Lexar unveils 1TB MicroSD Express card compatible with Switch 2 for $200

Jinzo Prime

Member
Lexar has officially launched its PLAY PRO microSD tb-micte perfectly timed with today's announcement of both the Nintendo Switch 2's pricing and availability.

The PLAY PRO microSD Express card utilizes the SD 7.1 specification, which integrates both PCIe 3.0 and NVMe 1.3. The card can achieve read speeds up to 900MB/s and write speeds up to 600MB/s. These impressive speeds are particularly beneficial for gaming applications, as they can potentially reduce load times.

While the card is designed to be forward-compatible with devices supporting the microSD Express standard, it also maintains backward compatibility with UHS-I and UHS-II devices, operating at reduced speeds in those contexts.

Pricing for the PLAY PRO microSD Express card is set at $199.99 for the 1TB model, $99.99 for the 512GB version, and $49.99 for the 256GB option. You can buy the card here now. Lexar will support the PLAY PRO microSD Express card with a limited lifetime warranty.

Other options:
  • SanDisk 128GB microSD Express Card -- $45 ($50)
  • SanDisk 256GB microSD Express Card -- $60 ($65)
  • Lexar 256GB Play Pro microSD Express Card -- $50
  • Lexar 512GB Play Pro microSD Express Card -- $100
  • Lexar 1TB Play Pro microSD Express Card -- $200
source: https://www.gamespot.com/articles/m...-switch-2-here-are-your-options/1100-6530578/
 
So, let's go to the tape to review this

Switch - 450 USD
1TB MSDX - 200 USD
Pro Controller - 80 USD

Total: 730 USD (1.25TB Storage, low end console, most expensive console games in history)

PS5 Pro - 700 USD
Disc Drive Attachment - 80 USD
Total: 780 USD (2 TB of storage, highest end console in history, pound for pound better than any PC, cheaper games than Switch 2)

One device praised while the other was vilified. Yeah, we're definitely living in bizzaro world.
 
I got my 2TB steam deck SSD for under £80. Second hand but still.

People are being pushed to digital with physical games tax but storage on switch 2 is expensive.
 
Hopefully I'll be able to get 90% of my Switch 2 library physically, with all the games on-cart. So I'll hold off on buying any memory.
 
So, let's go to the tape to review this

Switch - 450 USD
1TB MSDX - 200 USD
Pro Controller - 80 USD

Total: 730 USD (1.25TB Storage, low end console, most expensive console games in history)

PS5 Pro - 700 USD
Disc Drive Attachment - 80 USD
Total: 780 USD (2 TB of storage, highest end console in history, pound for pound better than any PC, cheaper games than Switch 2)

One device praised while the other was vilified. Yeah, we're definitely living in bizzaro world.

Eh I saw the same calculation 8 years ago, like "300 console + 70 dollars the controller + 70 dollars BOTW + 60 dollars SD card, almost 500 to play one game while you can buy an Xbox for 250"
 
Last edited:
What do these micro SSD cards do to warrant 200?
Micro SDexpress cards are SSD-caliber high-speed, rapid access, sustained transfer storage devices in the size of a thumbnail, with heat management protocols in place so it doesn't cook the handheld. It operates over a PCIe bus and conforms to NVMe interface protocols.

This kind of memory is how the Switch will do instant loading and other "Velocity Architecture" features we've come to depend on in this gen of consoles and PCs.

Switch 2 needs SDexpress for its removable memory, just as it needs the onboard UFS to play games of this era. What it's packing will not be as fast as a PS5 or Series drive (we don't know about the onboard drive, but even the highest speed class of SDexpress cards are portable caliber, not desktop/console elite,) but it should do the job of supporting next-gen game features, and a new Switch without this rapid IO feature would languish behind the gen (and would drag down online experiences in cross-play.)

...Unfortunately, it's fucking expensive right now, and it could get better over time, but there's no promise that the situation will clear up any time soon. Switch 2 is the first real driving force for the SDExpress format in either full-size or micro (a few cameras offer it, but that's about it until now.) Eventually, SDexpress should become the defacto SD card format, and should level out in pricing as competition and volume of production finally kicks in now that SDexpress has a killer app. Until then (if ever?), it'll be a rough adoption timeline.

Should've been just use standar nvme SSD, but Nintendo don't want you to open the console
That's also a a fair-sized chunk of hardware to find room for in a portable; there's SSDs the size of standard SD cards, but space is bound to be a premium even for those, and then it'll still need heat sink. And it wouldn't be easily removable, as you said. The surgery needed to replace the drive in a Steam Deck is simple once you get it open, but that's still an extreme ask for a kid's device, and it still locks you into whatever you have onboarded at the time rather than offering a true removable storage option. The condensed cartridge-style Xbox Series add-on memory unit is nice and I wish that had caught on and developed into a more common format even outside of Xbox, but that's still a big card, and you probably can't get it much smaller at the time and be a fully self-contained plug-in.

Micro SDexpress is the right format in general. It's small, its familiar, it's backward-compatible (...ish, since Switch will weirdly barely even read standard cards,) and it is eventually going to probably be the ongoing future of SD cards. In time, it could be ubiquitous, and it could be in the price range of other high-end cards in likewise capacity offerings.
Unfortunately, the timing here sucks.

Why micro and not a full size SD card?

I believe the Micro SDexpress has caught up to and maybe surpassed the standard size SDexpress, which lingered in disinterest without a major hardware piece to make use of it (and other problems,) and now it's the preferred format for the SDexpress concept. Finally there's a platform which would have a hard time succeeding without its high access and sustained speed. There's not much benefit to it being bigger in this case; much of the bigger size is extra plastic, and the memory in the SDexpress format is stacked. Price generally doesn't make much difference, you're paying for the memory, not the shell, and ideally Switch 2 will normalize this format and help it go wide/get cheaper. So Switch 2 went with the format that hopefully will be what works for the market.

Ironically though, because the cards are so small, people may balk at the prices for such a little doodad (that, and the low storage capacity so far, and the similarity/confusion of the standard Micro SD market.)
 
Last edited:
So, let's go to the tape to review this

Switch - 450 USD
1TB MSDX - 200 USD
Pro Controller - 80 USD

Total: 730 USD (1.25TB Storage, low end console, most expensive console games in history)

PS5 Pro - 700 USD
Disc Drive Attachment - 80 USD
Total: 780 USD (2 TB of storage, highest end console in history, pound for pound better than any PC, cheaper games than Switch 2)

One device praised while the other was vilified. Yeah, we're definitely living in bizzaro world.

Switch 2 praised for price? Dude have you been high for the last 24h ?

Totally need 1TB micro-SD express right out the gate 🙄. A micro SD technology that not even the most expensive PC handhelds have btw, the ones that shame switch 2 prices by multiples. In fact even ROG ally for the longest time struggled with just standard micro SD speeds and capped at ~40MB/s.

This one is 900MB/s. This is SATA SSD in a micro SD format.
 
Micro SDexpress cards are SSD-caliber high-speed, rapid access, sustained transfer storage devices in the size of a thumbnail, with heat management protocols in place so it doesn't cook the handheld. It operates over a PCIe bus and conforms to NVMe interface protocols.

This kind of memory is how the Switch will do instant loading and other "Velocity Architecture" features we've come to depend on in this gen of consoles and PCs. It's not as fast as a PS5 or Series drive, but it should do the job, and a new Switch without this rapid IO feature would languish behind the gen (and would drag down online experiences in cross-play.)

...Unfortunately, it's fucking expensive right now, and there's no promise that the situation will clear up any time soon. Switch 2 is the first real driving force for the SDExpress format in either full-size or micro (a few cameras offer it, but that's about it until now,) and eventually SDexpress should become the defacto SD card format, but it'll be a rough adoption timeline.


That's also a a fair-sized chunk of hardware to find room for in a portable; there's SSDs the size of standard SD cards, but space is bound to be a premium, and then it'll still need heat sink. And it wouldn't be easily removable, as you said. The condensed cartridge-style Xbox Series add-on memory unit is nice, but that's still a big card, and you probably can't get it much smaller at the time and be a fully self-contained plug-in.

Micro SDexpress is the right format in general. It's small, its familiar, it's backward-compatible (...ish, since Switch will weirdly not even read standard cards,) and it is eventually going to probably be the ongoing future of SD cards. Unfortunately, the timing sucks.



I believe the Micro SDexpress has caught up to and maybe surpassed the standard size SDexpress, which lingered in disinterest without a major hardware piece to make use of it (and other problems,) and now it's the preferred format for the SDexpress concept. Finally there's a platform which would have a hard time succeeding without its high access and sustained speed. There's not much benefit to it being bigger in this case; much of the bigger size is extra plastic, and the memory in the SDexpress format is stacked. Price generally doesn't make much difference, you're paying for the memory, not the shell, and ideally Switch 2 will normalize this format and help it go wide/get cheaper. So Switch 2 went with the format that hopefully will be what works for the market.

Ironically though, because the cards are so small, people may balk at the prices for such a little doodad (that, and the low storage capacity so far, and the similarity/confusion of the standard Micro SD market.)
So many text, yet people totally forgot what sunked Vita.

Also the format is just too specific and expensive, very few devices outside of Switch 2 adopted it and even with Switch 2 it would remain boutique format. Cameras jumped to CF Express (Type A and B) and phones almost removed SD slot in their flagships.

Point is no matter how good is the format, this type of card will remain expensive and rare for the entire run of the platform, because it is kinda of a poor choice to begin with.
 
So, let's go to the tape to review this

Switch - 450 USD
1TB MSDX - 200 USD
Pro Controller - 80 USD

Total: 730 USD (1.25TB Storage, low end console, most expensive console games in history)

PS5 Pro - 700 USD
Disc Drive Attachment - 80 USD
Total: 780 USD (2 TB of storage, highest end console in history, pound for pound better than any PC, cheaper games than Switch 2)

One device praised while the other was vilified. Yeah, we're definitely living in bizzaro world.
If you're going to be adding an additional controller for the switch 2 then you should add a ps5 edge controller too. Not to mention a portal if you're looking for some sort of parity here.

Switch 2 pricing is retarded but let's not act like Sony doesn't know how to hose people too.
 
So many text, yet people totally forgot what sunked Vita.

Vita was proprietary memory. This is a common memory standard; it's just not commonplace in the market yet.

Standard SD cards would not do the job. They cannot keep up with the needs of modern games.

...BTW, Vita had way, way more issues than just its memory cards. PS fans scapegoat the memory prices as its failure point, but the vast majority of game buyers never even looked at the hardware long enough to turn their noses up at the price of he cards.

Also the format is just too specific and expensive, very few devices outside of Switch 2 adopted it and even with Switch 2 it would remain boutique format. Cameras jumped to CF Express (Type A and B) and phones almost removed SD slot in their flagships.

SDexpress is the modern evolution of the SD card format. It's the best choice available AFAIK as a removeable format. We can, if you want, talk about CF Express (which are big and similarly expensive and totally uncommon outside photogs, so I'm not sure why they'd be in contention?) or UFS SD Cards (which Samsung tried once five years ago and hasn't followed up on.) Those are all basically the same concept of an interconnect express format utilizing PCIe/NVMe for rapid and sustained IO, so pick a horse and ride it.

...You may be right, this format may not actually make it. Maybe there will be no next-gen future where SDexpress becomes defacto. It may be that Switch 2 just won't be enough to get it over the hump, and the current messy range of older "Ultra" SD cards is the market tapped out in caring about how fast and how sustained and how efficient a memory card can possibly be. And there may be no other format of removable physical media to take its place. There's no new CD/DVD/BD on the horizon, there's no new SD card worth buying. Nothing new will be enough, especially if it costs a lot. Whatever came out in 2018, that's the market, take it or leave it. We're just done?

But if Switch 2 is going to have removable storage, if it's going to use a SD card for anything but cold storage, it's got to be something with express lanes like SDexpress. So it's this or, basically, nothing.
 
Last edited:
That nobody adpted and went with CFexpress. It's too fast and expensive for phones and too unreliable for redundant media in cameras.

It's this, or it's nothing.

If you're comfortable with the onboard 256GB UFS (which, btw, is already the case... just don't buy a memory card,) if you like the way phones are going with no extra storage options beyond what the device comes with, if you believe Nintendo would/should make a consumer portable device with a teardown option to extract and replace the UFS unit for those who want to make a semi-permanent upgrade, if you believe there's no hope for new removable storage formats because, even though they exist, they're too fancy to bother with, then that's your viewpoint. But if you want anything beyond what the unit comes with, you've got to look at the options which exist.

SDexpress exists. It's not a pretty option right now, it may ultimately not get over the hump holding it back, but it's the most viable option in a Memory Card format that I'm aware of.

Otherwise it's easier to use standarts SSDs. It's a dead end format.

What removeable "standard" SSD are you talking about?

If you are just talking about upgrading the internal storage, about having some accessible, unscrewable pocket which you could jack in an extra M.2, fine, I'd like that too. But swapping a SSD isn't exactly kid stuff, and there's little consensus about SSD sizes and heat profiles. This is not something Nintendo would want to get into for a portable device; it's surprising enough that Sony and Valve signed off on the option (they didn't make it easy,) and no phone manufacturer allows this, even some laptop makers don't let you in there. There's also not a good cartridge format to make it a mass-market option (Xbox did it, unfortunately Nintendo did not.) Alternately, there's probably not a good option of like a "backpack" accessory which would use the USB port (even then, that jack might be too far away from the rest of the hardware or might not be able to keep sustained needs for game use.)

Families want something as simple as a memory card that they can plug in when they run out of space. They don't want to spend an assload of money on a memory card, to be sure, but right now there's not better options.
 
Last edited:
So, let's go to the tape to review this

Switch - 450 USD
1TB MSDX - 200 USD
Pro Controller - 80 USD

Total: 730 USD (1.25TB Storage, low end console, most expensive console games in history)

PS5 Pro - 700 USD
Disc Drive Attachment - 80 USD
Total: 780 USD (2 TB of storage, highest end console in history, pound for pound better than any PC, cheaper games than Switch 2)

One device praised while the other was vilified. Yeah, we're definitely living in bizzaro world.
Yeah it's mental when you look at that.
It's simple platform warring/ trolling.
What I notice with a lot of these platform warriors whether they play pc, Xbox or Nintendo is that they all have what I call ABS. ABS is what I call, anyone but Sony. That's why they can all look past blatant hypocrisy such as this.
 
So, let's go to the tape to review this

Switch - 450 USD
1TB MSDX - 200 USD
Pro Controller - 80 USD

Total: 730 USD (1.25TB Storage, low end console, most expensive console games in history)

PS5 Pro - 700 USD
Disc Drive Attachment - 80 USD
Total: 780 USD (2 TB of storage, highest end console in history, pound for pound better than any PC, cheaper games than Switch 2)

One device praised while the other was vilified. Yeah, we're definitely living in bizzaro world.
scam
both of them
nintendo is even worse of course
 
Being the size of a finger nail for one.
Using less power and running cooler for another
And this is great news for everyone that nintendo is pushing forward with a new format
Greater adaption will bring down the prices of sd express
This isn't a proprietary format in 2020 a 1 to micro sd extreme was around 400 usd, today they're like 75 or so,
 
Yeah, these memory card prices are going to be dirt cheap in 2 years. Throwing your money away buying 1GB now.
 
Yeah, these memory card prices are going to be dirt cheap in 2 years. Throwing your money away buying 1GB now.
They will, but not in 2 years.

M.2 SSDs are used in a lot more applications and hardware than SD Cards, hence the reason why they went down in price quickly. This will take longer imo.
 
So, let's go to the tape to review this

Switch - 450 USD
1TB MSDX - 200 USD
Pro Controller - 80 USD

Total: 730 USD (1.25TB Storage, low end console, most expensive console games in history)

PS5 Pro - 700 USD
Disc Drive Attachment - 80 USD
Total: 780 USD (2 TB of storage, highest end console in history, pound for pound better than any PC, cheaper games than Switch 2)

One device praised while the other was vilified. Yeah, we're definitely living in bizzaro world.
PS5 Pro - 700 USD
Disc Drive Attachment - 80 USD
Wireless controller - 80 USD
Playstation portal - 200 USD
Low exclusive games
Total - 1,060 USD
 
PS5 Pro - 700 USD
Disc Drive Attachment - 80 USD
Wireless controller - 80 USD
Playstation portal - 200 USD
Low exclusive games
Total - 1,060 USD
Portability: $0. That's the key difference.

Switch 2 has pricing problems but it's also a fundamentally different product to PS5 pro. Comparing it to the Steam deck or ROG Ally would be better comparisons.
 
Eh I saw the same calculation 8 years ago, like "300 console + 70 dollars the controller + 70 dollars BOTW + 60 dollars SD card, almost 500 to play one game while you can buy an Xbox for 250"
There's a big difference between Xbox and Playstation though.
 
PS5 Pro - 700 USD
Disc Drive Attachment - 80 USD
Wireless controller - 80 USD
Playstation portal - 200 USD
Low exclusive games
Total - 1,060 USD
Nice try but no... Disc drive I'll give you but already comes with a wireless controller. Portal not needed. Switch needs a pro controller though for non tablet gaming.
 
So, let's go to the tape to review this

Switch - 450 USD
1TB MSDX - 200 USD
Pro Controller - 80 USD

Total: 730 USD (1.25TB Storage, low end console, most expensive console games in history)

PS5 Pro - 700 USD
Disc Drive Attachment - 80 USD
Total: 780 USD (2 TB of storage, highest end console in history, pound for pound better than any PC, cheaper games than Switch 2)

One device praised while the other was vilified. Yeah, we're definitely living in bizzaro world.

You don't have to buy a 1tb card or pro controller for the Switch you know. But if you want to go down that route lets throw in a Dual Sense Edge controller ($200) for the PS5 and bring it up to almost eleven hundred dollars and round it off with a game to more or less hit the twelve hundred mark. Pound for pound I think I'd buy that inferior PC.

Seriously Sony fanboys, we don't give a toss about your Playstation 5 and ain't gonna buy one so save your collective breath :messenger_tears_of_joy:
 
Not sure users will hold Nintendo accountable like they did with the Ps Vita memory card prices.
 
Last edited:
If you're going to be adding an additional controller for the switch 2 then you should add a ps5 edge controller too. Not to mention a portal if you're looking for some sort of parity here.

Switch 2 pricing is retarded but let's not act like Sony doesn't know how to hose people too.
The Pro controller for switch 2 is obligatory. Not for the PS5 it comes with a normal size controller.
 
PS5 Pro - 700 USD
Disc Drive Attachment - 80 USD
Wireless controller - 80 USD
Playstation portal - 200 USD
Low exclusive games
Total - 1,060 USD

rather insane that the PS5 Pro is that expensive.
 
So, let's go to the tape to review this

Switch - 450 USD
1TB MSDX - 200 USD
Pro Controller - 80 USD

Total: 730 USD (1.25TB Storage, low end console, most expensive console games in history)

PS5 Pro - 700 USD
Disc Drive Attachment - 80 USD
Total: 780 USD (2 TB of storage, highest end console in history, pound for pound better than any PC, cheaper games than Switch 2)

One device praised while the other was vilified. Yeah, we're definitely living in bizzaro world.
One has mario kart the other doesn't
 
Have we reached the point where people compare the performance / cost ratio of a portable versus a console that is around the same volume as the original Xbox?

This is the argument?
 
PS5 Pro - 700 USD
Disc Drive Attachment - 80 USD
Wireless controller - 80 USD
Playstation portal - 200 USD
Low exclusive games
Total - 1,060 USD
PS5 Pro - have it
Disc Drive - have it
Wireless controller - The PS5 Pro have one included, why would i need another one?
Playstation Portal - Don´t have one and don´t need it.
Games - subjective
Nice try
 
PS5 Pro - 700 USD
Disc Drive Attachment - 80 USD
Wireless controller - 80 USD
Playstation portal - 200 USD
Low exclusive games
Total - 1,060 USD
PS5 Pro - 700 USD
Disc Drive Attachment - 80 USD
Concord exclusive controller - 300 USD
85" Sony Bravia 9 Mini LED TV - 4,200 USD
Malibu beachfront home - 32,500,000 USD
Total - 32,505,280 USD
 
PS5 Pro - 700 USD
Disc Drive Attachment - 80 USD
Wireless controller - 80 USD
Playstation portal - 200 USD
Low exclusive games
Total - 1,060 USD
Adding an entire shopping basket of accessories isn't it chief rofl.

My god the desperation and copium is massive since yesterday.
 
You don't have to buy a 1tb card or pro controller for the Switch you know. But if you want to go down that route lets throw in a Dual Sense Edge controller ($200) for the PS5 and bring it up to almost eleven hundred dollars and round it off with a game to more or less hit the twelve hundred mark. Pound for pound I think I'd buy that inferior PC.

Seriously Sony fanboys, we don't give a toss about your Playstation 5 and ain't gonna buy one so save your collective breath :messenger_tears_of_joy:

You're comparing gaming on joycons vs a Dual Sense...

Mr. Jangles is fitting.

You don't need the capacity? This must be new.
 
Between the fact that the console's internal memory is ridiculous and that you have to download physical games, you're going to spend a fortune on these NS2 cards.
 
PS5 Pro - 700 USD
Disc Drive Attachment - 80 USD
Concord exclusive controller - 300 USD
85" Sony Bravia 9 Mini LED TV - 4,200 USD
Malibu beachfront home - 32,500,000 USD
Total - 32,505,280 USD
I prefer to see it as the house and Pro are free but the disk drive is 32,505,280.
 
So, let's go to the tape to review this

Switch - 450 USD
1TB MSDX - 200 USD
Pro Controller - 80 USD

Total: 730 USD (1.25TB Storage, low end console, most expensive console games in history)

PS5 Pro - 700 USD
Disc Drive Attachment - 80 USD
Total: 780 USD (2 TB of storage, highest end console in history, pound for pound better than any PC, cheaper games than Switch 2)

One device praised while the other was vilified. Yeah, we're definitely living in bizzaro world.
Now add a portable monitor, a battery large enough to run PS5 and the monitor for 2-4 hours and a cart to wheel that around.

You are comparing Apples and Horses. 😉
 
Now add a portable monitor, a battery large enough to run PS5 and the monitor for 2-4 hours and a cart to wheel that around.

You are comparing Apples and Horses. 😉

Even adding a PS Portal... which should have been the suggestion here as erroneous as it is, still makes the Switch 2 a bad buy.

You could get a PS5 standard with Astro Bot for 450 add a Portal for a total of 650 and still have significantly better graphics than the Switch 2 and cheaper games.
 
Should've been just use standar nvme SSD, but Nintendo don't want you to open the console
You can't be serious. These things are tiny and the slots are standard components. The switch 2 is in the tablet/mobile device class, it would be insane to try to accommodate NVME drives when SD cards are available. You are basically saying a company should sacrifice space and spend the time designing an interface to provide customers a slightly cheaper option that will also result in a bulkier device. Sure.
 
Even adding a PS Portal... which should have been the suggestion here as erroneous as it is, still makes the Switch 2 a bad buy.

You could get a PS5 standard with Astro Bot for 450 add a Portal for a total of 650 and still have significantly better graphics than the Switch 2 and cheaper games.
It's not the same thing. You can't take portal on a flight or a train ride and so on. One is a hybrid device and the other is a home console.

Different devices for different purposes. If you don't need portability outside the house, and don't want to play Nintendo games, get PS5, PS5 Pro or PC.

If you do need that, get the Switch or maybe Switch AND a PC or PS5/Pro.
 
Top Bottom