Jerk 2.0 said:
I finally got it.
If I do not enjoy every moment of this novel, I will hold Dresden personally responsible.
Cyan said:The fuck is this shit?
Someone said that this book was a lot better than Shards of Honor. I thought it was much worse. The first half of the book was pure political drama setting up for the action-packed last quarter of the book. Unfortunately, because of the way the author chose to name all of the lords and lordlings, things get very confusing.
My main beef with Barrayar was personality changes that both Vorkosigan and Cordelia went through. Cordelia in the first book was a strong-willed, clever woman who wasn't hung up on gender roles. Cordelia in this book was a whiney, stubborn woman who's only goal was to first have a son, and then later, to save this unborn son, even at the cost of her close friends, lots of death, and extended political turmoil.
Vorkosigan in this book turned into some no-direction, one-dimensional character that seemed to be hiding in the late emperor's shadow. Maybe that's what the author was trying to convey, but I rather liked him in Shards of Honor, and was just annoyed with him in this book.
To make up for my dislike of the two main characters, I found myself gravitating to the supporting cast this time. Koudelka and Drou's attempt at flirting was entertaining and I was relieved when they finally found a way to resolve their relationship.
I'm still torn about the Bothari character. The author takes great pains to point that he's mentally unstable. Funny how he always manages to find his stability to save the day in any situation that requires brawn. In fact, it's annoying how Cordelia *always* succeeds. There's just no tension at all because she always gets what she wants.
Perhaps I'm cold and I have no mothering instinct at all, but I was annoyed at Cordelia's reaction to the whole baby situation. She was willing to cause more political strife to try and save one unborn life. It seemed incredibly selfish to me, and I was hoping Cordelia was beyond that. Because of my annoyance of the central plot, I was disengaged from the entire book. Not sure if I want to read the rest now. I guess I should at least give the actual Miles books a try.
Remains of the Day is one of my favorite books.Dresden said:
I do hope you enjoy it. Working through Remains of Day whenever I have time right now, and it's been excellent.
peakish said:Steppenwolf, by Herman Hesse. I wanted a German language book (learning the language), browsed around and it seems interesting, I do have a feeling of taking water over my head but it will be interesting to decrypt.
Guileless said:That new Follett looks interesting. I like historical fiction set in and around World War I. My special lady is reading The Pillars of the Earth. It's a mass market paperback released in connection with the television series and holy shit is the type small. :lol
BenjaminBirdie said:
Oh my GOD so good.
We are living in a golden age of fiction.
GOLDEN. AGE.
Mifune said:This book sucked.
JBF!
BenjaminBirdie said:We are living in a golden age of fiction.
GOLDEN. AGE.
Eric WK said:What else are you submitting as evidence? My Kindle comes tomorrow and I must know.
Guileless said:That new Follett looks interesting. I like historical fiction set in and around World War I. My special lady is reading The Pillars of the Earth. It's a mass market paperback released in connection with the television series and holy shit is the type small. :lol
Attackthebase said:I never understood how people like reading mass market paperback novels. Every time, I tried reading mass paperback, it felt awkward holding the book and the font size simply drives me crazy.
Attackthebase said:I never understood how people like reading mass market paperback novels. Every time, I tried reading mass paperback, it felt awkward holding the book and the font size simply drives me crazy.
One of my favorite novels.Acidote said:I might be reading a "El Quijote" fragment in a few hours to take part in the youtube and the Real Academia de la Lengua Española project
:lol
BenjaminBirdie said:New Rick Moody. New Franzen. The new David Mitchell. Along with Super Sad True Love Story, that right there alone is pretty much what 1999 was for movies.
BattleMonkey said:Want epic sci fi naval battles, and everyone keeps recommending this to me, so just started.
BenjaminBirdie said:
Oh my GOD so good.
We are living in a golden age of fiction.
GOLDEN. AGE.
It's Shteyngart, so it'll probably be about a fat Jewish guy hooking up with an ethnic woman with tragic but hilarious results.DesertEater said:Im intrigued. What is this book about ? why is it good ?
Shteyngart (Absurdistan) presents another profane and dizzying satire, a dystopic vision of the future as convincingand, in its way, as frighteningas Cormac McCarthy's The Road. It's also a pointedly old-fashioned May-December love story, complete with references to Chekhov and Tolstoy. Mired in protracted adolescence, middle-aged Lenny Abramov is obsessed with living forever (he works for an Indefinite Life Extension company), his books (an anachronism of this indeterminate future), and Eunice Park, a 20-something Korean-American. Eunice, though reluctant and often cruel, finds in Lenny a loving but needy fellow soul and a refuge from her overbearing immigrant parents. Narrating in alternate chaptersLenny through old-fashioned diary entries, Eunice through her online correspondencethe pair reveal a funhouse-mirror version of contemporary America: terminally indebted to China, controlled by the singular Bipartisan Party (Big Brother as played by a cartoon otter in a cowboy hat), and consumed by the superficial. Shteyngart's earnestly struggling charactersalong with a flurry of running gagskeep the nightmare tour of tomorrow grounded. A rich commentary on the obsessions and catastrophes of the information age and a heartbreaker worthy of its title, this is Shteyngart's best yet.
One of my favorite non-fiction books. I like it a lot more than Guns, Germs, and Steel. It's organized into different societies, and really really interesting. I particularly enjoyed the chapters on Easter Island, the three Polynesian Islands, Iceland, and Greenland. I like islands. :lolbytesized said:
I just started it and it's a long book (for my standards) so I think it will take me a good month to finish it. Has anyone read it here? What's your opinion?
sparky2112 said:I know there are Weber fans here, so I'll try to be delicate: I thought this was utter crap. I'm assuming this was early on in his career, and maybe his writing gets better, but that doesn't mean I can give this one a pass...
Besides, if you want naval battles, why not stick with the 'real' ones? Patrick O'Brian and Forrester are literary gods, so...
BorkBork said:One of my favorite non-fiction books. I like it a lot more than Guns, Germs, and Steel. It's organized into different societies, and really really interesting. I particularly enjoyed the chapters on Easter Island, the three Polynesian Islands, Iceland, and Greenland. I like islands. :lol
Amazon description said:I am convinced, both by faith and experience, that to maintain ones self on this earth is not a hardship, but a pastime, if we will live simply and wisely. So said Henry David Thoreau in 1845 when he began his famous experiment in living on Walden Pond. In this graphic masterpiece, John Porcellino uses only the words of Thoreau himself to tell the story of those two years off the beaten track. The pared-down text focuses on Thoreaus most profound ideas, and Porcellinos fresh, simple pictures bring the philosophers sojourn at Walden to cinematic life. For readers who know Walden intimately, this graphic treatment will provide a vivid new interpretation of Thoreaus story. For those who have never read (or never completed!) the original, it presents a contemporary look at a few brave words to live by.