excelsiorlef
Member
I guess today was such a fuck up, this quote ran under the radar:
Trump on Gorsuch: 'Every 5-4 decision is because of me'
I mean not really every 5-4 is because of Kennedy basically.
I guess today was such a fuck up, this quote ran under the radar:
Trump on Gorsuch: 'Every 5-4 decision is because of me'
He was a middle-class kid who worked his way into Harvard Law and decided to spend his time being a community organizer in Harlem and the South Side of Chicago, but he knows nothing about "the lived experiences of Americans."
This pandering to the WHITE working class while disparaging a well loved black president is going to alienate quite a few voters from the most reliable voting bloc in this country.
I think President Obama, like many others in both parties, talk about a set of big national statistics that look shiny and great but increasingly have giant blind spots, she told the Guardian. That GDP, unemployment, no longer reflect the lived experiences of most Americans.
What is a government supposed to report if not job numbers, GDP, unemployment rates, real and nominal median incomes...
It doesn't run like your hippy communes where you cound how many one handed claps and spirit fingers waves occurred for Jim producing the best organic pumpkin.
I mean not really every 5-4 is because of Kennedy basically.
It's pretty much an implied threat to Gorsuch, kind of like a cartoon mob boss reminding someone exactly who his benefactor is, and how breaking that contract is a direct affront to himself and his legacy.
Trump's convictions seem to change day after day, so it's inevitable that one of Gorsuch's opinions will contradict him eventually, either if he tries to hold to a consistent ideology or bend to Trump's whims.
I got bored around the time you started indulging in weird personal speculations about the motivations behind my arguments rather that just responding to me.
Every single Ossoff voter from the primary better turn out for the run-off.
I doubt it. Democrats have a purity test problem like the tea party who are known for snatching defeat from victory. People acting like petulant children is the reality.
Yeah. Don't ban cars. Make more "livable cities."Dude, as a dyed in the wool political crank, I have to tell you that you need to figure out how to market your ideas better. Propose a London-on-steroids system where we de-automobilize urban cores through onerous entrance-exit fees combined by massive public transit investment. No one will take you seriously if you start with "ban cars". Read Cass Sunstein, we need to nudge nudge nudge nudge nudge.
Same, tbh. I just can't understand the whole human intuition thing, especially when the fatalities from car accidents kind of show that's hardly a failsafe. Personally, would much rather trust the thing that actually has 360 degree cameras and GPS and shit (while I have blindspots) and is incapable of panicking and acting irrational (I can, particularly in life or death situations), but that's me. Why would I even begin to suspect myself of being able to make a better decision than such a machine could in most circumstances? That's just silly. But such ideas seem quite pervasive regardless of how silly they are, so something like this seems necessary at some point or another.Don't take this the wrong way, but this sentence sums up why I believe we'll eventually need to ban or heavily restrict car ownership.Strimei said:And I'll go with human intuition over driving AI every time.
Economic forces can't arbitrage someone out of a position that economic forces didn't arbitrage them into.
New GA6 poll (Anzalone)
https://twitter.com/ossoff/status/859229421412257792
Ossoff (D): 48
Handel (R): 47
Undecided: 5
Handel takes this I think, close election but she wins.
God I haaaate this faux macho stuff. You fucking child, grow up.It's pretty much an implied threat to Gorsuch, kind of like a cartoon mob boss reminding someone exactly who his benefactor is, and how breaking that contract is a direct affront to himself and his legacy.
Trump's convictions seem to change day after day, so it's inevitable that one of Gorsuch's opinions will contradict him eventually, either if he tries to hold to a consistent ideology or bend to Trump's whims.
Said voters already voted for Ossoff once though. If anything I could see drop-off from people not understanding what the run-off election is. "I already voted in April!"I doubt it. Democrats have a purity test problem like the tea party who are known for snatching defeat from victory. People acting like petulant children is the reality.
Depends on what metric you look at I suppose. Clinton only lost the district by 1.5%, but Ossoff matching that would be a good sign in the long run, whether that reflects anger at Trump or trends in the district being good for us.What is the standard political lean of that seat? If they shave it down to 1-3 points is it a bad sign for Republicans?
It's pretty much an implied threat to Gorsuch, kind of like a cartoon mob boss reminding someone exactly who his benefactor is, and how breaking that contract is a direct affront to himself and his legacy.
Trump's convictions seem to change day after day, so it's inevitable that one of Gorsuch's opinions will contradict him eventually, either if he tries to hold to a consistent ideology or bend to Trump's whims.
I mean it's true. They would have kept being 4-4 or 5-3 decisions without Trump appointing gorsuch, also true in the alternate reality Hillary was elected in because they would have kept blocking democratic nominees as long as they held the senateI guess today was such a fuck up, this quote ran under the radar:
Trump on Gorsuch: 'Every 5-4 decision is because of me'
What is a government supposed to report if not job numbers, GDP, unemployment rates, real and nominal median incomes...
It doesn't run like your hippy communes where you cound how many one handed claps and spirit fingers waves occurred for Jim producing the best organic pumpkin.
According to politico we would have Supreme Court Justice Cory Booker right now.I mean it's true. They would have kept being 4-4 or 5-3 decisions without Trump appointing gorsuch, also true in the alternate reality Hillary was elected in because they would have kept blocking democratic nominees as long as they held the senate
ayyy lmaoAccording to politico we would have Supreme Court Justice Cory Booker right now.
(Lol)
You are saying they would show up for a jungle primary but not the general special?
lmao Joe going in on Trump
To "maybe a yes"You guys still watch Morning Joe? Don't they just switch between loving Trump and hating Trump like every two weeks?
I think AHCA passing looks more likely, Webster is now gone from No to maybe a Yes. Lot of pressure being applied as last chance to pass repeal.
So the AHCA is passing now?
So the AHCA is passing now?
So the AHCA is passing now?
NoSo the AHCA is passing now?
I doubt it. Democrats have a purity test problem like the tea party who are known for snatching defeat from victory. People acting like petulant children is the reality.
Morning Joe finally going all in on Trump's dementia.
Washington (CNN)
Bob Hemseath, whose corn-farming business hinges on the whims of mother nature, is comfortable with uncertainty. But as the fourth-generation farmer heads onto his northeast Iowa farm for the 2017 planting season, it's the uncertainty coming from the White House that has Hemseath increasingly worried.
The farmer listened during the 2016 campaign as Donald Trump, the real estate magnate turned politician, promised to end the North American Free Trade Agreement. Hemseath, a Republican whose industry relies heavily on exports to Mexico, chalked it up to political bluster, noted Hillary Clinton's anti-trade rhetoric and voted for Trump in November.
Now that Trump is looking to make good on his promise, Hemseath -- and countless corn, soybean and dairy farmers like him -- are worried the President's NAFTA rhetoric could directly impact the markedly narrow margins that provide them their livelihood. The same rural communities that animated Trump's campaign, would feel the brunt of changes to the trade deal, hurting the President's political base as he tries to make good on a key component of the campaign that got him elected.
Before someone else does itPro-Trump farmers now worry he was serious about NAFTA repeal
Yes, the content is as awe-inspiring as the headline makes it sound.
Pro-Trump farmers now worry he was serious about NAFTA repeal
Yes, the content is as awe-inspiring as the headline makes it sound.
I should not watch MSNBC as much as I should not watch FoxNews. But CNN has gotten so bad lately this Morning Joe thing is interesting and refreshing.
I'm so heartbroken Al Jazeera isn't on the air anymore. I like to have something on as I eat, and I always miss the BBC news broadcast. I somehow always hit their sports section.
No
If they had the votes they wouldn't be trotting out maybes as examples.
Voting for this bill is signing your own death warrant, and there's enough GOP house members that know this
Right now there seems to be a little more inertia with the "pass something" crowd
But on Monday, a stream of moderate members came out against the bill, putting its prospects in serious doubt and leaving little room for further defections. By early Tuesday, CNN's whip count suggested that 21 Republican lawmakers had said they would vote against the new iteration of the bill -- a compromise between some conservatives and moderates.
You can still watch Al Jazeera English, from their youtube stream but their news is a lot more global now.
I have it on a lot, their documentaries are still pretty damn good.