gregor7777
Banned
and..
I must admit I'm a little disappointed with the Europa book. A bit too much finger-pointing at the "establishment", and it's difficult to read at times. Ridges. Ridges.
Mifune said:Personal offense? Really? Saying an opinion is terrible is a personal offense now? I didn't call him names or anything.
I respect Snowman's opinions a lot. I just think that with this one he is way off the mark.
You should read Suttree by Cormac McCarthy.Tenck said:I don't want to sound like a Psycho, but I'm looking for a book that tells the story of pain and suffering. Just reading about people going through really bad times makes me feel goodI also love books set in the past. Though I like them better when they're not non-fiction (history ones).Yeah I think I'm fucking crazy
Jayayess1190 said:Just finished this for a summer class. This book had me emotional by the end. At first I wasn't feeling it, and Oskar was annoying me, but by the end I was completely changed. The letters confused me a little bit, and the multiple characters speaking on the same line, but overall I liked it a lot.
You want Russian literature. The Death of Ivan Ilych for starters.Tenck said:I love both books because they talk about frustration, hate, depression, and angst. I'm just tired of the same old stories. I like how you never know what will happen with books that are a bit darker than most.
Help me out Gaf :'(
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:I finished Jane Eyre a few nights ago. It's a good book overall, though not great and not as timeless as some other 19th-Century literature that I've read. I've actually not read Emily (Wuthering Heights is likely next, actually; after the Naipaul thing, I've been boning up on my women authors, pun absolutely intended), but Charlotte Bronte doesn't really have much of an ear for dialogue; not that I expected realism from a book of that period, or even something close to it, but the characters simply didn't have much interesting to say, save a few snippets here and there (mostly in the repartee between Jane and Rochester). Contrast that with the dense and poetic monologues and dialogue from Moby-Dick, which I also read recently, and Bronte's limitations as a writer (at least in this book) become apparent pretty quickly. I also didn't think that the occasional mix of Gothic elements (spooky mansions, ghosts, a purple-faced lunatic, etc.) worked all that well, as it never really built toward anything; one could maybe point toward the fact that Jane/Rochester seem to call out to each other from across the country at the end, but really, that seemed more a summation of the novel's religious outlook than a fulfillment of the superstitious stuff that peppered it throughout. But, for all the novel's limitations, it is a pretty breezy read, and there are parts and characters that are memorable, which is more than I can say for some more contemporary books that I've read recently. To sell the novel as great literature oversells it, I think - indeed, it would serve better as proof of Naipaul's assessment of women writers than as a counterargument - but as a light piece of entertainment, it's entirely serviceable and surprisingly modern, in that respect.
Next is... hmm, I'm not sure. I'm sticking with women writers for a while, but on my plate are:
Wuthering Heights by Emily Bronte (probably next read)
Beloved by Toni Morrison (thought The Bluest Eye was mediocre, bordering on bad; this is my "second chance" novel for her)
Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen (would be my first Austen as Wuther Heights/Jane Eyre will be/was my first Bronte)
A Tree Grows in Brooklyn by Betty Smith (I've read part of this before, and I can almost say without reading that it will probably be the best of the lot, the part I read being great great great)
The Good Earth by Pearl S. Buck (also very excited for this one)
Do you think, because I am poor, obscure, plain, and little, I am soulless and heartless? You think wrong! I have as much soul as you and full as much heart! And if God had gifted me with some beauty and much wealth, I should have made it as hard for you to leave me, as it is now for me to leave you.
Oh, man, that's terrible.Cyan said:Just got an email from my favorite library. They got their funding cut by the county, and will be charging $80/yr for residents of certain cities within the county. Including my city.
:/
So much for that. Not even close to worth it.
William Faulkner, Cormac McCarthy, Robert Morgan, etc, etc have all been part of Oprah's book club. So, no, that should not concern you in the slightest.Coldsnap said:Is FREEDOM by Jonathan Franzen any good? I picked it up at the library because I have seen it around but when I got into my car I noticed the Oprah book club selection sticker and thought i had made a mistake.
Dresden said:Reading Motherless Brooklyn. (about fifty in). First time reading these two authors - enjoying the Bolano more than the Lethem, but both are good.
Kraftwerk said:ONWARDS!
Yeah, there's some parts in there (MB) that really have a pop to it. It's good, really, I'm just not overly impressed with it. I'm reading mainly for Lionel at this point - he's amazingly eloquent for someone with Tourette's, but still, likable enough to follow.Help Me! said:I am reading Chronic City by Lethem right now (my first novel of his; I have read his short stories "The Light and the Sufferer" and "The Hardened Criminals") and am completely and totally enraptured. Lethem can seriously write. And I am loving the slipstreaminess of it.
I couldn't stand Kraken at all. It was even worse than his other dud, Iron Council.Kraken- Mieville
Dresden said:Yeah, there's some parts in there (MB) that really have a pop to it. It's good, really, I'm just not overly impressed with it. I'm reading mainly for Lionel at this point - he's amazingly eloquent for someone with Tourette's, but still, likable enough to follow.
I couldn't stand Kraken at all. It was even worse than his other dud, Iron Council.
Haha yeah, i think a better foray into classic sci-fic for someone like him would be maybe phillip l dick? (assuming he hasn't experienced any of his work).lol, Snowman, you're gonna hate Asimov. Talk about a tin ear for...well, everything.
Kraftwerk said:
Just finished. I MUST read this again soon. Amazing, simply amazing. It was complex at first, but I got used to it.
THAT ENDING HOLY SHIT.
The Culture Novels are the best 'series' I have read to date.
mike23 said:About 35% through American Gods at the moment. It's a little bit slow action-wise so far, but it has me interested.
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:Next is... hmm, I'm not sure. I'm sticking with women writers for a while, but on my plate are:
Wuthering Heights by Emily Bronte (probably next read)
Beloved by Toni Morrison (thought The Bluest Eye was mediocre, bordering on bad; this is my "second chance" novel for her)
Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen (would be my first Austen as Wuther Heights/Jane Eyre will be/was my first Bronte)
zero margin said:I did not care for it, trudged through and couldn't wait to just be done with it. I would have stopped early but I have OCD and can't leave a book unfinished.
Frankenstrat said:
fantastic read.
Just finished it. Loved it. One of my favorite books I've read the past year. Was at Borders today and picked up 'Of Human Bondage', also by Maugham, and will probably read it some time in the near future.demon said:Think I'm about to start this: