AmaterasuOni
Banned
Insidious 2 doesn't work with this narrative.
I didn't like the first Insidious either. That last act, damn it's horrible. It just wrecked a good movie. And I hated the red face, it looked goofy.
Insidious 2 doesn't work with this narrative.
It also doesn't not work with this narrative. Wan is talented and has been making solid horror movies. Insidious 2 isn't his best effort, but I didn't think it was bad. Still had good directing, acting and shots.
Absolutely. Horror is incredibly hard (if you're actually trying to make something scary), which is why most of them are shit, and when you get something good like what Wan typically does, it's a treat.
I hate how this series legitimizes the real-life scam artists Ed and Lorraine Warren.
I hate how this series legitimizes the real-life scam artists Ed and Lorraine Warren.
Nah. The production was a cluster (for obvious reasons) and Vin was a bitch to deal with to the point where he had health problems.
I'm sure Warner is giving him control over Aquaman.
I didn't like the first Insidious either. That last act, damn it's horrible. It just wrecked a good movie. And I hated the red face, it looked goofy.
I think Insiduous 2 being PG-13 was a big problem too.
This isn't Annabel?
This isn't Annabel?
eh, I mean The Conjuring was PG-13. You can do a lot and make a solid, scary film within that rating. I'm not saying Insidious 2 is great, again it's the weakest of the three (3rd one was actually pretty damn good especially for a first time director) but in terms of shitty horror movies, I mean I wouldn't put it in that bracket. Even if I disliked it, I'd still consider Wan to be a real talent.
This isn't Annabel?
It was rated R. It was even a big point for its marketing, as they claimed it was the first R-rating given to a film for being too intense in the scare department.eh, I mean The Conjuring was PG-13. You can do a lot and make a solid, scary film within that rating. I'm not saying Insidious 2 is great, again it's the weakest of the three (3rd one was actually pretty damn good especially for a first time director) but in terms of shitty horror movies, I mean I wouldn't put it in that bracket. Even if I disliked it, I'd still consider Wan to be a real talent.
eh, I mean The Conjuring was PG-13. You can do a lot and make a solid, scary film within that rating. I'm not saying Insidious 2 is great, again it's the weakest of the three (3rd one was actually pretty damn good especially for a first time director) but in terms of shitty horror movies, I mean I wouldn't put it in that bracket. Even if I disliked it, I'd still consider Wan to be a real talent.
The last couple of scenes were probably too much for the MPAA.It was R, I stand corrected. Weirdly I don't really think it had much to earn that, I mean it had some fucked up shit in it but it felt PG-13 to me.
The last couple of scenes were probably too much for the MPAA.
This movie is a goddamned masterpiece of horror.
Don't overhype it!!!
Just an opinion. Better than the first one. Excellent direction and craft. Story. Good writing. No reliance on jump scares.
I don't believe you but I want to believe.This movie is a goddamned masterpiece of horror.
I don't believe you but I want to believe.