Why is it problematicHey now... I like RE5 as much as the next horror fan, but let's not go bringing it up as some sort of victim of pre-woke wokeness. I know that gamers like to push back and say there's absolutely nothing racist or questionable about RE5 cause der der African zombies should be African, and, honestly, even with the white savior thing, for much of the game, there isn't anything particularly offensive, but I'm sorry.... the tribal stuff is... problematic.
Okay, guess I'll just post this again...
Yups, its known pattern for clownworld zealots to do it, they tried their best with calling sane ppl all kinds of stuff before, fascists, nazist, racists, mysogynists, narcisists etc all to soften/change the meaning of words, proof enough is just ask any wokeist what is a woman and they cant do it w/o using word "woman" itself.
. 
Don’t let the screeching get to you. Entertaining thread.
Bringing narrative into this discussion is pointless because it all depends on what the writers decide to craft. Your reasoning is flawed if you only focus on 'she’s the leader of a small army' vs 'retired treasure hunter,' while completely ignoring the actual gameplay. Nathan Drake, during gameplay, consistently takes down entire armies, performs superhuman stunts, and has killed hundreds of trained men, pirates, and criminals, often barehanded. He’s proficient with almost every weapon, including military-grade equipment, and displays near-superhuman strength and stamina. That’s what he’s done in every game, and yet you’re trying to frame him as some kind of frail old retiree—it just doesn’t hold up. This is a game, and you can’t just ignore what happens during gameplay as if it’s not part of the character’s reality.
I laughed so hard my back hurts thank you sir.
Uncharted the gameplay vs uncharted the cutscenes are 2 very different things. If cutscenes played out the way gameplay did, there would be nothing that could stop Nathan. The cutscenes portray him - and most other people in the game - as regular humans. Nate the Terminator capable of using every wepon known to man and surviving shotgun blasts to the chest is there for gameplay reasons only.
People give this game shit but vergils downfall really set up a game I wanted to play. Not to mention the original director of DMC 3-5 was ALL OVER THE PRODUCTION."Not in a million years" and yet the same director did his hair white at the end of the game when he unlocks his devil-mode something.
This was definitely humorous attempt, trying to depict Dante IS a punk but by end of game he will grow.
DmC was never given a chance to flourish. I believe DmC-sequels progressively would have gotten more better, darker and edgier.
Virgils downfall in DmC was just dumb and forced to set up the final fight for the sake of it.
What do you mean? It was an origin story and eventually at some point you'd know Vergil would turn and it's not like he didn't have certain actions like murdering that woman in cold blood that hinted STRONGLY at it.
Whether or not he's trolling is another question entirely
I no longer have no idea what that means anymore.
That's a well known issue in Uncharted narrative, but it's writer's fault in the first place. You could just say "it's a game" and be ok with that. But considering Nate cutscene and Nate gameplay as two different characters it's a big issue. Narrative wants Nate to be a good goofy guy vs gameplay wants him to be an action hero. However he is a Terminator and we can't just ignore the fact that things in gameplay happen in the game world. Uncharted is a great series but its writing has those incoherence issues and that's it. They even justified the fact that he's a bullet sponge saying that he is not actuallly take damage, but it's his "luck" that prevents him from dying. Also they added in Uncharted 3 a swimming animation when he throws the museum guard off the cliff because he doesn't kill innocents. At the end of Uncharted 2 during the final bossfight cutscene Lazarevic asks Nate how may men he's killed. Just sayin
