Totally agree. Never knew that till coworkers told me there was actually a big migration of Asians to the Caribbean way back. But still a big minority status compared to locals.Well to be totally fair there's this. Admittedly I bring it up because I literally worked with a Chinese guy who was from Jamaica. (Yes, he had a Jamaican accent.)
Hidden Racist, Crouching Nazi
You're comparing Japan to tatooine?"I'm not sure but I think this Tatooine place may not be real."
Right, they're willing to accept a game where one dude kills dozens of dudes as he takes over outposts...but they can't accept a 2017 Ford Escape Crossover? Why are they so retarded?If you question historical accuracy of a fictional game you are making something out of nothing and do not understand what historical accuracy means, especially when we are talking about a game where one dude kills dozens of dudes as he takes over outposts.
Is it racism? Maybe. Is it moronic to try to cite historical accuracy in this case? Yes. Was it a strange choice by Ubisoft to put a huge black dude in a a game set in feudal Japan? Absofuckinglutely. It's weird. Historical accuracy is only a piece of the weirdness.
Don't worry. I got your post, this topic is so heated it might get construed. Appreciate for noticing the comparisons.Make no mistake, I do agree with you. I hope I did not misrepresent my stance. My real goal was to show there was a right way to do it (SC) and a wrong way (AC) thank you for explaining it better than I could.
Black indeed... have you seen the size of his gun?Black protagonist in ancient Japan eating watermelons aside, how about this:
It's 2025 and we're still getting lazy shit like that in video games, come on developers.
As someone who liked the series, I criticized it for the unpolished aspect - it appears to be way better now.
As a professionally trained historian, I criticized not the historical accuracy but the insane, annoying campaigh to present it as super accurate when it is clear that Yasuke as a historical figure existed but we know little about him. However, they hammered a scholar whose book is half fiction and called anyone pointing out the inconsistencies in the narrative a racist.
Just have the non native protagonist chopping of the heads of native women, what could go wrong?
I wonder if they went the whole hog so you can do the same for children too?
Well, ubisoft has been making shitty games for almost 15 yrs now, still, they sell, if it failed, though I think AC is too big to fail, the would just blame the weak sales on the DEI shit, and still make another soulless game.Read the article.
The crux of it is that people blame game failures on whether they are woke/DEI or not, in this case the AC: Shadows is woke/DEI because one of the protagonists, who you dont have to play is Black.
Now lets just say Shadows actually sells well......we will stop hearing about Yasukes historical accuracy.......if it fails?
Thats the last time we get a Black protagonist from Ubisoft because its obviously his fault the game aint it.
And Baldurs Gate 3, Hades, Hogwartz, Undertale etc etc.
For every Go Woke Go Broke game theres a woke game that didnt fail but we just dont talk about how woke it is because it no longer fits the narrative.
Even dumber. Watch Skill Ups 5 hr playtest.If you question historical accuracy of a fictional game you are making something out of nothing and do not understand what historical accuracy means, especially when we are talking about a game where one dude kills dozens of dudes as he takes over outposts.
Is it racism? Maybe. Is it moronic to try to cite historical accuracy in this case? Yes. Was it a strange choice by Ubisoft to put a huge black dude in a a game set in feudal Japan? Absofuckinglutely. It's weird. Historical accuracy is only a piece of the weirdness.