eReaders? I was under the impression that the Kindle was still a mega-popular device.
And cameras? Sorry, but no. I'm sure sales are down, but cameras are still immensely popular. There's a big camera section in all the electronics stores. Go to a vacation spot, a national park or scenic attraction, and suddenly it's the moron taking pictures with his phone that looks completely out-of-place. Cameras aren't going anywhere. They're becoming more of specialty device, sure, but they haven't been "killed".
Hey...kind of like handhelds...and maybe consoles as well.
eReaders? I was under the impression that the Kindle was still a mega-popular device.
And cameras? Sorry, but no. I'm sure sales are down, but cameras are still immensely popular. There's a big camera section in all the electronics stores. Go to a vacation spot, a national park or scenic attraction, and suddenly it's the moron taking pictures with his phone that looks completely out-of-place. Cameras aren't going anywhere. They're becoming more of specialty device, sure, but they haven't been "killed".
Hey...kind of like handhelds...and maybe consoles as well.
Tie ratios should be worrying for Sony That's one of the last remaining areas where xbox has been outperforming for a the last decade. They PS customer is less willing to pay for software and that has to change somehow.
Watches and clocks are dead to most people now. Add home phones too.
We should probably start a list of all the device industries killed by mobiles so far:
Music Players
PDAs
GPS
eReaders
Cameras
Watches and clocks are dead to most people now. Add home phones too.
Watches and clocks are dead to most people now. Add home phones too.
i hate this argument. if the ps4 dominated xbox one and wii u, it's not a monopoly. all three of those platforms are competing with other gaming platforms now. and, if nintendo and microsoft were to be so unsuccessful that they dropped out of the market (unlikely), there would probably be others to replace them. the gaming industry is a lot bigger than sony, microsoft, and nintendo anyway (hello valve, amazon, apple, etc). if a company's product doesn't sell, it's because the market doesn't want it. the better product (in the eyes of most consumers) will and should win out over others. what it does is it pushes the losers (and new entrants) to work even harder. this is good for us.Yeah guys a monopoly will always make sure the consumer has the best deal!
I mean look at cable companies, I'm right now with Time Warner Cable, paying over 100$ a month for Internet Access that is literally 3 times slower on the download and 5 times slower on the upload than I could get from a competitor(I'm talking about Verison, having Google Fiber is nothing but a dream at this point) for the same exact price.
Thank God my area has only 1 dominant cable internet provider leading the industry forward, the consumer benefits are just awesome!
It's a concern mainly stemming from the 360 generation and onward, and since this is an NPD thread I was obviously focusing on the US market.Where is this coming from. PS2's tie ratio is still untouched, and we don't know the global tie ratio's of Xbox Family because MS doesn't provide SW info. I made an analysis of PS3 surpassing Wii in SW sales http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=767855
The Kindle and Cameras are about as "dead" as the 3DS is in that they are specialty devices that people are only buying because phones/tablets are jack of all trades/master of none replacements for them.eReaders? I was under the impression that the Kindle was still a mega-popular device.
And cameras? Sorry, but no. I'm sure sales are down, but cameras are still immensely popular. There's a big camera section in all the electronics stores. Go to a vacation spot, a national park or scenic attraction, and suddenly it's the moron taking pictures with his phone that looks completely out-of-place. Cameras aren't going anywhere. They're becoming more of specialty device, sure, but they haven't been "killed".
Hey...kind of like handhelds...and maybe consoles as well.
What about ps3, 360, 3ds, wii, and ds numbers?
Complete spectrum of NPD hardware sales estimates:
PS4: 271K
XB1: 141K
3DS: ~97K
PS3: ~53.5K
Wii U: 49K
360: ~48.5K
Vita: <17K
November 2006: 476K (heavily supply-constrained)
December 2006: 604K (heavily supply-constrained)
January 2007: 436K (heavily supply-constrained)
It actually wouldn't since the Wii was really a lightning in a bottle phenomenon and also so significantly supplied constrained that it was impossible to get one in the US without lining up or F5'ing retail sites for two years.
The PS4 isn't sitting on shelves but it's generally not impossible to find for someone actively looking for one. The XB1 on the other hand...
PS4 will definitely do better in months where someone roaming around a retail store can find one in plain view.
I wonder how much PS4's tie ratio is affected by all the PS+ and F2P games on the system. There are more free games available than most people even buy with a new system. I know a couple of people who got PS4s and have been playing mostly Warframe, Resogun and Pinball Arcade, and haven't bought any other games aside from COD and KZ. Yes, they're playing those F2P games more than the retail games they actually bought.
Thanks! Do you have by any chance also the february and march numbers?
The Wii has probably the most amazing 3 year run of any console ever. Imo you can learn alot by comparing it to the newer consoles. It's taking the best case senario and she where you stack up.
technically I would guess NPD could get it from Amazon for PS4.
But from both first party stores? No, neither company would likely give those numbers to NPD.
I own one physical disc for the Playstation 4 (COD: Ghosts, please don't judge). Everything else I picked up from the Playstation store: Battlefield 4, Resogun, Don't Starve, Pinball Arcade, Warframe, and Outlast. Assassin's Creed IV, I borrowed.
So, I guess I'm one of those owners that's bringing the attach rate down.
I thought attach ratios were taking digital into account. Is that incorrect? If so, then I can see numbers being highly misleading with more and more people shifting to digital purchases. I'm 100% digital now, too.I own one physical disc for the Playstation 4 (COD: Ghosts, please don't judge). Everything else I picked up from the Playstation store: Battlefield 4, Resogun, Don't Starve, Pinball Arcade, Warframe, and Outlast. Assassin's Creed IV, I borrowed.
So, I guess I'm one of those owners that's bringing the attach rate down.
Feels sogood.gif to see all of EA's games sell better on ps4 even though most were advertised with xbone. hehe
I guess that NFL and sports deals did nothing.
All the sport titles are selling better on ps4.
Making titanfall exclusive will be one of the dumbest decision they ever made.
Of course.
February 2007: 335K
March 2007: 259K
Wii started to really explode in late 2007 - 2008 when supply could sufficiently meet demand and the fad was sweeping the nation.
But apparently the second game is still due for a PS4 release.
EA probably.who cares
I agree with this.
Xbox One January NPD sales are way below Microsoft's internal projections for the device. If this trend keeps up throughout 2014 (which I doubt because of Titanfall, price drop, etc., but you never know), Mr. Nadella and investors may not be so eager to keep Xbox around in the future...
And Sony? Riddled with debt, low-performing sectors and an uncertain future. Microsoft's income statement is incredibly strong by comparison.
who cares
Feels sogood.gif to see all of EA's games sell better on ps4 even though most were advertised with xbone. hehe
I guess that NFL and sports deals did nothing.
All the sport titles are selling better on ps4.
Making titanfall exclusive will be one of the dumbest decision they ever made.
Watches and clocks are dead to most people now. Add home phones too.
Over 500,000 as of the last Famitsu, so yeah.Wow, impressed that 3D World managed 665,000 just in the US. Must be well over a million worldwide then given its decent sales in Japan.
Me too... I buy games from the US Store because I think a 70 MSRP for new retail games is utterly ridiculous.
And I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one.
I agree with this.
Xbox One January NPD sales are way below Microsoft's internal projections for the device. If this trend keeps up throughout 2014 (which I doubt because of Titanfall, price drop, etc., but you never know), Mr. Nadella and investors may not be so eager to keep Xbox around in the future...
And Sony? Riddled with debt, low-performing sectors and an uncertain future. Microsoft's income statement is incredibly strong by comparison.
Yup. No one is in a "good" position.
It will be very interesting to see where we are in 6 years from now.
Sony lives and breathes low-margin, zero-or-low growth CE bullshit. They're going down with this ship.
What's that come out to you in euro when you buy a $60 game in the US store? 45?
The Kindle and Cameras are about as "dead" as the 3DS is in that they are specialty devices that people are only buying because phones/tablets are jack of all trades/master of none replacements for them.
I've got a really nice Sony camera that I bought a couple years ago but I never use it anymore simply because my phone is always in my pocket and is more than good enough for my daily purposes.
The amount of money it would take is something MS would never pay. EA wants titanfall to be the next call of duty and if it comes even close to that level of popularity they would be potentially leaving billions of dollars of the table by keeping it off PS4, especially since currently it seems like it will outsell the xbox. The only reason MS can afford to buy the first one is because the install bases are so low right now.If Titanfall ends up being massively popular what are the chances that MS writes an equally massive check and just buys Respawn to secure TF exclusivity? I don't know how realistic that is but is it out of the realm of possibility that MS gets the studio and IP and Zamp and West just leave and start a new company again with that huge check from MS so they can do whatever they want without needing someone like EA backing them? Meanwhile MS doesn't care because they now own the franchise and will just get somebody else to make the sequels.
I know I really ran with the ball there but nothing would surprise me at this point.
Nintendo quietly cancelled it after 8 months and it received no more first-party support after March 1996. Interestingly enough, Nintendo advertised two games for Virtual Boy at E3 1996, but they never materialised.
Virtual Boy's LIFETIME NPD sales are only 496K...so Wii U's LTD of like ~2150K has already sold more than 4x what Virtual Boy ever managed.
Yes.
1st January PS3 - 244K
1st January 360 - 249K
1st January Wii U - 57K
1st January Xbox One - approx. 143K
MS keep drawing comparisons to the XB360 launch, so it seems appropriate to point out XBone's First January was only 57% of XB360's FJ. PS2, PS3, and XB360 all had about 250K while supply constrained, while PS4 and Wii were constrained at ~280K and 436K, respectively. So while XBone may not be headed to a Wii U/GameCube-style flop, it doesn't seem far off from the original XBox's performance, at 51% of XB360 FJ.OG Xbox - 127K first January
At least it's doing better than the original Xbox! That's something...right?
GameCube - 62K
PS2 - 248K
Wii - 436K
The amount of money it would take is something MS would never pay. EA wants titanfall to be the next call of duty and if it comes even close to that level of popularity they would be potentially leaving billions of dollars of the table by keeping it off PS4, especially since currently it seems like it will outsell the xbox. The only reason MS can afford to buy the first one is because the install bases are so low right now.
Yeah guys a monopoly will always make sure the consumer has the best deal!
I mean look at cable companies, I'm right now with Time Warner Cable, paying over 100$ a month for Internet Access that is literally 3 times slower on the download and 5 times slower on the upload than I could get from a competitor(I'm talking about Verison, having Google Fiber is nothing but a dream at this point) for the same exact price.
Thank God my area has only 1 dominant cable internet provider leading the industry forward, the consumer benefits are just awesome!
But EA has no ties to the series outside of this first game though, right? I thought they were only publishing the first one.
Just asking.
I've just read the thread about the Gamestop Layaway programme for Xbox One. Now, what I want to ask is: could it be that Gamestop needs only to see the first deposit from who participates to the programme in order to count an Xbox One as sold? Is it even possible?
If Titanfall ends up being massively popular what are the chances that MS writes an equally massive check and just buys Respawn to secure TF exclusivity? I don't know how realistic that is but is it out of the realm of possibility that MS gets the studio and IP and Zamp and West just leave and start a new company again with that huge check from MS so they can do whatever they want without needing someone like EA backing them? Meanwhile MS doesn't care because they now own the franchise and will just get somebody else to make the sequels.
I know I really ran with the ball there but nothing would surprise me at this point.
It is.
I agree with this.
Xbox One January NPD sales are way below Microsoft's internal projections for the device. If this trend keeps up throughout 2014 (which I doubt because of Titanfall, price drop, etc., but you never know), Mr. Nadella and investors may not be so eager to keep Xbox around in the future...
And Sony? Riddled with debt, low-performing sectors and an uncertain future. Microsoft's income statement is incredibly strong by comparison.
Yes, I think "hurt" would probably be more descriptive. To me something that's "dead" in a business sense is something that's no longer growing and thriving as opposed to buried and in the ground in the literal sense. I certainly wouldn't apply that to restaurants or live entertainment but I would say it applies to most casual electronic devices today.So when you say "killed", you really mean "appropriated a significant portion of marketshare from"? Or maybe just "hurt"? Because if you said what you meant, I wouldn't have replied, or maybe just agreed.
I also have a really nice Sony camera that I don't use - much. But when I go somewhere and I know I'll want to take pictures, whether that's on vacation or just hiking for the day, I take it.
I do a lot of things less frequently than I use my camera. Like eating at a "nice" restaurant, or going to a live show, or heck, going on vacation. But those industries are fine. They haven't been "killed" by fast food, or television, or local entertainment.
And many, if not most, of the businesses that phones' convenient abilities have impacted will also survive. Including video games.
Just as an aside, I had an interesting rumour on my desk today. Sony's new TV subsidiary is going to be loaded up with 400-500bn yen worth of debt and it would also have around a third of Sony's future pension liabilities. It really sounds like they are going to sell it to the Japanese government at a nominal price and reduce their indebtedness. If they do it as I think they are, then selling the division will reduce their indebtedness by a third and wipe around 100bn yen off the company's pension deficit, but they would take a 200-250bn yen loss on the book value of the division, by my reckoning at least.
If this does happen as I think it will, then I think Sony would suddenly be in a very strong position going forwards. Massive income from financial services, strong growth in their gaming division, strong growth in semi-conductors, strong growth in imaging, strongish growth in smartphones and a huge content ownership arm. I would put their target price up to 3700 yen (from our current target of 1900 iirc) if the rumour is true. Not sure about it though because the same person completely missed the sale of the Vaio division if they are in a position to know this then they should have been in a position to know about that as well.
A random bit of off topic that didn't fit anywhere else...