The first half of this post is surely obsolete: it consists of my thoughts after reading the thread about early Revolution info from USA Today before rushing off to work ~5 AM, and without a chance to reply. Mostly so with the combination of after-the-fact information, you'll know whether I'm deserving of mocking.
That 2-3x the power thing must have some context. NO rumor has placed it very below the Xbox 360. Matt Cassamadabra is no stranger to Nintendo critique and surely would act a bit more peeved about such a thing when giving vague indications of things in recent days and weeks. Something truly 2-3x the GameCube with wireless connections would be a $200-300 launch in 2003, easy. Considering the fixed costs, purposefully releasing something that was ~3x the GameCube in 2006 would seem extremely inefficient to the point of craziness.
The idea of buying and downloading old games is nice. In terms of where it fits in among all the rumors it makes me think of something Nighttrain said about how Nintendo was doing something that would make things better for developers... selling directly to the customer without production costs seems something some developers might like, though really Sony and MS have talked about the same sort of things.
Now to actually read what went on today.
-----------------------
Well uhh... very little to shine light on any of the above stuff, that's for sure. My thoughts on the hardware look are mixed. The size is amazing with the image with the hand grabbing the system. Looks single-tone flat dull, though. Like PS2 without the ridges. That design in Spice would be spicy, though!
Certainly a disappointing presentation. Revolution I'll cut them slack on; it's way more than we knew of the 360 even a month ago. But there was also quite the lack of major newness on GCN, GBA, and DS. GBA Micro looks hot, though.
Not just in the Nintendo camp but all throughout, when was the last time E3 came without any major hardware price reductions? PS2, Xbox, GCN, GBA, DS, PSP... all are as they were a few days ago.
Madrin said:
Is it true that Matt C. was the first one to call it Revolution? I recall last E3 GAF was saying Matt misconstrued what Iwata said during the conference, and Matt erroneously started calling the console Revolution.
Before last E3 it was rumored Revolution was the code name. The way Iwata used it in the presentation, though, at first it seemed unclear to me whether it was intended as a proper noun.
CrisKre said:
Show true, important 3rd party support.
If they already
have the support, though... well, that's the more important part than talking about it.
At least MS is trying! And E3 2005 is the place to do it for a system releasing in 2006.
So is MS damned for not doing yesterday's presentation a year ago?