GreatnessRD
Member
May your framerate be high and your temperatures low my boi.
If you think you're getting a PS5 for $500, let alone less, you're on crack...like real high grade shit. But yes...we do pay a little more for the hardware, dollar to dollar, performance to performance. It's more than offset by how little we pay for our games though. PC games are always cheaper. They're usually atleast $10 cheaper on launch, sometimes more with pre-release sales on sites like GMG or humble not being uncommon, and a few months later when the major sales hit? Forget about it.Getting a PS5 with a zen 2 CPU and a GPU that hits 2070 super performance with an SSD that can't be touched for 500 dollars or less, it just destroys the concept of getting what you pay for on PC. You get ripped off on the hardware side... less on the software side.
I'm not on a budget, I could buy an Alienware right now.... I just find the games and experience on console better. The exclusives on Nintendo and PlayStation are the best games in the industry.... followed by Rockstar and Capcom IMO. You're still waiting a long time for R* games to come out on PC.
I hate using windows and I hate the idea of sitting at a table to play a game in an office chair... that is not leisure or a good time.
I was in fact flirting with the notion of getting the new Alienware, it looks good but then the PS5 design came out and looks quite similar. Color scheme is very like it too.
I agree with that, I just tend to play more exclusives than anything.... then buy some 3rd party games at discount if I ever run out but I have a huge backlog.If you think you're getting a PS5 for $500, let alone less, you're on crack...like real high grade shit. But yes...we do pay a little more for the hardware, dollar to dollar, performance to performance. It's more than offset by how little we pay for our games though. PC games are always cheaper. They're usually atleast $10 cheaper on launch, sometimes more with pre-release sales on sites like GMG or humble not being uncommon, and a few months later when the major sales hit? Forget about it.
Agreed, mobile gaming must be destroyed!Nintendo and PS have great exclusives, agreed. I do own various Nintendo consoles for travelling. I think R* games are overrated, and that there are muuuuuch better PS games to get a console for.
You don't have to sit at a table or in an office chair. It's 2020. I lie in bed and play most of my games that way. unless it's a shooter. Then you use a M&K, like Batman would.
I would not buy Alienware, I'd go custom for the same price. Befriend a hobbyist, give him your budget, let him do his thing. I've found that people who are passionate about PC tech work magic when it comes to custom rigs.
At the end of the day, we're brothers in gaming you and I. Our choice of platform is irrelevant. Unless you're a mobile gamer. Those guys creep me out.
PC has a lot of strengths but also many weaknesses as a platform...
It really depends what you're looking for, do you want more customization but also to spend a lot more on hardware then PC is a good fit.
However it offers poorer performance per dollar, less optimization and less guaranteed support over time than consoles.
The PC model cannot use economies of scale and cannot be subsidized by a manufacturer due to making profits back on software or services...... therefore you are paying each manufacturer of each component a premium.
Also in the way Nintendo has cut out an identity for themselves with more kid friendly or family games, so too has PlayStation with more mature and artistic content, usually in the action-adventure genre.
Nintendo and Sony both have their own kind of culture. Even Xbox is starting to develop it's identity around subscriptions and service type gaming.
PC doesn't really have that, it doesn't have a set identity or culture, it can't really market itself or change direction quickly because nobody is managing it. So if it begins to fail or gets manipulated in a negative direction, there is no real corrective measures beyond the entire audience coordinating to counter whatever happens at industry level and that is hard to do....
So, I don't think it deserves the master-race term. It's just personal preference at the end of the day.
Of course, I was just pointing out that there are many perspectives and that PC doesn't fit all the needs of games.... that is why consoles, hybrids and other platforms exist.What you say is a weakness, many would say is a strength.
You can play games the way you want to. It's not just a lot of money on high specs. It is everything from ASCII-based dwarf sim to stuff like ultrawide, comfy couch 4K, advanced driving setups, multi-monitor, cockpit setups for flight sims, 60fps in every game, etc. Most people don't do all that but it is there. The PC has plenty of kid friendly games. The PC has tons of games with more mature or artistic content. The PC has subscriptions and services, including GamePass. So ultimately it can do all those things if that is what you want. I have no idea what you mean about "it begins to fail or gets manipulated in a negative direction." People have been playing games on the PC as long as there have been PCs. Even if you think, say, the adult VNs on Steam are a "problem" or "makes PC gaming look bad" or whatever, ultimately it's irrelevant - just don't buy 'em and don't play them.
It isn't about specs as the absolute majority of pc users have garbage pc's.
I assume it is to do with freedom of paying for online and unlimited backwards compatibility etc.
Digital sales don't count anymore as xbox and playstation sales are amazing.
The majority of users enterprise and work computers more than likely don't have a dGPU, so you could say they are trash for gaming. But the majority of PC gamers have much better specs than consoles.It isn't about specs as the absolute majority of pc users have garbage pc's.
The majority of PC gamers don't touch console ports and play nothing but League, CSGO, Dota and similar F2P titles on laptops and desktops that aren't designed for gaming at all.But the majority of PC gamers have much better specs than consoles.
If you look at steam surveys, how does the xb1 and ps4 stack up against these gpu's? No need to compare CPU's as we already know that can't even be compared to the Fisher Price, Jaguar chips. And many will be upgrading to Nvidia's and AMD's new gpu's when they release this year.The majority of PC gamers don't touch console ports and play nothing but League, CSGO, Dota and similar F2P titles on laptops and desktops that aren't designed for gaming at all.
If you look at steam surveys, how does the xb1 and ps4 stack up against these gpu's? No need to compare CPU's as we already know that can't even be compared to the Fisher Price, Jaguar chips. And many will be upgrading to Nvidia's and AMD's new gpu's when they release this year.
![]()
If PC players choose to play the games you listed, so what? Do they not have access or the choice to play other games as well? Isn't that the beauty of having choice?
X1X is about a 1060, PS4 Pro is about a 1050. Some of the cards on that list are obviously significantly faster, but many are way slower as well. Steam 's userbase it also likely to skew more towards the hardcore side of PC gaming, since they do offer a lot of games that actually require decent hardware.If you look at steam surveys, how does the xb1 and ps4 stack up against these gpu's?
Not sure what point you're trying to make here.If PC players choose to play the games you listed, so what? Do they not have access or the choice to play other games as well? Isn't that the beauty of having choice?
If you think that PS4 and Xbox One games look like PS2 games, your'e a PC Master....
If you can understand that PC and consoles both have their pros and cons.... Your are normal gamer. Congrats!
Does everyone who bought a xb1 or ps4, have an x1x or a ps4 pro now? Didn't think so.X1X is about a 1060, PS4 Pro is about a 1050. Some of the cards on that list are obviously significantly faster, but many are way slower as well. Steam 's userbase it also likely to skew more towards the hardcore side of PC gaming, since they do offer a lot of games that actually require decent hardware.
But what most people don't get is that most PC gamers don't use Steam at all. League of Legends is just one game, but it has more monthly active users than all of Steam, and that's not even the biggest, most popular PC game out there. Crossfire has 240 million monthly active users, that's not only more than Steam and League of Legends combined, but more than both consoles sold this gen. Both of these games run on toasters, and the average player's hardware would no doubt reflect that.
Not sure what point you're trying to make here.
Yes. The very fact that you prefer to control the settings of your games makes you a master.
People who game on PC are PC gamers, no matter what hardware they have. Hardware also has no bearing on whether you're "casual" or not. Someone who invests hundreds of hours into League or Crossfire is not a casual gamer just because they're running the game on their 8 year-old Dell laptop.Not sure why you are bringing up casual people that have a computer that just so happens to run a game, vs a PC gamer. They are not the same.
North America and Europe aren't the world. The biggest market for PC gaming is in Asia, and Steam isn't really much of a player there. There are hundreds of millions of PC gamers in China alone who don't use Steam.I've never met or heard of a PC gamer that doesn't have steam installed.
Yes, but most PC gamers don't have those GPUs, and they're not buying PC releases of console games.The point still remains, the majority of those GPU's beat consoles in sheer power. Especially when you compare people who buy the same games that are on console.
That's not quite what you said, though. You said the majority of PC gamers have PCs with much better specs than consoles. That's not the same thing.The average gaming PC has much better performance, which was my original point.
The vast majority of PC users are on the GTX 1060. I'm on 1070ti. 1660 is not quite as good as the 1070ti. However, I feel a lot of games play best on PC. Mainly because the CPU's in our PC's easily thwart anything the mid-gen consoles have.So GAF, I was wondering if I could proudly attach the coveted tag 'PC Master Race', if my PC specs read like
Ryzen 5, GTX 1660ti, 8 gb ram etc. (Laptop actually).
I am not talking about next gen systems either. Comparing to current gen 'enhanced consoles'.
The thing is if I can't, it basically means we have far fewer no of members of this race than previously thought. Steam hardware survey suggests less than 10% of pc gaming population.
What do we call rest of 90%? PC peasants? Sounds dumb.
Also not to mention, when next gen arrives even, hardcore members of this race will be stripped of the previledge. If Nvidia fails to launch GTX 3080 in timely fashion or if you got a bit late in upgrading.
So you will be changing from 'PC Master Race' to 'PC Peasants' to 'PC Master Race' again. How dumb is that? You will have your race changed depending on market conditions. I think gamers didn't think this through.
Help me solve this paradox GAF.
Wow thread turned out better than expected. Thanks GAF.
So I am convinced I will be PC Master Race' and console peasant at the same time.
Am in process of getting PC, its not even delivered yet. Can't wait to get into Disco Elysium and Witcher 3 after hearing so much about them.
What do we call rest of 90%? PC peasants? Sounds dumb.
Are you familiar with the phrase “Jack of all trades, master of none”?Wow thread turned out better than expected. Thanks GAF.
So I am convinced I will be PC Master Race' and console peasant at the same time.
Am in process of getting PC, its not even delivered yet. Can't wait to get into Disco Elysium and Witcher 3 after hearing so much about them.