I think the swarm of CGI face huggers is a great example of why this movie might go as wrong as everything else post the 90s. The alien works best as creature in the shadows. Only Cameron knew how to bring them out into the open effectively.
I expect this film to be another by the numbers, CG heavy, mess with a convoluted story that links back to all the pointless backstory Scott seems determined to bore us all with. Alvarez is talented though, so I'm hoping for a step up at least from the absolute dogshit of whatever the fuck that last piece of crap was called.
NGL I'll be happy if its as good as The Thing with MEW was compared to the Carpenter film. Those seminal LANDMARK films can not be replicated, so I'll settle for just a pleasing riff of it.I think the swarm of CGI face huggers is a great example of why this movie might go as wrong as everything else post the 90s. The alien works best as creature in the shadows. Only Cameron knew how to bring them out into the open effectively.
I expect this film to be another by the numbers, CG heavy, mess with a convoluted story that links back to all the pointless backstory Scott seems determined to bore us all with. Alvarez is talented though, so I'm hoping for a step up at least from the absolute dogshit of whatever the fuck that last piece of crap was called.
Eh that’s still better than Covenant.Well, since we're talking about it.
Leaked stuff from the screenings:
Apparently they find the Alien Ripley shot out at the end of the first movie, extract and disassemble its DNA all the way back to the Prometheus black goo and use that to make new modified Alien variants in this movie.
This seems to be a needlessly complex "origin" when you could just have an egg fall out of some desolate planet harvester or something to start things off.Well, since we're talking about it.
Leaked stuff from the screenings:
Apparently they find the Alien Ripley shot out at the end of the first movie, extract and disassemble its DNA all the way back to the Prometheus black goo and use that to make new modified Alien variants in this movie.
Alien: Romulus was originally scheduled to be released on Hulu,[4] but was switched to a theatrical release by 20th Century Studios scheduled for August 16, 2024.[12]
I think the swarm of CGI face huggers is a great example of why this movie might go as wrong as everything else post the 90s. The alien works best as creature in the shadows. Only Cameron knew how to bring them out into the open effectively.
I expect this film to be another by the numbers, CG heavy, mess with a convoluted story that links back to all the pointless backstory Scott seems determined to bore us all with. Alvarez is talented though, so I'm hoping for a step up at least from the absolute dogshit of whatever the fuck that last piece of crap was called.
Lastly, you just touched on the Weyland-Yutani spaceship that your team built, but overall, how did you balance practical effects and VFX?
For the creatures, we brought in all the guys from Aliens. They were in their early twenties when they made Aliens, and they were a part of Stan Winston’s [special effects] team. And now we had them at the top of their game. They have their own shops, and so we brought them all together to work on all the creatures, because we went with all animatronics and puppets at every level. I even got the chance to be under the table with them, puppeteering all these animatronics.
I have this obsession with no green screens, so we built every creature and set. Everything had to be built so we were really living and breathing in these spaces. But I’m not an anti-CG guy. I got the chance to do Evil Dead, because I had made this short movie called Panic Attack! with a couple of friends and we did all the CG. So I come from a background where I know how to build the effects myself. I still do VFX shots in my movies to this day. I’ll cut and do VFX shots on my computer, sometimes. So it’s just whatever is best for the shot, and when it comes to face-to-face encounters and moments with creatures, nothing beats the real thing.
For the sets, we built spaceships and we built miniatures. We went back to all of that. And then we figured out ways to marry it with the CG world. There’s some things that only CG can do for the scope and movement. So it really has to be the right tool for the shot. Ideally, you should never feel like you’re watching CG. Ideally, there should be nothing there where the audience goes, “Well, that was clearly CG.” It should always feel practical, but I prefer practical because I want to see it when I’m there [on set]. There is nothing worse than having nothing to look at when I’m shooting. But some things that are CG can really blow your mind when done right.
Rat Rage wrote:
Let's be honest... are you excited? I'm not. I really want to be excited, but cinematographically it - well - looks like a Hulu tv production. Also, this cheap ass run of the mill CGI is doing NOTHING for me. I can't be the only one who's out of his mind bored by cheap CGi. Those old puppet animatronic face huggers looked way better and scarier. The whole aesthetic of this movie production looks kinda sterile - it has a bit of a sci-fi soap opera feel to it - like the old Star Trek series, if you know what I mean. If you look closely, you'll notice it.
I'm not gonna bet any money on this being good.
Meh. HW likes to talk about practical effects but then goes as far as to replace Barbie behind the scene footage green screens with background renders. All of this is cheap CGI.Fede is an "old school" practical special effects director.
Here's a great interview where he addresses this very topic:
‘Alien: Romulus’ Director Fede Álvarez Unveils First Teaser, Talks Ridley Scott and James Cameron-Approved Prequel
The filmmaker confirms the project is not a standalone, but rather connects to the other films in the franchise: “I love all of those movies. I didn't want to omit or ignore any of them."www.hollywoodreporter.com
Hell yeah, that's how it should be!
See the above interview where he addressed practical effects use.
He pretty much found all the original "ALIENS" special effects crews(all owning multiple spfx companies now) and brought them on board for this movie.
Anyways, I guess I'm looking at it for for exactly what it is: a *teaser* trailer. He's holding a ton back and he doesn't like trailers that give away all of a movie's plot points/secrets.
Gotta space them out to cover the writers strike drought.Still 6 months away! FFS Why? Was finished ages ago.
Both, probably.I was really excited to see where they would go with the Engineers, but Ridley either got cold feet due to the criticism, or had no fucking clue what to do with them, so he punted it with Covenant.
Just another by the numbers Alien flic.
Covenent isn't nearly as awful as people say it is, but between Alien 3, Resurrection, Prometheus and Covenent the series is quite abysmal. I don't expect them to turn it around after 30 years of mediocrity with this essentially made for streaming movie.
No one is thinking about Rome anymore, it was yesterday's ticktock trend !I thought I had a top tier Rome joke......I get nothing.
Alien 3 is good. People just don't like the hard to swallow pill of the ending. It's a very nasty movie but I admire Fincher went through with it to the end. All the great British actors as prisoners was a nice disconnect from the American Weaver.I like Alien3