rockman zx
Member
I really like how the police follow you when you try to escape on foot. So far only played 1 hours, not super impressed but the hacking is really cool.
What's with the question mark?
82, huh?
Damn, I was so close.
We still waiting on any reviews?
Quantity generally rates well. Even AC3 got decent reviews.
Well yeah, if you read watchdogs threads on gaf this may come as a surprise ;pI'm so surprised that it's getting such good reviews. I mean, that's really awesome, I'm just surprised for some reason.
Its dead, isnt it? :-(Edge?
It's not if you remember AAA games are judged largely on quantity.85 for AC3 seems REALLY high now.
Read his reviews, enjoy the writing, dont pay attention to the score and definetly read some more reviews. He has a very interesting taste to say the least and scores weird sometimes (overly harsh, then too perfect), which doesnt always match the text.Interesting to see Jim Sterling rate it so highly. Not sure whether to take that as a recommendation or not. He's a great consumer activist, but after his reviews of Bioshock Infinite and Vanquish, I'm not so sure about his critical eye. Especially when he's saying there's an incredible amount of polish, yet other reviews are specifically criticizing poor AI and sloppy driving.
Wait and see, we must. Certainly doesn't seem like this game is the great next-gen hope we thought it would be.
the eurogamer review was complete drivel.
Spent most of the time nitpicking about the games faults rather than tell me anything informative about the game. In the first sentence complains about hacking...
the eurogamer review was complete drivel.
Spent most of the time nitpicking about the games faults rather than tell me anything informative about the game. In the first sentence complains about hacking...
the eurogamer review was complete drivel.
Spent most of the time nitpicking about the games faults rather than tell me anything informative about the game. In the first sentence complains about hacking...
I'm already regretting choosing this over MK8
There's wikipedia to tell you information about the game, the thing you just read is called a critique.
There is no way to 'match the scores to the text' necessarily. I can list 50 things wrong with Skyrim, but I would still give it a 10/10. It depends on how you weigh the flaws and the positives. If he gives it a 9, he's basically saying the positives definitely outweighed the negatives for him.Read his reviews, enjoy the writing, dont pay attention to the score and definetly read some more reviews. He has a very interesting taste to say the least and scores weird sometimes (overly harsh, then too perfect), which doesnt always match the text.
Holy crap that looks bad. Decision to not get the PS4 version justified.
I nailed it![]()
82 on Metacritic.
Sounds like GAF was pretty close in the guess the Metacritic thread.
Sounds really dull.
The game is sloppy controls which cause you to constantly do the wrong thing accidentally with disastrous consequences; is inconsistently interactive world design; is a cover system whereby you get stuck on scenery or it guesses incorrectly where you want to move. The game is insta-fail stealth missions, wave-defense missions, escort missions, missions where what the characters say and what the objective is dont match up. The game is restrictive objectives which dont make use of the possibilities provided by the open city or the hacking mechanics, and checkpoint positions that force you to re-watch short cutscenes or re-perform rote actions after every death.
Good scores but still underrated. This is a great game (GiantBomb review is a joke though).
There is no way to 'match the scores to the text' necessarily. I can list 50 things wrong with Skyrim, but I would still give it a 10/10. It depends on how you weigh the flaws and the positives. If he gives it a 9, he's basically saying the positives definitely outweighed the negatives for him.
Some people treat reviews like there should be standard docking system for a flaw, like -0.25 points for every problem listed, but reviews aren't like graded papers.
I'd add, just for curiosity, this
Watch Dogs - 82
Lego City Undercover - 80
![]()
Is there a consensus on the driving physics yet?
The game is sloppy controls which cause you to constantly do the wrong thing accidentally with disastrous consequences; is inconsistently interactive world design; is a cover system whereby you get stuck on scenery or it guesses incorrectly where you want to move.
85 for AC3 seems REALLY high now.
As I said in our review, I like Watch Dogs, which really is just the endpoint of 5-7 years of Ubisoft development (AC + Driver + Blacklist + FC3), but it's not perfect. It feel like Assassin's Creed 1, it's good, but the real magic is what's waiting when they build on it. I need a sequel.
Jaz absolutely loved it though and he's the primary reviewer, so it's his score on the end.
Oh, and Aiden's a dick.
I see eurogamer is turning into edge, low-ballin' a lot of games recently. that review is a load of drivel.
Interesting to see Jim Sterling rate it so highly. Not sure whether to take that as a recommendation or not. He's a great consumer activist, but after his reviews of Bioshock Infinite and Vanquish, I'm not so sure about his critical eye. Especially when he's saying there's an incredible amount of polish, yet other reviews are specifically criticizing poor AI and sloppy driving.
Wait and see, we must. Certainly doesn't seem like this game is the great next-gen hope we thought it would be.