stock Intel cooler, even at 3.2GHz, I was over 80 within a couple minutes of starting the test.
That being said, for OC'ing this up to 4GHz, are there other coolers you guys would recommend? I tend to be a better safe than sorry kind of guy, so I may drop things back to 3.6GHz. Thanks again.
Those won't even come close to taxing your rig. You could try witcher 2 I guess, or the Crysis gamesSo, with my new rig coming soon... what games should I get to test it?
I am thinking Darksiders 2, Dishonored... and don't know what else. Come GAF, I wanna test my future PC's power!!!
Could be driver related. Can you give details on your psu?
Neither of those will really tax any modern system. I've got a Planetside 2 beta key you could have, would certainly put that hardware to work.
BCLK 190, Multiplier 21, Vcore 1.25... I used Clunk's guide as a base. Been running for several hours now with stress tests and such, and 75 seems to be the max temp on core 0 with the others steadily lower to about 68 under load.Actually the Nehalem CPUs can run up to 100C, not that you would want to but 80C is definitely fine. What are your BLCK, multiplier and vcore settings and anything else you set in bios. My 930 and my friends 920 don't like 4.0Ghz, very unstable for some reason. Also 22x multiplier and 20x don't work well for me. Try getting it just above or below 4.0 and put vcore at 1.35 then keep lowering it till its as low as possible. I run mine at 20x 199Mhz BLCK at 1.3125V with droop enabled. I've gotten it up to 4.322 at 1.375v before, just have to keep pushing.
I think you can get other SSDs for that price from Newegg with free shipping.
http://www.Newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=20-167-121.
You can also get that same SSD from Newegg or other Kingston SSDs too, I believe.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Kingston-Hy...?pt=US_Solid_State_Drives&hash=item2a23145011
how does that look to you gaf?
might risk importing an SSD due to the small form factor. Could very well pass customs and whatnot without having to pay fees. That price is kinda low enough to risk it and storage space should at least sustain an OS drive..
Just saw this. I don't know about Amazon international shipping, but could give it a try.I need international shipping. Otherwise I would obviously go to other places before ebay, figured "importing" would give it away
is this kingston bad tho?
So I have my system mostly complete and I'd like to thank everyone here who helped me out with tips and answered general questions.
but... OH MAN!
The hard cold truth about what's required to get a perfect 7.9 Windows Experience Index is a tough one to swollow. So my build netted me easily 7.9 accross the board EXCEPT for the CPU at 7.8 which is a Core i7 SandyE 3930K @ 3.2 GHz stock. I foolishly thought to myself "I'll just overclock it!" It was easy enough to get it to 4 GHz on Noctua NH-D14 with plenty of breathing room. I re-ran the test and it was still at 7.8. I new I was never going to run the system past 4 and I wasn't even planning on running it past 3.2 but to just see a perfect 7.9, I thought it would be nice to read up a little on what was requried.
A single processor motherboard running my class of CPU (6-core) would require a 5.6 GHz clock. FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK THAT! 7.8 is a much nicer number anyways;_;
So I have my system mostly complete and I'd like to thank everyone here who helped me out with tips and answered general questions.
but... OH MAN!
The hard cold truth about what's required to get a perfect 7.9 Windows Experience Index is a tough one to swollow. So my build netted me easily 7.9 accross the board EXCEPT for the CPU at 7.8 which is a Core i7 SandyE 3930K @ 3.2 GHz stock. I foolishly thought to myself "I'll just overclock it!" It was easy enough to get it to 4 GHz on Noctua NH-D14 with plenty of breathing room. I re-ran the test and it was still at 7.8. I new I was never going to run the system past 4 and I wasn't even planning on running it past 3.2 but to just see a perfect 7.9, I thought it would be nice to read up a little on what was requried.
A single processor motherboard running my class of CPU (6-core) would require a 5.6 GHz clock. FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK THAT! 7.8 is a much nicer number anyways;_;
Aren't the scores assigned to the stock parts? As far as I know overclocking won't change the values.so.. the windows experience score targets scale up based on the hardware you have? So theoretically could someone score higher than you with a dual core setup?
Corsair Pro Series HX650w.
One other thing. Crysis first boot (res. still @ 1024x768) I got a blue screen after letting the product logos run.
Well no parts today but I got started anyways tearing apart my current build.
Bye bye massive air cooling
And the only part I have so far looks pretty!
So I have my system mostly complete and I'd like to thank everyone here who helped me out with tips and answered general questions.
but... OH MAN!
The hard cold truth about what's required to get a perfect 7.9 Windows Experience Index is a tough one to swollow. So my build netted me easily 7.9 accross the board EXCEPT for the CPU at 7.8 which is a Core i7 SandyE 3930K @ 3.2 GHz stock. I foolishly thought to myself "I'll just overclock it!" It was easy enough to get it to 4 GHz on Noctua NH-D14 with plenty of breathing room. I re-ran the test and it was still at 7.8. I new I was never going to run the system past 4 and I wasn't even planning on running it past 3.2 but to just see a perfect 7.9, I thought it would be nice to read up a little on what was requried.
A single processor motherboard running my class of CPU (6-core) would require a 5.6 GHz clock. FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK THAT! 7.8 is a much nicer number anyways;_;
I have the same CPU/ cooler and am wondering what your idle/basic use temps are. I haven't tried over locking my CPU yet so I don't know how much hotter it'll run for daily use stuff. Thanks.OK, did some OC tests tonight. As mentioned earlier, I have an i7-920 + CM Hyper 212 Plus w/ 2 fans on it inside a HAF 932 case.
I bumped up to 4GHz, and under load, looks like my temps are a little on the high side (68-74). I've read that anything below 80 is "OK", but it still seems high to me. Not like I game 24-7, though, so I might be good. It's funny noting that with the stock Intel cooler, even at 3.2GHz, I was over 80 within a couple minutes of starting the test.
That being said, for OC'ing this up to 4GHz, are there other coolers you guys would recommend? I tend to be a better safe than sorry kind of guy, so I may drop things back to 3.6GHz. Thanks again.
What're you doing with your old Noctua?
Boxing it. I would offer it to you but one of the mounting screws broke when I installed it, tried to get a replacement but was never able to find the secufirm kit in stock anywhere. I used a screw that worked well enough but I wouldnt want to give it to someone broken, unless you have an AMD chip, the AMD mount is unused.
Idle temps (and it's usually about 27C in our office... yes, a little warm) are about 44-47C.I have the same CPU/ cooler and am wondering what your idle/basic use temps are. I haven't tried over locking my CPU yet so I don't know how much hotter it'll run for daily use stuff. Thanks.
Just don't even look at the WEI. It has absolutely zero meaning whatsoever. Pretend it doesn't even exist, that's how useless it is. Wait, what was I talking about? I forgot, I must have been talking about about something so pointless that it's existence was erased from all of time-space.
so.. the windows experience score targets scale up based on the hardware you have? So theoretically could someone score higher than you with a dual core setup?
Aren't the scores assigned to the stock parts? As far as I know overclocking won't change the values.
They're far from an important measure of performance anyway, your build is sounding good!
I'm thinking of updating my current HDD setup, I think I'm going to get a 128GB SSD and a 2TB WD.
For years I had C: for Windows, D: for Software, E: for personal data, F: for Downloads, G: for Games, and H: for temporal data, pagefile file and thinks like that, I want to simplify all of this.
I was thinking about the SSD for Windows and Software, and splitting the 2TB one in two partitions, one for data and the other for backup, or maybe getting an external HDD for backup...
How do you guys have everything set up?
I'm thinking of updating my current HDD setup, I think I'm going to get a 128GB SSD and a 2TB WD.
For years I had C: for Windows, D: for Software, E: for personal data, F: for Downloads, G: for Games, and H: for temporal data, pagefile file and thinks like that, I want to simplify all of this.
I was thinking about the SSD for Windows and Software, and splitting the 2TB one in two partitions, one for data and the other for backup, or maybe getting an external HDD for backup...
How do you guys have everything set up?
Having a separate partition on the same hard drive for backup accomplishes next to nothing - not sure why you would be going that route.
Personally I use a SSD for OS and programs, a fast 1TB HDD (Samsung F3) for games, and an older 1.5TB HDD (Seagate 7200.11) for data. Media files and backup data is stored on my ZFS/RAID-Z fileserver with 8TB of space.
SSD = OS and everything needing to be installed like choice games and other menial programs.
1 and 2TB HDD = Music, movies, pictures, files etc. Basically anything that does not directly need to be installed.
I think everything having to be installed should only be on the SSD. Will be moving to external storage soon if any Black Friday deals pop up and eliminate one or both of my internal HDDs. Also, I agree with gokieks on partitions. No more for me in the future. All they do is add time to transferring files from one place to another.