Ev1L AuRoN
Member
I'm hoping for a Performance RT mode like the previous Insomniac games. Even at 1080p native with the amazing reconstruction tech, I think the result will be great.
The Motion Blur on Insomniac games are spot on basically the best in business, and they add a lot to the game fluidity, unless you keep pausing I'm pretty sure you will barely notice any blur.Motion blur - Off
Film Grain - Off
Chromatic Puke - Off
yeah, no man sky too was an ambitious game, this is just that with pretty graphics.
if the game had 100 planets hand crafted i would agree at the "ambitious", but is just a procedural generation galore, lets see how those 1.000 planets ll pan out.
i ll run this ambitious game on a Ryzen 3600 with a RTX 2060 at 60fps if i want, ambitious has nothing to do with this 30fps situation.
I've completely transitioned back to quality mode for most titles, LOL. I'm such a little shit.
Okay maybe just the ones with real differences (Hogwarts, FFXVI, Miles Morales, etc.).
Gimme dat raytracing dem graffixxxxx.
I would be surprised if it is not there at launchWaiting for unlocked VRR mode
Yeah it’s gotta be there.I would be surprised if it is not there at launch
Yep.Some of yall are ridiculous man.
The game literally looks like it should have a performance mode, it's basically enhanced Spiderman MM. It's not like this is Path Traced Cyberpunk or something.I'm just glad the game has a performance mode, frankly. That is becoming less and less an option on consoles, it seems.
A 40fps mode is inevitable.I'm all about 40fps mode. Insomniac don't miss with those features.
The game literally looks like it should have a performance mode, it's basically enhanced Spiderman MM. It's not like this is Path Traced Cyberpunk or something.
Yea RT performance mode was awesome in MM. I think Spiderman 2 is going to be a refinement of everything Insomniac learned from Spiderman 1 and MM. I expect it to be the best game in the series.Fine by me. SM:MM was quite a good looking game, even in performance mode. I'm not one of those who is expecting this gen to suddenly blow my mind either.
Yep, a future 40 fps mode with some RT would be nice. Hell, even without RT but with higher image quality would work as well.A 40fps mode is inevitable.
Performance RT is being saved as a Pro upgrade.No performance RT at launch?
Is this gonna be a proper next gen title? Like, zero pop in, completely stable image that is seen in latest UE5 titles.
If yes then good luck with that ray tracing and even resolution at 60 fps.
Depends on what type of RT they use.
Not sure about that. Looking at current gen games, Jedi Survivor is doing 600p with RT and 60 fps.
Remnant 2 is doing 720p but no RT.
Spiderman 2 might do all that, but then it might have to compromise on draw distance/ pop in.
Would be interesting to see what compromise they make.
Like I said there's different types of RT and not all of them impact the hardware in the same way. Insomniac have already used it in games like Spider-Man, Miles Morales and Ratchet and Clank. All those games have 60FPS modes with RT. If anyone can do this it's certainly them since they already have a lot of experience with it.
I wouldn't compare them to what other developers are unable to do.
Are you saying Insomniac will be able to get next gen geometry, 60 fps, RT while maintaining a respectable 1440p + resolution?
That's a bold claim.
I didn't say that your the one that claimed its impossible for them to do 60FPs with RT.
Please provide proof where I said that. You have 15 minutes to comply.
Edit: My proof.
"Is this gonna be a proper next gen title? Like, zero pop in, completely stable image that is seen in latest UE5 titles.
If yes then good luck with that ray tracing and even resolution at 60 fps."
Your turn.
Remember your argument is RT with 60FPS.
Read carefully. My comment includes all 4 things at the same time.
Besides, we need proof if it's using next gen geometry. If it's not, it will incorporate 60 fps and RT in same mode. But then it will be a souped up PS4 title.
Not sure about that. Looking at current gen games, Jedi Survivor is doing 600p with RT and 60 fps.
Remnant 2 is doing 720p but no RT.
Spiderman 2 might do all that, but then it might have to compromise on draw distance/ pop in.
Would be interesting to see what compromise they make.
Totally off topic, but just try to imagine if our today versions of ourselves went back in time and tried to tell our past versions at the launch of ps4 and xbox one that the ps5 and series x consoles would be pushing 600p & 720p in 2023....it would be insane.
I think my past version would die of laughter and I would pop out of existence.
Damn, Hogan was enormous. Randy Savage is a pretty large guy himself but he looks tiny next to Hulk.
Macho Man was 6' 1"I think he's 6 foot 7 inches tall too though.
I don't play games at 30 fps any more and 40 fps is not good enough. I also want to enjoy RT. It looks like I'll have to wait for the PC release or a potential patch when PS5 Pro comes out before buying this game.
Macho Man was 6' 1"
It's the thickness in the boots souls. Hogan claimed to have "shrunk 3 inches" and is 6' 4" now.
How tall is Hulk Hogan? The WWE legend's real height revealed
WWE legend Hulk Hogan is one of the tallest superstars to ever step foot inside the squared circle. His massive build, along with a towering structure, gave him a huge advantage against his opponents.www.sportskeeda.com
Between the ages of 30 and 70, you can shrink anywhere from 1 to 3 inches, depending on height and other factors.This sounds like insanity. I'm glad I'm not plagued with this fps disease.
How is this possible? How could he shrink 3 inches? Was it to roids?
Between the ages of 30 and 70, you can shrink anywhere from 1 to 3 inches, depending on height and other factors.
Women shrink on average of 2 inches during that period as well.
But, wrestling and Hollywood has been known to embellish and fib on height,
The Rock is claimed to be "6' 5" tall," but here he is next to the actual 6' 6" tall Barkley and he looks to have 3-4" inches on him, plus MASS.
\
It's all BS. They also intentionally use short referees to make these glorified heights seem even bigger.
It was in the run-up to the 1992 Olympics that the world finally learned what the cognoscenti had long suspected -- that Charles Barkley was more like 6-4 5/8 than 6-6, and Magic Johnson closer to 6-7 than 6-9.
- Sports Illustrated
You either haven't played games at higher fps or you lack high standards. There is little point in high resolution and fidelity when it's all smeared out by a displays Sample and Hold at low frame rates. I'd say 120 fps is truly the minimum fps where it should be at but I can still accept 60 fps.This sounds like insanity. I'm glad I'm not plagued with this fps disease.
How is this possible? How could he shrink 3 inches? Was it to roids?
I know people who met The Rock in person down in Miami, and they say the man is no taller than 6'1" to 6'2".And most people say Chuck is really 6'4". He just got away with saying 6'6" in the days of NBA lies.
You either haven't played games at higher fps or you lack high standards. There is little point in high resolution and fidelity when it's all smeared out by a displays Sample and Hold at low frame rates. I'd say 120 fps is truly the minimum fps where it should be at but I can still accept 60 fps.