![]()
‘Nintendo is losing their identity’: Shuhei Yoshida says Switch 2’s focus on power is what other companies would do | VGC
The former SIE president feels Switch 2 is uncharacteristic of a company that thrives on innovation…www.videogameschronicle.com
what the dont care bout no gimmicks am a portables player annnnd want switch 2 makes steam deck looks like 3DS
![]()
![]()
And can run all PC games, programs and consoles games up to the PS3/X360/Switch.Which were released 1.5 years later at $599 for the base model of both (with the Z1 being used, which barely gets more performance than Steam Deck). The Z1 extreme model goes for $699 in both cases.
Makes zero difference for those who knows about them.Nobody outside of core gamers knows about these systems though.
The Switch 2 will be better than them anyway.And can run all PC games, programs and consoles games up to the PS3/X360/Switch.
Makes zero difference for those who knows about them.
The Switch 2 direct was literally the 1st time many of us ever heard Nintendo talk up resolutions and fps.He thinks Switch 2 has a focus on power?
![]()
Especially at running PC, Sega, Nintendo, PS and Xbox, etc cheaper games... /sThe Switch 2 will be better than them anyway.
I'm not sure what else they could have done though. The ability to switch between handheld and docked mode makes it fly off shelves. It is incredibly appealing for parents to buy for their kids. They would have been stupid to try something gimmicky for the sake of it.I mean, if you spend more than 10 seconds on what he's saying and take out the console warrior thoughts. He's not really wrong. NS2 is a highly iterative product that is essentially "Switch 1 but more POWAAAAH", which Nintendo hasn't really done since the NES -> SNES.
Even the WiiU, while a flop, was trying to sell the idea of dual-screen gaming and tried to innovate even though it mostly was a failure. The NS2 is the absolute safest product they could have made.
The 256 model was more expensive at launch than the switch 2, with a 60hz screen at 800p, without HDR or VRR and with backlight bleed and horrible color representation, also with noisy fans and battery that lasted less than 2h with AAA.Deck is older, cheaper with much cheaper games and has all the freedom of PC.
Yeah, it's the point of open platforms vs consoles, so what?And can run all PC games, programs and consoles games up to the PS3/X360/Switch.
I'd say the GBA, Gamecube and 3DS didn't have much innovation aside from better visuals.I mean, if you spend more than 10 seconds on what he's saying and take out the console warrior thoughts. He's not really wrong. NS2 is a highly iterative product that is essentially "Switch 1 but more POWAAAAH", which Nintendo hasn't really done since the NES -> SNES.
Even the WiiU, while a flop, was trying to sell the idea of dual-screen gaming and tried to innovate even though it mostly was a failure. The NS2 is the absolute safest product they could have made.
Which were released 1.5 years later at $599 for the base model of both (with the Z1 being used, which barely gets more performance than Steam Deck). The Z1 extreme model goes for $699 in both cases.
It's no different than Pony fans stating Switch games look like PS1 titles.
Nobody outside of core gamers knows about these systems though.
I meant the base model (not extreme)Z1 Extreme is factually much more powerful than Steam Deck which is why I brought it up. More expensive, yes, but they should at least be part of the conversation
I meant the base model (not extreme)
You have multiple handheld pc type devices but they are extremely niche. The Steam Deck while still pretty niche has sold around 4 million consoles. So is pretty much the only competition Nintendo has. So it will be compared to the Switch 2..... Just like the original Switch.Z1 Extreme is factually much more powerful than Steam Deck which is why I brought it up. More expensive, yes, but they should at least be part of the conversation
Agreed. Why repeat stupid takes then?
That's fine, but we can acknowledge that they exist in saying there are more powerful options than Steam Deck.
It's a good thing they didn't try to derp on a completely different idea. They struck gold with the idea, just iterate
You have multiple handheld pc type devices but they are extremely niche. The Steam Deck while still pretty niche has sold around 4 million consoles. So is pretty much the only competition Nintendo has. So it will be compared to the Switch 2..... Just like the original Switch.
I'm not sure if it's still being sold TBH. I looked up the launch prices and the ROG Ally was released in two models in 2023, one with the Z1 for $599 and one with the extreme version for $699. I thought it was fairer to compare it to the former.Ah....my bad. Do they even still sell the base Rog Ally? I see the Z1 Extreme for $650 at Best Buy for both Rog and Legion Go (on sale), but no Z1.
I'm not sure if it's still being sold TBH. I looked up the launch prices and the ROG Ally was released in two models in 2023, one with the Z1 for $599 and one with the extreme version for $699. I thought it was fairer to compare it to the former.
Switch 2 is for mainstream gamers. Switch sold 150 million units.
Steam Deck is niche and for hardcore gamers. Steam Deck sold 4 million units.
They are two totally different markets.
By the way, what's going on with the console wars and console dick size comparisons here? Just buy whatever you want and play whatever you want. As gamers we're blessed with options. Fighting over which company is "best" or whichever processor had the biggest dick?
How old are you? Get a life. Play a game.
This. That thing is the same as Switch, underpowered the moment it comes out.He thinks Switch 2 has a focus on power?
![]()
My 64GB (upgraded to 1TB) was cheaper.The 256 model was more expensive at launch than the switch 2, with a 60hz screen at 800p, without HDR or VRR and with backlight bleed and horrible color representation, also with noisy fans and battery that lasted less than 2h with AAA.
Yeah, it's the point of open platforms vs consoles, so what?
I played Metroid Prime 4 on a big screen. I played TOTK at 60fps. It's powerful enough for me for its form factor."Powerful" is subjective.
Both are for everyone that want and can get them. No one is forbidden to get them/both.Switch 2 is for mainstream gamers. Switch sold 150 million units.
Steam Deck is niche and for hardcore gamers. Steam Deck sold 4 million units.
The Switch 2 will be better than them anyway.
Lol, people here saying that the Switch 2 is not a powerful device because is not like their PS5…
![]()
gimmick doesn't mean innovation, and all things considered, nintendo has always tried to innovate since Snes, even with their handhelds.I'm not sure what else they could have done though. The ability to switch between handheld and docked mode makes it fly off shelves. It is incredibly appealing for parents to buy for their kids. They would have been stupid to try something gimmicky for the sake of it.
Not every Nintendo console has to be a gimmick either. Before the Wii there was nothing unique about their approach. The software should always come first.
I mean.. they literally went from 1 screen to 2, one with stylus touch interface, gyro sensors and then on top of that introduced glassesless stereoscopic 3d.I'd say the GBA, Gamecube and 3DS didn't have much innovation aside from better visuals.
The DS already had 2 screens. The 3DS added glassesless 3D to enhance the visuals but it was basically just a more powerful DS.I mean.. they literally went from 1 screen to 2 and then on top of that introduced glassesless stereoscopic 3d.
The switch 1 to switch 2 is , a switch, its a bit bigger, the chips are a bit better, and you can use the one controller as a kind of half baked mouse. (instead of just allowing people to just simply plug in a usb mouse)