Perfectly suitable response from someone with Resident Evil avatar.
rofl *thumbs up*
Perfectly suitable response from someone with Resident Evil avatar.
Starship Troopers is a more successful version of, funnily enough, what Sucker Punch was trying to do, which was to be a brutal satire of what it is pretending to be. Starship Troopers is seemingly a fascist pro-war movie but its actually a condemnation of fascist pro-war movies. Sucker Punch seems to be a contextless-sexualized-female-eye-candy-excused-by-violence-making-them-"empowered" film when its actually meant to be saying very loud and clear "no its still objectification, its still essentially a strip tease, even if you show them wielding a sword"
I feel like anyone who cares too much about meanings and metaphors misunderstands movies.
Aren't the bugs in Starship Troopers meant to represent AIDS or communists or something? I recall reading those theories a long time back.
I kinda thought this stuff about 2001 as I was watching it.
Guess that kinda makes me feel special![]()
Aren't the bugs in Starship Troopers meant to represent AIDS or communists or something? I recall reading those theories a long time back.
For those asking about Sucker Punch interpretation
Why you are wrong about sucker punch part 1
WHy you are wrong about sucker punch part 2
Moviebob attempts to explain Sucker Punch.
I Have never watched the movie and cannot comment on the movie itself but he does a decent enough job explaining one of the interpretations that has been mentioned already in this thread.
I'm gonna sound pretentious as fuck, but that "deep interpretation" was incredibly obvious from the start...
I don't know as i didn't watch the movie but i thought that was part of that videos point was he was surprised so many people (Especially critics) didn't see it at all.
in the early minutes, Jim Halsey, the main characters, falls asleep on the wheel and wakes up just in time to avoid crashing against a truck. moments later, he picks-up the Hitcher and sets the events of the movie in motion.
now, i always saw it as Jim dying in the car crash and the Hitcher being a manifestation of the Grim Reaper, Death, toying with Jim's soul. it's the reason why the Hitcher is constantly teasing Jim to hurt him and stop him, cause he knows he can't be stopped. when Jim "kills" the Hitcher at the end, the Hitcher already destroyed everyone Jim came in contact with since meeting him and the movie ends with Jim alone, in the middle of nowhere with no one in sight.
I think I have a blind spot for recognizing metaphors and underlying themes on my own. Most of the movies' themes listed in this thread were things I'd never even thought to consider, even the ones that people are saying were really obvious. Like, the nazis cheering for American deaths as the audience cheered for nazi deaths? Totally lost on me until I read this thread. Same for Napoleon Dynamite, 12 Monkeys, and almost all the rest. The only one I did pick up on beforehand was 500 Days of Summer.
For those asking about Sucker Punch interpretation
Why you are wrong about sucker punch part 1
WHy you are wrong about sucker punch part 2
Moviebob attempts to explain Sucker Punch.
I Have never watched the movie and cannot comment on the movie itself but he does a decent enough job explaining one of the interpretations that has been mentioned already in this thread.
I seriously can't believe that...
The movie makes a freaking "swooosh IMGOINGINSIDETHECHARACTERMIND" sound everytime the action sequences start, the character even closes their eyes and the camera makes a zoom in.
And there's a lot of sexual (and rape) innuendos and lust from the male characters toward the females. I can't believe people missed that... it was my first reading... and I'm dumb as a brick analyzing movies.
And well, about the "criticism towards the audience", I guess that didn't take me by surprise, because I went to the movie with certain "shame"... being a 30 year old dude watching those girls in those outfits, I felt like awkward and unconfortable the whole movie :/
and don't get me wrong, not in the "gay" way... more like in a "pedophile" way.
I already told told you guys Signs was about demons, in that alien invasion thread, I didn't get any praise for my amazing insight, ya poo brains
with how slow and deliberate that movie is I think everything was supposed to think that stuff as they're watching it.
Looking at the IMDB message boards is just depressing sometimes. Now matter how obvious something is in a movie, it will inevitably fly right over the head of a large amount of people.
Some of the worst I can remember off hand is the board for the Josie and the Pussycats movie. There are tons of posts about how bad the product placement is in the movie, and how the director should be ashamed of themselves.
Aren't the bugs in Starship Troopers meant to represent AIDS or communists or something? I recall reading those theories a long time back.
There is no theorizing necessary, it is very clear that the arachnids are an allegory for communism. They are intelligent, tool-wielding and technologically advanced, as a species. They use beam weapons, rather than swarming melee attacks, and have spaceships.
The differences between this and the movie are mainly because the film wasn't supposed to be a Starship Troopers film, it was supposed to be "Bug Hunt at Outpost 9", and the ST license was attached during development.
I can't believe that the movie "signs" is so misunderstood (by evidence from these past few pages). The point M. Night was trying to make was plain as day. Unfortunatley, many people didn't give the film much thought.
I doubt it, just because someone has a theory doesn't mean that's all they believe. Besides, film is art. It's meant to be interpreted and have an effect on people. Analyzing what you consume teaches you critical thinking and creativity. Especially as someone who creates films or art in general, stuff like this is important because this is an exploration into how people understand the world around them. Also, it's fun to have an imagination.
I think it benefits from a few rewatches. I recently saw it again and the spiritual aspect was pretty strong, it hardly seemed about aliens at all.
I don't know that I agree with those generous interpretations of Sucker Punch. I know a few people who worked on the film, and they, at least, thought they were making a big sexy video game of a movie. The rapey misogyny of the movie probably is just a bad consequence of trying to make something titillating.
It's like INCEPTION, but without the hand-holding and with cool stuff to look at.
A deeper interpretation does not a better movie make.
I actually feel the opposite about his early movies, I still rewatch 6th Sense, Unbreakable, Signs and the Village. I honestly enjoy those movies and the atmosphere they create,
Something happened after that though, I stopped enjoying his output.
I don't know that I agree with those generous interpretations of Sucker Punch. I know a few people who worked on the film, and they, at least, thought they were making a big sexy video game of a movie. The rapey misogyny of the movie probably is just a bad consequence of trying to make something titillating.
I thought this one was fairly heavy handed. Surprised more people didn't catch on.I can't believe that the movie "signs" is so misunderstood (by evidence from these past few pages). The point M. Night was trying to make was plain as day. Unfortunatley, many people didn't give the film much thought.
I seriously can't believe that...
The movie makes a freaking "swooosh IMGOINGINSIDETHECHARACTERMIND" sound everytime the action sequences start, the character even closes their eyes and the camera makes a zoom in.
And there's a lot of sexual (and rape) innuendos and lust from the male characters toward the females. I can't believe people missed that... it was my first reading... and I'm dumb as a brick analyzing movies.
And well, about the "criticism towards the audience", I guess that didn't take me by surprise, because I went to the movie with certain "shame"... being a 30 year old dude watching those girls in those outfits, I felt like awkward and unconfortable the whole movie :/
and don't get me wrong, not in the "gay" way... more like in a "pedophile" way.
I don't think many critics missed it. Favorable critical analyses after the fact fail to realize that Sucker Punch simply wasn't a compelling or tactful film despite heavy themes (like this). Snyder has a history of making bad, loaded films what with Watchmen.
I don't think many critics missed it. Favorable critical analyses after the fact fail to realize that Sucker Punch simply wasn't a compelling or tactful film despite heavy themes (like this).
Are many people trying to argue for it favorably though? I'm certainly not making an argument for its quality, just for what I think it was trying to express.
Kinda surprised by lack of There Will Be Blood or more Paul Thomas Anderson movies. I thought he was big on imagery.