lol, come on guys, it was funny and awkward but it's not a big deal at all
Hey guys I don't think most voters will give a shit about him drinking some water awkwardly four years from now.
his was much worse though
and SNL made it into an even bigger thing
Because an awkward State of the Union response worked out so well for Bobby Jindal. oh wait...
No one will give a shit about him his response is the same old tired bullshit that gets peddled every singe SOTU response.
Hey guys I don't think most voters will give a shit about him drinking some water awkwardly four years from now.
lol, come on guys, it was funny and awkward but it's not a big deal at all
Rubio's delivery was alright, it was a bit high-school debatey in his earnestness, but the delivery was much better than Jindal.
The substance, if you can call it that, though was just stupid. No alternative plans, just denigration of a straw man. It didn't help that it seemed like he was responding to a speech in 2010....
Dead serious. There was an article about how it went up way early.
Because an awkward State of the Union response worked out so well for Bobby Jindal. oh wait...
Then no point in watching.
.....Jindal never have a SOTU response....
the entire thing was a disaster. He was barely better than Jindal.
Seemed like he was slurring almost at times. Spoke way too fast, smacking his lips, the water, etc.
He looked incompetent. Such a difference from the convention.
I agree with this. I find it hilarious that the water thing is going to be such a big deal, but in all honesty his speech was devoid of substance.Rubio's delivery was alright, it was a bit high-school debatey in his earnestness, but the delivery was much better than Jindal.
The substance, if you can call it that, though was just stupid. No alternative plans, just denigration of a straw man. It didn't help that it seemed like he was responding to a speech in 2010....
Then no point in watching.
.....Jindal never have a SOTU response....
Seriously folks, have all of you forgotten that the last response was given by Mitch Daniels? And before that Paul Ryan?
No Jindal.
Yes, yes he did. He did a Mr Rodgers impersonation during the whole thing.
Yeah.Remember that time Obama took a sip of water and everyone thought it was awesome?
Not according to my sources.
2013: Rubio
2012: Mitch
2011: Pauly
2010: McDonnell
Jindal was 2009.
Daniels was definitely better than Rubio.
That wasnt a SOTU rebuttal.
Pre school vote? More like sixth term thenSo my facebook has very little of note.
Just this gem:
Me:
Obama catering to the pre-school vote. Obvious power grab for 3rd term election.
Gun nut response: He doesn't know how to do anything but campaign
Didnt get the joke
Why do I say gun nut?
His status
Typical. Obama is using the state of the union address for partisan politics and gun control advocacy.
Pre school vote? More like sixth term then
Pre school vote? More like sixth term then
But PD told me Rubio was the real deal and wouldn't pull a Jindal.
So many of these supposedly formidable GOPers get their shot in the spotlight and just kind of melt.
~24,700: Tweets-per-minute during the most-tweeted moment of the state of the union -- when Obama covered middle class opportunity and minimum wage.
~9,200: Tweets-per-minute during the most-tweeted moment of Rubio's GOP response -- when Rubio gulped a sip of water, obviously.
PD showin once again he's the Dick Morris of GAF.
Dero derp. Atleast you accept that you once again are shown to be as accurate as a Ben Wallace free throw.Still mad Kobe has never had a season better than LeBron's last 3?
Dero derp. Atleast you accept that you once again are shown to be as accurate as a Ben Wallace free throw.
Not according to my sources.
2013: Rubio
2012: Mitch
2011: Pauly
2010: McDonnell
2009: Jindahl
After tonight, Christie better get on the treadmill. Because he's the Republican's only hope.
Jindahl got laughed at, McDonnell became toxic Governor Ultrasound, Paul lost as VP, Mitch Daniels went from translucent to transparent. Rubio is brave to take rebuttal, it seems cursed lately.
He's got a waterboy lined up.
I dont think any president has ever previously done the response speech.
"What we didnt hear tonight was a President telling the truth about the real state of the Union: that we are broke -- and that he and the Congress are succeeding only in digging us deeper into a financial hole that is, in reality, the single greatest threat to the nations well-being.
Rather, we once again heard the tired argument that the challenges we face can somehow best be met by more government that costs more and taxes more. Weve tried that. In fact, weve tried it so hard and so long that we have a debt totaling more than $90,000 for every worker in America.
And while he spent an hour laying out a mind-boggling list of things the government should do, from investing in infrastructure, technology and energy to helping parents pick the best college for their kids, he assured us his plans will not increase the deficit by a single dime.
That is absurd on its face, and could only be based on the same arithmetic that has given us a $16 Trillion debt.
Once again, we witnessed a great political performance wrapped around promises that shouldnt be made in the first place, and that we certainly cannot afford to keep.
Rubio?
Even a boss back then. He even used the "building bridges to the 21st century" line.