Keeping gaf operating smoothly on ancient vb3, managing the ads, keeping the team together and the community together, and prepping for our migration was a double-full-time endeavor.
I miss the old wild west internet before Facebook, before Twitter. When social interaction was just gaming forums where everybody called each other stupid faggots and nobody took it seriously.Internet, and world by extension would have been so much better places, if people just used web to jerk off to korean idols, and pirate licensed stuff.
Or, dunno, learn how to make pies.
I know it's off-topic to this thread, but seriously, thank you for keeping Neogaf alive.That's not an accurate characterization of my perspective, but I didn't talk much about it publicly around that time so I can understand why you'd think that. I opposed GG primarily because people on that "side" came after me obsessively from the start in an attempt to destroy my reputation, and the initial talking points of the movement generally seemed absurd: that Zoe Quinn slept with game journalists to promote her game for charity (I don't care who someone sleeps with), and ethics in game journalism (there has never been any, and I've been a lifelong critic of the enthusiast games press). I dismissed these grievances as being silly.
Things got too hostile and intense all at once though. When people started stalking my personal Facebook and brigading me on Twitter, I defriended a bunch of people and stopped using social media, generally staying out of the spotlight so that I could live my life. It was way too much.
Most of the ex-mods weren't hardcore social justice types, either, just gamers, but any time they acted in public on the boards, people on any which side would jump down their throats, and any public face of the mod team became targeted by extremist types off-site, which became a vicious cycle that drove most of the ex-mods into hiding, and broke down communication between the mod/admin side and the community side. Most of them were really stressed out all the time later on.
The only people left who were willing to get in the muck at that point were the True Believer intersectional warrior mods, and they doubled down after Trump got elected, totally bypassing my rules and mass stealth banning people as I uncovered later. I've attempted to right those wrongs in the time since.
Keeping gaf operating smoothly on ancient vb3, managing the ads, keeping the team together and the community together, and prepping for our migration was a double-full-time endeavor.
I miss the old wild west internet before Facebook, before Twitter. When social interaction was just gaming forums where everybody called each other stupid faggots and nobody took it seriously.
That's not an accurate characterization of my perspective, but I didn't talk much about it publicly around that time so I can understand why you'd think that. I opposed GG primarily because people on that "side" came after me obsessively from the start in an attempt to destroy my reputation, and the initial talking points of the movement generally seemed absurd: that Zoe Quinn slept with game journalists to promote her game for charity (I don't care who someone sleeps with), and ethics in game journalism (there has never been any, and I've been a lifelong critic of the enthusiast games press). I dismissed these grievances as being silly.
Things got too hostile and intense all at once though. When people started stalking my personal Facebook and brigading me on Twitter, I defriended a bunch of people and stopped using social media, generally staying out of the spotlight so that I could live my life. It was way too much.
The only people left who were willing to get in the muck at that point were the True Believer intersectional warrior mods, and they doubled down after Trump got elected, totally bypassing my rules and mass stealth banning people as I uncovered later. I've attempted to right those wrongs in the time since.
They only cared about their own image. They knew sticking with Alec would paint a target on their back as "rapist enablers." It's clear they didn't give a shit about him.What i dont get is why his team mates immediately threw him under the bus and cut ties if they knew about his mental health issues and him apologizing?
He probably had few if any support structures.
Absolutely. She deleted her twitter out of fear obviously. The thing is he was Canadian and I'm not sure if the same laws apply there for suspected rapists!
What lesson is there to be learned here? That people are shit to one another?
No bro, you always gotta BELIEVE WOMEN. Even if there's zero evidence to back up the statements and the accuser is a known pathological liar.What are Resetera saying? If groundless accusations did lead to a death - that's ok?? They really seem to be like a hate group at this point. Only a matter of time imo till it implodes. Most of the users know it isn't right but also know they risk their account for daring to say anything. That's untenable, and I don't think devs from big companies are gonna want to be seen to be attached to this shit either.
4 is being pretty generous. I guess some guys are really desperate though.The real crime is anyone dating Quinn, good grief she's a fucking 4 at best.
Honestly I'm more on Anita's side, she was just making a feminism 101 documentary and got years of harassment and abuse and weird stalkerish obsession with hating her from autists like Thunderf00t and Sargon. When the documentaries finally came out they were largely inoffensive, entry level feminist media analysis and then she basically disappeared. She never deserved the abuse she got. Honestly haven't heard literally anything about Anita in yonks.
The basis for justice in Western society is that one is innocent until proven guilty.Absolutely, my only point was: How would one go aboutproving that, with her detail free accusations? Presumption of innocence is not a viable answer to that.
It doesn't. Games development blows. Paid pennies for working twice as hard as any other dev. I'm much happier in FinTech. I'll be more active here for sure. Got my account nuked at the other place.
While i agree on everything you said earlier this is not something i can agree on. I saw many cases of you personally banning people in True Believer style. It is ok, you learned you lesson in rolling with wrong people and everything is fine now. While i certainly can believe that some mods were doing stuff behind your back i won't believe that they didn't have at least some sort of tacit acknowledgment in your own behavior which made them free to do what their forum believed in.
It is ok, like i said. You learned your lesson about people, and neogaf is again great place to be and talk about games, nothing to be shamed about anymore. I had few mistakes in my life too. Left wingers also seems to be coming back slowly to offtopic space and even politics which is great news as while i am certainly centrist-right i don't like to be in echo chamber which breeds circlejerk and non critical thinking.
cheers
What i dont get is why his team mates immediately threw him under the bus and cut ties if they knew about his mental health issues and him apologizing?
Well you don't need to prove innocence on his part, if she cannot prove her claims his innocence is simply assumed. You need to prove malicious intent on her part.Absolutely, my only point was: How would one go aboutproving that, with her detail free accusations? Presumption of innocence is not a viable answer to that.
Add engadget to the SJW list:
Emerging from the shadow of GamerGate
On August 26th, game developer Nathalie Lawhead published a blog post accusing legendary Skyrim composer Jeremy Soule of rape. It's a detailed account of the events leading up to and after the alleged assault, which Lawhead says took place in 2008, when she was in her mid-20s and trying to break...www.engadget.com
"The fear of retaliation from extreme corners of the internet remains, but the industry's response this week has been a fucking relief, to put it lightly. It feels like GamerGate's toxic cloud is finally dissipating. It feels like, maybe, we can breathe."
Yeah, not all of us.
Ah, they're still peddling this facetious lie years later. Got caught engaging in nepotism between journalists and developers - "yeah but this one person out of thousands said a mean word, it's just a harassment campaign!""Actually, it's about ethics in games journalism," a phrase that has, years later, transformed into a metaphor for dishonest moral pandering.
You think I went around banning people like an extremist? Cite specific examples or back off (preferably move over to the MetaGAF thread, since we're getting off-topic). I banned 40 people a year from 2013-2017, and nearly always advised restraint from the mod team in daily moderation discussions. The number of bans I reduced, vetoed, or overturned far exceeded my ban count. I've never liked banning people. I had no interest in destroying the community or killing off all our long-time users en masse. Every time I uncover one of those incidents my blood boils.
It doesn't. Games development blows. Paid pennies for working twice as hard as any other dev. I'm much happier in FinTech. I'll be more active here for sure. Got my account nuked at the other place.
Well, that’s eye opening.No bro, you always gotta BELIEVE WOMEN. Even if there's zero evidence to back up the statements and the accuser is a known pathological liar.
That's a very generous description of what Anita did so let me add my version - Few people really gave her any attention pre gamergate. There'd be the occasional article about her videos on Eurogamer (has that place ever not been cucked beyond belief?) but as far as i could tell, most people had no idea who she was or what she was about. So then gamergate happens and Anita makes sure to put herself right in the middle of it. She went on the Colbert show, she posed for Twitter pics with Joss Whedon, who of course turned out to be a creepy cheater, directly mocking gamergate and was generally egging gators on as much as possible. Now that people did pay attention to her, a few things about her came to light. For one, she had previously been part of a ponzi scheme as evidenced by youtube videos of her participating in it. Secondly, it became clear that she did not write the feminist frequency videos. Jonathan Macintosh did. Third, she was never a gamer, by her own admission. Finally, it was also pretty clear she never intended to start any dialogue as all her videos had comments disabled. All in all, she appeared to be there simply for the money while acting like Jonathan's puppet. In other words, she was actively making gaming worse in order to get paidHonestly I'm more on Anita's side, she was just making a feminism 101 documentary and got years of harassment and abuse and weird stalkerish obsession with hating her from autists like Thunderf00t and Sargon. When the documentaries finally came out they were largely inoffensive, entry level feminist media analysis and then she basically disappeared. She never deserved the abuse she got. Honestly haven't heard literally anything about Anita in yonks.
Zoe on the other hand is a narcissistic manipulative bully who seems to revel in creating drama and shitting on anyone who dares get on her bad side. She has multiple abuse allegations against her and somehow she still has the moral high ground among the media when shitting down on everyone around her.
I don't think Zoe should get abused or mobbed as well, but she needs to be told to fuck off and treated as a non-entity online and in the industry and she needs to face the allegations against her. The abuse Zoe has copped from GG types has just acted as a shield for her from allegations and criticism.
If this is true then maybe i am wrong. Usually i saw people being banned after you said something and assumed it was you who banned them but it must have been some other mods stepping in. Since usually there was no info who banned whom i assumed it was you as usually that stuff happened directly after you said something.
Yeah it is offtop as hell. Ending it now. Cheers.
Mirror of metokur stream. Might get taken down at some point.
You’re acting as if they did this lightly. If they had not cut him off this would have followed them forever. And they obviously had enough inside information to believe that the accusations were true. Or are we going to bully them too until they commit suicide?The two co-developers of NitW sure come out of this looking like they are almost the most responsible. If the guy still had his job he wouldn't have done this.
They were so scared for their own public image that they dumped this guy without hesitation, thinking they had skillfully cleared their names. Little did they know they are now even worse off.
Mister metokurwtf who is this
No bro, you always gotta BELIEVE WOMEN. Even if there's zero evidence to back up the statements and the accuser is a known pathological liar.
I'm really sorry to hear that. It takes a special sort of person (or persons in this case) to harrass a guy over a fucking forum. Like shit, what kind of person goes to such lengths, even calling your employer, just to fuck with you?This shit really gets to me, I mean I don't know the guy but it really stings. In part it's because I had a similar experience to EviLore in some ways, albeit on a much smaller scale, of running a forum and attracting a hate mob. It was pre-Twitter and the forum was smaller but it still happened. I banned people, and ended up with a hate mob of about 10-20 people ringing my employer telling them I fucked kids [I don't] to get me fired etc (I wasn't too smart about hiding my identity - I thought I was posting among friends - I was young and stupid). That was horrific, I honestly wanted to kill myself at points because I couldn't see any way it would ever go away (it took about 10 years to eventually start to die down). And that was a tiny mob. Now in the Twitter era it's thousands of people all over the world wanting you dead. I honestly don't think I'd have survived such an experience.
Nah, better let HER fall into oblivion.Oh... Come on... how... Why did this women have any credibility left at all with anybody, in order to even make the claims against Alex? Much less weaponize a social media mob of "followers" and "believers". If you lie once you'll do it again, etc. She needs to be held accountable. Unfortunately Alex's sister's own message makes that look unlikely.
Wh
What happened to that Phantom Thief guy? He's quite famous on resetera isn't it.