speculawyer
Member
Door2Dawn said:SUSA POLL: O: 51 M:45 in VA.
ABC News/WaPo poll: O: 50 M:44 in VA.
If Obama takes VA, this election is so over. Thank you, George "Macaca" Allen.
Door2Dawn said:SUSA POLL: O: 51 M:45 in VA.
ABC News/WaPo poll: O: 50 M:44 in VA.
It is from some cartoon in during the Hillary v. Obama days that I never quite understood.Smiles and Cries said:who is this guy? a GAFFer?
Y2Kev said:I honestly don't see Obama winning VA and not OH. I think OH is a necessary condition for VA.
Obama has a far larger organization in Virginia and far more loyalty among the dem party establishment there.Y2Kev said:I honestly don't see Obama winning VA and not OH. I think OH is a necessary condition for VA.
Well . . . that is kinda my thinking . . . if Obama wins VA, that means he has mostly likely already won MI, MN, IA, PA, OH, NM, CO and maybe even IN.Y2Kev said:I honestly don't see Obama winning VA and not OH. I think OH is a necessary condition for VA.
Y2Kev said:I honestly don't see Obama winning VA and not OH. I think OH is a necessary condition for VA.
besada said:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/22/dirty-secret-of-the-bailo_n_128294.html
I've just gotten off the phone expressing my displeasure to my congressperson. I hope others will do the same. Regardless of anyone's opinion on the necessity of a bailout, the idea that we'd turn over $700 billion to an appointed official with zero oversight is ridiculous.
I know the cartoon but who is that doing the poses?speculawyer said:It is from some cartoon in during the Hillary v. Obama days that I never quite understood.
http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Card_CrusherSmiles and Cries said:who is this guy? a GAFFer?
:lol no wayChoklitReign said:
:lol :lol wtf?!?!Frank the Great said:
ChoklitReign said:
Stoney Mason said:For the first time, I'm starting to think Virginia is possible. That 3 point lead gets even bigger when you look at registered voters.
Registered Voters VA:
Obama 50, McCain 44
infiniteloop said:nice
Pennsylvania
O48% M45%
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...tion_2008_pennsylvania_presidential_election2
I just can't get over the idea that he could win VA.Frank the Great said:Why? The demographics are very different in the two states. They really have nothing to do with each other.
Holding steady in PA, but that's a disappointing FL number. Most others have shown it closer recently. Then again, Rasmussen was the only pollster to show McCain ahead in New Mexico recently, so I'll wait for another FL poll to take it too seriously.infiniteloop said:Pennsylvania
O48% M45%
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...tion_2008_pennsylvania_presidential_election2
FL
McCain on top 51% to 46%.
capslock said:Being just 3 points ahead in PA is nice?
Cheebs said:Obama has a far larger organization in Virginia and far more loyalty among the dem party establishment there.
The House decides the president in an electoral tie.Zeliard said:VA scares the shit out of me, despite the positive polling for Obama. There are some significant parts that truly bleed red. Hopefully the AA/young peeps vote puts him over the top.
By the way, what happens if there's an actual tie in the electorate vote? I've heard that possibility being thrown around, when looking at the likely toss-up states.
Zeliard said:By the way, what happens if there's an actual tie in the electorate vote? I've heard that possibility being thrown around, when looking at the likely toss-up states.
speculawyer said:It is from some cartoon in during the Hillary v. Obama days that I never quite understood.
GhaleonEB said:The House decides the president in an electoral tie.
Obama wins.
Michigan, Pennsylvania and Virgina look good to me. It's imperative that he holds Michigan. I get the impression that Pennsylvania has a diminished ROI scenario for McCain.infiniteloop said:
Nate at fivethirtyeight calculates a 1.5% GOP house effect and factors that in when looking at Rasmussen polls.Door2Dawn said:Words can not describe my seething hatred for rassumen.
It will be. Not just there, but everywhere. Look for record numbers.Rur0ni said:Michigan, Pennsylvania and Virgina look good to me. It's imperative that he holds Michigan. I get the impression that Pennsylvania has a diminished ROI scenario for McCain.
Virginia... if it keeps trending lean (0 to 6) Obama, then I think McCain is fucked there come election day due to GOTV. AA turnout needs to be strong.
FL (and to a certain extent NC) seem to be the back-up plan, in case they lose PA, MI or any of the Kerry Midwestern states. FL and NC are probably is not terribly correlated with what's happening in the Midwest.Cheebs said:OH and FL don't matter.
Colorado and Virginia are the new OH and FL.
Yes. I'm not sure what the state delegation breakdown is.Zeliard said:Each state delegation would get a vote, rather than individual members, right?
I would go as far to say not only that but I think NC is more likely to switch than Ohio. The rustbelt seems to have a negative view of Obama more so than most other regions that are pre-disposed to democrats. He'll win MI and PA, but it wont be as easy as it was for say Gore.Rhindle said:I've always felt that VA was a better prospect than OH. OH was alwways going to be tough with the large white blue collar demographic.
Fatalah said:Electoral-vote.com and Princeton's page aren't as lopsided as 538. I feel most confident when the 3 of them are in congruence with each other. What the dillio.
Perceived importance in presidential elections is the only thing Ohio has going for it. :-(Cheebs said:OH and FL don't matter.
Colorado and Virginia are the new OH and FL.
Trurl said:Perceived importance in presidential elections is the only thing Ohio has going for it. :-(
Trurl said:Perceived importance in presidential elections is the only thing Ohio has going for it. :-(
Rhindle said:FL (and to a certain extent NC) seem to be the back-up plan, in case they lose PA, MI or any of the Kerry Midwestern states. FL and NC are probably is not terribly correlated with what's happening in the Midwest.
I've always felt that VA was a better prospect than OH. OH was always going to be tough with the large racist demographic.
Not to mention that it is Rasmussen.infiniteloop said:After those rumored 'leaks' of McCain being up in PA, yes
She even shrugged off her resemblance to Gov. Sarah Palin, whom she won raves for portraying on the season premiere of NBC's "Saturday Night Live."
"But then my kid saw her on TV and said, `That's Mommy!'" she said.
She was more open about her thoughts on reprising the "SNL" role. As in, she'd prefer not to.
"I want to be done playing this lady Nov. 5," she said. "So if anybody can help me be done playing this lady Nov. 5, that would be good for me."
Another factor: I think that if we see a "Bradley effect" in the election, it is most likely to manifest itself in the Midwest. If Obama is leading by a just couple of points in the polls come election day in PA and MI (or OH), that could mean trouble.maximum360 said:Fixed.![]()
In reality though, it's the same problem he faces in MI and PA. The 18 months of we don't really know Obama or claims of him being "exotic" by some in the media don't really help either.
gluv65 said: