Eh, I have a hard time calling people retards.
I am on a 3080 (5800x3d, QHD monitor). All the games I'm playing still run above 60 with the settings I like, so I don't quite need a new card yet. But looking at benchmarks, there are new games on my wishlist that I won't be able to maintain 60 on. So I'd like a new card at some point.
Despite having two unimpressive generations in a row, the 5080 is typically about double the average frame rate of my 3080 in most games. Also, I can afford to spend the money on it. So would I be a retard for buying one (assuming I could find one in stock)?
Well what's the alternative?
- I can buy a weaker card, but the 7900XT and 4080 didn't get me to bite, so why would I do that now?
- I don't have much interest in the 9070XT because the leaks suggest it's around a 7900XTX, but with less VRAM.
- I could hold out longer and wait for a 5080 Ti, but you know that's going to be $1500 MSRP, so the "frames-per-dollar" value won't be any better.
- I could wait for a 6080, but what if it's even more expensive and just as disappointing relative to the previous generation?
- I could also go kamikaze and get a 5090 since it's a little better value than the 5080 given the extra VRAM, but then Nvidia is winning by getting me to spend way more on a GPU...but then the 5090 is like 3x my 3080 and I'd be maxing out everything at 165hz which sounds pretty sweet.
There's no good answer here. Those of us who like the higher performance cards but don't want to keep upping our spend are over a barrel. We will be stuck here until a competitor comes along, or the AI bubble crashes and Nvidia has to come back to gamers with more enticing products/prices.
For me, I've got a bunch of unfinished games on my desktop. My goal this year is to work on finishing them out with my current hardware. I'll revisit the hardware side probably in late summer. If at that time we're still looking at $1200 for the 5080 and $2400 for the 5090...ugh...