-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
SlimeGooGoo
Banned
.
Last edited:
CrysisFreak
Banned
Very interesting video ngl.
Spukc
always chasing the next thrill
WoahGTA 6 better be like....
smallpotatosan
Member
thanks. i'm going to dive into the paper a bit. this is very interesting.
INC
Member
GTA 6 better be like....
I'll take this and ai, over 4k and RT any day
TintoConCasera
I bought a sex doll, but I keep it inflated 100% of the time and use it like a regular wife
I read the title as "Physical stimulation". Huge dissapointment.
N00b Saib0t
Neo Member
Keep your damn ray tracing and give me this in 1080pGTA 6 better be like....
SuperColourful
Member
I want bouncy boobies
PSYGN
Member
Understandable
smallpotatosan
Member
i've looked at the paper. it's a method to use gradient descent to quickly find the contact point. the concept is very straightforward. the result is stunning. we may see it in the nextgen physics engine soon.
OnThePathToWisdom
Member
thicc_girls_are_teh_best
Member
One step closer to CG-tier 3D in real-time video games 
Md Ray
Member
They better. One of the biggest immersion-breaking things for me personally is the non-interactivity with the objects, environment and inaccurate physics simulation. Bland, empty and lifeless worlds.
These things, IMO, have largely remained the same since the PS3/X360 and throughout current-gen era (thanks Jaguar).
But the improvement in the quality of graphics though is staggering when you look at the difference between RDR1 on PS3 for e.g. to RDR2 on PS4 - it's truly mind-blowing when you look at the huge jump in lighting quality, PBR materials, shaders, not to mention animations and the likes.
RDR1 to 2 in terms of visuals was a true next-gen jump. But when it came to world interactivity, AI and NPCs - they still felt dumb and last-gen. While there were some improvements but not as huge as we got in the graphics department.
It is here where I hope devs focus on when developing their PS5/XSX games from the ground up and greatly improve these things, add more interactivity, complex physics & increase NPC density.
These things, IMO, have largely remained the same since the PS3/X360 and throughout current-gen era (thanks Jaguar).
But the improvement in the quality of graphics though is staggering when you look at the difference between RDR1 on PS3 for e.g. to RDR2 on PS4 - it's truly mind-blowing when you look at the huge jump in lighting quality, PBR materials, shaders, not to mention animations and the likes.
RDR1 to 2 in terms of visuals was a true next-gen jump. But when it came to world interactivity, AI and NPCs - they still felt dumb and last-gen. While there were some improvements but not as huge as we got in the graphics department.
It is here where I hope devs focus on when developing their PS5/XSX games from the ground up and greatly improve these things, add more interactivity, complex physics & increase NPC density.
TheDreadLord
Member
This type of simulation is very expensive and generally it runs in clusters with many cpus. I guess the future for physics simulation in consoles is more towards the use o AI in reproducing these phenomena.
Vtecomega
Banned
That poor STIGTA 6 better be like....
Kikorin
Member
Physics simulation was way better than now years ago yet. Half Life 2, FEAR, GTA 4, Max Payne 3, Red Faction: Guerilla, Mafia 2, Stranglehold, Crysis, Flat-Out... we had lot of awesome examples of good integration of physics in games, but this gen has been pretty disappointing in this field imho. Really hope next gen will deliver, but special mention to Control for awesome integration of physics and destruction, insanely good, I suggest it to everyone that like this kind of interactivity in games.
rofif
Can’t Git Gud
That's not beaming is it? It looks to goodGTA 6 better be like....
Arkam
Member
Impressive tech. Can’t wait til this (or similar) is a widely used middle ware.
As much as I want full destructible environments, I know we are a couple gen away and likely won’t make major progress until we are done chasing “traditional” visual fidelity. (Which I hope is post 8k.... please no more!!)
As much as I want full destructible environments, I know we are a couple gen away and likely won’t make major progress until we are done chasing “traditional” visual fidelity. (Which I hope is post 8k.... please no more!!)
Jaguar Victory
Member
Don't forget thigh jiggle
Senua
Member
ColonialRaptor
Member
Now that is really awesome stuff. The key factor is the drop in processing time I truly believe we could seem some effects of this in the new gen if it's so much less expensive than previous methods. If the only benefit we see from this new method is no more clipping then I will be a happy gamer!
bender
What time is it?
bender
What time is it?
MiguelItUp
Member
My man. First time I saw ragdoll was in the Hitman 2 demo on PS2 when I shot a maid and she did a cartwheel down the stairs. I still remember the hearty laugh I had. I was CRYING. It was then that I realized I really loved ragdoll. I mean, REALLY loved it. I've always been so excited to interact with the next physics engine, so I'm ready and waiting!Yeay, Ragdoll 2.0. Love that shit!
This video was amazing, and I'm really excited to see what is done in the coming years.
clem84
Gold Member
The tech already exists and they said it is 30 times faster to process. It could be here a lot sooner than that.
GymWolf
Member
I love your optimism. (Not even joking, 10 years are not enough imo)
GymWolf
Member
GymWolf
Member
Games with euphoria engines are the king of good\hilarious ragdoll, sometimes i just fuck with the npcs in rdr2 just to see how good are the interaction between them and the scenery.
regawdless
Banned
Give me that! Want want want! When?
mango drank
Member
Two off-topic thoughts:
1. For a morbidly obese guy, Chris Farley sure could move.
2. That Chippendales logo was epic. The bland-ification of logos in recent times is a real bitch, and Chippendales wasn't spared.
alabtrosMyster
Member
Look at the video again, it's lighter than existing techniques.
