brilliance.jpg
lol well done. Exactly what I thought of.
Are we not allowed to post a link to that?
brilliance.jpg
First, please tell me how Vita games affect the PS3?
Second, why would they push the Vita when they are pushing the PS4? With your logic, wouldn't pushing the Vita affect first-party/third-party games for the PS4?
Third, where are people going to get this money to afford a PS4 + PSV + PS4 games + PSV games?
Fourth, handheld gaming is not growing, smartphone gaming is growing. This affects both the Vita and the 3DS.
Fifth, a developer could make a "PS3-quality" game on the PS4 with most likely the same budget. One does not have to break the bank to make a PS4 game.
Sixth, why is it left to Vita if PS360 games hurt next-gen sales?
I'm gonna state this one thing which really did not come across your mind when you made that post. Developers and Publishers will STILL SUPPORT THE PS360 after next-gen hits with CROSS-GEN GAMES. They will continue to do so until they see it isn't worth the investment and that will probably be until a year and maybe a few months into the release of the next-gen consoles.
They don't need to, but everyone wishes they did. It really is bullshit towards investors.
1-Advertising vita games [which you lot already have on ps3] lead to less ps3 sales
2-It affects it less than PS3, due to PS4 being so much better [I think some people are undermining how big the change will be in a while]
3-Not everyone has to buy everything, like I said, the option for handheld is there, it's not essential, it only adds to it. Bundles will help and I'm sure further pricecuts are planned. PSVita games also become cheaper alternatives to PS4 games.
4-Smarthphone gaming grew, is it still? I don't think so. But it grew SHITLOADS. And smartphones are handheld gaming. This changes peoples attitudes towards gaming in general given the reach it had. It has made people even more bored of current gen due to its convenience. Not everyone, but guess how many gamers have an iOS or Android device capable of gaming and play it. Quite a few I bet. It hasn't grown to its potential as the games, price and marketing haven't been the most it can be - people always say it has no games, and it's missing even notable first patty. Sony not pushing it as much as they should might have some affect on this I'd say.
5-As time goes on, standards will change. We will expect more and more physics features, which will need licensing. We will expect better animation, lighting you name it. Everything will cost. Bigger publishers are going to take even less of the chance. And they have to push it. To separate it from current gen, which is dying.
Handheld gaming is a way out. It allows you to put a decent game with a reasonable budget and charge a reasonable amount, without being compared to other AAA games that outclass it in every way. When it's portable, convenience becomes a big factor, that's why so many played angry birds, because who cares, I'm on a bus, or in my bed, or whatever.
6-PS360 hurt next gen so what does it leave, Wii U, 3DS, Vita. Wii U should get a couple like this, especially with the gamepad, so should 3DS. But the type of games Vita gamers want, they'll get em.
I'm sorry the last thing didn't come across but I did state many times that there will be a phasing out (maybe in edits) and that it would only happen when the people buying games at the moment start buying games next-gen (the majority of the people).
So it will first be multiports, maybe for a while too. Then vita upscales on ps3. Then Ps4 and Vita only. PS3 becomes a cheap last of us, wonderbook, puppateer, lbp/netflix player.
You realise there is this thing Sony has called crossbuy.
If Sony manages to get GTA and MonsterHunter, the Vita will be alright.
The numbers wouldn't be great, but they would be alright.
Best Case Scenario for 2013:
Killzone, Tearaway, GranTurismo6, AssassinsCreed: RisingPhoenix, Rayman Legends, FIFA14, PES14, WarriorsLair, Minecraft, pricecut for EU/US by the time those releases start coming. Another Uncharted an another GravityRush announced at E3 for the holiday season. MonsterHunter, GTA and GodOfWar announced for 2014.
New model with better shoulder buttons and TV out.
Attractiv Vita-Ps4 bundle; RemotePlay works perfectly. Gaikai streams Ps1, Ps2 and Ps3 games to the Vita.
WorstCase Scenario for 2013:
Killzone and Tearaway turn out mediocre, WarriorsLair canceled, GranTursimo not for Vita, AssassinsCreed: Rising Phoenix 3DS exclusiv, Rayman Legends, FIFA and PES not on Vita, no price cut. Indie hype ends. BENDs Vita project canceled. GravityRush2 Ps4 exclusive., nothing announced for 2014. RemotePlay with Ps4 buggy and useless.
GTA doesn't in anyway mean that Vita will be okay. GTA will not help in Japan at all, and on top of that while it might cause a small boost it will NOT save it (get it to decent sales month after month) in North America, just as the three PSP games couldn't save that system either.
Also even the smallest chance that Capcom decides to risk Monster Hunter install split, no way they do it until long after MH4 is out and the bulk of sales and hype have noce chance at being stolen by a game that isn't even out.
want a cookie for this thoughtful reply? if you are going to call what i said idiotic atleast back it up to why you think so. i am expecting another smart reply like " i don't need to" or "ain't got no time for that gif". i am giving you ammunition ahead of time just in case you have nothing good.
like i said it is a what if scenario. i like how all of you are taking that what if scenario and trying to make an argument on how it is not possible. i am not saying it will or it will not. i mean who predicted monster hunter would move to 3da after its massive success on psp? i mean they could have easily reused some assets and made the next monster hunter on psp and added a prettier version for vita like god eater 2 is doing and still be fine. maybe they will do a vita/ps3 combo to offset the install base differnce with 3ds and have a better sell ratio in the west with online integration on ps3. all i am saying it is not impossible to make an argument either way. we will see in due time if any of this materializes or if sony is going to just accept vita is dead and get out of the market like a lot of you keep implying.
GTA wouldn't do shit for Japan, but for the West.
And do you consider the PSP a failure or why do you thing GTA didn't "save" the PSP?
I think Capcom couldn't give two shits about what platform their games are on al long as the sales are good. The reason why Capcom is on the 3DS now is that they wanted to start their new MonsterHunter games and 3DS was there and PsVita wasn't. That was way befor 3DS did well and also way befor Vita did bad. Its also much less work to make a MH on 3DS, its comparable to the MHs on PSP, if it werent for the shadows there'd be no chance to tell MH4 apart from MHP3rd. On the Vita there would be more work to do for Capcom, even if they choose lazy mode and would just upscale it like they did with MH3U on the WiiU.
If Sony manages to get GTA and MonsterHunter, the Vita will be alright.
The numbers wouldn't be great, but they would be alright.
Best Case Scenario for 2013:
Killzone, Tearaway, GranTurismo6, AssassinsCreed: RisingPhoenix, Rayman Legends, FIFA14, PES14, WarriorsLair, Minecraft, pricecut for EU/US by the time those releases start coming. Another Uncharted an another GravityRush announced at E3 for the holiday season. MonsterHunter, GTA and GodOfWar announced for 2014.
New model with better shoulder buttons and TV out.
Attractiv Vita-Ps4 bundle; RemotePlay works perfectly. Gaikai streams Ps1, Ps2 and Ps3 games to the Vita.
WorstCase Scenario for 2013:
Killzone and Tearaway turn out mediocre, WarriorsLair canceled, GranTursimo not for Vita, AssassinsCreed: Rising Phoenix 3DS exclusiv, Rayman Legends, FIFA and PES not on Vita, no price cut. Indie hype ends. BENDs Vita project canceled. GravityRush2 Ps4 exclusive., nothing announced for 2014. RemotePlay with Ps4 buggy and useless.
If Sony manages to get GTA and MonsterHunter, the Vita will be alright.
If Sony manages to get GTA and MonsterHunter
.
You know the year the PS3 came out, what were the predictions like for the PSP? Anyone know how to find out?
can someone make a thread like make your prediction on what they think will be the fate of the vita? this way we can look back someday when the vita is discontinued and see who was wrong. i have no problem making my prediction and admitting when i am wrong and eat crow. it is just tiring to see week in week out people saying the same things over and over. i guess the same thing can be done for the wii u because those are the two that are dominating these threads nowadays.
You know the year the PS3 came out, what were the predictions like for the PSP? Anyone know how to find out?
You know the year the PS3 came out, what were the predictions like for the PSP? Anyone know how to find out?
Sony's initial forecast for FY06 (ending Mar 31/07) for the PSP was 12M. They cut the forecast to 9M halfway through the year, and they finished the year shipping 9.6M units.
Clearly waiting for PS3 to take off so PSP graphix would be more relevant.
Sony's initial forecast for FY06 (ending Mar 31/07) for the PSP was 12M. They cut the forecast to 9M halfway through the year, and they finished the year shipping 9.6M units.
I know it doesn't make much sense, but I think most of those HD Collections would have done better if released separately on 3DS or Vita.
For example, I think Kingdom Hearts alone could've sold those 200k units on Vita or Yakuza 1 better than the 42k the Yakuza HD Collection did in the first week. And development costs shouldn't have been much higher.
A gif!
You forgot the fact that the PSP hurt the PS2's sales during those ~2 years.
Thank you. I should have asked earlier but for the 2 years before and after as well? Or a link? Sorry.
lets say end of next year 149.99 vita and monster hunter game? are people going to still doubt that the system is not going to sell? now i know this is a what if scenario and people are going to jump on me for saying i am living in fantasy land and this won't happen etc... but you have to admit it is not out of the realm of possibility. this possible scenario is for people that are like so sure that vita is dead and is never making a comeback.
You have to go through their financial reports. Here's a link for the FY06 forecast - PDF
Go to Page 7 for the PSP hardware.
It's a little tricky back then though, because that was when Sony was still reporting production shipments instead of the more traditional retail shipments.
In any case, the PSP had 2.97M production shipments in FY04 (ending Mar 31/05). It had 14.06M production shipments in FY05 (ending Mar 31/06). And then they forecast 12M production shipments for FY06 (ending Mar 31/07), and then they reduced that forecast to 9M production shipments for the year. The PSP ended up with 9.6M traditional retail shipments for that year.
Edit - I'd have to go back and double-check the number, but I believe that the actual retail shipments for FY04+FY05 ended up being 14.1M units LTD through Mar 31/06. The production shipments for that timeframe were 17.03M - so it seems like Sony kept 2.5-3M units sitting in their warehouses for most of those first 2-3 years of the PSP lifespan.
so it seems like Sony kept 2.5-3M units sitting in their warehouses for most of those first 2-3 years of the PSP lifespan
They seemingly wanted to delay pushing those PSP units until the PS2 was closer to done and PS3 was out?
Are you a real person?
Wait. GTA will save the Vita?
I don't buy that in the slightest. PSP got multiple GTAs. Like three or four?
Two original ones, and a port of the DS game. And the PSP sold something like 77 million units world wide.
I'm not saying GTA will save the Vita, especially in Japan, but the first LCS sold a couple million, I believe. VCS didn't do as well, but it was undercut by LCS being ported to the PS2 a few months later for half the price.
When it's sitting their [sic] already, it becomes a different matter than if they had the choice of selling it easily.
Otherwise, what?
They seemingly wanted to delay pushing those PSP units until the PS2 was closer to done and PS3 was out?
No. Sony was trying to rip the handheld crown out of Nintendo's hands - they weren't delaying anything based on the timelines of the PS2/PS3. That's just the inventory level that they kept for those first few years of the platform. Based on the sales at the time, that never would have been more than 3-6 months worth of sales, so it wasn't anything worrisome, and it allowed them to keep the manufacturing lines humming without too much slowdown. Having to reduce and then later boost the manufacturing quotas adds costs. And a 2-3M inventory isn't a problem for a system that's selling 10-15M units per year.
PSP actually outsold the DS for the most part until the DS lite, the mid section of it's lifetime was most probably the realisation that it wasn't going to outsell the DS but most probably not that'd be discontinued etc.
15 was for 2 years I thought? Seemed like half the inventory in the beginning.
Either way, there was a dip when the ps3 came out and a rise up again afterwards (I assume...).
It changed pretty dramatically half-way through though, maybe they are accommodating for that in this years plans. Natural when focus will be on the PS4 during launch given the somewhat shared userbase.
Well, I can see that you're sticking to your "this is all part of Sony's master plan for Vita" theory - so have at it.
What. Unless I'm remembering completely wrong the DS was winning everywhere, even before the Lite. Granted the gap was small enough that thinking it could be overturned wouldn't be crazy, but unless you have numbers to back this up I'm fairly sure the DS was ahead even before it got the Lite.
Hey, if it fits.
What else would cause such a significant revision, that I'm still assuming was only temporary.
Haven't Sony's Vita forecasts been consistently dropping? How could that possibly be a positive?
Because they're secretly waiting until after the PS4 launches for people to become nostalgic about sub-PS3 level graphics and then sell them the Vita on the back of that nostalgia in droves, part of their master plan. Duh.
^ Does it sound that crazy?
Let's say you're a father and your child is a student. They take a class and say "I'm definitely going to get 100% on this!"
But they come back with 40%, a failing grade. They apologize, and instead promise that they'll be able to get a 90%.
But they come back with 40%, a failing grade. They apologize, and instead promise that they'll be able to get a 80%.
At what point do you imagine that your child, without more help, will be able to pass the course? Do you believe they have a strategy to improve their grades?
The strategy was on the previous pages, the support comes when it's going to help them the most. Like everyone says, there is limited money.
Then it should've come a long time ago.
And yes, your theory sounds crazy and non-realistic.