twilo99
Member
is it confirmed . the 8gb 5060?
No.
is it confirmed . the 8gb 5060?
Yeah 8gb
Huh lol
i guess its wait and seeI thought we don't have confirmed specs for the new stuff...
Is there any reason why you don't see these cheaper cards in pre-built PC builds? You only see AMD/Nvidia.
i guess its wait and see
That's why I think it's a mistake to skip the high end - even if you think it isn't going to sell that well - just as an advertisement of the brand. Pretty much every game on PC is shown on a 4090 and people see that and go buy a 4060 not fully understanding the gulf that the 9 to 6 represents.I said that earlier. Nvidia runs 90% of the GPU market simply by name alone. It's why the 1650Ti isn't $80 right now. People would buy that old card before they'd touch an AMD card. Most people don't even realize there is a difference.
For Intel to break in, Nvidia will have to royally shit the bed.
It's known info 5060 is 128bitI mean some of the leaks are pretty solid I guess but I usually wait for Nvidia to "confirm"
Because the majority PC gamers now a days don't care about maxing out the graphics, they just want to play the game at an affordable price.That's why I think it's a mistake to skip the high end - even if you think it isn't going to sell that well - just as an advertisement of the brand. Pretty much every game on PC is shown on a 4090 and people see that and go buy a 4060 not fully understanding the gulf that the 9 to 6 represents.
But I think they buy low end Nvidia because all they see is games being ran on Nvidia 40xx.Because the majority PC gamers now a days don't care about maxing out the graphics, they just want to play the game at an affordable price.
And let's be honest, people barely have the $500 - $600 for a 4070(Ti), let alone the $2,000 or more for a 4090. They go to get their graphics card, see that price and go directly to whats more affordable, but still has nvidia's name on it.
Again, the top seven used cards may be all nvidia but none of them are high tier cards. The only high tier card in the top 10 is the 3070. More people still use the GTX 1060 then use an RTX 4070. More people use the iGPU on their AMD and Intel CPU than own a 4090.
So I can't agree with you on that point. The type of people who frequent places like GAF may want to highest end card to get those high end graphics, but average consumer just wants the game to run, even if they have to run it at 900p low settings, they're happy that it's running at all.
Breaking into the GPU market at this point isn't showing off what you have at the highest end, but literally just trying to show that you exist outside of nvidia. The price is a good start but people could see it and go "I can buy this $250 Intel card or I can buy a card with nvidia's name on it for $150" and end up with a GTX 1650, the fourth most used graphic card after five years since it's released that nvidia has discontinued.
Some comparision
Some comparision
I've got a question - is the primary purpose of upscaling to be so that you can run raytracing at higher resolutions at a high frame rate? Example - why go with dlss if you have hardware that can run 120fps with raytracing off other than to be able to turn it on? Sorry if this is a dumb question, I've never been a high end PC gamer.
Might have been a good alternative as they were going for sub $300 several months ago but stock of 6700XT have largely dried up now.
XeSS 1.3 on native hardware is also way better than FSR 3.1 in terms of quality. And Arc will have better RT performance.
12GB n48 is way faster, than B580The 8700xt price point will be very interesting...
My friend got 6750 last week, there no 6700XT anymore.were going for sub $300 several months ago but stock of 6700XT have largely dried up now.
12GB n48 is way faster, than B580
True Intel has to take drastic measures to get people to buy their GPU's and build market and mind share. And are willing to cut their margins in to do so. AMD doesn't really have to but time will tell if they want to compete or just go with Nvidia's pricing, minus several dollars. They'll definately try keep their flagship in the lineup the most competitive against Nvidia. Which should be in between the 5070 and 5070Ti.Right, I really think that the B580 will be impossible to beat at that price point, unless AMD also don't care about making money
Doubt they will sell N48 (8700XT?) for under $400. If rumors are true and full Navi 48 performs like a 4080 then they'll milk that for all its worth. I'd say they'd do the 8800 XT for $649. And perhaps $499-549 for the 8700 XT.12GB n48 is way faster, than B580
My friend got 6750 last week, there no 6700XT anymore.
There 3 version N48Doubt they will sell N48 (8700XT?) for under $400.
AMD will compter with NV. Intel for now aloneAMD doesn't really have to but time will tell if they want to compete or just go with Nvidia's pricing, minus several dollars
Only see two rumored for N48. XT and XTX - https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-confirms-radeon-rx-8600-and-rx-8800-rdna4-gpu-seriesThere 3 version N48
12GB/16GB/16GB and one N44
They're drunk. N44 is 8gb, not 12GBOnly see two rumored for N48. XT and XTX
Intel is progressing with the development of its Battlemage-generation graphics card, known internally as the BMG-G31. On December 3, the company announced two new models in the Battlemage series: the Intel Arc B580 with 12GB of memory and the Intel Arc B570 with 10GB of memory, both built on the BMG21 architecture. The Intel Arc B570 10GB model is set to be available for purchase on January 16. Import and export data have highlighted the importance of the BMG-G31 chip in Intel's Battlemage generation. Records show that Intel exported a shipment of graphics cards featuring the BMG-G31 chip from Malaysia to India.
This suggests that Intel is focusing on developing higher-end GPUs within the Battlemage series. The BMG-G31 is expected to provide better processing power and improved energy efficiency, meeting the needs of current graphics-intensive applications and gaming.
This decision will likely consider the upcoming product launches from competitors like AMD and NVIDIA during the same period. By timing its release strategy in this way, Intel aims to position its BMG-G31-based graphics cards competitively in terms of performance and features within the changing and challenging GPU market.
There's dozens of us!All it takes for that is a dozen buyers.
Oh man, I don’t know what to do. Should I buy the 4080 or wait until NVIDIA announces new cards?
That Intel engineer is really good at dumbing it down for a pleb like me.
Is there any reason why you don't see these cheaper cards in pre-built PC builds? You only see AMD/Nvidia.
These price points are pretty good and if they lead to cheaper pre-builds, they'll probably entice more people.
No worries. Gamers were clueless enough to buy "green card no matter what" for a while now. 3050 vs 6600 story is particularly notable. Slower, more power hungry and more expensive card by The Filthy Green outsold AMD's amazing 6600 4 to 1.Shame it's just the two low end cards. They'll massacre AMD at the price range
Do you do anything else than bitch and moan about NVIDIA? Jesus Christ, you're insufferable.No worries. Gamers were clueless enough to buy "green card no matter what" for a while now. 3050 vs 6600 story is particularly notable. Slower, more power hungry and more expensive card by The Filthy Green outsold AMD's amazing 6600 4 to 1.
He’s gone unhinged and rogue. He may need to be put down if Intel doesn’t get their shit together.@Leonidas approval process shouldn't take long