Chezzymann
Member
Seems like its okay from the scores. Problem is that its competing with a lot of really great games coming out right now, and if you have to chose between an okay game and a great game you're probably not gonna get this.
I think it depends on what one liked/disliked about the first. If you thought "I love these mechanics just give me an open world to collect shit in and do time trials" then this is exactly what you wanted from a sequel to the first. If you thought "I love these mechanics and the tight design of the game, but I wish combat was just not even in the mix and I hope the sequel doesn't dilute the focus by adding open world padding" then this sequel is probably not what you wanted.
Reviews do mention that if you loved the first, you will like this one as well.
Sounds solid. Excited.
How do you beat that final level server room on anything but Easy without combat? o_o Room was filled with armored gunners wielding LMG's..Doubtful
You could beat the entire first game without engaging in combat even once
Is that true of catalyst?
How do you beat that final level server room on anything but Easy without combat? o_o Room was filled with armored gunners wielding LMG's..
I think people are forgetting the reviews of the first game. This is reviewing better so far.
Mixed like the first game, which I loved.
¯\_(ツ_/¯
Day one.
Wait, did people actually expect this to get more positive reviews?
I loved the first one but come on, it's an inherently niche thing and was always going to get middling reviews.
Definitely picking up that CE when the prices drop though.
Same. It's not 10/10 OMG GREATEST GAME EVAR!, but it certainly sounds like a polarizing game that stumbles at times but when it's in its groove, it really soars...
... which is EXACTLY what the reviews for the first Mirror's Edge were like.
I don't know where the idea is coming from that the first Mirror's Edge got reviews that were just as mixed as Catalyst. That simply isn't the truth.
http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/mirrors-edge-2008
http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/mirrors-edge-catalyst
The first Mirror's Edge is at a 79 on Metacritic. That's a full 9 points higher than Catalyst. Catalyst also only has 17 reviews in, and generally scores tend to drop a bit as more reviews come in.
By any measurement, the reviews have been a disappointment thus far.
There are PLENTY of low - very low - scores for the original too. It's a polarizing game. Lots of 7s, 6s, and 5s. Variety outright hated the original (45/100). Even the sites I followed that liked it gave it merely "average" reviews, mostly in the 7s.
So if it's a "huge" difference between a 71 (currently) and 79, I guess I just don't see it.
It's a huge difference.
Imagine if Uncharted 4 dropped 8 or 9 points from Uncharted 3 and sat at an 83 or 84 MC. These forums would be burning to the ground.
A sequel is supposed to improve upon it's predecessor. If the scores were within 2-3 points, I could see. But 8-9 points? That's a huge drop.
I think some people here are putting a bit too much stock into arbitrary review scores...
Run a circle around the room, letting the Gunners destroy the servers, run to the exit.How do you beat that final level server room on anything but Easy without combat? o_o Room was filled with armored gunners wielding LMG's..
Review threads are where people trot out the "but do reviews really matter?" and the "its still a good score" arguments every time a game doesnt get a 9 or 10.This is a review thread. We're here to discuss reviews.
This is a review thread. We're here to discuss reviews.
The original didn't have any problems though, unless you count the serviceable story as a "problem".
Not surprised lol. It just didn't seem all that interesting with open worldish and the always online bs.
The reception seems more or less in line with the original's, which I loved.
I'm in.