BennyBlanco
aka IMurRIVAL69
I wish everyone had the same fervor of suing Nintendo for every miniscule possibility of plagiarism they had done.

exhibit A, your honor
I wish everyone had the same fervor of suing Nintendo for every miniscule possibility of plagiarism they had done.
the irony is hilarious
Lol, New in the town? Nintendo is Yakuza, they never lose.Nintendo won't win, Palworld isn't a 1 for 1 copy. Nintendo would have to sue every other monster collecting RPG game then .
the irony is hilarious
the use of A.I.what irony
Eh, I see a handful, but some are ridiculous. Like Pidgetto and that bird is just reaching. Same for the crab and Krabby and most of them honestly.![]()
exhibit A, your honor
You can't even patent fictional characters either, they are protected under copyright, and this lawsuit is talking about patent infringement for some reason..because not even Pokemon itself has originality with their own as some of their monsters resemble alot other franchises
the use of A.I.
Eh, I see a handful, but some are ridiculous. Like Pidgetto and that bird is just reaching. Same for the crab and Krabby and most of them honestly.
The think DQ has very different artstyle than Pokémon but Palworld is actively trying to mimic Pokémon style.This gonna be a fun case. It basically gonna involve any monster or creature as stealing if end up being true, because not even Pokemon itself has originality with their own as some of their monsters resemble alot other franchises(DQ comes to mind).
The lawsuit says patent infringement though, not copyright.I painted that by hand, bud
It is exactly as ridiculous as saying Palworld infringed on their copyright
They aren't even saying that, copyright and patent rights are two different things and this lawsuit mentions patent rights specificallyIt is exactly as ridiculous as saying Palworld infringed on their copyright
Or get sue from dragon questNintendo won't win, Palworld isn't a 1 for 1 copy. Nintendo would have to sue every other monster collecting RPG game then .
what patent exactly?They aren't even saying that, copyright and patent rights are two different things and this lawsuit mentions patent rights specifically![]()
I painted that by hand, bud
what patent exactly?
Weird that it says patents. Shouldn't it be copyright or trademarks for characters?What patents?
The think DQ has very different artstyle than Pokémon but Palworld is actively trying to mimic Pokémon style.
People might get triggered for saying this but I have no sympathy for Palworld devs.
They could have easily just design their own creature design but instead they chose actively copy Pokémon, they should have expected Nintendo will eventually gonna go after them.
This is going to settle before going to a trial… Nobody wants to mess with Nintendo lawyers in court…I hope they loose, fuck them.
Not for copyright infrigment but Patent infrigment, makes you wonder what the hell it is
yesWeird that it says patents. Shouldn't it be copyright or trademarks for characters?
for media outside games I thinkDidn't Sony 'tard themselves up and get into a licensing/development deal with these idiots?
This lawsuit seeks an injunction against infringement and compensation for damages on the grounds that Palworld, a game developed and released by the Defendant, infringes multiple patent rights.
wait, Nintendo sued MiHoyo?This is the same stupidity when rabid Pikmins accused Mihoyo of copying BOTW and then TOTK "copied" the flying islands from Genshin Impact.
From time to time Pikmins show us they are a special kind, too. Jesus wept.
They are literately using same arstyle...Like what? They didn't actively copy Pokemon more than say Duke Nukem ripped off Doom. They're just cutesy animal designs that exist in a million games.
Nintendo won't win, Palworld isn't a 1 for 1 copy.
Waited until they finished collecting all their revenue, to take it all back in court.
"A Nintendo lawyer is never late, Yamaguchi, nor is he early. He arrives precisely when he means to!"
wait, Nintendo sued MiHoyo?
They are literately using same arstyle...
![]()
![]()
You could say these look orange looking Dragon but their face, their body and their wings look very different because they both using different artstyle.
Meanwhile
![]()
![]()
You have to be blind not to see they actually trying mimic Pokemon's artsyle.
Fuck that.
It's a shame, IMO. It's like if Capcom or SNK sued Mortal Kombat devs because it's a fighting game with assists
Look at that DQ to Pokemon comparison and tell me that's not the same artstyle.