FunkMiller
Member
If at any point it becomes apparent in the show that the Jedi learn of Darth Teeth, then it’s canon breaking stupidity. If they don’t, it’s fine.
I don't think Disney gives a shit about 'canon' they arbitrarily retconned the entire EU out of existence after allIf at any point it becomes apparent in the show that the Jedi learn of Darth Teeth, then it’s canon breaking stupidity. If they don’t, it’s fine.
Yeah I have no idea. I won’t be watching itSo, has it been established in The Acolyte that the Jedi command have been told about what's happening? If so... yeah, fucking idiot bullshit. Makes no sense.
If not, then maybe they're going to make it clear that this doesn't happen in the episodes left?
Regardless, people can't be complaining that the Sith shouldn't be in The Acolyte at all, when they were obviously around prior to the prequels... otherwise the prequels couldn't happen!
So, has it been established in The Acolyte that the Jedi command have been told about what's happening? If so... yeah, fucking idiot bullshit. Makes no sense.
If not, then maybe they're going to make it clear that this doesn't happen in the episodes left?
Regardless, people can't be complaining that the Sith shouldn't be in The Acolyte at all, when they were obviously around prior to the prequels... otherwise the prequels couldn't happen!
Regardless, it diminishes the Jedi by (once again) painting them as incompetent (All of this questionable stuff goes on beneath their noses and the Jedi don't notice a thing) and reduces the impact of the resurfacing of the Sith/dark side in Episode I.It's been established that they don't know anything about the proto-Kylo Ren. They saw a hologram of the dead twin sister of Sol's former apprentice throwing knives at Carrie Anne Moss. They don't know anything about the dark side user who they use Kylo Ren's theme for and looks like a non-BBQed version of Ren.
Regardless, it diminishes the Jedi by (once again) painting them as incompetent (All of this questionable stuff goes on beneath their noses and the Jedi don't notice a thing) and reduces the impact of the resurfacing of the Sith/dark side in Episode I.
Yes. And then if you do it again in a prequel it diminishes them even more. Do you see how that works?George Lucas did that. The whole point of the Prequels that the Jedi had their heads so far up their ass and were so concerned with politics that they didn't see the Sith Lord running everything until it killed them all.
Yes. And then if you do it again in a prequel it diminishes them even more. Do you see how that works?
I mean, Mundi is right there. Yoda must've been like 750 years old at this point? There's probably many other Jedi who would remember this period of time due to their age. I'm guessing they just didn't notice what happened, or maybe they just forgot? Some crazy dark side dude killing a dozen Jedi is nothing special of course. Oh, or maybe the council covered it all up because it made the Jedi look bad! But why would that affect people who were directly involved a hundred years later?This is 100 years before TPM. The High Republic was a time when the Jedi weren't like what they were in the Prequels
No he wasn’t. He was in one scene that was long before they ran into the dark side user and had zero connection to it. But of course people here believe bullshit and anyone who dares try to correct bullshit get called a shill. Fuck it.I mean, Mundi is right there
He's literally there when they're discussing the assassination of Jedi and the possibility of Sith involvement my dude. Even if he personally never finds out the truth, he's gotta have an inkling that something funny is going on there.No he wasn’t. He was in one scene that was long before they ran into the dark side user and had zero connection to it. But of course people here believe bullshit and anyone who dares try to correct bullshit get called a shill. Fuck it.
He's literally there when they're discussing the assassination of Jedi and the possibility of Sith involvement my dude. Even if he personally never finds out the truth, he's gotta have an inkling that something funny is going on there.
Decades later Qui-Gonn is gonna show up and say "Hey, I just fought something, I don't know what but they were trained in the Jedi arts" and Mundi's just gonna go: "I dunno man! Never heard of such a thing! the Sith have been dead for thousands of years sooooo..!" Come on man...
No they don’t. They never talk about the Sith at all in that scene. They’re watching a hologram of Mae jumping around and throwing daggers and they think a Jedi trained her and want to keep a Jedi training an assassin secret from the Senate. They don’t talk about Sith at all.He's literally there when they're discussing the assassination of Jedi and the possibility of Sith involvement my dude.
He won’t ever admit to being wrong. He will make excuses or duck out of the thread by ghosting it.
"Could this be a splinter order... or something worse?" obviously alludes to the involvement of the dark side, with the Sith being an obvious possibility. Then the green lady brings up her being trained by a Jedi. Which doesn't really change anything. Maul was also described as "trained in the Jedi arts."No they don’t. They never talk about the Sith at all in that scene. They’re watching a hologram of Mae jumping around and throwing daggers and they think a Jedi trained her and want to keep a Jedi training an assassin secret from the Senate. They don’t talk about Sith at all.
You’re inserting the Sith there. It’s never mentioned."Could this be a splinter order... or something worse?" obviously alludes to the involvement of the dark side, with the Sith being an obvious possibility. Then the green lady brings up her being trained by a Jedi. Which doesn't really change anything. Maul was also described as "trained in the Jedi arts."
Read again.You’re inserting the Sith there. It’s never mentioned.
I don’t need to read again. I just turned on that episode. They never mention the Sith.Read again.
I never claimed that to be the case. You're either responding to arguments no one ever made, or you're not reading properly.I don’t need to read again. I just turned on that episode. They never mention the Sith.
You said they were discussing the possibly of Sith involvement. They weren’t.I never claimed that to be the case. You're either responding to arguments no one ever made, or you're not reading properly.
they're discussing the assassination of Jedi and the possibility of Sith involvement
They were. They just never uttered the word "Sith." Everyone understands that's what they meant when they suggested it could be "something worse."You said they were discussing the possibly of Sith involvement. They weren’t.
They obviously don’t since they’re inserting something that isn’t there.They were. They just never uttered the word "Sith." Everyone understands that's what they meant when they suggested it could be "something worse."
Then what did she mean with "something worse" that shocked the other members present for that scene? It can't be rogue jedi because as you explained those already existed before, and would be considered a splinter order. So what is worse than that?They obviously don’t since they’re inserting something that isn’t there.
The Jedi were just done fighting a war against the Nihil. Basically Star Wars Vikings who were against he Jedi and Republic and wanted to live without their rules and would have every reason to assassinate Jedi. Ironically that’s what the proto-Kylo said to Sol in the last episode.Then what did she mean with "something worse" that shocked the other members present for that scene? It can't be rogue jedi because as you explained those already existed before, and would be considered a splinter order. So what is worse than that?
Would encountering a Nihil apprentice illicit this kind of reaction? I doubt it. They already fought a war against them. You're either wrong or the writing for this show is terrible.The Jedi were just done fighting a war against the Nihil. Basically Star Wars Vikings who were against he Jedi and Republic and wanted to live without their rules and would have every reason to assassinate Jedi. Ironically that’s what the proto-Kylo said to Sol in the last episode.
Don't try to argue with him. For real. He will ALWAYS find an excuse and when he doesn't, he just stop responding. Until he can quote someone else who criticize the series, then the cycle repeats. It's obvious that in the scene you are talking, they alude to the Sith and not some other stuff that took place in another media unknow from the GA.Would encountering a Nihil apprentice illicit this kind of reaction? I doubt it. They already fought a war against them. You're either wrong or the writing for this show is terrible.
No he wasn’t. He was in one scene that was long before they ran into the dark side user and had zero connection to it. But of course people here believe bullshit and anyone who dares try to correct bullshit get called a shill. Fuck it.
When Qui-Gon said that his assailant was trained in the Jedi Arts, why did Mundi immediately invoke the Sith? Qui-Gon was in no way specific about it being a Sith, yet Mundi made this assumption. It simply appeared that if you were talking about a highly competent Force user with a red lightsaber ambushing you, the first reaction is BUT WAIT I THOUGHT THOSE GUYS WERE GONE??? Mundi didn't seem to too caught up on it maybe being one of those *other* possible explanations he became familiar with 100 years ago. So even if it's not Sith, it still doesn't make sense.
Well the real reason is because that movie too is poorly written and that line from mundi only makes the jedi look even worse as the movie shows us that not only is he wrong; but hes been wrong for a long time and palpy has been able to set up connections and back end deals before he even became chancellor without anyone catching notice.
Thing about phantom menace is that it introduces so many strange plot conveniences that you have to write around that it almost becomes expected to ignore some of that stuff. A lot of the stuff shown in that movie doesn't make a ton of sense and you kinda just have to go along with it. Same with most star wars(rotj openly retcons the first movie and somewhat the second in the series as well)
Embarrassing.
My posts were written while referencing the scene in question. Ki-Adi Mundi is an active participant in the discussion about Mae and her unknown master. He is privy to any information shared there and presumably whatever else they find out about this case. This has implications for all future scenes and statements he makes. How is any of this BS?Its amazing folks who didn't even bother to fact check themselves are defending the BS they've been fed as if its gospel.
If we're gonna argue such semantics, would Darth even be the correct title for Vader? He only turned because he was manipulated. He was never properly trained to be a Sith and he doesn't seem to care about the Sith religion at all. Why is he more of a Sith than someone actively trying to become one like you suggested? How about Dooku? He only cared about reducing the power of the senate. Wouldn't call him a Sith. I mean, it takes more than a red lightsaber to become one, right?Like.. even the website description for this chatactwr doesn't explicitly say hes a sith. He says to sol "i guess... you jedi would call me... sith"
Yes. The prequels were terribly written too. That doesn't excuse this show for its own terrible writing.Well the real reason is because that movie too is poorly written
Uhh, yeah. That was the point of those movies. To show that the Jedi were deceived and how their order died out. And all this show does is beat that dead horse again. Actually the horse died like a week ago, and they were beating it back then too. Just so you know how dead and beaten it is. This does nothing for Star Wars.and that line from mundi only makes the jedi look even worse as the movie shows us that not only is he wrong; but hes been wrong for a long time and palpy has been able to set up connections and back end deals before he even became chancellor without anyone catching notice.
At this point the word Sith has lost all meaning, I mean isn't Sith sinonimous with evil Jedi to the average viewer?
The majority of viewers when they see a dude wielding a red saber, they think Sith.
We're talking here strictly of live action, no books, games or whatever.
Well, I do too, I've only watched live action, so I couldn't care less how many names the dark force users have, or what obscure race did something that's never mentioned in the movies or shows.I certainly do, as someone who's never really been into this franchise much beyond the original movies.
Exactly, I have been saying for ages, why not go way into hundreds of years ahead and detach yourself from these characters, do something original.The major issue around this show seems to stem from the fact it's yet another prequel, and a slap-dash one at that by most accounts. If you're going to do a prequel, you kinda have to make sure you're not altering things from the better known and more popular parts of the franchise.
15 years ago criticizing TPM was not only expected but encouraged. Its amazing to see things flip in real time, but such is the way of things.
Its not a terrible movie mind you. But saying it has bad dialogue is hardly sacrilegious.
EDIT: Apparently not even 15: https://www.neogaf.com/threads/how-was-it-to-watch-the-phantom-menace-in-the-cinemas.1127282/
Similar things elsewhere.
Leia being Lukes sister was not planned and a cop-out to tie up the love triangle by the end of ROTJ.
That's not why they made Leia the sister. Luke's sister was originally Nellith in the 1st draft of Empire (when Vader wasn't the father and Luke meets Anakin's ghost on Dagobah). Nellith was always going to remain the sister and George's outlines he had when Kurtz left had Nellith being introduced in Episode VII.
By the time ROTJ came around two things were happening: The merchandise was running Lucasfilm and George's decisions, and George was going through his divorce and couldn't be bothered to continue the movies (that's why Boba Fett went into the pit. George was so annoyed over his divorce he didn't want to come up with a plot for him in the movie). So instead of ROTJ ending in a continuation to Episode VII, he wrapped it all up with a happy ending.
There was no love triangle. In the version of ROTJ that would've continued to Episode VII, Han died in a raid on an Imperial base, Leia becomes queen at the end, and Luke goes off by himself in solitude where he would've met Nellith in the next movie.
Yeah, as much as I like hearing about the original ideas, rough drafts, and cut scenes, ultimately the "canon" is what made it to the screen, regardless of the intent or reasons behind it. It makes the OT fairly well contained and internally consistent but it would have been very difficult to actually address the "lore" given in ANH with the outcome in ROTJ, and what we did get was a pretty sloppy job of it with the PT. But quadrupling down on "the Jedi are complacent and corrupt" for a CENTURY leading up to TPM rings hollow. The Acolyte would have been better served (judging from audience response) with having Jedi (or preferably a Republic team with a single Jedi 'advisor') dealing with a totally alien threat without any taint of the Sith, Night sisters, or any of that crap. Having a remote world that uses the Force in a novel way isn't canon breaking if done correctly, but this constant pressure to keep reiterating on "the Force" within the Dark/Light side binary dichotomy (and I'm VERY surprised we have not seen a "I'm force fluid" joke (but actually serious) in there somewhere.The only thing you need to know this is to watch ROTJ. Obviously Leia is Luke's sister so she could stay with Han, without dissing Luke.
Not sure how all the scrapped plans are relevant, unless our veracity is measured by how much arcane lore we know.
I mean this show hasn't actually changed anything yet. I dont think they should aim for that no. Would it be the end of the world for me? Also no.You guys are insane. I never said TPM was not an extremely flawed film. But it's obviously canon.
Leia being Lukes sister was not planned and a cop-out to tie up the love triangle by the end of ROTJ. It was obviously poor writing given they had kissed in both prior films. Now that I have found a flaw in ROTJ, is it suddenly okay to disregard it? I can't make a new story where Leia isn't Luke's sister because "I didn't like it". That's canon. If you write another story, you need to deal with it.
Making the case that it's too hard to write a story 100 years prior while respecting established canon in TPM because it had bad dialog and "was asking for it" just makes you seem too inept and ridiculous to even bother having a discussion. You'll just pull embarrassing excuses out of your ass until end times.
I mean this show hasn't actually changed anything yet. I dont think they should aim for that no. Would it be the end of the world for me? Also no.
Its not my preference, mind you. I just don't think that tying any and all future installments intended to take place prior to phantom menace, to a single line said by a single minor character is a great way of doing things, priorities wise.
You're completely ridiculous. I'm out of this thread.
...dude you dont have to agree with me on this. Plenty dont. It's not that deep.
If you don't like it, you don't like it.
If you like it, you like it.
Some will not like it (and they've voiced that all over the net) because there are black and brown people being the majority of these particular characters (there was actually a huge backlash when Lando came on board, contrary to popular belief... Even though most love him now).
Some will not like it because the acting is wooden (it's on brand for me for Star Wars)
Some will not like it because it features women and/or queer women (seen this all over the net too)
Some will not like it for reasons they can't articulate
And some will not like it because of lore reasons
People dislike things for a ton of reasons that have nothing to do with story or acting or lore ... Or because of story, acting or lore.
I will always love Star Wars so I'll always give these shows and movies a chance. I hated The Last Jedi because of how they did Finn, Poe and Kylo ... Rey was ok-ish but they did a HUGE disservice to those 3. Thanks RJ
Rise of Skywalker was... Meh. Not bad but meh. Hated the pairing of Rey with Ren. Hated Lando not finding out that curly hair girl is his daughter. Hated Finn not using the Force. Hated them forcing Carrie in there and killing her character on screen. Loved Force Ghost Yoda and how powerful he became inside the Living Force.
Obi Wan was a snoozefest until the last episode. Well, the first two were good but after that it was snoozefest central.
I really liked Ahsoka! Kinda confused about Sabine but I liked it overall.
Acolyte has my attention (using my sister's login to watch). I like it thus far. Not much to complain about except for how the forest looked AND the obviousness of who Smilo Ren was. Fight scenes have been GREAT!
This is just my opinion... I'm a fan and I love this stuff! Still wish there was an actual PLAN for the ST. RJ did a Heard on it.