Deus Ex Machina
Member
:lol
The video is up!!ralexand said:She's talking like she's Annie Oakley
:lol God, I hope there is video of this.
ralexand said:Well, he's trailing in Penn and likely to lose there.
Eight year olds, dude. Eight year olds.Amir0x said:Oh you just meant this state?
Well, when you say "race" i'm thinking the actual overall race for the nomination, which Hillary has a 0% chance of winning unless news leaks that Obama is actually a sister-raping pedarist.
impirius said:Obama just committed to "cut poverty in half" in ten years at the behest of Jim Wallis
ralexand said:I think that wordiness suggests that he's thought alot about an issue and is even in the moment is considering an issue verses just repeating a rote response.
.
impirius said:Obama just committed to "cut poverty in half" in ten years at the behest of Jim Wallis
Deus Ex Machina said:
She plays it off due to goodwill from Bill Clinton in 1992.MightyHedgehog said:You know, the whole elitist shit is just worthless. How can someone like Hillary even make a very strong case on the matter when she's spent the last thirty years or so being rich, living in mansions, and has 109 million in the bank today with her husband? Or McCain who has millions mostly due to his marriage? AFAIK, Obama just finished paying off his college loans and has barely one million to his name and spent more time voluntarily in community service than either of the other candidates? If Clinton and McCain press this ridiculous shit too far, their own personal wealth and histories will start to creep up from the back of things very quickly and hurt them in the long run.
Triumph said:Eight year olds, dude. Eight year olds.
Regardless of how they were brought up, the people that they are today are who we are electing or not electing to office. I was just pointing out the political bomb that McCain and Clinton are both playing with here.Cheebs said:She plays it off due to goodwill from Bill Clinton in 1992.
It's hard to remember but just how "backwards" Bill Clinton seemed to the public in 1992 after a president from a rich elitist political family (Bush Sr) and a hollywood star president (Reagan). Bill being raised by a a trailer trash mom who was always sleeping with new men and a drunk abusive step father in a white trash part of Arkansas without a penny to their name.
harSon said:The topic is closed![]()
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0408/Clinton_Out_of_touch_and_like_Gore.htmlClinton wins the coin toss (really) at the "Compassion Forum" this evening and chooses to receive.
The first question is, of course on Obama's remarks.
"The characteriation of people in a way that really seemed to be elitist and out of touch is really something that we have to overcome," she said, turning to the Democratic Party's problem with religious voters in the past.
"The Democratic Party, to be very blunt about it, has been viewed as a party that didn't understand and respect the values and the way of life of many of our fellow Americans," she said.
"It did seem so much in line with what often we are charged with -- someone goes to a closed door funraiser in San Francisco and makes comments" that, she said, could be seen as "patronizing."
Clinton then repeated her suggestion that John Kerry and Al Gore had failed to be seen as respecting people of faith, said Obama is " a good man and a man of faith."
"We had two very good men, and men of faith, run for president in 2000 and 2004," she said. "Large segments of the electorate concluded that they did not really understand, or relate to, or respect their ways of life."
The forum is streaming live on CNN.com, if you're feeling the need for a bit of...compassion.
I don't see her point because she has none.. and she's losing her mind making a suggestion like that about Gore and others.PhoenixDark said:Back on topic: Hillary throwing bleach in Gore's eye
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0408/Clinton_Out_of_touch_and_like_Gore.html
Wow. I see her point but damn that's still a pretty dumb thing to say. She's taking this too far
PhoenixDark said:Back on topic: Hillary throwing bleach in Gore's eye
Deus Ex Machina said:I don't see her point because she has none.. and she's losing her mind making a suggestion like that about Gore and others.
Yo candidate!PhoenixDark said:Her faith comment was off the mark, especially with respect to Kerry, but I understood the point about those two not connecting with regular people and seeming "out of touch" - once again, with respect to Kerry. But insulting their faith to make a point is just low.
PhoenixDark said:Her faith comment was off the mark, especially with respect to Kerry, but I understood the point about those two not connecting with regular people and seeming "out of touch" - once again, with respect to Kerry. But insulting their faith to make a point is just low.
Especially since Gore is one of the many keys to her future.Deus Ex Machina said:I don't see her point because she has none.. and she's losing her mind making a suggestion like that about Gore and others.
PhoenixDark said:Her faith comment was off the mark, especially with respect to Kerry, but I understood the point about those two not connecting with regular people and seeming "out of touch" - once again, with respect to Kerry. But insulting their faith to make a point is just low.
Jesus. That... I think... Is not going to go over well. Remember New Hampshire. Obama was pretty damn smarmy there and there's no factual support for it.Amir0x said:He's pretty forceful there. For the most part, I like what he did here. Didn't like the "shame on her" part, evoked the Hillary pre-Ohio "shame on you, Barack Obama" publicity stunt.
siamesedreamer said:This thing really took place at Messiah College? :lol
CoolTrick said:PD, she didnt attack their faiths. She's making a point that is something that is necessary to talk about: Despite Gore and Kerry having strong values, Republicans painted them as being out of touch. That was a big part of them, ESP. Kerry, losing.
CoolTrick said:PD, she didnt attack their faiths. She's making a point that is something that is necessary to talk about: Despite Gore and Kerry having strong values, Republicans painted them as being out of touch. That was a big part of them, ESP. Kerry, losing.
This is a ridiculous myth. The GOP doesn't need Hillary to drum up anything for them. They'd do it regardless.schuelma said:She's just giving the GOP talking point after talking point. It's breathtaking really.
She should not point out flaws in Obama though. When it became clear to Huckabee he lost the nomination he never attacked McCain.CoolTrick said:PD, she didnt attack their faiths. She's making a point that is something that is necessary to talk about: Despite Gore and Kerry having strong values, Republicans painted them as being out of touch. That was a big part of them, ESP. Kerry, losing.
CoolTrick said:This is a ridiculous myth. The GOP doesn't need Hillary to drum up anything for them. They'd do it regardless.
The Digg on that is pretty hilarious.Deus Ex Machina said:
CoolTrick said:You guys are really off the mark if you guys don't think there's been restraint from the Clintons on what they can attack Obama with.
Well, they could have thrown the bathroom sink as well.quadriplegicjon said:like?
quadriplegicjon said:like? there are certain lines they will not cross because it will hurt them even more.
CoolTrick said:You guys are really off the mark if you guys don't think there's been restraint from the Clintons on what they can attack Obama with.
They shouldnt be attacking him PERIOD. Neither Clinton honestly believes hillary will be the nominee, they aren't that deluded. So what is the point of what they are doing?CoolTrick said:You guys are really off the mark if you guys don't think there's been restraint from the Clintons on what they can attack Obama with.
Cheebs said:They shouldnt be attacking him PERIOD. Neither Clinton honestly believes hillary will be the nominee, they aren't that deluded. So what is the point of what they are doing?
I cant think of any rationale.
And all she is doing is hurting the party.Cheebs said:She should not point out flaws in Obama though. When it became clear to Huckabee he lost the nomination he never attacked McCain.
Which is why I lost the respect I had for her in 2007. The Democratic Party should always come first, not the candidates personal potential gains.
All it does is hurt the party.
CoolTrick said:Uh, Reverend Wright? Being blunt about electability arguments? Being blunt about Obama's lack of experience and untrustworthiness?
Come now. You guys NEED to start being more objective.
CoolTrick said:Uh, Reverend Wright? Being blunt about electability arguments? Being blunt about Obama's lack of experience and untrustworthiness?
Come now. You guys NEED to start being more objective.
Cheebs said:They shouldnt be attacking him PERIOD. Neither Clinton honestly believes hillary will be the nominee, they aren't that deluded. So what is the point of what they are doing?
I cant think of any rationale.
Deus Ex Machina said:
she's been touting the lack of experience thing from the very beginning right?