Is it bad that I kinda want this now?I dreamt the new trailer came out and revealed a new character, an Ewok musician voiced by John Williams. His introduction involved him spinning down a dust-covered ship leaving a spiral trail behind. Help.
Looks like they caught Snoke at 3am when he was up for the third time that night to take a piss
Damn, I knew Snoke was giant but that's really tall.
Snoke looks pretty menacing.
I'm more intrigued by why they felt the need to make a Jabba the Hutt car.Snoke looks pretty menacing.
So...what are the odds that Maz is in the Han film in some capacity?
I would have thought Lupita would have been part of the casting announcement if that was the case. I wouldn't be against seeing more Maz though, especially knowing she has a smaller role in The Last Jedi.
So is she in The Last Jedi? I was hoping to see more of her, but I saw someone saying she wouldn't be there at all.
”She has a smaller part in this than she has in The Force Awakens, but it's a really fun part, and Lupita is so awesome," Johnson says. ”I'm just happy I got to work with her."
So I haven't been following rumors or leaks but are there still any chances that Snoke is Plageuis or that Rey was already in training to be a Jedi but had her mind wiped ? Is the next movie going to elaborate on how the First Order has the resources and money to redesign all the empires original designs and put new armor and tie fighters into production all while supposedly being a remnant ? I kind of thought all their stuff would be worn down and old so there's got to be something going on there.
So I haven't been following rumors or leaks but are there still any chances that Snoke is Plageuis or that Rey was already in training to be a Jedi but had her mind wiped ? Is the next movie going to elaborate on how the First Order has the resources and money to redesign all the empires original designs and put new armor and tie fighters into production all while supposedly being a remnant ? I kind of thought all their stuff would be worn down and old so there's got to be something going on there.
Untitled Han Solo film might have had its title leaked by LEGO.. shocking if true
The most likely scenario is still that Snoke is a new character. Johnson's said he's not going to be exploring his background too much.
Rey was dropped off on Jakku long before the attack on Luke's academy so it seems unlikely she was ever training to be a Jedi.
Aw man I really liked that Plagueis idea. He looks pretty worse for wear visually speaking and I was thinking the story Palpatine told could lead to Snoke being Plagueis that used the ability to influence life to bring himself back after he was believed to be killed. Plus his name sounded like it was the real name of Plagueis like Sidious was to Palpatine and Tyrannus to Dooku etc (since just Snoke doesn't sound too hot imo). So if they're not going to delve much into the backstory of him we're just going to have to believe he was just chilling somewhere while everything else went down and no one had a clue he existed. I don't know about that.
And if Rey didn't already have base level training or knowledge of the force somehow (even forgotten) ... yikes lol. Well, who knows how they'll explain everything in Last Jedi I guess lol.
I don't exactly LOVE the Plagueis theory, but I also don't love the implication that Snoke was "around" throughout the OT and maybe even the PT, just in the background. While not technically a retcon, it sort of feels like one.
I don't exactly LOVE the Plagueis theory, but I also don't love the implication that Snoke was "around" throughout the OT and maybe even the PT, just in the background. While not technically a retcon, it sort of feels like one.
If they'd gone with Plagueis it would have undermined Palpatine's role in the saga significantly.
Same. That would feel like they just pulled him out of thin air. It gives me a retcon-fanficton type vibe I don't much care for.
It would ? Palpatine's accomplishments are literally galaxy wide and were not implied to be predicated on the killing of Plagueis in any way since he was said to be dead during everything Palpatine did in the PT. And even if you ignore all of the PT and OT, there would still be no first order without the Empire's foundation either.
Plus they could easily say Plagueis spent years to slowly regenerate himself back to life since it sounds like a near impossible feat to achieve.
And to be fair TFA is already undermining a lot of things the OT and PT set in place already so I wouldn't put anything past them anyway.
It would mean Palpatine - who is still regarded as the big bad of the saga - was too stupid to realise he hadn't successfully killed his master despite knowing what powers he supposedly possessed. Plus it taking him 40+ years to return is a stretch.It would ? Palpatine's accomplishments are literally galaxy wide and were not implied to be predicated on the killing of Plagueis in any way since he was said to be dead during everything Palpatine did in the PT. And even if you ignore all of the PT and OT, there would still be no first order without the Empire's foundation either.
Plus they could easily say Plagueis spent years to slowly regenerate himself back to life since it sounds like a near impossible feat to achieve.
And to be fair TFA is already undermining a lot of things the OT and PT set in place already so I wouldn't put anything past them anyway.
It would mean Palpatine - who is still regarded as the big bad of the saga - was too stupid to realise he hadn't successfully killed his master despite knowing what powers he supposedly possessed. Plus it taking him 40+ years to return is a stretch.
TFA doesn't undermine the previous films like that in my opinion.
I think the best way forward would be to look at what what JJ and Kasdan did with Kylo. He's not the Vader clone many people expected (or wanted for some reason) but he feels like a pretty unique villain. They knew they couldn't just use the same character again as he would come up short.To be honest, no matter what they do it's hard not to undermine Palpatine.
Palpatine was the culmination of 1000 years of Sith tradition, and the main villain for six films. Then 30 years later there's already somebody bigger and badder (well, we don't know exactly how big/bad Snoke is compared to Palpatine yet, but nevertheless...)?
In my opinion having Snoke turn out to be Plagueis, if handled well, could actually undermine Palpatine LESS than having Snoke just be a random new character.
Yeah, I kind of like that one too.I liked the theory that Kylo will overthrow Snoke himself once he finds out he's not as powerful as he thought and that he's been using him all along.
In my opinion having Snoke turn out to be Plagueis, if handled well, could actually undermine Palpatine LESS than having Snoke just be a random new character.
I think the best way forward would be to look at what what JJ and Kasdan did with Kylo. He's not the Vader clone many people expected (or wanted for some reason) but he feels like a pretty unique villain. They knew they couldn't just use the same character again as he would come up short.
That's the thing though. They made so many parallels to Ren and Vader both in his choice of clothing and in his obvious idolizing of him that he already came up short in that very way. We already feel like he's a Vader wannabe early on, but that's not inherently bad. Before I'd seen how it was handled in the movie I thought it was an interesting element to him actually.
But the execution of it is not great. He's made to look intimidating like Vader at first, but it isn't long before we start to not even take him seriously anymore. I actually feel like even something as simple as having his lightsaber be blue or green would have helped establish that he was a fallen Jedi as opposed to a full on sith apprentice.
Plus I always wondered why he would idolize someone who ended up not believing in those ideals anymore, since I'm sure he knew the story in great detail having been trained by Luke and even knowing where Vader's body was burned.
”Kylo Ren, I watched the Galactic Empire rise, and then fall. The gullible prattle on about the triumph of truth and justice, of individualism and free will. As if such things were solid and real instead of simple subjective judgments. The historians have it all wrong. It was neither poor strategy nor arrogance that brought down the Empire. You know too well what did." Ren nodded once. ”Sentiment." ”Yes. Such a simple thing. Such a foolish error of judgment. A momentary lapse in an otherwise exemplary life. Had Lord Vader not succumbed to emotion at the crucial moment—had the father killed the son—the Empire would have prevailed. And there would be no threat of Skywalker's return today."
He's already gone further than Anakin ever did by killing a member of his family in order to try and increase his own power. That in itself means he's still a significant threat.
The relationship, or lack thereof, with his parents is another interesting dimension. Moving away from the shadow of his parents and having that huge weight on his shoulders was definitely a contributory factor to him turning to the dark side.
He killed Han to increase his power ? Do you suddenly get a better understanding of the force, or a stronger force pull because you stabbed someone ? What's the logic behind that. How would that do that. I thought force users on both sides trained, meditated and studied to increase their power, not perform unrelated acts that give arbitrary experience points.
^^ This is not a point in favor of Ren being different than Anakin. This is more support that they are similar.
And with regards to what Kylo apparently said in a book ; that should've been in the movie too then. Cut out the line where Finn asks Rey if she "has a boyfriend, cute boyfriend" and now you have time for actually interesting information that is relevant to the story. Also, that quote from the book is pretty weak anyway considering powerful force users like Obiwan, Yoda, and then Anakin can easily come back as spirits and say "Nope, that's wrong." If anything, logically I would have thought Luke would have communicated with Anakin after his death and even have him speak to his pupils about the lure of the dark side. But that's just more things that were apparently never considered lol.
Yeah I can believe that, and that makes a lot of sense. I just don't see it as an actual gain in powers or mastery of skills at all. It don't think it translates in that way.He'd be cutting out what he perceives as a weakness i.e. the sentiment that Kylo and Snoke view as the foil of Darth Vader. As Rey realises earlier in the film, his greatest fear is that he'll never be as strong as Vader. If he succeeds in killing his father, he probably sees it as a step in the right direction.
It was also his motivation to butcher a whole tribe of sand people including their children, lol. They were both motivations for some not so great dark side developments lol.It's a pretty different situation. Shmi's death is one of Anakin's motivations for doing anything to save Padme. Kylo's situation is almost a mirror image to that. He wants to get away from the shadow of his parents and follow the footsteps of his grandfather.
We don't even know if Luke was in regular contact with any force ghosts yer. Even if he was, do you really think Kylo would listen to them if he wouldn't listen to Luke? Especially if this was the Anakin that made what he sees as a crucial mistake.
Emilia Clarke's character in the Han Solo film is called Kura according to Making Star Wars.
I don't mind weird names usually but when they mean something in my native tongue...
Kura means mud in Finnish.
EDIT Actually, also diarrhea in certain context.