SuperPac
Member
But the 4 isn't.
The iPhone 4 is 11 days away from being 2 years old. Came out on June 24, 2010.
But the 4 isn't.
Depends on whether the Google Maps app includes it or not.Hope somebody hacks Apple, now that they have taken away an advertised feature with streetview.
Why does every thread need to de-evolve into a Android vs. Apple bitchfest. Both platforms have their PRO's and CON's; neither is the outright best. Get over it already.
Back away from the ledge this is not a thread about Android.
Glad to hear it. I don't need music downloaded on my phone. Streaming is fine.Nice to see they've added iTunes match streaming in iOS 6. Seemed silly not to be able to stream to portable devices. Lot of defenders were against me when I brought this up in a previous topic, good to see it was a valid issue.
Depends on whether the Google Maps app includes it or not.
Don't upgrade your phone. You get to keep streetview.
I don't have huge moral issues with Apple holding back features. It's the justification of it as anything but holding back features I don't like.
Don't upgrade your phone. You get to keep streetview.
Guess you have no idea how much proc. power/data goes into handling siri requests. You have to have stateful sessions between many devices simultaneously as well as handling compressed voice files during these sessions. I don't know why its ridiculous.
I'm glad you're here to tell us what opinions we shouldn't have.
It sucks that iphone 4 and ipad 2 users cant get Siri. That doesn't mean it's 100% without question holding back features to force upgrades.
Guess what? You might be wrong or I might be wrong. Without evidence or proof, we're all speculating. Get over yourself.
I'm glad you're here to tell us what opinions we shouldn't have.
It sucks that iphone 4 and ipad 2 users cant get Siri. That doesn't mean it's 100% without question holding back features to force upgrades.
Guess what? You might be wrong or I might be wrong. Without evidence or proof, we're all speculating. Get over yourself.
I thought people were talking about Siri. What's your experience with Siri been like on your iPad?It's not speculating to say an iPhone 4 has the capabilities to do turn by turn. I don't even understand why you're arguing this point. You can like Apple products without having to defend everything they do, fyi.
How did we get on turn by turn?It's not speculating to say an iPhone 4 has the capabilities to do turn by turn. I don't even understand why you're arguing this point. You can like Apple products without having to defend everything they do, fyi.
I thought people were talking about Siri. What's your experience with Siri been like on your iPad?
Its ridiculous because apple has more money than god in the bank and this (should be) solely a hardware problem. Scaling a service like this should be incredibly simple if it was architected properly.
The fact that they haven't expanded Siri to other devices is a marketing ploy, the fact that Siri still isn't reliable in terms of speed and service on devices that support it points to poor execution and has me somewhat worried about their new mapping service.
How long have you been using it?The point is if they'll hold back turn by turn for no reason, why wouldn't they hold back Siri for no reason?
It's an OK novelty I suppose. I told it to set a reminder and it did it. I guess that's kinda cool.
The point is if they'll hold back turn by turn for no reason, why wouldn't they hold back Siri for no reason?
It's an OK novelty I suppose. I told it to set a reminder and it did it. I guess that's kinda cool.
How long have you been using it?
How long have you been using it?
Why did they hold Siri back for so long? Why do they continue to hold it back from new iPads until iOS 6 ships in the fall? There's no reason except to push people to buy new devices in October when iOS 6 is officially public, right?Since I installed iOS 6 about...17 hours ago?
No, nothing got announced. I doubt you wouldn't have noticed if it were announced.
Why did they hold Siri back for so long? Why do they continue to hold it back from iPads until iOS 6 ships in the fall? There's no reason except to push people to buy new devices in October when iOS 6 is officially public, right?
I'm a little alarmed at how inconsistent the UI is becoming on iPhone with the stock apps alone. You've got the default blue UI that Safari and most other apps still use, Settings still uses it too, but now the status bar also turns blue in Settings (but not Safari), then you've got the new store apps whose UI is shiny black, and finally Maps and Music are now silver like on the iPad.
WTF are they thinking? I really wish the rumour that they were switching the iPhone UI to match the iPad's silver was true, but even if regardless, I would've appreciated if they kept it consistent.
So no iPhone 5 this year? :/
Not everything boils down to a marketing ploy.To give the current iPad an extra bulletpoint for the Christmas marketing campaign? I'm not sure what you're trying to argue. Apple adding a feature to a current product doesn't disprove they're holding back features from old products.
I'm a little alarmed at how inconsistent the UI is becoming on iPhone with the stock apps alone. You've got the default blue UI that Safari and most other apps still use, Settings still uses it too, but now the status bar also turns blue in Settings (but not Safari). Then you've got the new store apps whose UI is shiny black, and finally Maps and Music are now silver like on the iPad.
WTF are they thinking? I really wish the rumour that they were switching the iPhone UI to match the iPad's silver was true, but regardless, I would've appreciated if they kept it consistent.
That's what I thought initially, but it doesn't make sense why they'd bother making the status bar blue in Settings if they're moving away from it soon.Could be a matter of them in transition. They may be moving to a UI like the new App Store looks and just haven't spread it system wide yet.
There are already inconsistencies with the Blue/Black status bar at the top across different apps.
I don't think it is necessarily a marketing ploy.
History has shown that Apple have always been a bit poor on the Internet services side of things. As you say yourself, maybe poor execution. A slow expansion is probably Apple's solution to their past woes.
Will Apple ever give older machines Siri? I would think it's in Apple's best interest that if they COULD give it to older devices cost effectively (more devices supported is more devices SUPPORTED), they would. There,s other ways to make money than just incentivise upgrades, but In the case of Siri, it probably just fell on that side of the line. Like the cost of implementing it for iPhone 4, including the development resources and support, and increased server and support for that wasn't worth the 'goodwill' of older users.
But it's good we're having this conversation. Sometimes Apple does change its mind given enough uproar.
No, I don't think so. It's all tied to iMessages which is an iOS/OS X service only. Same thing with FaceTime where someone calls your iPhone from their iPhone, you can answer from you iPad or Mac.Question for iOS6 experts: If somebody not using an iPhone texts me, and I'm on my Mac, can I reply from my Mac?
If so, it's honestly a megaton feature nobody is talking about.
Nope.Question for iOS6 experts: If somebody not using an iPhone texts me, and I'm on my Mac, can I reply from my Mac?
If so, it's honestly a megaton feature nobody is talking about.
Nope.
They have to be using an Apple platform with the messaging feature. Would be crazy if you could reply to normal text messages :lol
On the iPad it only allows me to add additional email addresses to receive at. On the iPhone, the number is there and greyed out as it is in iOS 5.I set both of my devices up as new and was prompted to do that in the setup.
But look under Messages and Facetime in Settings for "Receive at". Hopefully that helps.
On the iPad it only allows me to add additional email addresses to receive at. On the iPhone, the number is there and greyed out as it is in iOS 5.
Maybe they've added the option in the setup screen but not yet to the Settings app.
You're not texting her through iMessages but through Messages. It's not the same. iMessages is only between Apple ID users and Apple ID users who have a number linked to it, and it uses data. Messages (or like I call it, "normal" text messages) is what you exchange with every type of phone, no matter brand or OS.It should be possible, even if they had to implement it as Mac talks to iPhone which talks to friend.
The only person I text extensively is my girlfriend and she has an Android phone.
IMessages work through instant messaging protocols, not through SMS, but it's disguised as an SMS-like service to the end user. It's actually instant messaging with persistent presence. Think of it like AIM or MSN Messenger except with your status is always set to Available whenever you can be reached.
You can't message non-Apple devices because it's not really related to SMS at all.
No doubt it would be a seriously killer feature but I don't see it happening soon for some reason.It should be possible, even if they had to implement it as Mac talks to iPhone which talks to friend.
The only person I text extensively is my girlfriend and she has an Android phone.
Apple really pissed off the carriers with iMessage. Sending free SMS messages to non-Apple devices might start World War 3.