Ridicululzz
Member
I'm not even sure why they need bots. I'm sure the game will sell pretty well just because it's an Assassin's Creed game set in Japan
And yet their last MC is ugly, yeah yeah, last time they also use the same technique, in SWOLThis is so pathetic
And of course most of the bots are using attractive women as profile pictures. I wonder if that was ordered too lol
Congrats, you have more faith in the franchise than Ubisoft, unless they know something we don’t…I'm not even sure why they need bots. I'm sure the game will sell pretty well just because it's an Assassin's Creed game set in Japan
Would you buy a car if other people who are convincing you to buy it, didn't actually buy the car but are hired by the dealer to make you believe it's a great car.I'm all for dunking on Ubisoft but everybody who sells stuff online does this. What is the actual issue here that you see?
You asked what was the issue, so I listed a few (and fair) points that's it. Now you may disagree, it's fair but all I listed is easily verifiable online .I'll actually change my name if you change your name to Straw Man which is very apt after what I just read.
That's not true, maybe it is for big AAA from Ubi, EA, Activision etc etc... but thank God they are not the only things available to play.99% of everything you see on the Internet is the same thing as this here.
I said they SHOULD use that money to fix the game before release, not that they would.I also find it very cute that you think Ubisoft if given the chance will take feedback accurate or innacurate thst will then use money to fix their game.
Ok, show me those top comments made by bots for Rogue Trader, Trepang², AoM Retold, Disco Elysium, Space Marine II etc etc...For years now most of the top comments you've seen for all the games you've ended up buying have been 100% bots that's how this works especially on twitter and YouTube.
I've just checked on some games I mentioned and you are wrongThe next time you see one click into it and its very apparent.
Also I have to apply humour here or else ill be banned again haha
It's fraud. I know that in commercials people are hired to act like they love the product. But there we at least know they are paid actors.Meanwhile people should have gotten used to it, it's just another form of marketing.
Clickbaits are also fraud and yet it's the most normal thing in media. I don't like it, but this will be the future of advertising and at some point people won't even regognize if it's a bot or not.It's fraud. I know that in commercials people are hired to act like they love the product. But there we at least know they are paid actors.
You have come back with so much receipts I need to reevaluate my argument appropriately hahaYou asked what was the issue, so I listed a few (and fair) points that's it. Now you may disagree, it's fair but all I listed is easily verifiable online .
That's not true, maybe it is for big AAA from Ubi, EA, Activision etc etc... but thank God they are not the only things available to play.
I said they SHOULD use that money to fix the game before release, not that they would.
Ok, show me those top comments made by bots for Rogue Trader, Trepang², AoM Retold, Disco Elysium, Space Marine II etc etc...
Or even better, that's my Steam profile: https://steamcommunity.com/id/Kyoshiro/
Pick one game in my "Featured Games" and show me bots in comment. And I'm not talking about that one bot with a girl avatar baiting other for phishing. I'm talking about hundred of comments like in this AC Shadows trailer, which is what you said was happening.
When you produce good games, you don't need bots to promote them.
I've just checked on some games I mentioned and you are wrong![]()
Told ya'll that @SenjutsuSage still has employment along with Colt Shillwood.
Probably one of the biggest mistakes I've ever made.People are reading Youtube comments?
I clicked on something of his the other day that was linked here and he wasn't any good at the game he was playing. Although most streamers talk over/read chat during cutscenes and immediately walk the wrong way afterwards.Asmongold
![]()
Bots are hot chicks and the women in games are ugly. I’m confused, which one do we like?This is so pathetic
And of course most of the bots are using attractive women as profile pictures. I wonder if that was ordered too lol
What about now
![]()
I'm all for dunking on Ubisoft but everybody who sells stuff online does this. What is the actual issue here that you see?
Exactly. Those pics should all be trans women as to line up with their DEI agenda.Why is Ubisoft using attractive women profile pictures to market their games now? It lies counter to their DEI agenda where women should look like men. Such hypocrisy!
I'm a 80/ 90s movie man too scary for youi bet you watch marvel movies
I thought we don’t do attractive women in Western gaming anymore? Profiles should have had Star Wars Outlaws in-game character model.This is so pathetic
And of course most of the bots are using attractive women as profile pictures. I wonder if that was ordered too lol
Bots are hot chicks and the women in games are ugly. I’m confused, which one do we like?
With that avatar…I'm all for dunking on Ubisoft but everybody who sells stuff online does this. What is the actual issue here that you see?
You can go from Atari up all the way to PS360 for that. I prefer to do it emulated on PC for a better quality.In times like this, it feels more and more comfy firing up my Mega Drive or PC Engine when I want to play games.
No bots, no GaaS, no body type A/B, no always online. Just fun games.
Yes, it does look like a flat coil spring used in clockwork.I'm sorry but THAT avatar!!! You can't make this shit up it's like clockwork lol
I thought it was apparent but I changed my avatar to that after my first 2 messages to go with the joke that I'm a Ubi shill. New username came right at the perfect time too.With that avatar…
![]()
Yes you’re right. That means Ubisoft and their bots are RACCCCIIIISSSSSSSSS……..lol.the bots account are white too!
![]()
I'm curious, are companies able to boost their monthly average users estimates with bots? Granted its shady, but what isn't. Even our own governments boost their numbers with false reports and edit them later with revisions, such as in the US with the non-farm Payroll job estimates. Its almost always revised down a month to half-year reports later, meanwhile they fudge the numbers to try and keep investors happy because when the numbers are bad suggesting a flailing economy the market contracts.Dont really see any issue. The bots need something to play too![]()
You're so god damn right. Quick on and off sessions playing the good old games. Much less stressful and more healthy too imo.In times like this, it feels more and more comfy firing up my Mega Drive or PC Engine when I want to play games.
No bots, no GaaS, no body type A/B, no always online. Just fun games.
I thought we don’t do attractive women in Western gaming anymore? Profiles should have had Star Wars Outlaws in-game character model.
![]()
The problem with doing this is that there are multiple parties involved that would not be very happy with this kind of deceit, such as platform holders and investors. In fact, i think this is ground for lawsuit even since you're basically falsifying reports.I'm curious, are companies able to boost their monthly average users estimates with bots? Granted its shady, but what isn't. Even our own governments boost their numbers with false reports and edit them later with revisions, such as in the US with the non-farm Payroll job estimates. Its almost always revised down a month to half-year reports later, meanwhile they fudge the numbers to try and keep investors happy because when the numbers are bad suggesting a flailing economy the market contracts.
So what would stop a company from trying to game the system? Granted, if they were caught in the act the scandals might implode on them, but then again like with why political parties don't bring up certain points against their opposition, it'd be like using an area of effect weapon that would cause collateral on both/all sides. Which in turn causes the unmentionable problems to escalate. Granted this is more of an aside on the topic of GAAS and subscription numbers, but I could see some companies boosting their own numbers by just enough to keep their MAU's in the black or green if necessary.