![]()
Seriously Sony, how hard can it be:
![]()
well it would be cheaper to be traditional wouldn't it
well the cost is massive isn't it? I mean the super fast SSD isn't gonna be cheat either, this will easy be 450 cost wise or moreYeah, but should that always be the goal?
And from the link above.....
Compared to this traditional 2D architecture, 3D ICs provide several significant advantages:
1. Footprint
Obviously, stacking multiple dies atop one another produces a chip that takes up less space than if those dies were side by side. If the layers are aggressively thinned, a multi-layer 3D-IC is actually no thicker than a traditional 2D chip. The tiny size of 3D-ICs is extremely valuable in miniaturized devices such as cell phones and IoT applications.
2. Speed
Dies stacked in a 3D chip are much closer together than chips on a circuit board. The shorter distances allow electronic signals to travel more quickly from one component to another. 3D stacked devices have shown as much as 5x speed improvement over comparable 2D solutions.
3. Power
Shorter connections automatically require less power, but 3D ICs have another power-saving trick. When an electronic signal travels from one chip to another, it passes through special circuitry that screens out any accidental electrostatic discharge (ESD). These ESD filters consume energy. Signals that travel from one layer to another within a 3D-IC do not require ESD checks. Tests have seen as much as 90% reduction in power consumption.
4. Heterogeneous Integration
Because the layers in a 3D IC are manufactured separately, they can be built differently. This is more important than it might seem! The process in which a die is built affects the behavior of the components on that die: one process makes better capacitors, another makes faster transistors, etc. Even more interesting, the layers may be built at different process nodes – that is, the electronic components may differ in size. This affects the cost, complexity, and performance of each layer. It is even possible to stack layers that are built of different materials. All of these possibilities mean that a 3D IC can combine the best of each process, node, and substrate without compromising some components to accommodate others. In fact, a multi-die stack can contain combinations that are flatly impossible to achieve on a 2D chip.
That's fine if you're running a standard cpu which is 65c to 80c.
That kind of heatsink and fan is also designed around having at least 1 linear foot of airspace in a average sized case. Meanwhile consoles have airspace measuring a few inches.
Not to mention that wouldn't vent any heat away from the system and just circulate it inside it. In confined spaces you need to draw and from one point, over a passive heat sink and vent it out somewhere else.
So no, that thing would do you no good and probably just allow the chips to overheat.
well the cost is massive isn't it? I mean the super fast SSD isn't gonna be cheat either, this will easy be 450 cost wise or more
I just think with fancy cooking like that comes a cost. Wouldn’t vapour cooling like the X uses be cheaper? New tech comes at a cost I get that but some things don’t need to be reinvented for the sake of reinventing itYou're probably right. It's why I think the PS5 will cost $500 and it still may not break even until someone buys 1 game.
Why don't you go build a new console and sell it? Since you're so smart.
I just think with fancy cooking like that comes a cost. Wouldn’t vapour cooling like the X uses be cheaper? New tech comes at a cost I get that but some things don’t need to be reinvented for the sake of reinventing it
You know something like them bugs bunny cartoon, where he drilled throug the globe and reach the other side of the world.
That only happens because he doesn't take that left turn to Albuquerque.
Anyways, I'd like some help with Cerny's speech ...
The part I need help with is in 34:00, where Cerny talks about the heating issues of the previous consoles and their goals forward.
![]()
![]()
Can someone tell me if both those 'graphs' are referring to the PS4, or if the second one is referring to the PS5? I have a hard time understanding whether Cerny means that this is fan noise they're targeting for the PS5, or if that was the optimal fan noise they were targeting for the PS4 Pro.
Basically I want to know if Cerny implies that the PS5 will be quieter than the 2nd graph's fans, or if that (2nd graph) is the fan noise they're targeting for the PS5.
I have zilch experience with engineering or working with computers (other than generally using them). What is the significance of this patent?
Yea i will also be surprised if ps5 is below 500. Fastest ssd on market and expensive cooling system and noise canceling dual sense and zen2 and 16 gb gddr6 does not come cheapYeah Expensive SSD and dual heat sink and state of the art controller yeah PS5 finna cost 500 plus
Is it possible to stack GDDR6 chips this way?That solution wouldn't allow them to stack other chips on top of the main chip
![]()
This wouldn't be the first Sony console to employ 3D stacking. PSP also used 3D stacking and it is used all the time for NAND manufacturing.well the cost is massive isn't it? I mean the super fast SSD isn't gonna be cheat either, this will easy be 450 cost wise or more
I just think with fancy cooking like that comes a cost. Wouldn’t vapour cooling like the X uses be cheaper? New tech comes at a cost I get that but some things don’t need to be reinvented for the sake of reinventing it
Normally you can only cool a chip from the top, the PCB is below it and not worth too much effort cooling, too many layers of material between the hot silicon and bottom of the board.
A 3D stacked chip being relevant to cool from both the top and bottom could mean that within the same size of a console, you can move away substantially more power/heat.
Ok what are the advantages of it compared to traditional cooking? So let’s put it against vapour cooling or traditional fan cooling? Am curiousDid you read the 4 things that stacking adds? Do you think that's reinventing "just for the sake of it"?
Ok what are the advantages of it compared to traditional cooking? So let’s put it against vapour cooling or traditional fan cooling? Am curious
Yeah well i ain't buying it for 500 not in this pandemic economyYea i will also be surprosed if ps5 is below 500. Fastest ssd on market and expensive cooling system and noise canceling dual sense and zen2 and 16 gb gddr6 does not come cheap
Ok what are the advantages of it compared to traditional cooking? So let’s put it against vapour cooling or traditional fan cooling? Am curious
Are you retarded?
I see one obvious advantage. The majority of the heat produced by a chip is because of the movement of data between transistors. The interconnect that connects each transistor is usually at the bottom layer of a chip and traditional cooling systems cool from the top. This patent devices a way to cool from the bottom with a big heatsink as well as cooling from the top as well. If they are stacking memory on the top layer, it provides an effective way to cool the memory on the top layer as well as other parts of the chip in the bottom layer.Ok what are the advantages of it compared to traditional cooking? So let’s put it against vapour cooling or traditional fan cooling? Am curious
That only happens because he doesn't take that left turn to Albuquerque.
Anyways, I'd like some help with Cerny's speech ...
The part I need help with is in 34:00, where Cerny talks about the heating issues of the previous consoles and their goals forward.
![]()
![]()
Can someone tell me if both those 'graphs' are referring to the PS4, or if the second one is referring to the PS5? I have a hard time understanding whether Cerny means that this is fan noise they're targeting for the PS5, or if that was the optimal fan noise they were targeting for the PS4 Pro.
Basically I want to know if Cerny implies that the PS5 will be quieter than the 2nd graph's fans, or if that (2nd graph) is the fan noise they're targeting for the PS5.
Thanks for posting this.Painted it to better see what is what.
green - PCB
orange - heatsink/heatpipes
blue - main chip with housing
Basically chip is placed not on PCB but on heatplate that heatplate has miniheatpipes coming throught it on other side of pcb where lies heatsink with fins. center of chip is used to cool via heatplate and PCI lanes go around the rim of chip. Consoles don't need a lot of PCI lanes so it is perfectly reasonable that a lot of underside is without PCI lanes unlike something like PC chip. Then there is other heatsink which lies on top of housing with paste in traditional way.
neat design, but i doubt it would poliferate to PC as PC chips have massive amount of PCI lanes and there is simply no space for heatplate. With such setup you can cool chip from two sides which is especially important for 3D stacked chips.
![]()
I don't think they'll separate I/O from the main die (APU) for performance/latency gains its better to keep it on die. SSD/SRAM though could fit this purpose further reducing latencySo probably they will use main chip at 7nm with cpu and gpu and separate chip maybe at 12nm with I/O and cache
That depends. It is trading a higher cooling expense for a lower APU expense. This design allows Sony to use an APU with fewer CUs but run it faster.well it would be cheaper to be traditional wouldn't it
what the heck is 3d stacked chips
Ok what are the advantages of it compared to traditional cooking?
They might work, but it would be more noise at the very least.is it running to hot that traditional cooling methods won't work?
I don't think they'll separate I/O from the main die (APU) for performance/latency gains its better to keep it on die. SSD/SRAM though could fit this purpose further reducing latency
It would be awesome if they found a way to put GDDR6 chips on top but that doesn't sound plausible right?
Thanks for posting this.
What does this mean for packaging?
Can we expect a small form factor console or are we looking at a large box like Series X?
What about 2? I think this is confirmation that the PS5 has stacked GPU, coming in at 20,4GHz now.Do you have a problem with reading? because no one said anything about 3 GPUs
Yeah Expensive SSD and dual heat sink and state of the art controller yeah PS5 finna cost 500 plus
Out of those only SSD is expensive. Rest are insignificant in unit cost.
Out of those only SSD is expensive. Rest are insignificant in unit cost.
Poor FUD attempt.Remember. The PS5, with its last minute overclock in attempt to reduce the gap between the XSX will overheat. 10.2 TF will not be reached.
Don't make me ban you. Final warningDial back the theatrics, especially after the trolling bait.
PSVITA too afaikThis wouldn't be the first Sony console to employ 3D stacking. PSP also used 3D stacking and it is used all the time for NAND manufacturing.
Im aware but they do so at a latency cost, besides the I/O isn't only used for CPU here its for the GPU as well. It won't be separateThat is how Ryzen3600 operate. They have die for I/O and die for cores.
Stacking cache would actually improve latency not lower it as road to cache would be shorter not longer.
I want to see this but in a spiral so it's not slanted!So this is why PS5 will have this form factor:
![]()