Tyrone Slothrop
Banned
PANIX
GhaleonEB said:Everything is going to be okay.
Fatalah said:Although, I always felt like Obama's campaign was being run so intelligently--that it was in good hands and his people would make the right decisions to win this election. That was until Palin was picked. It's as if the Obama camp has stalled and is trying to figure out how to handle her.
Fatalah said:Although, I always felt like Obama's campaign was being run so intelligently--that it was in good hands and his people would make the right decisions to win this election. That was until Palin was picked. It's as if the Obama camp has stalled and is trying to figure out how to handle her..
Fatalah said:I really want Palin to be exposed for what she is--- an unfit pick for VP. I know that Obama camp will do it, but how long will it take?
Zeliard said:What the fuck? How does something like that even happen? I mean, how is that even allowed?
(1) 2004 election: A Minnesota elector, pledged for Democrats John Kerry and John Edwards, cast his or her presidential vote for John Ewards [sic], apparently accidentally. (All of Minnesota's electors cast their vice presidential ballots for John Edwards.) Minnesota's electors cast secret ballots, so unless one of the electors claims responsibility, it is unlikely that the identity of the faithless elector will ever be known. As a result of this incident, Minnesota Statutes were amended to provide for public balloting of the electors' votes and invalidation of a vote cast for someone other than the candidate the elector is pledged to.
syllogism said:According to 538, Mccain will likely today be up by a few points on Gallup
"Clearly, Palin is helping the McCain ticket. She has high favorability numbers, and has unified the Republican Party. The striking thing here in this poll is that McCain has pulled ahead among Catholics by double-digits. On the other hand, Palin is not helping with likely voting women who are not aligned with either political party. The undecided independent women voters decreased this week from 15% to 7%, but those women went to Obama. Palin is also helping among men, conservatives, notably with suburban and rural voters, and with frequent Wal-Mart shoppers, who tend to be "values" voters who like a good value for their money."
I live in a small conservative Ohio town (being mayor is no more of a qualification than being mayor of Wasilla) and the few Hillary supporters I know have switched over to Obama and actually resent the idea that women should vote for Sarah Palin just because she is a chick. Anecdotal evidence, but whatever.Kulock said:Also, seeing the unsure Republicans walk around with a gleam in their eyes when Sarah Palin was announced, because "it was a really smart choice." Why? She's going to capture all those upset Clinton voters, don't you know.
maharg said:To a large extent, I think they're doing the exact right thing. Making McCain and Palin expose themselves as being unfit. Imo, they're both going to get destroyed in the debates.
That's zogby interactive online poll so...Chiggs said:Zogby showing something similar:
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1548
From John Zogby himself:
Touchdown said:
Chrono said:
soul creator said:
BigJonsson said:Sarah Palin is Sean Avery?!?
AniHawk said:Oh I think they'll both be torn to shreds, but I doubt the media will say so. McCain will give a soundbite and short answers that the media loves, and Palin will do 'better than expected' while the GOP attacks Biden for being sexist, win or lose.
AniHawk said:while the GOP attacks Biden for being sexist, win or lose.
Kulock said:I don't wish ill of John McCain, but I'm not sure the potential reality of "President Palin" is striking people as clearly as it should.
AniHawk said:Oh I think they'll both be torn to shreds, but I doubt the media will say so. McCain will give a soundbite and short answers that the media loves, and Palin will do 'better than expected' while the GOP attacks Biden for being sexist, win or lose.
Chiggs said:Well, if it makes you feel better, she'd be impeached before she decided to go Fahrenheit 451 on libraries and push creationism into schools.
Zeliard said:That in particular is so damn true. That is exactly what will likely happen. Hopefully Biden destroys her rather unequivocally, so as to make even that an unlikely talking point.
AniHawk said:On the other hand, if the GOP could trick the American people three times in a row,
Quick, everyone raise their expectations of Palin!Zeliard said:That in particular is so damn true. That is exactly what will likely happen. Hopefully Biden destroys her rather unequivocally, so as to make even that an unlikely talking point.
AniHawk said:Canada, I hope you have room for a lot of sane people.
Vgamer said:53% to 47% Bush in Ohio 8% reporting.
Xenon said:haha this reminds me of the soda/car/rabbit race at halftime at sporting events with the back and forth....
+1 Bush
+1 Obama
the mrs
+1 Kerry(=P)
+1 Obama
not that it mattered in IL
GO BUSH!
CrimsonSkies said:"That so many people are stupid. Really, really stupid. Kerry is no saint, but if you can't see he's a better option than Bush, there's a problem."
Fuck you for calling Bush supporters stupid. I have a masters in mechanical engineering with a 4.0 GPA. I voted for Bush.
AniHawk said:I'm going to go and hijack a helicopter, steal a rocket launcher, and blow shit up to let some anger out.
Then I think I'll play GTA: San Andreas.
Diablos said:CO, NM, WI, MI, OH, NH, FL all currently leaning towards Bush. Not good, not good at all.
mashoutposse said:WHAT DO PEOPLE SEE IN THIS GUY.
-jinx- said:Living in this country just got even more dangerous for anyone with any kind of intelligence or dissenting opinion. I'm seriously so angry that I don't know how I'm going to sleep tonight.
lilraylewis said:*sigh*, any Canadian GAers need a roomie?
There will be blood.AniHawk said:Looking back at the 2004 Election thread... I think I blocked most of that out.
WTF.
Yep, *sigh* indeed. I wasn't really that emotionally invested in Kerry's campaign, though I deeply wanted Bush out of there. This time I need to see Obama win. I'm not sure what I'll do if he doesn't.
AniHawk said:Yep, *sigh* indeed. I wasn't really that emotionally invested in Kerry's campaign, though I deeply wanted Bush out of there. This time I need to see Obama win. I'm not sure what I'll do if he doesn't.
This is exactly why Bush won in 04. You cannot win an anti-campaign. People actually have to want you in there.AniHawk said:Yep, *sigh* indeed. I wasn't really that emotionally invested in Kerry's campaign, though I deeply wanted Bush out of there. This time I need to see Obama win. I'm not sure what I'll do if he doesn't.
Have met her. NOT HOT.Cloudy said:This is a bit OT but does anyone else find Kathleen Sebelius kind of hawt for an old chick? :lol
Was reading Huffington Post and saw her pic in an article
![]()
Total GILF*runs*
Saint Gregory said:I've been listening to that all week at work too. I can't help but think "Aren't these the same people who said that they couldn't support Obama because they didn't "know" him? Yet here comes this woman that no one has ever seen or heard of and they immediately all jump on the hype train :/
There is some truth to this notion. Part of the problem has to deal with the lobbyist and bureaucrats that run Washington. They don't have a side and they play both sides all the same. That is the depressing part of politics. This really isn't going to change any time soon no matter who is elected.Chrono said:To all the people earlier in this thread saying things would've been very different if Gore was elected, and that this election matters a lot, what do you think of Chomsky? Many here on GAF love him, and I saw a youtube video of him just recently going on about how there's no difference between the parties and that the American people knew this and that's why they didn't care for voting in the 2000 election. You'd think for someone so smart he'd learn to recognize stupidity, though it must be harder when he's a fucking moron himself.
Chrono said:To all the people earlier in this thread saying things would've been very different if Gore was elected, and that this election matters a lot, what do you think of Chomsky? Many here on GAF love him, and I saw a youtube video of him just recently going on about how there's no difference between the parties and that the American people knew this and that's why they didn't care for voting in the 2000 election. You'd think for someone so smart he'd learn to recognize stupidity, though it must be harder when he's a fucking moron himself.
echoshifting said:So how is everyone enjoying the mass hysterical panic and premature blues in this thread
Joke? Of course it'll be a factor. People won't get another chance to see Palin (i.e. Plain) live and on stage until then. All she'll be doing in the mean time is avoiding the press and reading her script. Lotsa "undecideds," partisans, etc. will be watching to see what all the Plain fuss is about. Me? I'll be watching for the lulz.devilhawk said:I hope you guys don't get your hopes to high on the vp debate. Traditionally, it never really is much of a factor.
How honest or non-crazy/crooked do you think McCain really is when he has essentially flip-flopped on everything he used to 'believe' just a short seven years ago? I mean, the guy has sold out to the crazies of his party just to win the election at any cost. If there was any serious hope that he'd just use the religious right's votes to get into the White House and then flip the switch to that ol' maverick moderate Republican McCain of 2000, that died when he made Palin his VP choice at the age of 72.lawblob said:I should note, however, that I also think McCain would be much better than Bush. McCain, IMO, is a much more honest person than Bush, and would not be nearly as crooked or crazy as the Bush administration.
maharg said:To a large extent, I think they're doing the exact right thing. Making McCain and Palin expose themselves as being unfit. Imo, they're both going to get destroyed in the debates.
The Abominable Snowman said:So apparently the GOP got 38.9 million viewers while the Dems fell just short at 38.4 million viewers. Does this have any significance? Was this already discussed?
Arde5643 said:The idea is simple, instead of defending against the lies and baseless attacks from GOP, attack their lies. Make it stick with the masses that GOP are all liars and slanderers.
Don't make the same mistake Kerry did - just defending against lies and slanders.
Instead, attack the lies - show all the facts and records of all their baseless claims.
Tommie Hu$tle said:They have a pretty good idea of who the guy is. They have sent it to their local news stations and to CNN, NBC, FOX, and the rest of the major networks.
Slurpy said:Thats my cynical view. History supports this view. Tragically.
Slurpy said:You really think so? Every day there's a new barrage of news pointing as to why she's utterly unfit for the position, exposing new hypocrisies, new lies, new information about her record which contradicts everything she says she is and everything she says she's done. Yet, the polls keep swinging to her favor more and more every day. It's sickening. What makes you think the debates will be any different?
Here's how I see it: Biden will, by any objective measure, destroy her in the debates when it comes to anything resembling issues/knowledge/policy, etc. After the debates we'll get the usual punditry bullshit, with guests and panelists representing republicans and democrats. Democrats will say Biden won, Republicans will obviously say Palin did. The public will listen to these asshats, everyone will believe what they want to believe, the ones who dont know what to believe will be told what to believe, and it will essentially be a wash. There will be very little actual intelligent scrutiny re the debate and regarding issues, but instead we'll get the usual fare of partisan punditry with expected results. Many will fawn over how well 'she held up' against Biden. She may even win some 'gotcha' moments on him. News networks will let republican shills spout their bullshit on air without major challenge, even if she fails spectacularly and epically.
Rinse and repeat for the presidential debates.
Do you honestly think most of those who are supporting McCain/Palin have the potential to have their minds changed by the debates? The answer is no. Palin, like McCain, has shown that she has the same type of invulnerability, the same resilience to reality, that he does- the people who support her don't really give a fuck about the reality of the situation, and aren't susceptible to have their opinion being changed.
Cue some desperate fear-mongering ads from the GOP close to election time, and who knows where we'll be.
Thats my cynical view. History supports this view. Tragically.
You have the basic idea right but are missing how the idea is put into action. The farthest right of the Republicans vote strictly on social issues. McCain in the past has been moderate on those issues. The social conservatives, which put Bush in office, will stay home if they don't get their attention. If you are any type of conservative wishing to get elected you must pander to the social conservatives as there numbers are much too great.MightyHedgehog said:How honest or non-crazy/crooked do you think McCain really is when he has essentially flip-flopped on everything he used to 'believe' just a short seven years ago? I mean, the guy has sold out to the crazies of his party just to win the election at any cost. If there was any serious hope that he'd just use the religious right's votes to get into the White House and then flip the switch to that ol' maverick moderate Republican McCain of 2000, that died when he made Palin his VP choice at the age of 72.
HocusPocus said:Palin = Winner!![]()
HocusPocus said:Palin = Winner!![]()
stressboy said:Ok thread over guys.. Palin is the winner.
GhaleonEB said:http://projects.washingtonpost.com/2008/pick-your-president/
The WP electoral map is now linked to a contest - predict the outcome. IE/Vista is being a bitch and not letting me submit but it's fun to tinker with.