Cross-buy / Cross-Save PS4 & Vita?
Vita?
Cross-buy / Cross-Save PS4 & Vita?
Tom Chick says it's bad so I'm not buying it.
/s
I have $20 in my Steam wallet from my Trials Fusion return (I thought it had online multiplayer). I think I may pick this up after reviewing Watch Dogs.
That's a website bug. Reload the page. PlayStation LifeStyle gave it a 9.5/10.
Why were they banned previously?
http://www.pushsquare.com/reviews/ps4/transistor - 9/10Transistor is an absolute triumph: a stunning sensory experience that buoys its lofty ambitions on a rock solid strategic core. It spins a tale of love, technology, and political and social unrest that speeds confidently towards a magnificent crescendo. Whats more, the razor sharp combat remains thrilling throughout, and the visuals and music display an almost superhuman level of polish. While niggling complaints can certainly be levelled at the gorgeous indie, a trip to Cloudbank comes highly recommended.
Tom Chick going for hits.
I don't expect a 90+ crazy game, but it's going to be a great game regardless.
Tom Chick going for hits.
I don't expect a 90+ crazy game, but it's going to be a great game regardless.
Oh, I guess that answers it then. ThanksVita?
8.5 from Polygon?
Glad I'm skipping on this.
Pretty much every game gets a 8, a 9 or a 10, these days. How do I know which ones are actually good and which ones are bad? What does it take for a game to get a 1, a 2, a 3, a 4, a 5, a 6 or a 7?
Lol, of course Tom Chick is the outlier. Not surprised.
Tom Chick's game of the year for 2011 was Bastion.
Fucking parody hack click baiter.
lol, and people were posting that they thought it was just going to be pretty but shallow, talking about the basic looking combat and lack of pre-release exposure.
I knew this one was going to be awesome, can't wait to play it.
See Daylight, Knack, Shadowfall, Ryse, Crimson Dragon, etc.
He goes out of his way to give everything that is popular/well reviewed a low score, so I would not put much weight in his verdict.
edit: For those wondering, look at the big games on Metacritic, he nearly always gives a 2/3.
The Quarter to Three link doesn't go anywhere for me.
That's fine and all, but this game is pretty much the complete antithesis of those types of games.He loved GTA V when everyone thought he was gonna trash it, people should read his reviews with an open mind, of course you don´t have to agree with him but is always interesting to hear or read his opinions, and he is totally right when he says that game criticism is not going to be mature till the transformers (i´m referring to the movies) type of games (meaning bid budget AAA games) can be given low scores without making a fuss.
That's fine and all, but this game is pretty much the complete antithesis of those types of games.
The Escapist gave it a 3.5/5 not a 4.5/5
"Following on from Bastion, I doubt many would have begrudged Supergiant from heading down the same path again. While Transistor does hold certain similarities, such as having the constant presence of a voice and the general underpinnings of the action RPG gameplay, the Turn() planning phase completely transforms the manner in which you will tackle a fight, making it a far more considered and tactical experience.
Add to this the strengths of the world that has been created, Darren Korbs soundtrack, the charm of Ashley Barretts voice, and the clever story that unfolds, and Transistor is a near essential game to own on PS4."
btw. http://www.playstationlifestyle.net/ is not a banned site anymore. So linking to it should be ok.
I didn't say anything was wrong that.and? guy didn't find it enjoyable, so low score according to his criteria which is 'how fun was it for me'.
Was worried people would be all pissed at me for "lowballing" the game or something.
But Tom Chick is the reviewers' ultimate blast shield.![]()
Anyone answer this? I'm curious tooI'm glad to see Transistor getting good reviews... pre-order vindicated.
Maybe this is the wrong place to ask (just ignore me if this is the case), but what makes some sites banned? Is it just poor reviews or bias, or is there something more in play?
Maybe this is the wrong place to ask (just ignore me if this is the case), but what makes some sites banned? Is it just poor reviews or bias, or is there something more in play?
Your review is incorrectly listed as 4.5/5 in the OP. It's GAF's version of the witness protection program.Was worried people would be all pissed at me for "lowballing" the game or something.
Dang...IGN said ps4 version has a feature where the sword voice coming out of DS4 speaker.
Sounds like ps4 is the version to get.