Bunch of antigovernment types who identify with the Boston Tea Party isn't really a hard line to draw.How?
It's currently baseless as shit though.
Bunch of antigovernment types who identify with the Boston Tea Party isn't really a hard line to draw.How?
WTF is this?No shame https://twitter.com/EWErickson/status/323903654161682433 both EE and Rubin
WTF is this?
No shame https://twitter.com/EWErickson/status/323903654161682433 both EE and Rubin
What is wrong with that? Local crime story for now is right. Granted, a bomb went off and the story may develop, let's not lose our heads over this. Keep Calm and Carry On. Figure out who did this and proceed as appropriate. It could be anything . . . just some random punk, an anti-tax extremist, Al-Qeada, etc. Who knows?
Thank you for contacting me regarding marriage equality.
It is generally accepted in American law and U.S. society today that, as Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence, "...all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.''
I believe that. The civil rights and responsibilities for one must pertain to all. Thus, to discriminate against one class and not another is wrong for me.
If we are endowed by our Creator with rights, then why shouldn't those be attainable by all? Simply put, if the Lord made homosexuals as well as heterosexuals, why should I discriminate against their civil marriage? I shouldn't, and I won't.
So I added my name to the petition from senators asking the Supreme Court to declare the law that prohibits same-sex marriage unconstitutional.
I appreciate your sharing your views with me. Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future.
Sincerely,
Bill Nelson
Fuck, I really don't want to jump to conclusions, but a boming in Boston on tax-day brings some connections to mind about the possible motivations that are incredibly hard to shake : (
Exactly, which is why everyone should have easy access to military grade explosives to protect our freedom. The second amendment said so.
White House didn't comment on the Gosnell case because it was a "local crime story."
Rubin is being snarky at what some might call a bad time for it.
Its a reference to
Its a comment about abortion.
Yeah, because an abortion incident and a bombing at marathon are the same fucking thing.
Pretty sure he was trying to be ironic. Come on man.
Yes, and I wrote that before this boston bombing, so I'm not trying to be disrespectful about that.
Its a reference to
Its a comment about abortion.
It's a weird reference, because she is a policy reporter. I don't know what kind of policy that she would write about Gosnell.
Your face.What part of "OWNED!" do you not understand, Tamanon?
Oh yeah you guys, just saw this.. http://www.nationalmemo.com/republicans-and-dems-come-together-to-keep-irs-from-competing-with-turbotax/
Business interest has an incredible stronghold on government, its fucking sad man.
They want people to write that Gosnell's actions were what PP stands for.It's a weird reference, because she is a policy reporter. I don't know what kind of policy that she would write about Gosnell.
You keep stating this as a fact but there is no evidence it is true. It does not at all strike me as true that the average Cuban would be better off if Cuban independence had not occurred.
For those of you who think Reid is worse than Obama:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/...with-Obama-but-only-if-Reid-isn-t-in-the-room
Rubio hitting for the cycle.
not pictured his appearances on
Face This Nation
Faceless Nation
Facetion
Rubio hitting for the cycle.
not pictured his appearances on
Face This Nation
Faceless Nation
Facetion
Once more info crystallizes it'll be more deft to reckon, but yeah in general the only way to truly ward off this sort are addressing the root causes that eventually spiral out into this sad sort of madness---be they simple lack of education, mental illness, criminal enterprises, etc.
Of course, these sorts of actually deep things are taboo to tangle with outside of cuts to make things even worse on folks---they'd much rather homeland security it all up.
I really don't know what our current media would do with another even remotely OKC-like situation----as bad as it was back then, with the state of the media wanting to stir things now, yikes.
Why do you believe that Castro was a better alternative for Cuba then the alternative of Batista eventually being replaced with another (most likely democratic) revolution?
Its not a matter of Cuba's independence, but more so just how its independence occured. If Batista stayed in power it was only a matter of time until a democratic revolution came into place just as it did literally everywhere else in South America.
Cuba went from having the best economy in the Carribbean to being merely in-line with the rest of the region. You can say "Well how exactly was the wealth distributed?" but a democratic revolution would have likely had that economy be more or less intact while the citizens gaining more of the fruits from the economy. You can also say "Well yeah that's because the Soviet Union fell and the embargos", but if you are going to commit to an economic ideology that radically limits your trade partners and is very new and risky, you have all the blame if it deteoriates, especially if your people can't chose at any time whether or not they want to follow that path.
Fuck that shitGun bill is getting even weaker!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/15/manchin-toomey-compromise_n_3088957.html?1366083198
Fuck this. There's so many goddamn loopholes in this bill now it's practically useless.Gun bill is getting even weaker!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/15/manchin-toomey-compromise_n_3088957.html?1366083198
Gun bill is getting even weaker!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/15/manchin-toomey-compromise_n_3088957.html?1366083198
So, what's the point of the bill at this point?
A bandaid until the next shooting, when the NRA can again use their influence to divert the issue, and water down the bill to the point of uselessness. They know the general public loses interest in issues quickly. So they can repeat this over and over so nothing ever gets done.So, what's the point of the bill at this point?
Joseph Stalin said:The death of one man is a tragedy. The death of millions is a statistic.
So in 10 years we can say "you see? we told you gun control doesn't work!".So, what's the point of the bill at this point?
Fox really will cling to anything to make Obama look bad.http://www.mediaite.com/tv/oreilly-...-attack-a-tragedy-this-is-what-the-nazis-did/
Really, Bill? You're mad that Obama used that word like as if it's ba...wait, a minute!
I'm at the point where I honestly don't give a shit about gun control anymore. America made this bed. Time for it to lay in it. The amount of stupidity is fucking ridiculous. We either go all the way or not at all.Gun bill is getting even weaker!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/15/manchin-toomey-compromise_n_3088957.html?1366083198
Fox really will cling to anything to make Obama look bad.
From Fox? Sure. From the idiots watching? Unfortunately not.Faux outrage
I'm at the point where I honestly don't give a shit about gun control anymore. America made this bed. Time for it to lay in it. The amount of stupidity is fucking ridiculous. We either go all the way or not at all.
Gun bill is getting even weaker!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/15/manchin-toomey-compromise_n_3088957.html?1366083198
Why not increase federal licensees so they can be placed in rural areas.
Fuck this. I hope Obama doesn't sign this nonsense. What's the point? The next time there's a shooting we'll hear "I guess gun control didn't work" snark from all angles.
Why not increase federal licensees so they can be placed in rural areas.
This attitude I don't think is helpful, ANYTHING is better than nothing. This bill will probably at least save one persons life I'd imagine. Thats worth it.