painey said:I managed to sell my TTWO shares today
I invested £1,000;
bought:
100 @ $14.38
55 @ $12.44
sold:
155 @ $16.14
Total after all commission charges, and most importantly, currency conversion:
£1,239.21
23.92% profit, in 1 month, 3 days. Im delighted My first trades ever.
koam said:P.S I was wrong about the drop, which is good cause it's letting me sell today
Miroku said:Were you expecting fed rates to stay the same?
Just curious
koam said:Selling off everything today, i got huge spikes, 5% and 12%. My new account is active tomorrow.
mrWalrus said:This might not be a popular opinion but I suggest buying a book or two first. Here's a great one to get started with and might be the only one you need to begin being successful.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/0471225347/?tag=neogaf0e-20
It's much more prudent to spend $50 and take your time rather than jumping in feet first with all your clothes on.
Cheapest place if you plan to invest with margins is Interactive Brokers. Their commission is .005 per share, and they have easily the best interest rate on margins in the business.Cloudy said:No one answered my question about the best/cheapest brokerage account for newbz :\
Why are you selling though, after the fed just dropped the rate by 50 points? Historically, the market has gone up an average of 12.5% in the six months following a drop like todays.koam said:Can someone quickly get me the price of NTDOY (not using the pink sheets site, that's 15 min delayed)?
Selling off everything today, i got huge spikes, 5% and 12%. My new account is active tomorrow.
also, does anyone know when Q3's financials come out?
P.S I was wrong about the drop, which is good cause it's letting me sell today
mr stroke said:
Maxwell House said:Why are you selling though, after the fed just dropped the rate by 50 points? Historically, the market has gone up an average of 12.5% in the six months following a drop like todays.
mikeybwright said:What would be the best route for me to go to get like 10 shares of something like Ford (yes i know how low it is)? I'm just entering my second year at university, and I want to start building a portfolio (i live in the US). Any advice would be great
mikeybwright said:What would be the best route for me to go to get like 10 shares of something like Ford (yes i know how low it is)? I'm just entering my second year at university, and I want to start building a portfolio (i live in the US). Any advice would be great
Ouch, you are short term selling with that little? Commissions and taxes are going to eat up your profits, IMO.koam said:PANL is awesome, bought them at $14.98 at this time yesterday, they're at $16.74 right now.
Currently, i'm up $300 with my holdings. Which isn't bad considering that 2 of them are brand new and the other two weren't so hot last week.
Overall
Initial investment: $6000.
Current Worth: $7500.
First investment: April 2007.
Change: +25%
Maxwell House said:Ouch, you are short term selling with that little? Commissions and taxes are going to eat up your profits, IMO.
koam said:I average out to a bit over $100 a day in profit on top of my salary.
Maxwell House said:Cheapest place if you plan to invest with margins is Interactive Brokers. Their commission is .005 per share, and they have easily the best interest rate on margins in the business.
Cloudy said:I'm a newb. No margins!
Yes, but short term trading, your profits will be added to your income, which means a hefty tax rate.koam said:I'm at $8200 now. Commission fees are only $7 per trade. Taxes don't matter, you get taxed a percentile.
Maxwell House said:Yes, but short term trading, your profits will be added to your income, which means a hefty tax rate.
Capital gains on long term trades is only 15%.
If you want a much cheaper broker, go to www.interactivebrokers.com. It is only .005 per share per trade. Buying 200 shares would cost you $1.
Well good luck.koam said:True, but if i can make more money in short intervals of time, than less money over a long period of time, i'd rather deal with the heavier taxes. I'm also in canada, we have different rules here.
koam said:True, but if i can make more money in short intervals of time, than less money over a long period of time, i'd rather deal with the heavier taxes. I'm also in canada, we have different rules here.
Odean's study of stock traders
Terry Odean, then a grad student at the University of California at Berkeley, and his Professor Brad Barber researched the accounts of 10,000 discount-brokerage trading accounts between 1987 to 1993.
Later, Odean repeated this study on a much larger scale, in the repeat he examined the accounts of 66,465 households from 1991 to 1996. So in total, he looked at a huge number of accounts, and a vast number of trades. The conclusions from each study were virtually identical: trading hurts your wealth.
Odean found that as a group all amateur investors underperform the market due to higher than necessary trading costs. But the 20% of traders with the highest turnover underperformed the most. In the sample, while the market went up an annualised 17.1% over the period, the average investor/trader with a turnover of 80%pa returned 15.3%, but the 20% with the highest turnover, 283%pa on average, got only 10%pa.
This study was performed with the clients of a discount (non web) brokerage. How would the figures change for the ultra cheap Internet brokers?
According to Odean, not very much. Commissions were an important part of the reason why active traders had the worst performance, but the main bogeyman was the bid/ask spread. In fact Odean believes that traders as a group are now doing even worse than they did in the old discount brokerage days because turnover has increased even more.
Odean offers the following example: The average trade in his sample was roughly $13,000 in size. Trading through a discount broker, an investor might have paid $60 or so in commissions "round-trip," or $30 for the buy and $30 for the sale. But by Odean's estimate, the typical investor also lost a full 1% to the bid-ask spread -- or $130 on this typical $13,000 purchase.
If this investor switches to an online broker that makes trades for only $10, the "round-trip" cost of the trade falls to only $20 -- but the spread still amounts to a loss of $130, for a total transaction cost of $150.
No doubt $150 is cheaper than $190 but it's only around 21% less, not the 66% that investors might believe that he or she is saving. And even this 21% savings could be swallowed up if investors choose to change their behavior and trade more frequently as a result of the lower commissions.
As a matter of fact, Odean did find a tendency to trade more when traders switched to cheap web brokers. In the second study he examined the trading records of 1,600 traders that switched from discount telephone trading to deep discount web trading. He found that turnover increased by a third and traders doubled their exposure to "speculative" stocks. That is to say that telephone traders were twice as likely as web traders to buy large stocks, compared to web traders that on average concentrated more on small speculative stocks trading on the NASDAQ and other minor exchanges.
The most interesting finding of Odean's research is that traders underperform as a group even after taking out trading costs. On average, the stocks these traders sold outperformed the market, and those they bought underperformed the market. One year after each trade, the average investor wound up more than 9% poorer than if had he done nothing. Two years later, the results were even worse.
Another finding was that the traders in the group had a strong tendency to sell the wrong stocks. Odean says traders "strongly prefer to sell their winning investments and hold on to their losing investments, even though the winning investments they sell subsequently outperform the losers they continue to hold." Selling a loser amounts to admitting you have made a mistake. Traders hate that, they much prefer to sell stocks at a profit, which makes them feel like a winner, as a result traders systematically weeded out good stocks from their portfolios and retained poor ones.
bggrthnjsus said:i've got a question for all you stock types...so this fed rate cut is responsible for a lot of the big gains today...how long can we expect those gains to hold for? is stuff going to go up, then dive back down again sometime soon, or should we expect things to hold for awhile?
ARM reset?Javaman said:I'm betting that it'll likely fall around each of the ARM resets, falling more then it should due to fears then the actual loss. Worried people trying to play the daytrade game will likely jump out bringing the market lower then it really "should" be. Once that happens it'll probably be a good time to buy. (With long term investment in mind) Of course no-one knows for certain what will happen, but historically speaking the market always goes up over the long term.
Adjustable Rate Mortgage. Even with the Feds cutting the interest rate, most people with ARM loans are still going to be paying a lot more per month for their mortgage over the next couple of months/years.bggrthnjsus said:ARM reset?
bggrthnjsus said:ARM reset?
edit: adjustable rate mortgage? so when does that happen...when do i sell is what i'm asking really
Javaman said:No-one can answer that except you. Personally I'm staying in for the long haul. I've managed to sock away $78,000 in my 401k over a decade a couple hundred at a time and am looking forward to retiring a happy man in 30 years. (barring a global disaster or course)
Javaman said:No-one can answer that except you. Personally I'm staying in for the long haul. I've managed to sock away $78,000 in my 401k over a decade a couple hundred at a time and am looking forward to retiring a happy man in 30 years. (barring a global disaster or course)
None of us will be relying on social security for retirement. So if it collapses, then it collapses. A bigger problem is the continuing devaluation of the American dollar. But yeah, even if that guy can guarantee an annual return of 10% for the next 30 years, $78K will still only be $1.5 million in 30 years, which is not enough with current inflation and woefully inadequate with higher inflation (which is expected with the plummeting dollar).boo7z said:How about a national disaster, such as the collapse of Social Security? You are going to need to invest at a higher rate than that if you want to retire when you are 60.
boo7z said:How about a national disaster, such as the collapse of Social Security? You are going to need to invest at a higher rate than that if you want to retire when you are 60.
Stele said:None of us will be relying on social security for retirement. So if it collapses, then it collapses. A bigger problem is the continuing devaluation of the American dollar. But yeah, even if that guy can guarantee an annual return of 10% for the next 30 years, $78K will still only be $1.5 million in 30 years, which is not enough with current inflation and woefully inadequate with higher inflation (which is expected with the plummeting dollar).
Yeah, if you travel back in time 30 years from now. People in their 20s today will need 4-5 million to retire.*Javaman said:I think I can live with that.
Javaman said:Your investment is going to need to gain over 25% (plus any trading fees) in under a year just to break even. :lol Good luck with that. It just doesn't sound worth the high risk to me. You would be much better off settling for growth mutual funds and hanging onto them for a while. While not as "exciting" it's much more safe, and more likely to gain you more of a profit.
Javaman said:I think I can live with that.
mrWalrus said:This is the dollar index over the last year two years.
http://quotes.ino.com/chart/?s=NYBOT_DX&v=w&w=15&t=l&a=4
NM, I realized you are in Canada.koam said:So in a nutshell. You're only taxed on the profits you made. So if we look at my case. I started off with $6000 and now i'm at $8200. These are both book values. So 8200 - 6000 = $2200 in profit. I'm going to get taxed 40% (my tax bracket) on $1100. In the end, my profit is $1100 + 60% of $1100.