Fragamemnon
Member
syllogism said:Rasmussen has Obama up by 8 in MN
And McCain up 3 in NC (though crosstabs are in the premium area so I can't say how "good" the poll is).
syllogism said:Rasmussen has Obama up by 8 in MN
It has Obama getting 98% of AA vote, which is pretty funny if plausibleFragamemnon said:And McCain up 3 in NC (though crosstabs are in the premium area so I can't say how "good" the poll is).
Seeing that previous democratic candidates received roughly 90% of the AA vote, I don't find it too surprising that an AA candidate is able to increase those numbers.syllogism said:It has Obama getting 98% of AA vote, which is pretty funny if plausible
yea...saturday/sunday oldShiggie said:McCain has 13 cars
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/22/dems-seize-on-mccains-13-cars-2/
old?
Shiggie said:McCain has 13 cars
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/22/dems-seize-on-mccains-13-cars-2/
old?
ryutaro's mama said:
AniHawk said:Five, at one point.
What do you mean 5 just between his parents? That's still plenty. My parents only had one car and my mother couldn't drive.quadriplegicjon said:five just between your parents? the 13 are only between john and cindy. the whole thing is a little childish though.
mj1108 said:First it was houses...now it's cars.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/21/dems-seize-on-mccains-13-cars/
The point is he lied about that retarded thing you are laughing at.methane47 said:LOL OH GAWD he owns a Honda!! Non american car... Dont vote for that guy.. :lol
ViperVisor said:(Cindy McCain also drives a Lexus and daughter Meghan owns a Toyota Prius, but neither are registered to the McCains.)
So it is really 15?
:lolRapeApe said:
Napoleonthechimp said:What do you mean 5 just between his parents? That's still plenty. My parents only had one car and my mother couldn't drive.
Senator John McCains campaign manager was paid more than $30,000 a month for five years as president of an advocacy group set up by the mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to defend them against stricter regulations, current and former officials say.
Mr. McCain, the Republican candidate for president, has recently begun campaigning as a critic of the two companies and the lobbying army that helped them evade greater regulation as they began buying riskier mortgages with implicit federal backing. He and his Democratic rival, Senator Barack Obama, have donors and advisers who are tied to the companies.
But last week the McCain campaign stepped up a running battle of guilt by association when it began broadcasting commercials trying to link Mr. Obama directly to the government bailout of the mortgage giants this month by charging that he takes advice from Fannie Maes former chief executive, Franklin Raines, an assertion both Mr. Raines and the Obama campaign dispute.
Incensed by the advertisements, several current and former executives of the companies came forward to discuss the role that Rick Davis, Mr. McCains campaign manager and longtime adviser, played in helping Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac beat back regulatory challenges when he served as president of their advocacy group, the Homeownership Alliance, formed in the summer of 2000. Some who came forward were Democrats, but Republicans, speaking on the condition of anonymity, confirmed their descriptions.
The value that he brought to the relationship was the closeness to Senator McCain and the possibility that Senator McCain was going to run for president again, said Robert McCarson, a former spokesman for Fannie Mae, who said that while he worked there from 2000 to 2002, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac together paid Mr. Daviss firm $35,000 a month. Mr. Davis didnt really do anything, Mr. McCarson, a Democrat, said.
Mr. Daviss role with the group has bubbled up as an issue in the campaign, but the extent of his compensation and the details of his role have not been reported previously.
Mr. McCain was never a leading critic or defender of the mortgage giants, although several former executives of the companies said Mr. Davis did draw Mr. McCain to a 2004 awards banquet that the companies Homeownership Alliance held in a Senate office building. The organization printed a photograph of Mr. McCain at the event in its 2004 annual report, bolstering its clout and credibility. The event honored several other elected officials, including at least two Democrats, Gov. Edward G. Rendell of Pennsylvania and Representative Artur Davis of Alabama.
In an interview Sunday night with CNBC and The New York Times, Mr. McCain noted that Mr. Davis was no longer working on behalf of the mortgage giants. He said Mr. Davis has had nothing to do with it since, and Ill be glad to have his record examined by anybody who wants to look at it.
Asked about the reports of Mr. Daviss role, a spokesman for Mr. McCain said that during the time when Mr. Davis ran the Homeownership Alliance, the senator had backed legislation to increase oversight of the mortgage companies accounting and executive compensation. The legislation, however, did not seek to change their anomalous structure as private companies with federal support.
The spokesman, Tucker Bounds, also noted that the Homeownership Alliance included nonprofit organizations like Habitat for Humanity and the Urban League. Its not controversial to promote homeownership and minority homeownership, Mr. Bounds said. More than a half-dozen current and former executives, however, said the Homeownership Alliance was set up mainly to defend Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by promoting their role in the housing market, and the two companies paid almost the entire cost of the groups operations.
They were financed largely, possibly exclusively, by Fannie and Freddie, said William R. Maloni, a Democrat who is a former head of industry relations for Fannie Mae. We thought it would be helpful to have someone who was a broadly recognized Republican to be the face of the organization, and that person became Rick Davis. Mr. Maloni added, Rick, for that purpose, turned out to be quite good. (Several executives said Mr. Daviss compensation was not unusual for the companies well-connected consultants.)
The federal bailout of the two mortgage giants has become an emblem of what critics say is the outdated or inadequate regulatory system that allowed the financial system to slide into crisis this summer.
At the time that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac recruited Mr. Davis to run the Homeownership Alliance in 2000, they were under new pressure from private industry rivals and deregulation-minded Republicans who argued that the two companies federal sponsorship gave them an unfair advantage and put taxpayers at risk. Critics of the companies had formed their own Washington-based advocacy group, FM Watch. They were pushing for regulations that would deter the companies from expanding into new areas, including riskier and more profitable mortgages.
Mr. Davis had recently returned to his lobbying firm from running Mr. McCains unexpectedly strong 2000 Republican primary campaign, which elevated Mr. McCains profile as a legislator and Mr. Daviss as a lobbyist.
You can say what you want about free-market distortions, but people like the system because it gets them into houses cheap, Mr. Davis said to Institutional Investor magazine in 2000, adding that he would run the advocacy group out of his Alexandria, Va., lobbying firm.
The organization also hired Public Strategies, a communications firm that included former Bush adviser Mark McKinnon. Mr. Davis wrote letters and gave speeches for the group. In April 2001, he sent out a press release headlined, Its Tax Day Do You Know Where Your Deductions Are? For Most Americans, Theyre in Your Home.
But by the end of 2005, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were recovering from accounting problems and re-examining costs, former executives said. The companies decided the Homeownership Alliance had outlived its usefulness, and it disappeared.
ViperVisor said:LBJ got 94% in the wake of the Civil Rights movement.
If he can match that I will be surprised.
Maybe I am overestimating the # of AA GOPers based on their inflated numbers on cable news. I guess they like affirmative action after all.
Obama has a campaign jet, too.RapeApe said:
But why did that poll have him at 98% and why would he still be down 3 if that was the case??VanMardigan said:I'm quite confident Obama can hit 95%. The AA population is excited beyond belief, and understandably so.
VanMardigan said:I'm quite confident Obama can hit 95%. The AA population is excited beyond belief, and understandably so.
ChoklitReign said:Obama has a campaign jet, too.
artredis1980 said:Front page on the NY TIMES
Loan Titans Paid McCain Campaign Manager Nearly $2 Million to defend Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from Regulators
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/22/u...r=1&oref=slogin&ref=politics&pagewanted=print
mAcOdIn said:You place safety and prosperity over integrity and loyalty, I just believe the opposite. That's also why you guys would be more in tune with a financial bail out while I'm more apt to say fuck them and watch the whole system collapse smiling while whatever shitstorm that brings comes my way.
I'd rather do what I think is right and laugh all the way to hell or where ever then live a long life with walks on the beach and a boatload of cash. Different strokes for different folks I guess.
Edit: Oh and thanks for not reading my third option about just doing business as usual. If you want to feel all good about yourself and call lip service and diplomatic BS aid or support then I guess sure you're right, if you want to be honest with yourself however feel free to come over to my side. I don't think Georgians if occupied by Russia would consider our pleading and money "support," but I digress.
ChoklitReign said:Obama has a campaign jet, too.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0908/Brooks_and_his_many_critics.html?showallDavid Brooks, a liberal's favorite conservative, talks to the Washington Post today about how he can't make anyone happy -- that includes anti-war critics (who aren't fans of his neocon views), conservative talk-radio hosts (who think he's a tweedy elitist), and even his Obama-loving family (who just think he's wrong).
After Brooks gave a lukewarm review of Obama's convention speech on PBS, his wife, Sarah, texted him from their Bethesda home: "You are crazy. That was great." What was worse, she reported that their 9-year-old son, Aaron, had said: "For the first time, I really disagree with Daddy."
That, Brooks said, "was like a knife stuck in my heart."
What was worse, she reported that their 9-year-old son, Aaron, had said: "For the first time, I really disagree with Daddy."
Fatalah said:That's just beautiful. We have a big week ahead of us, I can't wait to see how each day pans out leading to the convention. Last week was just a barn burner, as Jim Ross would call it.
But I have a feeling both sides may run a quiet campaign leading into the debates.
Although, what's this I'm reading about Obama wanting to downplay the importance of this first debate? Bah, humbug, Barack! We've been waiting for this day for months!
syllogism said:http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0908/Brooks_and_his_many_critics.html?showall
As someone who reads almost his every column, I found this funny
It makes good theater, but Fannie and Freddie's collapse are far removed from the origins of the crisis. It's good to watch McCain's false populism fall flat on his face though.artredis1980 said:Front page on the NY TIMES
Loan Titans Paid McCain Campaign Manager Nearly $2 Million to defend Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from Regulators
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/22/u...r=1&oref=slogin&ref=politics&pagewanted=print
Stoney Mason said:Obama's problem is he doesn't seem like the kind of guy who could go into an Applebee's salad bar, and people think he fits in naturally there...
u mean debate?Fatalah said:That's just beautiful. We have a big week ahead of us, I can't wait to see how each day pans out leading to the convention. Last week was just a barn burner, as Jim Ross would call it.
But I have a feeling both sides may run a quiet campaign leading into the debates.
What's this I'm reading about Obama wanting to downplay the importance of this first debate? Bah, humbug, Barack! We've been waiting for this day for months!
lawblob said:Obama needs to be aggressive in the first debate. I guarantee McCain will come out swinging like a cornered animal, I would too if I were down in the polls. Obama needs to be fiery and intense or he runs the risk of looking soft.
Essentially, it's all about power. He (quite controversially) described Barack Obama as a power-hungry, ruthless person. Going into detail about how he got his seat on the Illinois senate by getting all other candidates disqualified.
Fatalah said:That's just beautiful. We have a big week ahead of us, I can't wait to see how each day pans out leading to the convention. Last week was just a barn burner, as Jim Ross would call it.
But I have a feeling both sides may run a quiet campaign leading into the debates.
What's this I'm reading about Obama wanting to downplay the importance of this first debate? Bah, humbug, Barack! We've been waiting for this day for months!
lol he's playing the Rezko card? That's the mini-boss before the Wright card! :lolGhaleonEB said:I'm actually pleased that McCain is reduced to playing the Rezko card this early. It shows how desperate he's getting.
Good results in the NC and MI Rasmussen polls.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQ0c...008/09/election_central_morning_round_165.phpThe Lamonster said:lol he's playing the Rezko card? That's the mini-boss before the Wright card! :lol
btw Ghal u have a link?
Dude ought to trade in some of those houses for a hotel.RapeApe said: