Fenderputty
Banned
Sure it's not Manos? Nothing made him go full-derp like the subject of guns.
Manos was more of a centrist IIRC. He was just a gun nut. That comment sounds like someone just finished listening to Rush before posting.
Sure it's not Manos? Nothing made him go full-derp like the subject of guns.
President delivering marks on the cliff soon: http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/watch-live-obama-to-deliver-remarks-on-fiscal
User comment from a conservative blog I read:
Was sifting through a video game website I used to frequent where conservatives are greatly out numbered, my God the level of stupidity that permeated the thread was mind blowing. I couldnt take it anymore. Between the moron Americans who love Call of Duty but pretend to hate guns and the European fascists who concern troll about American violence while ignoring their own, my head was gonna explode.
Alright, who is it?
He's like 30 min late for his speech here. Hurry it up Obama!
Here's my 'unassailable logic' post from the armed guards as school thread:
Really surprised at what Joe Scarbarogh said about the current state of the GOP here no Morning Joe.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036789/ns/msnbc-morning_joe/#50267594
Wish he'd taken some questions. Also wish he's stop saying "Democrats and Republicans" every time he talks about "Washington" not working. The problem right now is Republicans.
Starting now.
How are we going to get anything done in 10 days when republicans can't get a passing vote through the house on something senate dems woudn't even look at?
Because they're two completely different proposals.
How many Republicans are willing to cross the line in the house and vote for Obama's proposal?
Not working for me...just blank?
How many Republicans are willing to cross the line in the house and vote for Obama's proposal?
http://www.politicususa.com/obama-drops-hammer-republicans-pulls-fiscal-cliff-proposal.html
So essentially, the GOP has two choices:
A)Give in and give President Obama everything he wants
or
B)Go over the cliff, taxes raised regardless, and the Democrats will essentially dicate what the budget deal is essentially, if they don't want to be tied to their base and primaried.
Glorious.
I dunno, you'd think we could scrounge up the ~20 or whatever it would take that would be able to take it back to their home states and say "hey, I care about you guys, I did what I had to, and I worked across the aisle to make sure things didn't go belly up."
How does the speaker vote happen? Do Democrats vote too? Why wouldn't they vote for Boehner if cantor had a legit shot? And why couldn't they use their votes as leverage in dealing with Boehner? Assuming that everyone votes.
Also, I was banned for a week =( Did anyone notice? Did anyone miss me? No? Okay =(
How does the speaker vote happen? Do Democrats vote too? Why wouldn't they vote for Boehner if cantor had a legit shot? And why couldn't they use their votes as leverage in dealing with Boehner? Assuming that everyone votes.
Also, I was banned for a week =( Did anyone notice? Did anyone miss me? No? Okay =(
How does the speaker vote happen? Do Democrats vote too? Why wouldn't they vote for Boehner if cantor had a legit shot? And why couldn't they use their votes as leverage in dealing with Boehner? Assuming that everyone votes.
Also, I was banned for a week =( Did anyone notice? Did anyone miss me? No? Okay =(
God I'd laugh if somehow Pelosi ended up speaker. lol
Technically the system allows for this, but I'm not sure it makes sense for anyone involved. Democrats would probably prefer to prolong the Republicans' struggles by preventing any candidate for Speaker from having a majority, and Boehner might not actually want to be Speaker if the only way to have the job is to obviously be the Democrats' preferred Republican.How does the speaker vote happen? Do Democrats vote too? Why wouldn't they vote for Boehner if cantor had a legit shot? And why couldn't they use their votes as leverage in dealing with Boehner? Assuming that everyone votes.
The number is right but it's important to realize that that's a majority. Pelosi can't possibly become Speaker without Republicans voting for her.Candidates need a House plurality (218) to be elected Speaker, meaning even a small leadership challenge could cause Boehner to lose - at which point republicans would have to select a candidate capable of unifying the caucus.
If this happened it would mean things have really gone off the rails for the GOP.
How does the speaker vote happen? Do Democrats vote too? Why wouldn't they vote for Boehner if cantor had a legit shot? And why couldn't they use their votes as leverage in dealing with Boehner? Assuming that everyone votes.
Also, I was banned for a week =( Did anyone notice? Did anyone miss me? No? Okay =(
God I'd laugh if somehow Pelosi ended up speaker. lol
Candidates need a House plurality (218) to be elected Speaker, meaning even a small leadership challenge could cause Boehner to lose - at which point republicans would have to select a candidate capable of unifying the caucus.
Good, Good! Keep questioning and someday you too will be JUST. LIKE. US.Im a Conservitve.
How the fuck the NRA accused every dude playing Call of Duty a murderer?
HOW THE FUCK THAT WORK?
So after we cenor Betty Boop because she was too sexy...
Then we fix the cenoring.
then we have the supreme court come help us on the censoring...
then the conservitives still not happy
so we continue to do the censoring...
then we realize we behind in education so we put Childrens TV acts and continue to cesnoring...
then Columbine and the censoring continues
then 9/11 and everybody censoring (yea its too scary but yet 4Kids left Ultraman Tiga uncut)
Then Virgina Tech and more censoring.
Then Aurora and they continue...
Now Sandy Bridge and now their calling us Murderers of Kids.
when everybody and there momma knows its the fucking medical industry and the damn drugs that some need but many DONT.
There isnt a real conservitive left in this country that doesnt hate the youth and its a damn fucking SHAME.
Yeah, I've largely stayed out of the gun politics but they pissed me off with their blaming it on videogames and their brain-dead solution of putting armed guards everywhere. That is just bad bad bad. The could have just kept their mouth shut but instead they stuck their foot in it.Im a Conservitve.
How the fuck the NRA accused every dude playing Call of Duty a murderer?
HOW THE FUCK THAT WORK?
So after we cenor Betty Boop because she was too sexy...
Then we fix the cenoring.
then we have the supreme court come help us on the censoring...
then the conservitives still not happy
so we continue to do the censoring...
then we realize we behind in education so we put Childrens TV acts and continue to cesnoring...
then Columbine and the censoring continues
then 9/11 and everybody censoring (yea its too scary but yet 4Kids left Ultraman Tiga uncut)
Then Virgina Tech and more censoring.
Then Aurora and they continue...
Now Sandy Bridge and now their calling us Murderers of Kids.
when everybody and there momma knows its the fucking medical industry and the damn drugs that some need but many DONT.
There isnt a real conservitive left in this country that doesnt hate the youth and its a damn fucking SHAME.
I got "The Years of Lyndon Johnson: The Passage of Power" as a Christmas gift. I'm about halfway through the introduction, but beforehand I was skimming the pictures included in the novel, and one had a man with a protest sign that read, "LBJ sold out to Yankee socialists." Oh, how little things change.
And yet how they do! The introduction touches on Kennedy's less-than-satisfactory political prowess, citing the stalled tax reduction bill and major civil rights legislation. What's said about the tax reduction bill was that Kennedy believed it would cause an economic expansion, resulting in more tax revenue necessary to fund a larger welfare state. Not exactly the current line of thinking today. Well, unless you're in the Republican party. And setting aside any crazy notion of you liking a welfare state.
You might want to be careful, PD. Your wit dulls as your trolling sputters.
JFK being an overrated president is not new territory. LBJ would have been the modern FDR if not for Vietnam/Gulf Of Tonkin.
Come now, that's not what I was talking about. The lame comparison to Obama was boring. The more you try to troll the worse you get at it. I suggest giving it a rest for a while.
Agreed on all points.JFK being an overrated president is not new territory. LBJ would have been the modern FDR if not for Vietnam/Gulf Of Tonkin.
This has nothing to do with conservatism and everything to do with arms dealers trying to maximize their profits.Im a Conservitve.
How the fuck the NRA accused every dude playing Call of Duty a murderer?
HOW THE FUCK THAT WORK?
So after we cenor Betty Boop because she was too sexy...
Then we fix the cenoring.
then we have the supreme court come help us on the censoring...
then the conservitives still not happy
so we continue to do the censoring...
then we realize we behind in education so we put Childrens TV acts and continue to cesnoring...
then Columbine and the censoring continues
then 9/11 and everybody censoring (yea its too scary but yet 4Kids left Ultraman Tiga uncut)
Then Virgina Tech and more censoring.
Then Aurora and they continue...
Now Sandy Bridge and now their calling us Murderers of Kids.
when everybody and there momma knows its the fucking medical industry and the damn drugs that some need but many DONT.
There isnt a real conservitive left in this country that doesnt hate the youth and its a damn fucking SHAME.
Carter didn't sell out the civil rights movement and he isn't responsible (at least more than any other president) for the Vietnam war.How was Carter better than JFK?
Carter was truly a victim of circumstance; there was little he could do about the oil and inflation situations, and if the mission to free the Iranian prisoners succeeded he'd probably be hailed a hero. Instead he's forever considered a loser and failure.
You'd think republicans would love him in retrospect because he fought to shrink government and attempted to the challenge the "system" and entrenched Washington culture even within his own party.
And the best thing you can say about Carter's presidency was that it was inoffensive. He didn't really accomplish anything.
I didn't say he didn't do anything.Egypt/Israel?
I didn't say he didn't do anything.