Crab Shaker
Doesn't pay his sources
Good lord I really want a new watch really bad. I can't afford anything as awesome as you guys though .
OnkelC said:Hobby Fusion Shots (most of them are sold by now to raise funds, though):
AFAIK, there is currently no watch with Tritium and a perpetual calendar out there, sorry.vdo said:I've always been intrigued by watches that advertise they have Tritium in them that constantly glows, rather than the regular glow in the dark phosphors that fade so quickly. I also am interested in perpetual calendars on watches, but have never found one with both Tritium and a perpetual calendar together. Does anyone know of brands that have both features?
I have that problem too. I got a pretty small watch, but in relation to my tiny wrists it's still more than large enough .elostyle said:This thread needs prices. I am so limited in regards to watches due to the worlds skinniest wrists
elostyle said:This thread needs prices. I am so limited in regards to watches due to the worlds skinniest wrists
Diameter is the real issue though, it looks funny if the watch extends beyond your wrist. I like this one though.seanoff said:A TAG Link is pretty much infinitely adjustable, even for your puny wrists.
$1300+ in the US. look for specials/Wait for a sale.
See the links in the band, pretty much all of them can be removed because they all fit together the same way. And if mine is anything to go by, they last forever.
Of course your budget may limit your choice. but this would be a 10year + investment
elostyle said:Diameter is the real issue though, it looks funny if the watch extends beyond your wrist. I like this one though.
What's are the model #s on the Bertelin and the Bulova?DaCocoBrova said:My starting 3:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v334/DaCocoBrova/IMG_0733.jpg
Klauss Kobec | Yves Bertelin (Got while in Paris) | Bulova
One is on injured reserve... Two actually. One needs a battery, the other needs the band fixed (not pictured).
DaCocoBrova said:WM15681 - Yves Bertelin
C837378 - Bulova
I know of no watch that doesn't lose value once it is bought. Because of the yearly price increases, Rolex watches hold their value quite stable, but you got to keep them for at least 10 years to "get even" on the original list price.Kal said:I love watches... had a Breitling for a couple of years but I had to pawn it when things got rough :lol I want to get another one but I thought I'll ask this (stupid question) here first: Is there any watch you can buy that doesn't depreciate the moment it leaves the store? Is it possible to buy a watch less than £3000 that would become a collector's item sometime in the future?
No numbers around the face = fail!OnkelC said:lol, 250k USD for a watch and the PR dept. is not able to pull off a decent pic of the watches' movement:
http://www.jaeger-lecoultre.com/reverso-gyrotourbillon-2/en/
Spot the Error (It's an official press kit picture, imagine the hilarity):
dream said:Awesome thread. I'm looking at getting this sometime this year:
OnkelC said:lol, 250k USD for a watch and the PR dept. is not able to pull off a decent pic of the watches' movement:
OnkelC said:I know of no watch that doesn't lose value once it is bought. Because of the yearly price increases, Rolex watches hold their value quite stable, but you got to keep them for at least 10 years to "get even" on the original list price.
In general, watches as an object of financial speculation are no good idea IMHO.
Fusebox said:this Tag is my daily wearer.
I mentioned it in my post about my watch.OnkelC said:nobody has spotted the error in the press pic yet?
OnkelC said:lol, 250k USD for a watch and the PR dept. is not able to pull off a decent pic of the watches' movement:
http://www.jaeger-lecoultre.com/reverso-gyrotourbillon-2/en/
Spot the Error (It's an official press kit picture, imagine the hilarity):
That's intentional and the watch in fact looks like it. check again. maybe it's too obvious?RubxQub said:I mentioned it in my post about my watch.
I noticed that there is no face on the press pic, as in no numbers around the border.
You need 31 days for a month.OnkelC said:That's intentional and the watch in fact looks like it. check again. maybe it's too obvious?
That's not it, though the direction is right.lil smoke said:You need 31 days for a month.
OnkelC said:That's not it, though the direction is right.
OnkelC said:Let's solve this. Unless it's an Escher movement, though...
http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i216/OnkelC/Uhren/reversogyrofehler.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
Since it's military time, shouldn't midnight be "00" and not "24"?
Anyway, this thread is prodding me to buy an adult watch [now, I just use my cell phone] for the adult job I'm starting in August. Thanks, guys, another expense! :D
:lolCaptain Glanton said:Since it's military time, shouldn't midnight be "00" and not "24"?
Anyway, this thread is prodding me to buy an adult watch [now, I just use my cell phone] for the adult job I'm starting in August. Thanks, guys, another expense!
OnkelC said:Flo_Evans, nice collection and thanks for the Kudos. What brought you to Stührling?
OnkelC said:IWC is top notch for sure.
If you llike the IWC chronos, you could go for one of these for around 250 EUR: