Starfield | Review Thread

What scores do you think StarfieId will get?

  • 40-45%

    Votes: 3 0.5%

  • 45-50%

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • 50-55%

    Votes: 1 0.2%

  • 55-60%

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • 60-65%

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • 65-70%

    Votes: 2 0.3%

  • 70-75%

    Votes: 5 0.8%

  • 75-80%

    Votes: 15 2.3%

  • 80-85%

    Votes: 81 12.5%

  • 85-90%

    Votes: 241 37.3%

  • 90-95%

    Votes: 243 37.6%

  • 95-100%

    Votes: 55 8.5%
  • Total voters
    646
  • Poll closed .
So it's a great game. We can all carry on now and be friends and everyone can enjoy the game….right…..right? I just wish it was 60fps on consoles and I would buy a Series X this second. I think I'm going to build a beast of a PC to play this and all MS exclusives going forward.
 
Last edited:
The Cockatrice said:
Wait what the fuck, theres no space exploration in a space exploration game? THe more I read the more I regret my purchase, what the fuck are you even playing then? Just fast travel from empty planets, find a a stupid cave/base, do a stupid side-quest and thats it? No way. They must be exaggerating.
Click to expand...

Yeah this shocked me the most, I thought it would be a core part of the game. I even thought there would be seamless flying in and out of planets like NMS but what you get here is a (excuse the pun) world away from that type of immersion. Instead, loading screens for just leaving the cockpit!
 
Mr Moose said:
Guardians of the Galaxy.
Click to expand...
To be fair, according to IGN, it's apparently a better game than Starfield.

I know it's actually a pretty great game, though.
 
Gudji said:
It's even more funny if you understand portuguese. :messenger_grinning_squinting:
Click to expand...
lol i bet. Their laughter made the video funnier.

FFS BUGTHESDA AT IT AGAIN!!!!

They said bug free............... BUG FREE?? A Bethesda game? LMAO!!

dead GIF
 
Last edited:
Moochi said:
Lord of the Rings, the Amazon show, was good? It was a disappointment when measured against its predecessors in every respect, just like Starfield.
Click to expand...

I actually found it better, less dragged out.
As to starfeild, considering the wide differing opinions so far, I'll reserve judgment for myself after actually playing it.
 
Dacvak said:
Lmfao get the fuck outta here are people serious

Sorry, that's not directed at you. It's just funny if people are saying that sort of thing unironically lol
Click to expand...
No, it's serious. You literally had Xbox fans declaring that it was the last game they were ever going to play and that they will keep it playing it for the rest of their lives because it has over 1,000 planets to explore. And endlessly going on about the "hype".

I honestly didn't see any hype except for a few focused pockets of people... Most people I know who are into games semi-casually and don't own Xbox never even heard of Starfield.
 
But I was told multiple times who cares about not being seamless, no one will care!

Seems reviewers definitely cared when the game is just menu click loading screen click. It's 2023 ffs, people have ssds why do we have so many loading screens
 
Last edited:
Kenneth Haight said:
So it's a great game. We can all carry on now and be friends and everyone can enjoy the game….right…..right? I just wish it was 60fps on consoles and I would buy a Series X this second. I think I'm going to build a beast of a PC to play this and all MS exclusives going forward.
Click to expand...
There are people here with cum drinking bet apparently. I dunno how you could be friends after that. Or is it because they are friends that they do it?
 
alphachino said:
No, it's serious. You literally had Xbox fans declaring that it was the last game they were ever going to play and that they will keep it playing it for the rest of their lives because it has over 1,000 planets to explore. And endlessly going on about the "hype".

I honestly didn't see any hype except for a few focused pockets of people... Most people I know who are into games semi-casually and don't own Xbox never even heard of Starfield.
Click to expand...
Some were saying due to the sheer perfection that this game was undoubtedly going to be that it'd end the war in Ukraine.
 
So to sum up it looks like we have standard Bethesda fare of hyped expectations not meeting reality + shitbryo strikes again since (once again) they lied about the new engine.
 
Ribi said:
But I was told multiple times who cares about not being seamless, no one will care!

Seems reviewers definitely cared when the game is just menu click loading screen click. It's 2023 ffs, people have ssds why do we have so many loading screens
Click to expand...
Funnily enough the reqs demand a ssd
 
Last edited:
There is such negativity that if someone hadnt looked the scores, he would think you are talking about a game in the 60's or something.

Also, typical brain behavior....people always fixate on the points of the reviewer which gave the lowest score..not only.that..they treat the lowest score as point of reference, accusing all other reviewers that gave the game a better score.
 
HeisenbergFX4 said:
I enjoyed SM as well but its funny how so many PS guys are like "Oh 88 thats trash wait for SM2"

Meanwhile..

z4ivllJ.png
3tFd8Zo.png




Watching now
Click to expand...
Has even one person said 88 is trash? Literally just one, quote them.

Its just not what the person I quoted and a lot of this thread thought it was going to be. Guy I quoted literally "lmao!" at the notion of Spiderman 2 being as good. Now, I would imagine Spiderman 2 is favored to review better when if its an improvement on 1 it'll have that same score at minimum.
 
HeisenbergFX4 said:
Actually a good question but here we are
Click to expand...
I find it oddly comforting to know that, 30 years later, the console wars of the 90s are still going strong. Albeit with different companies, now.
 
nani17 said:
Click to expand...


Also watched that... Locations being copy pasted more than 5x times, even enemy position is the same. Planets where you can't even travel to (and not only the gas giants)... This after the promise of having 1000 planets and places to explore?
What the actual fuck?
The ones who gave it 7 were the only ones who actually thoroughly played the game? :messenger_tears_of_joy:
 
It looks good. Not too bothered about the free traversal stuff but the copy pasta locations are kinda heart-breaking. Rerunning the same encounter and location half a dozen times on half a dozen different planets in the first twenty hours is a massive emersion breaker.
 
Last edited:
It's 88 on opencritic. That's the same score as Spider-Man, Horizon: Forbidden West, Ratchet and Clank: Rift Apart and Final Fantasy XVI. It's also higher then games like Ghost of Tsushima, Returnal, and Death Stranding.

How on earth are people trying to spin this as a bad game?

Sure it's not the 90+ that many were hoping for, but it's by most accounts a great game that you will sink a massive amount of time into. Three years plus from now this game will be have that special Bethesda touch of being even better due to the massive modding community.
 
Cyberpunkd said:
So to sum up it looks like we have standard Bethesda fare of hyped expectations not meeting reality + shitbryo strikes again since (once again) they lied about the new engine.
Click to expand...
People never learn...

He earned the nickname "Lying Todd" for a reason.



Once a lier always a lier.

Best bet is to wait for the mod community to fix this game per usual..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Starfield: Shattered Space | Review Thread
Analysis Review  2 3
129
10K
JayK47 replied
Lunar Remastered Collection | Review Thread
Opinion Review 
43
3K
anthony2690 replied
Avowed | Review Thread
Analysis Review  28 29 30 31 32
2K
86K
GymWolf replied
AI Limit | Review Thread
Opinion Analysis Review 
36
2K
Thick Thighs Save Lives replied
  • Poll
Assassin's Creed: Shadows | Review Thread
Analysis Review  18 19 20 21 22
1K
71K
Rocco Schiavone replied
Top Bottom