8BitsAtATime
Member
Do you guys prefer hardback or softback?
I prefer hardback for collecting, softback for reading at home, and ebook for reading when im out and about
anyways.. Im jumping into the Sherlock Holmes books.
Do you guys prefer hardback or softback?
Way of Kings- Brandon Sanderson:
Probably one of the best Fantasy novels I've read in a long time if not ever. I can not say how much I loved that book. I nearly read through it in about three or four days and had to stop myself from reading because I didn't want it to end. Any recommandations for a book which I might enjoy as much as this?
Ullyses- James Joyce:
I tried, I really wanted to like this, but I think that (for me at last) it is impossible to read this book without some secondary literature right next to it. It is just so god damn constructed, that you just keep wondering " Why did he use that phrase? Is there a menaning to this or that...?" And while I can admire that on a level of literary studies it is not so enjoyable if you just want to read... but maybe I will get some secondary literature and finish it someday.
Crime and punishment- Fyodor Dostoevsky:
Good read so far. I wish I spoke Russian so I could read the original. I don't know about the Englisch translation but the German one (the old one, there is a new one but it was not for free... yeah I'm cheap, I know) sounds a bit cheesy sometimes. I just wonder if for someone who speaks Russian, compared to contemporary Russian the language in the book sounds oldish, too. But storywise a great book so far which actually keeps on suprising me. Have read about 20% (damn you Kindle for not having numbered pages), and I don't know, so far this could be a Cohen movie or somthing. Really excited how this will go on.
You read the Wheel of Time series?
*blink*
Goodness.
I suppose it's all perspective, but I found them pretty similar. Giant epic story, multiple POVs, some of which are really boring. Enjoyed both of them, in any case.
There are some problems with the female characters in WoT (most notably Nynaeve and Elayne), but overall Jordan is really skillful at POV. Where for Sanderson, I've found characters to be probably his weakest area. I dunno, different strokes.
My favorite author, and yea, if it sounds cheesy the translation sucks. I would describe Dostoevsky's writing as serious, depressing, enlightening with some dark comedy thrown in. Of course, im going by a translation so who knows?
Excellent. That seems to be the consensus everywhere. Thank you.from reading around the Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky translations always get high praise for russian literature
from reading around the Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky translations always get high praise for russian literature
Loved that book as well. I would recommend A song of Ice and Fire if you havent read it or the Long Price Quartet by Daniel Abraham.
I hate Joyce with a burning fiery passion.
My favorite author, and yea, if it sounds cheesy the translation sucks. I would describe Dostoevsky's writing as serious, depressing, enlightening with some dark comedy thrown in. Of course, im going by a translation so who knows?
You read the Wheel of Time series?
Can anyone recommend some books that are like The Devil in the White City*?
*Set in the late 1800s, gives a good taste of the time, perhaps a murder investigation
Can anyone recommend some books that are like The Devil in the White City*?
*Set in the late 1800s, gives a good taste of the time, perhaps a murder investigation
I didn't know that bitter seeds had a sequel. Thank you for the info. The idea of this series is really interesting. I'm curious about the story so I have to read it soon.it's very new 'the coldest war' I picked it up right after finishing bitter seeds. books are not overly long as well, unsure on pages as I got em on kindle.
Did end up enjoying the first one quite a bit. it was obviously written with a sequel in mind, and I didn't think long about purchasing the second. Does suffer badly from the english main guy being quite unlikeable though, my only criticism would be that the german characters are just WAAAAY more interesting generally, book talks about their perspectives and motivations a lot more than the warlocks, who are sort of secondary characters a lot of the time.
It's not as good as 'wool' which is the best book I've read in ages, but very enjoyable read, been getting through it on the bus ride to and from work.
Just finished it today. I liked it a lot, but I had an issue with how the magic and gods were handled. I never knew what the "rules" of the world were. It always seemed like who or what was the most powerful was constantly changing and some of the twists weren't really twists because I had no idea of what the limits of different magics and gods were. So if someone just defeated a great evil, I wasn't impressed because I had no idea what made that great evil so powerful, or how the person even defeated them.
Are my critiques answered in later volumes of the series?
I'm going to keep reading, but it would be nice to know that the magnitude of the world becomes easier to grasp.
I've heard a lot of good things about Wool and I already have the first book on my kindle but always forgot about it. Maybe I should delay reading bitter seeds and start with wool instead?! So many good books and so little time to read
Finally finished the Wool Omnibus yesterday. It got a lot better as it went and I definitely got sucked in, already started recommending it to friends.
It reminds me of the Hunger Games in that it is a really great story but not terribly well written. That and the whole post-apocalyptic theme.
Will read more from this author when he returns to theas promised.silos
I was looking forward to Wool, but I had a hard time reading The Hunger Games. I fell asleep on it many times and ended up just not enjoying it at all. Going to give Wool a try though.
I'm currently onto book 4 in the series (House of Chains) and it all seems to be, slowly, coming together in regards to the magic systems / rules / gods etc. It is incredibly drawn out and obscure though, especially after the first book, as everything is just thrown out there and you're left to piece it together yourself.
Definitely continue with the series though as they get better and better after GotM which, essentially, is one novel's worth of prologue to the rest of the series. I remember reading somewhere that GotM was written a decade before the rest and it really shows in the quality of the writing from Deadhouse Gates onwards.
At least get as far as Memories of Ice (book 3) which is one of the best fantasy novels I've read in a long, long time. Up there with A Storm of Swords for me.
Finally finished the Wool Omnibus yesterday. It got a lot better as it went and I definitely got sucked in, already started recommending it to friends.
It reminds me of the Hunger Games in that it is a really great story but not terribly well written. That and the whole post-apocalyptic theme.
Will read more from this author when he returns to theas promised.silos
Can anyone recommend some books that are like The Devil in the White City*?
*Set in the late 1800s, gives a good taste of the time, perhaps a murder investigation
Ooh, new Tad Williams? Awesome.
Still need to read the Shadowmarch series. I put it off for a long time because I didn't want to have to wait for each book to come out, but now that it's all done I keep forgetting.
exactly what I was thinking while I read Wool 2.Just found out that Fox required the film rights to the book. I kind of thought the whole time I was reading that it could make a great television series, can't see it as a film as easily.
Just found out that Fox required the film rights to the book. I kind of thought the whole time I was reading that it could make a great television series, can't see it as a film as easily.
Amazing book. Got a little long, but overall awesome read. Sad to hear the sequel sucks.
if anything it's far more relevant and prescient than anything the Forever War mustered up--worth a read if you're a fan.
I'm reading Deadhouse Gates now and finding it a chore. I was about ready to give up on it, which I rarely do, but I suppose I'll stick it out. The biggest problem I'm having with it and GotM is Erikson creates this expansive world and rule set, leaves it to you to figure how all the rules, deities, and magic interact, and fills the world with characters and conflicts that I can't seem to care about.
I would rate Wool above Hunger Games. Somewhere between Hunger Games and The Road on the recent-post-apocalyptic-books scale.
Edit: Has anyone read Leviathan Wakes?
Edit Edit: Actually you don't have to answer that because I just did a forum search and every what are you reading thread since 2011 talks about it