• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Asteroid may impact Earth in 2032

Hookshot

Member
The current prediction, IF it hits.

2024_YR4_risk_corridor.png
India is used to air pollution, so maybe it wouldn’t affect them as much
 

Cyberpunkd

Member
It's a very small asteroid. It says the impact will be as powerful as a nuclear bomb. They already did plenty of nuclear tests in the ocean decades ago and i don't remember any of them causing anything close to a tsunami or something.
Quiet, this is no place for logic. We are busy hyperventilating due to impending doom.
 

Bitmap Frogs

Mr. Community
It's small enough that fracturing is a viable solution. If you can turn it down to 4 10 meter impactors it's a nothingburger. Anything bigger however, you have to divert.
 
It's a very small asteroid. It says the impact will be as powerful as a nuclear bomb. They already did plenty of nuclear tests in the ocean decades ago and i don't remember any of them causing anything close to a tsunami or something.
It would cause a huge tsunami, mega tsunami if you will.
 

EverydayBeast

ChatGPT 0.001
earth asteroid GIF


I can’t imagine an asteroid impact, you’re dealing with something that’s massive, people life’s ending, could people survive? There might be a couple found underground.
 
We'll lose sight of it around April-May this year at which point it won't be back near us to study again until 2028. We'll need to make a decision soon how we'll deal with it if it still poses risk and if the US will step in to help or leave it up to somebody else to figure out as it poses no risk for us but could potentially mess it up and make it worse.
 

Cyberpunkd

Member
I can’t imagine an asteroid impact, you’re dealing with something that’s massive, people life’s ending, could people survive? There might be a couple found underground.

We'll lose sight of it around April-May this year at which point it won't be back near us to study again until 2028. We'll need to make a decision soon how we'll deal with it if it still poses risk and if the US will step in to help or leave it up to somebody else to figure out as it poses no risk for us but could potentially mess it up and make it worse.
That shit is so tiny if it hits Earth with 100% of it's size (so no atmosphere burn) it will be an equivalent of one atom bomb, and not the largest one at that.

From the OP:
It’s 40-90 meters in diameter. So would be like a large yield thermonuclear bomb going off where it hits in terms of energy.
 
Last edited:

Dutchy

Member
That shit is so tiny if it hits Earth with 100% of it's size (so no atmosphere burn) it will be an equivalent of one atom bomb, and not the largest one at that.

From the OP:
ah *just* one atom bomb. then it can drop in the middle of NY for all I care
 

BlackTron

Member
Here's the bad part...

There are 2, 518 days until 2032.

At its current rate of increasing probability of .8 every 4 days...

That means there will be a 506% chance of impact.

This Math totally checks out. Be warned.

And even if it never increases at all, it's still a much bigger chance of being hit by an asteroid than winning the lottery, right now.

Either way, you're fucked.
 

Pagusas

Elden Member
That shit is so tiny if it hits Earth with 100% of it's size (so no atmosphere burn) it will be an equivalent of one atom bomb, and not the largest one at that.
Couple of things... 1 if it hits India or central America, that could be tens of millions dead. Peoples lives have value.

2. this is amazingly good practice to start testing and planning for something worse.
 

Hookshot

Member
Anything that comes from the direction of the Sun is invisible and will kill us if it wants to but we might as well track and stop everything else we do know of.
 

Hookshot

Member
Anyone else keeps coming back to this thread to see if the percentage has gone up? lol
No because
We'll lose sight of it around April-May this year at which point it won't be back near us to study again until 2028. We'll need to make a decision soon how we'll deal with it if it still poses risk and if the US will step in to help or leave it up to somebody else to figure out as it poses no risk for us but could potentially mess it up and make it worse.
If it’s 5% in 2028 or higher I’ll buy a baseball bat
 

jason10mm

Gold Member
Anyone else keeps coming back to this thread to see if the percentage has gone up? lol
I'm starting to see stuff on my socials showing the possible impact sites as all equatorial spots. As you can imagine, quite a few "oh well, let it hit" comments. Ahhh, humanity, never lets me down.
 

sono

Gold Member
I asked Grok what would be the theoretical blast radius

To determine the theoretical blast radius of a 70-meter asteroid impacting Earth on land, we need to consider several factors, including the asteroid's size, composition, velocity, and the energy released upon impact. Let's break this down step by step:

1. Asteroid Characteristics
Diameter: 70 meters
Density: Asteroids can be stony (density 2,600 kg/m³), iron (7,800 kg/m³), or a mix. We'll assume a stony asteroid (most common) for this calculation.
Velocity: Typical asteroid impact velocities range from 11 km/s to 25 km/s. We'll use an average of 17 km/s (a reasonable estimate for Earth-crossing asteroids).
Mass: The volume of a 70-meter sphere is
V = \frac{4}{3} \pi r^3
, where
r = 35 \, \text{m}
.
V = \frac{4}{3} \pi (35)^3 \approx 179,594 \, \text{m}^3
Mass
m = \text{density} \times \text{volume}
:
m = 2,600 \, \text{kg/m}^3 \times 179,594 \, \text{m}^3 \approx 4.67 \times 10^8 \, \text{kg}

2. Impact Energy
The kinetic energy of the asteroid is given by:
E = \frac{1}{2} m v^2

Substituting
m = 4.67 \times 10^8 \, \text{kg}
and
v = 17,000 \, \text{m/s}
:
E = \frac{1}{2} (4.67 \times 10^8) (17,000)^2

E = \frac{1}{2} (4.67 \times 10^8) (2.89 \times 10^8)

E \approx 6.75 \times 10^{16} \, \text{Joules}

To contextualize, 1 megaton (MT) of TNT releases
4.184 \times 10^{15} \, \text{J}
. So:
E \approx \frac{6.75 \times 10^{16}}{4.184 \times 10^{15}} \approx 16.1 \, \text{MT of TNT}

This is equivalent to a 16-megaton explosion, roughly comparable to the largest nuclear weapons ever tested (e.g., Tsar Bomba was 50 MT).

3. Blast Radius Calculation
The blast radius depends on the energy released and how it propagates through the atmosphere and ground. For airbursts or surface impacts, scaling laws are used to estimate the radius of destruction. The blast radius for overpressure (damage) scales roughly with the cube root of the energy:
R \propto (E)^{1/3}

Using empirical data for nuclear explosions:
A 1 MT explosion causes severe damage (overpressure > 20 psi, destroying most structures) within ~2–3 km.
The energy scales with
R \propto (E)^{1/3}
, so for 16 MT:
R = R_{\text{1 MT}} \times (16)^{1/3}
(16)^{1/3} \approx 2.52
If
R_{\text{1 MT}} \approx 2.5 \, \text{km}
for severe damage:
R \approx 2.5 \, \text{km} \times 2.52 \approx 6.3 \, \text{km}

Thus, the blast radius for severe damage (20 psi overpressure) is approximately 6–7 km.

4. Additional Effects
Thermal Radiation: The fireball from a 16 MT explosion would cause third-degree burns (and ignite flammable materials) out to ~15–20 km, depending on atmospheric conditions.
Seismic Effects: The impact would generate an earthquake of magnitude ~6–7 locally, causing structural damage up to ~50 km, depending on the geology.
Crater Size: Using impact crater scaling laws, a 70-meter stony asteroid at 17 km/s would create a crater 1–1.5 km in diameter and ~300–400 meters deep. The immediate area (1–2 km) would be obliterated.
Ejecta and Airblast: Debris and shockwaves could extend damage (broken windows, minor structural damage) out to ~30–50 km.

5. Comparison to Real Events
The Tunguska event (1908) involved a ~50–60-meter object (likely a comet or asteroid) exploding in the atmosphere with an energy of ~10–15 MT. It flattened trees over 2,150 km² (radius ~25 km).
A 70-meter asteroid impacting on land would be slightly more energetic, with a similar or slightly larger damage radius, especially if it doesn't airburst and strikes the surface.

Final Answer
The largest theoretical blast radius for severe structural damage (20 psi overpressure) from a 70-meter asteroid impacting land is ~6–7 km. However:
Thermal effects (burns, fires) could extend to 15–20 km.
Airblast and minor damage (broken windows, debris) could extend to 30–50 km.
The crater itself would be ~1–1.5 km in diameter, with total devastation within ~2–3 km.

This is a regional-scale disaster, not global, but it would devastate a city-sized area if it struck a populated region.

Notes
These estimates depend on the asteroid's composition, velocity, and impact angle. An iron asteroid or higher velocity would increase the energy and damage.
Tools like the Impact Earth Calculator (Purdue University) or Earth Impact Effects Program can provide more precise estimates based on specific parameters.
 

Hudo

Gold Member
I asked Grok what would be the theoretical blast radius

To determine the theoretical blast radius of a 70-meter asteroid impacting Earth on land, we need to consider several factors, including the asteroid's size, composition, velocity, and the energy released upon impact. Let's break this down step by step:

1. Asteroid Characteristics
Diameter: 70 meters
Density: Asteroids can be stony (density 2,600 kg/m³), iron (7,800 kg/m³), or a mix. We'll assume a stony asteroid (most common) for this calculation.
Velocity: Typical asteroid impact velocities range from 11 km/s to 25 km/s. We'll use an average of 17 km/s (a reasonable estimate for Earth-crossing asteroids).
Mass: The volume of a 70-meter sphere is
V = \frac{4}{3} \pi r^3
, where
r = 35 \, \text{m}
.
V = \frac{4}{3} \pi (35)^3 \approx 179,594 \, \text{m}^3
Mass
m = \text{density} \times \text{volume}
:
m = 2,600 \, \text{kg/m}^3 \times 179,594 \, \text{m}^3 \approx 4.67 \times 10^8 \, \text{kg}

2. Impact Energy
The kinetic energy of the asteroid is given by:
E = \frac{1}{2} m v^2

Substituting
m = 4.67 \times 10^8 \, \text{kg}
and
v = 17,000 \, \text{m/s}
:
E = \frac{1}{2} (4.67 \times 10^8) (17,000)^2

E = \frac{1}{2} (4.67 \times 10^8) (2.89 \times 10^8)

E \approx 6.75 \times 10^{16} \, \text{Joules}

To contextualize, 1 megaton (MT) of TNT releases
4.184 \times 10^{15} \, \text{J}
. So:
E \approx \frac{6.75 \times 10^{16}}{4.184 \times 10^{15}} \approx 16.1 \, \text{MT of TNT}

This is equivalent to a 16-megaton explosion, roughly comparable to the largest nuclear weapons ever tested (e.g., Tsar Bomba was 50 MT).

3. Blast Radius Calculation
The blast radius depends on the energy released and how it propagates through the atmosphere and ground. For airbursts or surface impacts, scaling laws are used to estimate the radius of destruction. The blast radius for overpressure (damage) scales roughly with the cube root of the energy:
R \propto (E)^{1/3}

Using empirical data for nuclear explosions:
A 1 MT explosion causes severe damage (overpressure > 20 psi, destroying most structures) within ~2–3 km.
The energy scales with
R \propto (E)^{1/3}
, so for 16 MT:
R = R_{\text{1 MT}} \times (16)^{1/3}
(16)^{1/3} \approx 2.52
If
R_{\text{1 MT}} \approx 2.5 \, \text{km}
for severe damage:
R \approx 2.5 \, \text{km} \times 2.52 \approx 6.3 \, \text{km}

Thus, the blast radius for severe damage (20 psi overpressure) is approximately 6–7 km.

4. Additional Effects
Thermal Radiation: The fireball from a 16 MT explosion would cause third-degree burns (and ignite flammable materials) out to ~15–20 km, depending on atmospheric conditions.
Seismic Effects: The impact would generate an earthquake of magnitude ~6–7 locally, causing structural damage up to ~50 km, depending on the geology.
Crater Size: Using impact crater scaling laws, a 70-meter stony asteroid at 17 km/s would create a crater 1–1.5 km in diameter and ~300–400 meters deep. The immediate area (1–2 km) would be obliterated.
Ejecta and Airblast: Debris and shockwaves could extend damage (broken windows, minor structural damage) out to ~30–50 km.

5. Comparison to Real Events
The Tunguska event (1908) involved a ~50–60-meter object (likely a comet or asteroid) exploding in the atmosphere with an energy of ~10–15 MT. It flattened trees over 2,150 km² (radius ~25 km).
A 70-meter asteroid impacting on land would be slightly more energetic, with a similar or slightly larger damage radius, especially if it doesn't airburst and strikes the surface.

Final Answer
The largest theoretical blast radius for severe structural damage (20 psi overpressure) from a 70-meter asteroid impacting land is ~6–7 km. However:
Thermal effects (burns, fires) could extend to 15–20 km.
Airblast and minor damage (broken windows, debris) could extend to 30–50 km.
The crater itself would be ~1–1.5 km in diameter, with total devastation within ~2–3 km.

This is a regional-scale disaster, not global, but it would devastate a city-sized area if it struck a populated region.

Notes
These estimates depend on the asteroid's composition, velocity, and impact angle. An iron asteroid or higher velocity would increase the energy and damage.
Tools like the Impact Earth Calculator (Purdue University) or Earth Impact Effects Program can provide more precise estimates based on specific parameters.
Not even on GAF, I can escape Latex.
 

jason10mm

Gold Member
I'm kinda curious if "big space" (i.e. SpaceX, Blue Origin, NASA, etc) actually WANT this thing to hit, preferably in a manner that is dramatic but not directly affecting first world operations, just so it would create a MASSIVE call for a planetary defense system and push trillions their way. Obviously I don't think we have the capability to MAKE this thing hit us, I just wonder if some groups would be happy if it did (and only hit along that low equatorial path not directly affecting the US or Europe). It would potentially be the largest hit in a century and I'm sure we would have time to both mitigate any loss of human life but also capture the impact in glorious 4K.
 
Top Bottom