saelz8 said:Biden - Bipartasanship
The gulf between these parties methods in explaining things is wide. It's embarrassing. I wish it wasn't the case.
Just image McCain explaining that with that amount of details. Hint: You can't.
saelz8 said:Biden - Bipartasanship
The gulf between these parties methods in explaining things is wide. It's embarrassing. I wish it wasn't the case.
Patrick Bedard said:Turning Asphalt Into Gold - Column
Selling the Roads Out From Under Us: Tapped-Out Governments Grab for Cash.
BY PATRICK BEDARD
November 2007
Pssst. Hey, buddy, I got this bridge, goes to Brooklyn, make ya a deal.
Yeah, rightsnickerthats the oldest con on the planet.
But maybe the joke is over. The city of Chicago, in 2004, really did sell its famed Chicago Skyway Bridge connecting the Dan Ryan Expressway to the Indiana East-West Toll Road. The price was $1.83 billion. Two years later, the state of Indiana sold the Toll Road for $3.85 billion.
To us motorists, roads are about getting where were going, but to the buyers and sellers in the above deals, its about the money. Chicago and Indiana wanted money right now, for reasons that governments always have for wanting moneypassing out bennies to voters. Will they hock the furniture to do it? Just watch em.
Why would somebody buy a toll road? Theres only one reason: to capture a steady stream of future income. Pension funds, particularly, have to plan for 50, even 100 years into the future. With interest rates low over the past half-dozen years, theyre grabbing for better returns. Theyre looking for income streams that have been poorly managed. Almost anything operated by government fits that definition.
The buyer of both the Chicago Skyway and the Indiana Toll Road was the Australian syndicate Macquarie Bank, as lead partner along with Spanish investment company Cintra SA. Macquarie Bank has been buying roads worldwide. Its operating the Dulles Greenway, a toll road from Dulles airport to Leesburg, Virginia, and bidding on several more, including an 11-mile highway in Denver.
Cintra has a $1.3 billion deal with Texas to build two segments of the Trans Texas Corridor east of Austin, after which it would collect tolls for 50 years. While interest rates stay low, expect these highway plays to continue.
Were watching the undoing of the American way. Weve always counted on our government to lead in building transportation networks. The Midwest was opened in the early 1800s when New York governor De Witt Clinton built the Erie Canal. The nationwide interstate highway system was a vision of the Eisenhower administration.
Should we motorists be alarmed? In some cases, you bet. For example, Texas has been scheming to convert State Highway 121 in Dallas, which was built by taxpayers as a free road, into a private toll road. Earlier this year the Texas House put a two-year kibosh on such public-private partnerships, although the politics could change before this sees print. Chicagos sale of the skyway looks like something only a politician could love.
First, a clarification. The roads mentioned above werent actually sold. The deals are written as long-term leases in which the buyertechnically, the lesseepays the money up front in exchange for the toll income over a stated period99 years for the Chicago Skyway, 75 years for the Indiana Toll Road.
Why would Chicago pols love the skyway deal? Easy. All politicians dance to this ditty: Dont tax you, dont tax me, tax the man behind the tree. The taxmans game is to shift the burden out of his district to voters who have no say in his reelection. Skyway toll payers are almost entirely commuters from Indiana. So, in effect, the pols secured a $1.8 billion windfall, about one-third of Chicagos operating budget, at the expense of Indiana residents.
But whats that giant sucking sound? Chicago sold a 99-year stream of revenue for payments that will end in 10 years. What will the pols do for cash over the following 89 years? Worse, not one dollar of that income will go to Chicago-area transportation projects. Talk about a complete sellout of motorists. Skyway tolls hadnt been raised since 1993, but the fine print of the contract allows the new owner to more than double tolls over the next dozen years, and to continue raises for the rest of the lease. (Me: again, screwing the working middle class families...)
Selling roads and bridges isnt necessarily a bad deal. At least Indiana earmarked all the proceeds from selling the Toll Road for investment in transportation infrastructure. Moreover, tolls were significantly increased in advance of the sale, by 70 percent for two-axle vehicles and a multistep 113 percent for trucks. In effect, this cranked up the income stream immediately, thereby increasing the price a buyer would be willing to pay. The bottom line is more money up front for Indiana.
But watch out for toll increases. Financial analysts calculate that a three-percent annual hike will be necessary to justify the $3.85 billion purchase price. That would raise passenger-car tolls for the roads full 157 miles from $8 initially to $71 at the end of the lease. The contract allows that much and more, based on various economic-growth scenarios.
Financial analysts say all these infrastructure sales are based on the ability to raise tolls in the future. Thats what makes toll roads attractive investments compared with fixed-rate bonds. But governments could raise tolls, too, if politicians werent afraid of angry calls from constituents. Macquarie charges commissions and fees when it repackages these investments for resale to pension funds. Moreover, private investors must rent money to put deals like this together in the first place. Since governments can always rent money cheaper than can privateersmuni bonds pay lower interest ratesthe state, acting for the taxpayers, should be able to fund better roads and bridges than private companies can.
Let me propose a simple standard by which we, the people, should decide if selling roads is a good idea. What happens to the money? If its plowed back into transportation infrastructure, mobility will be improved. But if its a scheme to turn asphalt into pocket money for the politicos, as Chicago did, just say no.
Patrick Bedard said:Since governments can always rent money cheaper than can privateersmuni bonds pay lower interest ratesthe state, acting for the taxpayers, should be able to fund better roads and bridges than private companies can
Cooter said:I'd say it's about even.
You guys are really too smart to think politicians are that different. Regardless of party they all only care about one thing, power. They will do or say whatever it takes to keep it. The fact that the right is beholden to the NRA and the religious right is no different than the left being beholden to trial lawyers and environmentalists. It really isn't.
frankthurk said:Are you going to reply at all to what everyone else has said about the USPS?
Y2Kev said:i don't want civil unions! all the gays would be complacent! I'd suspect they'd rather be curedddd by ms palin! Cure sarah cure ALLALALALALALA SPEAKING IN TONGUES AHALALALA
monchi-kun said:Dude...i replied to this last time...THE USPS IS SELF-SUFFICIENT!!!!
SELF SUFFICIENT
- AKA SELF-SUFFICIENT!!!!
Azrael said:The media has been much more negative towards Obama than McCain. Other than the houses gaffe, they've been pretty soft on him. The media has ignored McCain's connections with Charles Keating while talking a lot about Obama's connections to Rezko and Ayers, and a harmless flub from Michelle Obama being "really proud for the first time" gets wide coveage while Cindy McCain stealing drugs from the needy to feed her drug habit gets almost none.
Some of that is Obama's fault though for pulling too many punches. While he shouldn't be making the attacks himself, he shouldn't be muzzling his supporters from hitting back as hard and dirty as the Republicans are hitting him.
ComputerNerd said:
monchi-kun said:ok, so i read this...and where the hell does it say the government is funding the USPS with taxes subsidies or otherwise...which was your argument to begin with.
we are not arguing profit/loss here we are arguing against what you said that the USPS is funded by taxes
This has to be some kind of joke :lolComputerNerd said:USPS's losses in 2008 aren't much better.
http://www.foliomag.com/2008/usps-1-1b-loss-could-force-maximum-rate-hike-next-year
1.1 billion dollars in losses year to date.
ComputerNerd said:USPS's losses in 2008 aren't much better.
http://www.foliomag.com/2008/usps-1-1b-loss-could-force-maximum-rate-hike-next-year
1.1 billion dollars in losses year to date.
ComputerNerd said:Those billion-dollar a year losses are going to be coming from somewhere.
CharlieDigital said:What it really comes down to is the intensity of the criticism and dirty laundry coming out against Palin.
But guess what? Obama had to go through the same media hounding! Surprise! But it's taken place over several months. Sure, it seems a lot more intense and aggressive when it's all compressed into 4 days, but that's not the fault of the media.
ComputerNerd said:
monchi-kun said:so what's it to you? i thought you only railed against things funded by the federal government that you feel shouldn't be. what's the point you are trying to make here?
monchi-kun said:so what's it to you? i thought you only railed against things funded by the federal government that you feel shouldn't be. what's the point you are trying to make here?
well, it's NOT coming from the federal government as you have claimed it was...TWICE
Are you seriously this stupid?
How is it the media's fault that John McCain picked someone who was hardly on anyone's radar and who the nation knows nothing about?ComputerNerd said:For the bold, do you really believe that?
Really?
You're doing a lousy job at making it.ComputerNerd said:USPS should be sold off.
Yes, they come from the surplus that they have right after when they raise stamp prices.ComputerNerd said:Those billion-dollar a year losses are going to be coming from somewhere.
The media's fault? Fuck, it's the media's job.ComputerNerd said:For the bold, do you really believe that?
Really?
ComputerNerd said:USPS should be sold off.
ComputerNerd said:For the bold, do you really believe that?
Really?
In my experience?Tommie Hu$tle said:So is this small town values?
monchi-kun said:because you actually believed that it was funded by your hard earned tax dollars
seriously, stop, there's no way around this...you got caught, be a man and admit you were wrong.
speculawyer said:That is the job of the media . . . are you a communist that only wants a state media? WTF?
demon said:The media's fault? Fuck, it's the media's job.
Tommie Hu$tle said:I just got off the phone with an old college buddy who lives in Tennessee and he just told me about a Domino's Pizza employee who was so upset that his brother had on an Obama shirt that he wrote all these racial slurs and doused the car with gasoline.
He called the Police and they didn't want to take a report because there was "Nothing they could do about it."
Look at the pictures below and you ask yourself if it is worth a report.
Politics aside how much longer are do we as Americans going to be subjected to fear tactics such as these? Americans have fought and died from the beginning of formation of this Union so that we all can all live in peace and thru the pursuit of happiness achieve the American Dream. We have to stop these cowardly attacks on one another. It is 2008 and this still exists? That is crazy to me. Well maybe it's not. So is this small town values?
![]()
![]()
Tommie Hu$tle said:I just got off the phone with an old college buddy who lives in Tennessee and he just told me about a Domino's Pizza employee who was so upset that his brother had on an Obama shirt that he wrote all these racial slurs and doused the car with gasoline.
He called the Police and they didn't want to take a report because there was "Nothing they could do about it."
RubxQub said:Anyone interested in Barack's past should kick on CNN.
Doing a walkthrough of his past.
More like a GameFAQs guidemonchi-kun said:Prima Guide or Brady Games walkthrough?
monchi-kun said:Prima Guide or Brady Games walkthrough?
speculawyer said:Tell him to get the badge number of the cop and go up the chain of command. Yeah, I doubt they'll try to find the perpetrator but there should at least be a report so it goes into the statistics. These cops are trying to make it look like they do a better job than the actually do by preventing crime reports from going into the public record.
The cop that refused to take a report should be disciplined.
If the don't come and take a report then it is time to call the local TV station and have them film the car and do a story about the do-nothing police.
I'm serious. Don't let this stand.
speculawyer said:Tell him to get the badge number of the cop and go up the chain of command. Yeah, I doubt they'll try to find the perpetrator but there should at least be a report so it goes into the statistics. These cops are trying to make it look like they do a better job than the actually do by preventing crime reports from going into the public record.
The cop that refused to take a report should be disciplined.
If the don't come and take a report then it is time to call the local TV station and have them film the car and do a story about the do-nothing police.
I'm serious. Don't let this stand.
:lolComputerNerd said:USPS should be sold off.
Tommie Hu$tle said:They have a pretty good idea of who the guy is. They have sent it to their local news stations and to CNN, NBC, FOX, and the rest of the major networks.
I get the feeling you don't get what you're linking to. This describes a one time loss due to a change to accounting to recognize pension liability.ComputerNerd said:
Wow. Maybe they should respond to that like a business, and I dunno, raise prices or something. Hey, didn't they do that recently?ComputerNerd said:USPS's losses in 2008 aren't much better.
http://www.foliomag.com/2008/usps-1-1b-loss-could-force-maximum-rate-hike-next-year
1.1 billion dollars in losses year to date.
1) They don't lose a billion dollars every year. They have performing at a break even level since the 1971 reorganization. You can see this both on the NALC site as well as the statement of net assets in their latest 10Q. USPS financials are available on their site, after allComputerNerd said:Those billion-dollar a year losses are going to be coming from somewhere.
Gruco said:I don't know why I bother researching to fight an argument this stupid, but...
On July 20, 2008, the pastor of Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palins home church, Larry Kroon, delivered a sermon called Sin Is Personal To God. Kroon, the senior pastor of the non-denominational Wasilla Bible Church in Wasilla, Alaska, used the book of Zephanaiah as his reference point for discussing that great day of the Lord when God will finally bring closure to human history a day of wrath. According to Kroon, all things and all people are going to bear the brunt of Gods intense anger. Theres anger with God, he proclaimed. He takes sin personal.
Kroon placed Zephaniah in a modern context, warning that the sinful habits of Americans would invite the wrath of God. And if Zephaniah were here today, Kroon bellowed, hed be saying, Listen, [God] is gonna deal with all the inhabitants of the earth. He is gonna strike out His hand against, yes, Wasilla; and Alaska; and the United States of America. Theres no exceptions here theres none. Its all.
RubxQub said:Anyone interested in Barack's past should kick on CNN.
Doing a walkthrough of his past.
Isn't he just talking about the end of the world?maximum360 said:http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/09/god-is-gonna-st.html
Full Audio is here: http://wasillabible.org/sermon_files/2008_Sermons/wbc080720.mp3
Full Transcript here: http://www.wasillabible.org/sermon_files/2008_Transcripts/Sin is Personal to God.doc
Now I fully expect this to played on cable news channels 24/7 for at least the next two weeks.
Sounds eerily similar to another sermon I heard. Too bad there's no video.
RubxQub said:Isn't he just talking about the end of the world?
Kolgar said:Yeah. McCain's was earlier.
Fox News is doing a two-night special on Palin.
During one of the videotaped debates for Alaska governor (or lieutenant governor, I'm not sure), the incumbent and some other man were squabbling at each other and all of a sudden Palin scolded, "You know, guys, Alaskans deserve a better discourse than this."
The two looked up right away and shut up immediately, with one of the men saying, "I agree," and that was that.
Sarah Barracuda indeed. :lol
maximum360 said:Sorry, I forgot. White preacher of a Republican candidate so context matters. ABC didn't care much for context when it broke the Rev. Wright story.
CharlieDigital said:B-U-M-B-L-E-B-E-E
Kolgar said:And what context was that? Rev. Wright is a nutjob and possibly worse.