Steelyuhas
Member
Yeah, no issues for me.Does anyone use Linkedin? Since getting my 1520 back it hasn't been able to sync Linkedin contacts.
Yeah, no issues for me.Does anyone use Linkedin? Since getting my 1520 back it hasn't been able to sync Linkedin contacts.
Ffs dropped my 930. Screen crack...
Where is my cortana? The 930 has 8.1 as default and I double checked there is no update available, but I don't have a cortana app (which I did on my 920 after a dev preview update)
Any news when DP users get Cyan? I'm still waiting.
Use the software recovery tool.
Nearly everything is backed up now anyway.
I did that and now I can't select Google as my search provider.
Any news when DP users get Cyan? I'm still waiting.
Reading this thread with envy. Had a Lumia 900 with WP7 (early adopter curse) and recently bought a S4. Gosh I really want a Cortana-enabled phone. This "Hello Galaxy" thing sucks.
So nice to have the phone (even back in WP7) say "Text received from ______: Would you like me to read it?"
Gosh I miss that
Use the software recovery tool.
Nearly everything is backed up now anyway.
Use the software recovery tool.
Nearly everything is backed up now anyway.
Is cyan available for my 920 on Verizon?
Cyan is making my 920 fly. I was already noticing some clunkiness after playing with the latest crop of Android phones, but I swear my phone feels a bit more airy after updating it.
Same here, my 520 flies, it truly flies. Feels like a new phone now xDDDD, the increased performance is hard to believe, really. Everything feels so fast now.
New options are great. This OS is evolving pretty nicely IMO, if MS can make a shitty phone like mine run everything so quick.
EDIT: update took a loooong while, dunno whether that's normal. I could barely use the phone yesterday.
Nope, cyan isn't available to any Lumia phones on Verizon yet. =/
What would be a good use for a 520 without a sim card other than a music player? I just got a 620 but I can get a 520 for 80 if I trade in any old phone. Just as a music player you're already getting more value than any dedicated mp3 player in the same price range.
Decent internet browser.
Can check facebook on it with its really quite nice facebook app. If you download the maps you can use it as a GPS with no sim card in it.
I've never used skype on it but you can go for that.
Does the cyan update (920 in Canada) include the cortana alpha? I see there are no folders.
Yeah, it's pretty amazing really. And another great thing about it is I've dropped it about 20 times and it hasn't broken. The back pops off and the battery falls out when you drop it, but no cracked screen and not even a scratch. I'm not sure if that's a common experience, but if it was an iphone it would be fucked.So you can do pretty much anything except call and text if you use wifi? It's crazy how much value you get for that price compared to anything else.
Nope, just 8.11.
US Cortana is still much better anyways.
Yeah, it's pretty amazing really. And another great thing about it is I've dropped it about 20 times and it hasn't broken. The back pops off and the battery falls out when you drop it, but no cracked screen and not even a scratch. I'm not sure if that's a common experience, but if it was an iphone it would be fucked.
Yeah, it's pretty amazing really. And another great thing about it is I've dropped it about 20 times and it hasn't broken. The back pops off and the battery falls out when you drop it, but no cracked screen and not even a scratch. I'm not sure if that's a common experience, but if it was an iphone it would be fucked.
Half ass solution? It's not like MS can force web developers to send proper mobile css to the browser. If aren't gonna code for the user agent right now, what else is MS supposed to do in the meatime?I wish I had the 8.1 update just to use the browser and get prompted to download an app from the IOS or Google store. Love their half ass solutions and hopefully soon an android app emulator.
Half ass solution? It's not like MS can force web developers to send proper mobile css to the browser. If aren't gonna code for the user agent right now, what else is MS supposed to do in the meatime?
Abandon Trident, fork WebKit.Half ass solution? It's not like MS can force web developers to send proper mobile css to the browser. If aren't gonna code for the user agent right now, what else is MS supposed to do in the meatime?
Abandon Trident, fork WebKit.
Nah, let's blame everyone else for websites not rendering properly in IE. IE is perfect and that's why everyone is using the Trident engine. Oh wait...
My Icon's camera needs Cyan. Hurry up Verizon!Nope, cyan isn't available to any Lumia phones on Verizon yet. =/
My Icon's camera needs Cyan. Hurry up Verizon!
Abandon Trident, fork WebKit.
Move to WebKit? Sure I'll bite. But we're talking about now. It's not like re-authoring a rendering engine is like flipping a switch. WP IE uses IE proper's rendering engine. So we're talking about desktop IE being re-authored first.How about changing the underlying technology so it uses what everyone else is using? Do you think Google or Apple would do this solution where you'd get prompted to download an app from a competitor's app store when using their browser?
Dear godNah, let's blame everyone else for websites not rendering properly in IE. IE is perfect and that's why everyone is using the Trident engine. Oh wait...
Move to WebKit? Sure I'll bite. But we're talking about now. It's not like re-authoring a rendering engine is like flipping a switch. WP IE uses IE proper's rendering engine. So we're talking about desktop IE being re-authored first.
MS obviously is running the risk of further exposing WP's status in the market by the fact iOS/Android apps get advertised here. The fact that people are hating on a move that is obviously meant to improve user's functionality in-the-now seems pretty odd to me. Yes we should want them to move to WebKit long-term, but critisizing them improving the user experience for us now - possibly at expense to perception of the platform - is pretty masochistic.
As things stand right now, yes there isn't the need we saw in years past. Trident and WebKit have pretty similar performance and support overall.I don't see the point in moving to Webkit. The standard is HTML5 and not Webkit. Rendering engines like Trident and Gecko support it well. One dominating rendering engine would be like IE 6 all over again.
As things stand right now, yes there isn't the need we saw in years past. Trident and WebKit have pretty similar performance and support overall.
But like you said, the standard is HTML5 ... and while Trident and WebKit's support is pretty similar, neither do in fact support all features completely (or in some cases, at all). The want for MS to move to WebKit is because people are scared that long term, they may diverge again. The web space is pretty fast moving, and what are peers now may not be in the future. People are of the mind that the risk of stagnation (having all 4 of the main web makers using the same engine) is less than the risk of divergence. It's hoped that having all 4 utilizing it may actually move things quicker.
Is that theory wrong? Quite possibly, but I at least understand argument for it.
BTW - Unless something changed, Mozilla abandoned Gecko for WebKit a few years back. Other than Opera (the smallest blip that registers on web browser usage stats), everything already is WebKit beyond IE.
BTW - Unless something changed, Mozilla abandoned Gecko for WebKit a few years back. Other than Opera (the smallest blip that registers on web browser usage stats), everything already is WebKit beyond IE.