Must be FF2 then, I ain't paying to see that shit, is this clip in the trailer or what? Is there more?jmdajr said:coming soon to theaters near you!
Must be FF2 then, I ain't paying to see that shit, is this clip in the trailer or what? Is there more?jmdajr said:coming soon to theaters near you!
At this point it´s pretty much certain that 360 will sell over 30M.santouras said:I also contend that ps3 especially, and probably 360 as well, will never crack 30million each. I can't see ps3 getting past 20.
Bungalow Bob said:At this point it´s pretty much certain that 360 will sell over 30M.
jvm said:As I've done before, I'll stick my neck out and lay claim to that piece of writing. If anyone has any comments on the Gamasutra piece, feel free to let me know, since I may be doing a piece similar to this each month.
I'd like to think it's a hair more than your usual rundown of the NPD numbers, but that's just me.
Open Source said:Again, it is pointless to say who's winning in May. After the smoke clears from the holiday season, we will know who the winners are this gen. MS will have made their price cut and brought out their big exclusives. PS3 will have at least one huge title and maybe will cut the price enough to get back into the game. You can't declare a winner before the real armies have even arrived.
Until then, MS and Sony are in his boat.
At this point last gen in the US (after all consoles were on the market for 7 months) Xbox was at 2.1M. 360 is now at about 5.6M. The one year headstart was huge, and people who think otherwise are fools. I also expect this holiday season to be the most successful ever for the Xbox brand. (Note: In Europe and Japan, 360 has made a similar improvement over Xbox.)Shiggy said:Why do you think so?
You've got a fair point there. I would probably take the stance that it does matter if no third party is breaking the 100k barrier on the Wii in any given month, and that's essentially what's happened. In retrospect, I could have added that publishers have signaled that they're shifting resources to take advantage of the Wii and that it won't be a problem unless we're still saying the same thing in 2008...BuzzJive said:The only part I questioned was the third party on Wii analysis.
Bungalow Bob said:At this point it´s pretty much certain that 360 will sell over 30M.
As for PS3, it´s unlikely it will reach 30M, but certainly possible. I give it a 25% chance.
Bungalow Bob said:As for PS3, one thing I forgot to add to my last post is that is it VERY unlikely that PS3 will sell as well as GC in NA. Definitely less than a 10% chance. However, I think that it will outsell it by enough in other territories to outsell it overall.
Wow, I think this are downright stupid assumptions.Bungalow Bob said:At this point it´s pretty much certain that 360 will sell over 30M.
As for PS3, it´s unlikely it will reach 30M, but certainly possible. I give it a 25% chance.
h0l211 said:Some further analysis:
http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=14341
'While much of the focus will be on the hardware sales alone, there are some other very interesting results just below the surface of the data: three consoles with diminishing sales, a key to the Nintendo DS sales streak, Spider-Man's weakness, and the game that sold more copies than Pokemon Diamond this month -- but wasn't in the top 10 list.'
* 2.8 million Nintendo DS systems were sold from June 2005 to May 2006.
* 6.7 million Nintendo DS systems were sold from June 2006 to May 2007
mclem said:That's okay. When Nintendo buy Microsoft they'll put Halo on the VC.
Those numbers make it look like design is much more important than touchscreen, double screen and whatever else the DS has to offer.Empty_One said:Wow, I knew the DS exploded when the Lite came out, but I hadn't seen the numbers put that way before.
sonycowboy said:Absolutely ridiculous. It's possible, but only slightly so. The odd's are better for it (PS3) hitting 60M than < 30M.
You're basing it off of how badly it's selling at $599 (and higher in the UK, lower in Japan) for it's entire lifecycle.
Crazy.
Here you completely went off the deep end.
Segata Sanshiro said:Yes, but it dropped faster than this. I mean...we're in June now. This has got to be getting "real" for some people out there, don't you think?
Y2Kev said:
I dont know in what context this gif was used, but this performance of Nessun Dorma by Pavarotti is just amazing.
How stupid is that? If a console sells extemely well, why drop the price? But if a console sells badly, who would even waste one thought about using the price drop strategy from last gen only because it worked back then? Maybe a slow moving and deadlocked mind like yours?!?Bungalow Bob said:Here you went completely off the deep end.
And I´m basing my prediction on other things as well - like the competition and sony´s price drop history.
the 360 would have to sell at it's current rate for over 5.5 more years to hit 30M. Not saying it is or isn't likely, just to put things into perspective. To say it is pretty much certain is a bold statement. Is it possible? Definitely. Is it a certainty? Hell no. Is it likely? Who knows?Bungalow Bob said:At this point it´s pretty much certain that 360 will sell over 30M.
As for PS3, it´s unlikely it will reach 30M, but certainly possible. I give it a 25% chance.
I dunno, unless there's a major upset (and soon) I'd say the odds are about even either way. Just like 360 and PSP, PS3 is looking like a dead cert for somewhere more than Genesis (29m) but less than SNES (49m) territory. Only the Nintendo systems have a decent chance at cracking 50m this gen...sonycowboy said:Absolutely ridiculous. It's possible, but only slightly so. The odd's are better for it hitting 60M than < 30M.
quetz67 said:Wow, I think this are downright stupid assumptions.
Dont you get what the PS3 means for Sony? It means their future in videogaming, it means their future in the bluray/hd-dvd fight, they want to sell their movie and music content on it, they even want to sell real estate in Home.
Losing just isnt an option. If sales continue to be sluggish, they will drop the price until they pick up, if that alone doesnt help they will increase marketing and will try to get more (exclusive) games out.
Anything they will and can do is cheaper than to admit defeat and to write off the huge R&D and not sell all that content from games to movies to whatever.
Nintendo had not nearly that dedication for the GC. The GC was more or less profitable from the beginning, they were happy to sell their first party games on it and being last didnt mean that much for them, as they made lots of money.
For the 360, I cant see how anything is certain, right now the sales are at xbox level more or less (though this time they have Halo and price drop still to come, which sure is an advantage, but not a guarantee for anything).
borghe said:the 360 would have to sell at it's current rate for over 5.5 more years to hit 30M. Not saying it is or isn't likely, just to put things into perspective. To say it is pretty much certain is a bold statement. Is it possible? Definitely. Is it a certainty? Hell no. Is it likely? Who knows?
Bungalow Bob said:I completely agree with this. If Sony was no more aggressive with their PS3 pricing than Nintendo was last gen, PS3 would have debuted for about $799 US. It would currently be selling about 25K/month is NA, 10K/month in Japan, and somewhere in between in Europe.
If it wasn´t for this difference, PS3 would have no chance of selling anywhere near as well as GC. The reason why I expect PS3 to outsell GC is that I expect Sony to continue to invest huge amounts of money (and take huge losses) because the PLAYSTATION brand is so important to them.
PSPquetz67 said:How stupid is that? If a console sells extemely well, why drop the price? But if a console sells badly, who would even waste one thought about using the price drop strategy from last gen only because it worked back then? Maybe a slow moving and deadlocked mind like yours?!?
Gekkonidae said:I'm sorry guys, but there is only so much Sony can do. I'm not saying the PS3 will be a failure, I'm saying we need to get used to the possibility that it will fail.
The PSP is doing fine and there is no need to prevent it from being a failure. You need to get that Highlander thinkin out of your head.Bungalow Bob said:
And who says PS3´ll sell 60M units? Fools, that´s who.beermonkey@tehbias said:It won't fail. If it sells 60 million units, that's a successful product and platform. Who cares if PS2 sold 120 million? Sales-age gamers, that's who.
quetz67 said:The PSP is doing fine and there is no need to prevent it from being a failure.
beermonkey@tehbias said:It won't fail. If it sells 60 million units, that's a successful product and platform. Who cares if PS2 sold 120 million? Sales-age gamers, that's who.
What does a DS, Wii and 360 dominated generation have to do with highlander?quetz67 said:The PSP is doing fine and there is no need to prevent it from being a failure. You need to get that Highlander thinkin out of your head.
Bungalow Bob said:I think that by the time it comes down to a mainstream $200, even casual gamers will think of the PS3 the way that they used to think of the GC 2 years ago.
Shamrock said:Don't think the Wii is powerful enough to run Halo.:lol Seriously
Haven´t seen software sales for the past year, have you?quetz67 said:The PSP is doing fine and there is no need to prevent it from being a failure.
yawn!Bungalow Bob said:Haven´t seen software sales for the past year, have you?
Ya! It´ll be just like how how all those non-gamers bought PS2 last year because it was the cheapest dvd player available in 2006.oo Kosma oo said:Was the GC the cheapest next gen movie player? Don't think so.
People WILL be interested in the PS3, even if it's only as a BR player when it hits 200 in a couple of years. By then HD adoption will be huge, the PS3 will be a low priced BR player that also has a ton of cool HD games.
I don't even own a PS3 (360 owner here) but I know then when it drops in price I will have to get one for this alone. People thinking the PS3 is lost really don't see the big picture I think.
oo Kosma oo said:Was the GC the cheapest next gen movie player? Don't think so.
People WILL be interested in the PS3, even if it's only as a BR player when it hits 200 in a couple of years. By then HD adoption will be huge, the PS3 will be a low priced BR player that also has a ton of cool HD games.
oo Kosma oo said:People WILL be interested in the PS3, even if it's only as a BR player when it hits 200 in a couple of years. By then HD adoption will be huge, the PS3 will be a low priced BR player that also has a ton of cool HD games.
Bungalow Bob said:I think that by the time it comes down to a mainstream $200, even casual gamers will think of the PS3 the way that they used to think of the GC 2 years ago.
You´re really underestimating just how badly Sony ****ed up this gen, while at the same time drastically overestimating the selling power of Sony´s first party games.
Cooter said:I have to agree with Bob on this. It has been proven time and time again that $200 is the mainstream price.
Think about when the PS3 will be at that price and things really don't look good at all. The Playstation name alone is not gonna move a 600, 500, 400 dollar system for 3 years until Sony decides to it wants to hit the casual gamer.
I think we're looking at three years as a minimum. And as you said, the relative competition will be insane at that point.Gekkonidae said:The question is how long will it take the PS3 to hit 200 dollars. If it takes two/three years, and the competition is way ahead of it at that point in installed base, it will probably be too late at that point for the PS3 to recover.
Jammy said:A couple months back you allowed us to request the sales for a couple of games outside of the top ten. Are you still doing this?
I'd really like to know how much the best-selling PS3 and PSP games sold, and I'm sure other people want to know how much Super Paper Mario (apparently around ~100,000) and Zelda: TP (apparently right below SPM in terms of console game sales) sold.
GhaleonEB said:I think we're looking at three years as a minimum. And as you said, the relative competition will be insane at that point.